In: Finance
FTG commissioned a study to look into the feasibility of changing the packaging of the fruit from cans to sealed bags. The Consultant charged $54,000 for the report.
The report concluded that the new packaging will increase sales and reduce some operating costs.
The new packaging machinery will cost $1,100,000. The new machine is expected to last 5 years. The Taxation Office advise the life of the machine, for tax purposes, is 4 years.
The old canning machinery was purchased 2 years ago for $800,000 and was being depreciated at $200,000 and will be for the next 2 years. The old machine could be sold today for $260,000. In 5 years it will be worth nothing.
Installing the new machine will require staff training (a tax deductible expense) of $35,000 before production can commence. Due to the lower cost of the bags Inventory required will be reduced by $80,000 for the life of the project.
The new sales of bagged fruit is expected to be $700,000 in Year 1 rising by 15% for 2 years then 0% for the rest of the life of the project. Variable Costs associated with the new packaged fruit are 50% of sales.
Canned fruit production will be discontinued. Sales of canned fruit were static at $450,000 with variable costs of $225,000 (50% of Sales).
The new equipment is very hi-tech. Maintenance costs are expected to be higher at $44,000 per year. Maintenance costs on the old machine were $30,000 per year.
The lighter packaging will reduce annual freight cost significantly from $250,000 to $100,000 per year.
Fixed costs are expected to remain at $320,000 per year.
At the end of the project the new machinery can be sold for $275,000.
Notes:
FTG will borrow the full Year 0 funds using a secured five-year interest-only loan at an interest rate of 10% per annum to finance the new equipment.
The company tax rate is 30%.
The required rate of return is 12.5%.
Requirement:
5. The NPV of the project (5Marks)
6. The IRR of the project(5Marks)
7. The PI of the project(5Marks)
YEAR 0 FUND NEEDED | |||||||||||
NOTE:$54000 charged by consultant is a sunk cost and not relevant to this analysis | |||||||||||
A | Cost of new equipment | $1,100,000 | |||||||||
B | Current market Value of old equipment | $260,000 | |||||||||
C | Depreciation of old equipment in first two years | $400,000 | 2*200000 | ||||||||
D | Current book value of old equipment | $400,000 | (800000-200000) | ||||||||
E | Loss on sale of old equipment | $140,000 | (400000-260000) | ||||||||
F | Tax savings due to loss old equipment | $42,000 | (3160*30%) | ||||||||
G=A-B-F | Net Cost of New Equipment | $798,000 | |||||||||
H | After tax cost of staff trainning | $24,500 | (35000*(1-0.3) | ||||||||
I | Reduction of Inventory | $80,000 | |||||||||
J=G+H-I | NET FUND NEEDED IN Year0 | $742,500 | |||||||||
Annual interest cost on borrowed fund | $74,250 | (742500*10%) | |||||||||
INCREMENTAL DEPRECIATION | |||||||||||
N | A | B=A*1100000 | C | D=C*800000 | E=B-D | F | G=E*F | ||||
Year | Recovery Rate for new equipment | Depreciation on New Equipment | Recovery Rate for old equipment | Depreciation on old Equipment | Incremental Depreciation | Tax Rate | IncrementalTax shield benefit | ||||
1 | 25.00% | $275,000 | 25.00% | $200,000 | $75,000 | 30% | $22,500 | ||||
2 | 25.00% | $275,000 | 25.00% | $200,000 | $75,000 | 30% | $22,500 | ||||
3 | 25.00% | $275,000 | 0.00% | $0 | $275,000 | 30% | $82,500 | ||||
4 | 25.00% | $275,000 | 0.00% | $0 | $275,000 | 30% | $82,500 | ||||
|