In: Statistics and Probability
Here's a slightly more realistic example
Due to mismanagement of funds and a complete lack of fiscal oversight, a significant tax levy is necessary to close a budget shortfall and prevent default on several municipal loans. The town council seeks to impose a universal, one-time tax levy on all families to fix the budget problem. They propose a one-time tax of $5,000 on each family in the town. The politicians state, “The Median Family Income in this town is $100,000. Surely, a one-time 5% tax is a small price to pay to shore up our town’s funds and fix things once and for all”.
Let's say you're a member of the town council, and a TV reporter asks you the following questions:
INFORMATION WE HAVE:-
AFFLUENT:-
NOT-SO-AFFLUENT:-
TOWN:-(consits of both affluent & not so affluent)
TAX:-
QUESTIONS TO ANSWER:-
Answer:=0% affluent families have annual earning of $5,000 (Based on statement 1 & 2 of affluent section)
Answer:=0% not so affluent families have annual earning of $5,000 (Based on statement 1 & 2 of not so affluent section)
Answer:=No, as no of families of allfluent section is larger and hence mean salary of town is baised.
Answer:= It is inaapropriate to conclude tax value based on entire town's median salary , as biasedness due to more no of obs(in this case families) that belong to higher earning band hence 5% of tax for lower earning band will be higher in percentage.
% tax based on annual income of each houselhold/ 2 sections of town can be used to recover taxes.