In: Finance
Provide a detailed explanation and discussion of Modigliani and Miller’s Proposition I and II
The Modigliani - Miller theorem states that the value of the firm is irrelevant of its capital structure.
Capital structure implies how a company finances its assets. It indicates whether a company finances through only debt, or only equity or through different combinations of both debt and equity.
Thus, the theorem says that
the way a company finances itself, either by using high debt (levered firm) or with equity only (unlevered firm) or combination of both options; does not effect the market value of a firm.
So, this theorem is also called as Irrelevance theory.
There are two cases
-Proposition I and II with no taxes
-Proposition I and II with taxes
PROPOSITION I AND II WITH NO TAXES
It is based on following assumptions:
· No taxes
· No transaction cost between buyers and sellers
· Symmetry of information. That means investor will have same information that a corporation has.
· Cost of borrowing is same for investors and corporations
· No floatation cost such as an underwriting commission, payment to merchant bankers, advertisement expenses, etc.
· No corporate dividend tax
In case where all the above assumptions holds true, the theory is divided into
Proposition I
This proposition states that VU = VL
VU = Value of the unlevered firm (financing only through equity)
VL = Value of the levered firm (financing through a mix of debt and equity)
The market value of levered firm is same as unlevered firm, if all the above assumptions are true.
Propostion II
This proposition states that the company’s cost of equity is directly proportional to the company’s leverage level.
It is given by
rE = rU + (D/E)*( rU - rD)
here,
rE = Cost of levered equity
rU= Cost of unlevered equity
rD = Cost of debt
D/E = Debt-to-equity ratio
PROPOSITION I AND II WITH NO TAXES
In real world, it is not possible that the assumptions hold true.
So, the propositions in real world changes as below
Proposition I
This proposition states that VL = VU + t *D
t= tax rate
D= debt
This proposition states that value of levered company is greater than the value of an unlevered company as levered company includes tax shields that result from the tax-deductible interest payments
Proposition II
It is given by
rE = rU + [(D/E)* (1-t)*( rU - rD)]
This proposition states that the cost of equity has a directly proportional relationship with the leverage level. But, here the presence of tax shields affects the relationship by making the cost of equity less sensitive to the leverage value.