In: Finance
Professor Wendy Smith has been offered the following opportunity: A law firm would like to retain her for an upfront payment of
$50,000.
In return, for the next year the firm would have access to eight hours of her time every month. As an alternative payment arrangement, the firm would pay Professor Smith's hourly rate for the eight hours each month. Smith's rate is
$550
per hour and her opportunity cost of capital is
15%
per year. What does the IRR rule advise regarding the payment arrangement? (Hint: Find the monthly rate that will yield an effective annual rate of
15%.)
What about the NPV rule?
Showing the working in excel
PV | 50000 | upfront payment |
Pmt | 4400 | (550 * 8) |
months | 12 | |
IRR(monthly) | 0.8484% | (=Rate(12,-4400,5000,0,0) |
Annual IRR | 10.67% | (=(1+0.008484)^12 -1) |
IRR rule advise regarding the payment arrangement
Since IRR is less than cost of capital (15%), smith should turn down this opportunity.
EAR = 15%
EAR = (1 + r/m)^m - 1
0.15 = (1 + r/12)^12 -1
1.15 = (1 + r/12)^12
1.15^1/12 = (1 + r/12)
1.011715 = (1 + r/12)
r/12 = 0.011715
Monthly rate = 1.1715%
NPV = Payment received - PV of work done
NPV = 50000 - 4400 * ( PVIFA @ 1.1715% for 12 months)
PVIFA = A/r*(1-(1/1+r)^n))
NPV = 50000 - 4400/(0.011715) * (1-(1/1+0.011715)^12))
NPV | 1010.088 | (=50000-4400/(0.011715)*(1-(1/(1+0.011715)^12))) |
As NPV is positive, he should accept the deal.
If you have any doubts please let me know in the comments. Please give a positive rating if the answer is helpful to you. Thanks.