Question

In: Economics

Empirical studies in Economics and Education have proven without a doubt that a college education is...

Empirical studies in Economics and Education have proven without a doubt that a college education is worth it, from a cost-benefit analysis. While obviously not all colleges and college degrees are created equal, earning a college degree significantly boosts annual wages, on average. The question is however, what are the exact channels through which college education improves earnings? I will offer you 3 "theories" and I will ask you to tell me which of the 3 you think are valid explanations (can be more than 1) and also which do you think is the most important one? There is no correct or wrong answer here. I simply want you to think about it and properly reason your answers.

1. The human capital theory - by getting a college education, students acquire and develop skills that increase their productivity in the work force, which results in higher wages.

2. The college selection theory - people who go to college are overall smarter/harder working/more productive/etc. to begin with. These people would have gotten higher wages even if they hadn't gone to college. College attendance just happened to be there. This is essentially a story of a spurious correlation. This theory claims there is no causality between attending college and earnings, but simply that college attendance correlates well with certain innate abilities which are rewarded on the job market.

3. The signaling theory - people who earn college degrees are overall smarter/harder working/more productive/etc., but the reason they earn higher wages is that they earned a degree and that degree signals to employers that these students are overall better workers. This is an incomplete information story - employers do not know how productive you are but they can infer that from you having a degree. Unlike theory 2 states, these students would not have earned higher waged had they not gone to college simply because there wouldn't be anything to certify to employers that these students are truly more productive.

Solutions

Expert Solution

After analyzing all the theories above we can infer from each theories as :

1. The human capital theory - by getting a college education, students acquire and develop skills that increase their productivity in the work force, which results in higher wages.

Only college education without skill enhancement does not increase the productivity in the work force . If students are attending the skill development programs in the college education than only it will lead to the productivity in the work force. Because it will lead to human capital productivity.

2. The college selection theory - people who go to college are overall smarter/harder working/more productive/etc. to begin with. These people would have gotten higher wages even if they hadn't gone to college. College attendance just happened to be there. This is essentially a story of a spurious correlation. This theory claims there is no causality between attending college and earnings, but simply that college attendance correlates well with certain innate abilities which are rewarded on the job market.

While selecting a college , if the college has a huge name than it will surely lead to the enhancement of the student because mostly those type of colleges select students on the basis of their early education personality as well as on certain compititive exams. Thus the students can only enter that college if he is intelligent and hard working and more productive. Thus the students mostly work on ground level and thus their earnings in the future are more.

3. The signaling theory - people who earn college degrees are overall smarter/harder working/more productive/etc., but the reason they earn higher wages is that they earned a degree and that degree signals to employers that these students are overall better workers. This is an incomplete information story - employers do not know how productive you are but they can infer that from you having a degree. Unlike theory 2 states, these students would not have earned higher waged had they not gone to college simply because there wouldn't be anything to certify to employers that these students are truly more productive.

This theory is mostly applicable beacause the employers do not have other knowledge about the person because the only thing in front of him is the persons CV which is the only document which can tell about the person to the employer.


Related Solutions

The probability that an individual without a college education earns more than $100,000 is 0.2, whereas...
The probability that an individual without a college education earns more than $100,000 is 0.2, whereas the probability that a person with a B.S. or higher degree earns more than $100,000 is 0.6. The probability that a person chosen at random has a B.S. degree is 0.5. What is the probability that a person has at least a B.S. degree if it is known that he or she earns more than $100,000? (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
1. The article states that “Uncertainty is, without a doubt, one of the biggest causes of...
1. The article states that “Uncertainty is, without a doubt, one of the biggest causes of volatility for currency." Explain why you believe this to be the case. 2. Are currency speculators really smart enough, collectively, to figure out what will happen to the value of a currency in the future? Explain.
The financial impact of COVID-19 in Malaysia “It is without a doubt that the COVID-19 situation...
The financial impact of COVID-19 in Malaysia “It is without a doubt that the COVID-19 situation has impacted global markets. It is an unprecedented event and many – including businesses – have been taken by complete surprise with the way things have been unfolding. For example, the global aviation sector is forced to scale back their operations as people are no longer travelling. Non-essential businesses including real estate, construction, automotive, travel agencies and retail outlets have been forced to close....
What insights have education economists taken from behavioural economics?
What insights have education economists taken from behavioural economics?
“For several years empirical studies have spanned the spectrum of research from software productivity, quality, reliability,...
“For several years empirical studies have spanned the spectrum of research from software productivity, quality, reliability, performance to human computer interaction. Analyses have involved software systems ranging from desktop software to telecommunication switching systems. But surprising there has been little work done on the emerging digital game industry, one of the fastest growing domains today. To the best of our knowledge, our work is one of the first empirical analysis of a large commercially successful game system”. “In this paper,...
Covid-19, without a doubt, has exposed the many inequalities and inefficiencies which exist in the United...
Covid-19, without a doubt, has exposed the many inequalities and inefficiencies which exist in the United States. One of those being access to high speed internet. With nearly all educational institutions moving to remote/ distance learning and many individuals working from home, the question becomes: Should internet be treated as a public utility? Explain. What are the pros and cons? Please cite all sources used to support your response.
Give an overview of the studies testing discrimination in education.
Give an overview of the studies testing discrimination in education.
Give an overview of the studies testing discrimination in education.
Give an overview of the studies testing discrimination in education.
There are numerous empirical studies that provide evidence that the birth of children influences both a...
There are numerous empirical studies that provide evidence that the birth of children influences both a mother’s and father’s labor force participation. Use the theory of labor force participation of individuals to explain this relationship. Do you think that the birth of a child will have a positive or negative effect on the mother’s labor force participation? What about on the father’s labor force participation?
Discuss the status of Home economics in contemporary education.
Discuss the status of Home economics in contemporary education.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT