In: Accounting
Liesel Inc. is considering the following two separate leases. Each lease pertains to the lease of equipment with a fair value of $100,000.
Lease One |
Lease Two |
|
Ownership of equipment transfers to lessee at lease-end |
No |
No |
Lease includes a purchase option |
No |
Yes |
Length of lease term |
5 |
7 |
Economic life of the equipment |
8 |
8 |
Alternative use of the equipment at lease-end |
Yes |
Yes |
Annual lease payment, first payment due at end of each period. |
$21,500 |
$18,000 |
Guaranteed residual value |
$20,000 |
$0 |
Liesel Inc.’s incremental borrowing rate is 7% and is not aware of the implicit rate of either lease. For Lease One, the lessee estimates an expected residual value of only $12,000 of the equipment at lease-end based on its expected usage.
How would Liesel Inc. classify Lease One and Lease Two?
Lease One Lease Two
Question 3 options:
Finance lease Finance lease |
|
Operating lease Finance lease |
|
Operating lease Operating lease |
|
Finance lease Operating lease |
In order to differentiate between the two types of leases, one must consider how fully the risks and rewards associated with ownership of the asset have been transferred to the lessee from the lessor.
If these risks and rewards have been fully transferred, it is called a financing lease under IFRS Standards.Otherwise, it is an operating lease, which is basically the same as a landlord and renter contract.
At least one of the following criteria must be met in order to consider the lease a financing lease:
Under Lease-1 the terms says that there should be no transfer of ownership rights, no inclusion of bargain- purchase option, the lease period is 62.5% i.e. less than 75% of economic life of asset. Therefore, it is clearly a case of Operating Lease.
Under Lease-2 , it contains an option of bargain-purchase of the asset, also it covers the 87.5% of economic life of the asset, Thus, we can say that it is a case of Finance Lease.
Thus, Lease-1 is Operating Lease and Lease-2 is Finance Lease.