Question

Provide an example of a theory of organisations that has a normative and a positive dimension. What are the relationships between these two dimensions, how are they different and how do they complement one another? Please answer in 1000 words.

Answer 1

ANSWER :-

☆ In advance of expressing and clarifying the example:

●It is essential to comprehend what is theory of organization,positive and normative dimension,so when we talk about theory of organizations

●We essientielly are discussing how association is structured,how its objectives and destinations are met,what are the manners by which workers can be organized,work can be divided,in different words we take a gander at an association and perceive how it capacities with assistance of various theories

☆ Majorly there are four theories :

1.bureaucracy

2.rational system

3.division of work and

4.present day theory,

●We will take case of bureaucracy theory of association yet before that let us comprehend what is positive  and normative dimensions

●When we talk about positive dimension we take a gander at cause and effect,we take a gander at logical way to deal with why something occurred.

●When we talk about normative dimension we talk about what should be and take a gander at non logical methodology.

☆ Presently going to the example:

●We have chosen bureaucracy theory of organization where rules are formed,pre-characterized chain of command is there,onus is on fixed duty and framework is mechanical and is less fluid,it is consistent,risk disinclined and monotonous.

●When we search for positive dimension in it,we see that rules give ideal stage to cause and effect,it resembles if something went wrong,it was on the grounds that a standard or strategy wasn't followed.

●So, organizations in such theory  can recognize the blemish and correct it quickly,when we take a gander at normative  dimension.

●We take a gander at progression where everybody is set on premise of normative thinking that is an increasingly experienced individual will supplant individual resigning as that should be the standard of hierarchy.

☆ When we talk about the relationship  between these two dimensions:

●We see the two of them are significant in some structure in such theory,they are distinctive as in as we take a gander at flaw,we take a gander at rationale while when we take a gander at pecking order we may wind up disregarding rationale as individual fit may not get the job in view of what should be

●However they supplement each other too as in they balance each other out,alot of organizations even the cutting edge ones have blend of various ages where these two measurements play out.

●The more up to date age will in general get rid of randomized procedures and need to consummate why something is occurring while more seasoned generatiion take a gander at keeping up the structure and guaranteeing they get organization far from inconveniences utilizing their experience.

PLEASE UPVOTE.