Question

In: Economics

The following income distribution data are for Brazil. Quintile Percent Share Lowest 20% 3.0% Second quintile...

The following income distribution data are for Brazil. Quintile Percent Share Lowest 20% 3.0% Second quintile 6.9% Third quintile 11.8% Fourth quintile 19.6% Highest 20% 58.7% Highest 10% 43.0%。

(e) Suppose one percent of national income were transferred from the richest 20% of households to the poorest 20% of households. Show the effect on relative inequality.

(f) Under the same transfer, what is the effect on poverty?

Solutions

Expert Solution

From the above data we can clearly there is huge ineuality in income distribution.the most of the national income holds by the rich individuals of the country and the poor peoples lives in severe poverty.

a)in this diagram we are putting the data and represents the graphical picture of income inequality.here in vertical axis we measure income and horizontal.axis we measure population.the straight vertical line OA denotes no inequality of income distribution.the more fluctuation from this means the more inequality.OBA is the lorenz curve for Brazil which shows how much income inequality presents there.now if we transfer one percent of national income from the richest group to the poorest group then also this figure looks like quite similar.there would be some negligible minor changes.but it has a huge economic impact.the richest 10% individual holds 43% of income and if we take only 1% then also they holds 42%of national income so it doesn't impact them much.and the higher 20%people holds almost 59% of national income it means the rest of the 80% individual holds only 40% which is lesser than the highest 10% individuals holding.so only one percent transfer doesn't has any impact upon the ineuality to the country.it belongs the same.

b)although from the one percent transfer it has no impact on inequality but it has huge impact on poverty as we can see there holding is only 3% and after 1% increase it becames 4% it means there income holdings increases by neraly 33% than before.which is quite good if we compare it to the initial stages.as the poorest people suffers from severe poverty then an increase of their income by 33% than previous means they are now in better situation.some of them can found himself above the poverty line.there are some basic needs to live but the poorest people doesn't fulfill all the basic needs but if there income increases then they can fulfill some more.and they can demand more good quality goods which may increase the aggregate demand of whole country.


Related Solutions

The following income distribution data are for Brazil. Quintile Percent Share Lowest 20% 3.0% Second quintile...
The following income distribution data are for Brazil. Quintile Percent Share Lowest 20% 3.0% Second quintile 6.9% Third quintile 14.8% Fourth quintile 19.6% Highest 20% 55.7% Highest 10% 43.0% (i) Brazil’s national income is about $300 billion. What is the approximate dollar income of the bottom 20%? Bottom 40%? (ii)  Suppose one percent of national income were transferred from the richest 20% of households to the poorest 20% of households. In the context of the Lorenz curve, would we see an...
The following income distribution data are for Brazil. Quintile Percent Share Lowest 20% 2.5% Second quintile...
The following income distribution data are for Brazil. Quintile Percent Share Lowest 20% 2.5% Second quintile 7.4% Third quintile 11.8% Fourth quintile 20.9% Highest 20% 57.4% Highest 10% 43.0% (i) Brazil’s national income is about $300 billion. What is the approximate dollar income of the bottom 20%? Bottom 40%? (ii) Suppose one percent of national income were transferred from the richest 20% of households to the poorest 20% of households. In the context of the Lorenz curve, would we see...
The following income distribution data are for Brazil. Quintile Percent Share First quintile 2.0% Second quintile...
The following income distribution data are for Brazil. Quintile Percent Share First quintile 2.0% Second quintile 7.9% Third quintile 11.8% Fourth quintile 19.6% Fifth quintile 58.7% Highest 10% 43.0% Brazil’s national income is about $350 billion. Assume that total national personal income is approximately equal to national income. (a) What is the approximate sum of incomes for everyone in the bottom 20%? (b) Bottom 40%?
Household Percentage Percent of income Alpha Percent of income Beta Poorest 20% 9 13 Second poorest...
Household Percentage Percent of income Alpha Percent of income Beta Poorest 20% 9 13 Second poorest 20% 10 15 Middle 20% 12 13 Second richest 20% 29 26 Richest 20% 40 33 The above table shows the distribution of income in two countries, Alpha and Beta. Based on these distributions of income, Group of answer choices Country Beta has a higher value of the Gini coefficient than does Country Alpha. the Lorenz Curve for country Beta is closer to the...
Household Group Share of Aggregate Income One-fifth with lowest income 4.7% Next lowest one-fifth 8.5% Middle...
Household Group Share of Aggregate Income One-fifth with lowest income 4.7% Next lowest one-fifth 8.5% Middle one-fifth 19.4% Next highest one-fifth 27.6% One-fifth with highest income 39.8% What is the Gini coefficient?
Tutorial 8 Question 6. Suppose Brazil - the largest producer of sugar – provides 20 percent...
Tutorial 8 Question 6. Suppose Brazil - the largest producer of sugar – provides 20 percent export subsidy to sugar companies. By what extent would the domestic prices and the terms of trade be affected in Brazil? If the export subsidy of Brazil hampers the sugar manufacturers of importing countries, what countervailing action would you suggest to protect the domestic industries and prices of the latters?
What was Young's total share of net income for the second year?
A partnership began its first year of operations with the following capital balances: Young, Capital: $143,000 Eaton, Capital: $104,000 Thurman, Capital: $143,000 The Articles of Partnership stipulated that profits and losses be assigned in the following manner: Young was to be awarded an annual salary of $26,000 with $13,000 salary assigned to Thurman. Each partner was to be attributed with interest equal to 10% of the capital balance as of the first day of the year The remainder was to be assigned on a 5:2:3 basis to...
Make a Frequency Distribution Chart for the following set of Data 50, 10, 25, 20, 20,...
Make a Frequency Distribution Chart for the following set of Data 50, 10, 25, 20, 20, 20, 50,100, 30, 15
Which of the following will provide the lowest amount of after-tax income for an individual in...
Which of the following will provide the lowest amount of after-tax income for an individual in the top federal tax bracket? Group of answer choices $100 of eligible dividends from Canadian corporations $100 of interest income from Canadian bonds $100 of capital gains from Canadian stocks $100 of non-eligible dividends from Canadian corporations
Assume the following productivity data for the US, Brazil and Mexico with regard to pineapple and...
Assume the following productivity data for the US, Brazil and Mexico with regard to pineapple and coffee production:                                                                      Pineapples                                          Coffee US (daily output per worker)                           30 lb                                                   15 lb Brazil (daily output per worker)                       40 lb                                                   75 lb Mexico (daily output per worker)             16 lb                                                   25 lb QUESTION 1 Apply only the theory of absolute advantage. What trade, if any, would we see between the US and Brazil? a. No trade because Brazil has the absolute...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT