In: Economics
Discrimination in the labor market
The following table lists the name, gender, height, and minimum wage 10 people are willing to accept to work as personal assistants at a prestigious law firm.
Name |
Gender |
Height |
Minimum Wage |
---|---|---|---|
(Inches) |
(Dollars per week) |
||
Neha | F | 66 | $309 |
Alyssa | F | 64 | $321 |
Crystal | F | 68 | $344 |
Tim | M | 70 | $367 |
Brian | M | 70 | $390 |
Hilary | F | 66 | $402 |
Edison | M | 71 | $425 |
Rajiv | M | 70 | $448 |
Kevin | M | 63 | $460 |
Maria | F | 68 | $483 |
The lowest wage that the law firm can pay to hire five personal assistants is
per week.Suppose the head of the law firm has a preference for tall employees because he thinks it will increase revenue, and thus, he imposes the restriction that all personal assistants hired must be at least 67 inches in height. Under this new regulation, the wage rate the law firm must pay to attract five personal assistants rises by
per week.
In the first case, the lowest wage rate is $309 at which all 10 workers can be hired. However to hire only five of them a wage rate of $390 can be set. At this wage rate, Neha, Alyssa, Crystal, Tim and Brian are willing to work. The lowest wage that the law firm can pay to hire five personal assistants is $390 per week.
Under the new constraint we have six individuals with a height of 67 inches or above. Lowest wage among them is $344 and highest is $483. If we discard Maria then we can hire five workers. Hence the required wage rate is second highest which is $448.
Hence the wage rate is increased by $58 per week. The wage rate the law firm must pay to attract five personal assistants rises by $58 per week.
Crystal | F | 68 | $344 |
Maria | F | 68 | $483 |
Brian | M | 70 | $390 |
Rajiv | M | 70 | $448 |
Tim | M | 70 | $367 |
Edison | M | 71 | $425 |