Question

Major "Big 6" Certified Public Accounting firms have three sources of revenue or three divisions: Audit, tax, and Management Consulting. But the real power resides in the Audit Department because the Audit Partners earn between $100,000-750,000 per year. An annual audit of a large U.S. corporation can cost over $500,000 each year. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of the federal government requires that all corporations selling stock on the New York Stock Exchange be audited annually by an independent national CPA firm. The Audit Partner in-charge of the engagement directs the staff auditors to keep audit workpapers for evidence in case of a law suit. These workpapers show that the corporation is or is not maintaining generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). During an audit in Hollywood, California a staff auditor was completing an audit of a home health care corporation. During the investigation it was noticed that some of the accounting records were missing. It was common knowledge that the prior corporate controller had embezzled hundreds of thousands of dollars from the corporation and had fled the United States. The staff auditor commented in the workpapers that the missing files could be due to the embezzlement. Upon reviewing the workpapers, the Audit Manager rebuked the staff auditor for mentioning the embezzlement in the workpapers. Questions:

1 What are the issues involved here? Explain in your own words ?

2 Should the audit workpapers be re-done? Explain in your own words?

3 What would you do? Explain in your own words?

4 What are the short and long term consequences of not reporting the embezzlement in the workpapers? Explain in your own words ?

5 What are the legal ramifications of this case? Explain in your own words?

6 Who is affected by the note in the papers: stockholders, employees, auditors, the community in general? Explain in your own words

Answer 1

Answer to 1)

Issues in this case:

• The accounting records were missing and they were not maintaining generally accepted accounting principles.
• Prior corporate controller had embezzled hundreds of thousands of dollars from the corporation and had filed the united states.
• The manager rebuked the staff auditor for mentioning embezzlement in the workpapers.

Answer to 2)

Should the audit workpapers be re done?

Yes in this case, the audit workpapaers should be redone. This is because the corporate controller had embezzled hundreds of thousands of dollars from the corporation and had filed the united states. This is because audit workpapers are necessary for the auditors to provide required source for the auditors to help them in taking decisions. Hence it ios necessary to ensure that information provded must be of good quality.

Answer to 3)

What would you do?

I would certainly redo the workpapers. Because this is important for the company. If the information provided is misleading, then it would effect the decisions taken on the company by the auditors. Also the company’s name and fame would be effected if wrong information is provided.

Answer to 4)

Short term consequences of not reporting embezzlement:

• It results in company going to the stage of bancruptcy.
• Legal action would be taken against the company for missing documents.
• Wastage of money on bogus audits that doesn’t provide accurate results.

Long term consequences:

• The company may be liquidated because the company may owe mney from lawsuits.
• The audit deprtment of the company cant be trusted because of not doing justice to their job.

Answer to 5)

Legal ramifications of this case:

The legal consequences can include imprisonment for certain years depending on the law prevailing. Sometimes fine may be imposed on theindividual asking him to pay certain amount, termination from the job etc.