Pittman Company is a small but growing manufacturer of
telecommunications equipment. The company has no sales force of its
own; rather, it relies completely on independent sales agents to
market its products. These agents are paid a sales commission of
15% for all items sold. Barbara Cheney, Pittman’s controller, has
just prepared the company’s budgeted income statement for next year
as follows: Pittman Company Budgeted Income Statement For the Year
Ended December 31 Sales $ 22,000,000 Manufacturing expenses:
Variable $ 9,900,000 Fixed overhead 3,080,000 12,980,000 Gross
margin 9,020,000 Selling and administrative expenses: Commissions
to agents 3,300,000 Fixed marketing expenses 154,000 * Fixed
administrative expenses 2,040,000 5,494,000 Net operating income
3,526,000 Fixed interest expenses 770,000 Income before income
taxes 2,756,000 Income taxes (30%) 826,800 Net income $ 1,929,200
*Primarily depreciation on storage facilities. As Barbara handed
the statement to Karl Vecci, Pittman’s president, she commented, “I
went ahead and used the agents’ 15% commission rate in completing
these statements, but we’ve just learned that they refuse to handle
our products next year unless we increase the commission rate to
20%.” “That’s the last straw,” Karl replied angrily. “Those agents
have been demanding more and more, and this time they’ve gone too
far. How can they possibly defend a 20% commission rate?” “They
claim that after paying for advertising, travel, and the other
costs of promotion, there’s nothing left over for profit,” replied
Barbara. “I say it’s just plain robbery,” retorted Karl. “And I
also say it’s time we dumped those guys and got our own sales
force. Can you get your people to work up some cost figures for us
to look at?” “We’ve already worked them up,” said Barbara. “Several
companies we know about pay a 7.5% commission to their own
salespeople, along with a small salary. Of course, we would have to
handle all promotion costs, too. We figure our fixed expenses would
increase by $3,300,000 per year, but that would be more than offset
by the $4,400,000 (20% × $22,000,000) that we would avoid on
agents’ commissions.” The breakdown of the $3,300,000 cost follows:
Salaries: Sales manager $ 137,500 Salespersons 825,000 Travel and
entertainment 550,000 Advertising 1,787,500 Total $ 3,300,000
“Super,” replied Karl. “And I noticed that the $3,300,000 equals
what we’re paying the agents under the old 15% commission rate.”
“It’s even better than that,” explained Barbara. “We can actually
save $101,200 a year because that’s what we’re paying our auditors
to check out the agents’ reports. So our overall administrative
expenses would be less.” “Pull all of these numbers together and
we’ll show them to the executive committee tomorrow,” said Karl.
“With the approval of the committee, we can move on the matter
immediately.” Required: 1. Compute Pittman Company’s break-even
point in dollar sales for next year assuming: a. The agents’
commission rate remains unchanged at 15%. b. The agents’ commission
rate is increased to 20%. c. The company employs its own sales
force. 2. Assume that Pittman Company decides to continue selling
through agents and pays the 20% commission rate. Determine the
dollar sales that would be required to generate the same net income
as contained in the budgeted income statement for next year. 3.
Determine the dollar sales at which net income would be equal
regardless of whether Pittman Company sells through agents (at a
20% commission rate) or employs its own sales force. 4. Compute the
degree of operating leverage that the company would expect to have
at the end of next year assuming: a. The agents’ commission rate
remains unchanged at 15%. b. The agents’ commission rate is
increased to 20%. c. The company employs its own sales force. Use
income before income taxes in your operating leverage
computation.