Question

In: Economics

Consider an economy. Government has measured inflation in this economy in the recent year using two...

Consider an economy. Government has measured inflation in this economy in the recent year using two methods: CPI method and the DGP-deflator method. The results showed that CPI inflation was higher than GDP-deflator measured inflation. How can you explain this? Support with theory and examples.

Solutions

Expert Solution

CPI and GDP deflator shows different level of inflation because these are the two different methods of measuring inflation. CPI includes money spent by urban consumers on goods and services whereas GDP deflator captures change in price of goods consumed by consumers, business people, government or you can say that GDP deflator capture change in price of all goods.

CPI was higher than GDP deflator due to rise in price of goods consumed by consumers more than price of other goods.


Related Solutions

Consider an economy that is at potential output. Using the aggregate demand curve and the inflation...
Consider an economy that is at potential output. Using the aggregate demand curve and the inflation adjustment line, describe what would happen to real GDP and inflation in the short run, in the medium run, and in the long run if the government cut spending on defense. Be sure to provide an economic explanation for your results.
Consider an economy that is at potential output. Using the aggregate demand curve and the inflation...
Consider an economy that is at potential output. Using the aggregate demand curve and the inflation adjustment line, describe what would happen to real GDP and inflation in the short run, in the medium run, and in the long run if the government cut spending on defense. Be sure to provide an economic explanation for your results.
Consider an imaginary economy that has been growing at a rate of 4% per year. Government...
Consider an imaginary economy that has been growing at a rate of 4% per year. Government economists have proposed a number of policies to increase the growth rate but first need to convince the President that the policies will pay off. To do so, they want to present a comparison of the number of years it will take for the economy to double, depending on the growth rate. According to the rule of 70, determine the number of years it...
Consider an imaginary economy that has been growing at a rate of 3% per year. Government...
Consider an imaginary economy that has been growing at a rate of 3% per year. Government economists have proposed a number of policies to increase the growth rate but first need to convince the president that the policies will pay off. To do so, they want to present a comparison of the number of years it will take for the economy to double, depending on the growth rate. Using the rule of 70, determine the number of years it will...
Consider an economy where in year t the government has a primary deficit of 2% of GDP.
 Consider an economy where in year t the government has a primary deficit of 2% of GDP. The government debt at the end of period t -1 is 80% of GDP on which the government has to pay a real interest rate of 3%. The economy's real GDP grows at an annual rate of 5%. (i) In the long run, what value will the debt-to-GDP ratio converge to? The government aims to reach a 60% debt ratio within 2 years and decides to...
Consider the effects of inflation in an economy composed of only two people: Jake, a bean...
Consider the effects of inflation in an economy composed of only two people: Jake, a bean farmer, and Latasha, a rice farmer. Jake and Latasha both always consume equal amounts of rice and beans. In 2016 the price of beans was $1, and the price of rice was $4. Suppose that in 2017 the price of beans was $2 and the price of rice was $8. Inflation was ______% . Indicate whether Jake and Latasha were better off, worse off,...
Consider the effects of inflation in an economy composed of only two people: Manuel, a bean...
Consider the effects of inflation in an economy composed of only two people: Manuel, a bean farmer, and Poornima, a rice farmer. Manuel and Poornima both always consume equal amounts of rice and beans. In 2016 the price of beans was $1, and the price of rice was $4. Suppose that in 2017 the price of beans was $2 and the price of rice was $8. Inflation was __%? . Indicate whether Manuel and Poornima were better off, worse off,...
Consider the effects of inflation in an economy composed of only two people: Andrew, a bean...
Consider the effects of inflation in an economy composed of only two people: Andrew, a bean farmer, and Beth, a rice farmer. Andrew and Beth both always consume equal amounts of rice and beans. In 2016 the price of beans was $1, and the price of rice was $4. Suppose that in 2017 the price of beans was $2 and the price of rice was $8. Inflation was _____% . Indicate whether Andrew and Beth were better off, worse off,...
Consider the effects of inflation in an economy composed of only two people: Rajiv, a bean...
Consider the effects of inflation in an economy composed of only two people: Rajiv, a bean farmer, and Simone, a rice farmer. Rajiv and Simone both always consume equal amounts of rice and beans. In 2016 the price of beans was $5, and the price of rice was $3. Suppose that in 2017 the price of beans was $10 and the price of rice was $6. Inflation was ________% . Indicate whether Rajiv and Simone were better off, worse off,...
Consider the effects of inflation in an economy composed of only two people: Jake, a bean...
Consider the effects of inflation in an economy composed of only two people: Jake, a bean farmer, and Latasha, a rice farmer. Jake and Latasha both always consume equal amounts of rice and beans. In 2016 the price of beans was $5, and the price of rice was $3. Suppose that in 2017 the price of beans was $10 and the price of rice was $6. Inflation was ____________%. Indicate whether Jake and Latasha were better off, worse off, or...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT