In: Accounting
Item18
Time Remaining 1 hour 53 minutes 45 seconds
01:53:45
Item 18
Item 18
Time Remaining 1 hour 53 minutes 45 seconds
01:53:45
At the beginning of this year, a group of lawyers and accountants in Calgary decided to join efforts in providing one-stop legal and accounting consulting services to industry and the government. The group established a consulting company, rented office space, and hired both professional and clerical staff.
Following several initial organizational meetings, the partners decided to divide the operation into three parts: the Consulting Department, the Legal Department, and the Accounting Department.
The consulting department deals directly with the clients, providing two somewhat distinct services, accounting consulting (AC) and legal consulting (LC). In its first full month of operations, this department recorded its own identifiable costs as $20,000, with 30% attributed to accounting consultations and 70% to legal work. Billings to clients amounted to $40,000 and $25,500 for accounting and legal consultations, respectively. This department made use of the other two departments’ services in preparing work for the external clients.
The accounting and legal
departments provided professional services for each other and for
the consulting department on the basis of time according to the
following schedule:
Consulting | ||||||||||||
Accounting Department |
Legal Department |
AC | LC | |||||||||
Departmental costs before allocation | $ | 10,000 | $ | 15,000 | ? | ? | ||||||
Proportion of Accounting Department services used | 20 | % | 60 | % | 20 | % | ||||||
Proportion of Legal Department services used | 50 | % | 10 | % | 40 | % | ||||||
The accounting department incurred $10,000 in costs in the first
month, and the legal department incurred $15,000. Neither
department directly bills external clients.
Having completed the first month’s activity, the partners are ready to evaluate the performance of the group and of the individual areas.
Required:
1.Prepare an income statement for each consulting branch
using the direct allocation method.
2. Prepare an income statement for each consulting branch using the the step-down method.
3. Recommend one of the two methods to the partners and justify your choice.
Direct allocation method
Step-down method
Accounting Dept | Legal Dept | Accounting Consultancy | Legal Consultancy | |
Deptt cost before allocation | 10000 | 15000 | ||
Proportion of Account Dept service used | - | 20% | 60% | 20% |
Proportion of Legal Dept service used | 50% | - | 10% | 40% |
1. DIRECT ALLOCATION METHOD | ||||
Proportion of service used by AC & LC of accounts Deptt | 60+20=80 | |||
Proportion of service used by AC & LC of legal Deptt | 10+40=50 | |||
Allocation of accounts deptt cost in AC & LC in following ratio | 60/80 | 20/80 | ||
Allocation of legal deptt cost in AC & LC in following ratio | 10/50 | 40/50 | ||
SERVICE DEPARTMENTS | OPERATING DEPARTMENTS | |||
Accounting Dept | Legal Dept | Accounting Consultancy | Legal Consultancy | |
REVENUE (A) | 40000 | 25500 | ||
Identifiable costs | ||||
($20000 in ration of 3:7 in Accounts and Legal resp.) | 10000 | 15000 | 6000 | 14000 |
Allocating cost of account deptt in AC & LC | -10000 | 7500 | 2500 | |
Allocating cost of legal deptt in AC & LC | -15000 | 3000 | 12000 | |
TOTAL COST (B) | 0 | 0 | 16500 | 28500 |
NET INCOME (A-B) | 23500 | -3000 | ||
2. STEP DOWN METHOD: Under step-down allocation method, firstly cost of that service deptt is allocated which provides greatest amount of servicee to other service deptt. In the given example, legal deptt provides 50% of its service to accounts deptt. Hence cost of legal deptt will be allocated first to accounts deptt, AC & LC and the cost of accounts deptt will be allocated in AC & LC. | ||||
Accounting Dept | Legal Dept | Accounting Consultancy | Legal Consultancy | |
Proportion of service of legal deptt used by accounts dept, AC & LC | 50% | 10% | 40% | |
The proportion of service of accounts Deptt used by AC & LC | 60% | 20% | ||
Allocation of legal dept cost in accounts dept, AC & LC in the following ratio | 50/100 | 10/100 | 40/100 | |
Allocation of accounts dept cost in AC & LC in following ratio | 60/80 | 20/80 | ||
SERVICE DEPARTMENTS | OPERATING DEPARTMENTS | |||
Accounting Dept | Legal Dept | Accounting Consultancy | Legal Consultancy | |
REVENUE (A) | 40000 | 25500 | ||
Identifiable costs | ||||
($20000 in ration of 3:7 in Accounts and Legal resp.) | 10000 | 15000 | 6000 | 14000 |
Allocating cost of legal deptt in accounts deptt, AC & LC | 7500 | -15000 | 1500 | 6000 |
Allocating cost of legal deptt in AC & LC | -17500 | 13125 | 4375 | |
TOTAL COST (B) | 0 | 0 | 20625 | 24375 |
NET INCOME (A-B) | 19375 | 1125 |
3. As per my view, the step-down method is more recommendable as it allocates the cost of service department among other service departments to some extent based on the percentage of its services used by another service department starting with the cost allocation of that service department which provided its maximum service to other service department and then cost of another service department is then allocated among operating departments. This way, the cost of service departments is properly being allocated amongst other service dept and then to the operating dept.
While in the Direct method, the cost of the service dept is not allocated in another service dept even though the service is provided amongst each other. It direct allocates the cost of service dept to operating dept ignoring the fact that the cost of service dept also includes the cost for providing service to another service dept.