In: Psychology
Compare the controversies generated in Massachusetts by Roger Williams and Anne Hutchinson during the 1630s. What did their challenges to the status quo share in common? How did they differ?
When it came to Massachusetts, there was no place was religious
dissent when it come to the bay colony. The people were extremely
dedicated to God's work and any kind of dissent was not seen in a
positive light. As a result when people like Roger Williams and
Anne Hutchinson dissented during the 1930s, it became the matter of
a great controversy.
Anne Hutchinson was vocal about her dissent and that when even she
was a religious woman. She believed that the authority had lost
their way even when they had started on the right notes. This kind
of thinking and ideology was very dangerous in that time and people
believed that if they would not believe in the church then it would
lead to anarchy.
The case of Roger Williams was similar to that of Anne Hutchinson.
He believed that the church should not interfere when it came to
the matters of the state. Also, the state should not interfere when
it came to the matters of religion. Puritans had no plurality of
thought and hence such thoughts were looked down upon by the people
as they shook the status quo.
Thanks
Hope I could help you
Please upvote the answer to show your support
Keep studying and learning