Question: Perfectly competitive industries are believed to be more efficient than either Monopolies or Oligopolies yet...

Question:

Perfectly competitive industries are believed to be more efficient than either Monopolies or Oligopolies yet there are few such industries operating within the U.S. Draft a memo addressed to your Congressman or Senator outlining the case for promoting more perfectly competitive industries and restricting the number of

Monopolies and Oligopolies currently operating in the country.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Perfectly competitive industries are believed to be more efficient than monopolies and oligopolies because Perfectly competitive firms are price takers in the market which set their price equal to marginal cost of the firm and thus earn zero economic profits. Also, these firms face perfectly elastic demand curves. Thus, if they raise prices their sales will be zero. Also, since price is equal to marginal cost of production they are allocatively and productively most efficient as total surplus is maximized with no deadweight loss in the society.

On the other hand in case of imperfect competition, monopolies and oligopolies are profit maximizers and set a higher price as compared to price in perfect competition. The prices are higher than marginal cost and thus these firms earn super normal profits. Also total surplus is not maximized and there is deadweight loss in the society in case of imperfect competition.

Thus, in order to maximize total surplus in the society there should be promotion of more perfectly competitive industries and number of monopolies and oligopolies should be restricted.

Rahul Sunny answered 1 year ago

Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

Using the notion of total surplus, explain why perfectly competitive firms are efficient by monopolies are...

Using the notion of total surplus, explain why perfectly competitive firms are efficient by monopolies are not. Be sure to draw graphs to explain your answer.

Explain why monopolistically competitive firms are considered to be less efficient than the perfectly competitive ones...

Explain why monopolistically competitive firms are considered to be less efficient than the perfectly competitive ones in the long run despite the fact that both are operating at the break-even points.

Evaluate the following claim: “Monopolistically competitive industries are strictly worse than perfectly competitive industries because long...

Evaluate the following claim: “Monopolistically competitive industries are strictly worse than perfectly competitive industries because long run monopolistic competition involves inefficient allocation of resources and product differentiation is wasteful.” Your answer should take into account the efficiency and the consumer welfare implications of both types of industry structures. Diagrams are not required, (but you may choose to use them if you think it will help)

Monopolistic competitive markets are said to be less economically efficient than perfectly competitive markets. Explain why...

Monopolistic competitive markets are said to be less economically efficient than perfectly competitive markets. Explain why this is true. Diagram the equivalent long-run equilibrium points for each to demonstrate your answer.

1. Monopolistically competitive industries differ from perfectly competitive industries in that: a. there are barriers to...

1. Monopolistically competitive industries differ from perfectly competitive industries in that: a. there are barriers to entry in the former but not the latter b. there are few producers in monopolistically competitive industries and many in perfect competition c. there is product differentiation in monopolistically competitive industries but not in perfect competition d. monopolistic competition has easy entry 2. In the market for peaches, we observe both market equilibrium price and quantity increase. What could have caused this change? a. an...

Q2. Why are unions more effective at raising wages in oligopolistic industries than in competitive industries?

“Government-owned monopolies are less X-efficient than private monopolies and have less ofan incentive to initiate and...

“Government-owned monopolies are less X-efficient than private monopolies and have less ofan incentive to initiate and implement cost-saving innovations than their profit –driven privatecounterparts.” (Calitz. E, Siebrits, K. and T. Steenkamp: 2019. Public Economics, 7thedition:70)Discus this statement by referring to the current situation at Eskom 2. Subject: Governmental economics 20A

1) Explain the similarities and differences between monopolistically competitive markets, monopolies, and perfectly competitive markets. 2)...

1) Explain the similarities and differences between monopolistically competitive markets, monopolies, and perfectly competitive markets. 2) Does the presence of asymmetric information in a market justify governmental intervention? Justify your answer using economic principles. 3) Explain bargaining power, the factors that determine it, and its impact in determining the outcome of negotiations.

Explain why a perfectly competitive agricultural firm (a farm) is perfectly efficient in the long run...

Explain why a perfectly competitive agricultural firm (a farm) is perfectly efficient in the long run having achieved allocative efficiency,productive efficiency, and zero economic profit.

1. Compare and contrast competitive markets, oligopolies and monopolies 2. List 5 things learned from Ch.14...

1. Compare and contrast competitive markets, oligopolies and monopolies 2. List 5 things learned from Ch.14 Oligopoly (Mircoeconomics)

Subjects