Consider two economies that are identical in all dimesions -- the same population, same saving rate, the same production function, etc, -- except for the fact that one has a level of productivity that is twice as high as the other, that is Ah = 2Al . Assume both economies are in their steady states. what is the relationship between the levels of income per worker in these two economies?
In: Economics
A Nash equilibrium in a game is
A. |
an outcome in which all players are choosing the best strategy they can, given the choices being made by all the other players. |
|
B. |
a strategy which is always inferior for a player to choose, regardless of what other players do. |
|
C. |
an outcome in which all players experience their best possible collective outcome. |
|
D. |
an outcome in which a player receives his/her best possible individual payoff. |
The prisoners’ dilemma game
A. |
is a situation in which two players both have dominant strategies which lead to the highest total payoff for the two players. |
|
B. |
has no Nash equilibrium since players, regardless whether they initially agree to play their dominated strategies, will have the incentive to switch to their dominant ones. |
|
C. |
has a Nash equilibrium, but the Nash equilibrium outcome is not the outcome the players would agree to if they could cooperate with each other. |
|
D. |
Both (a) and (c) are correct. |
Suppose that each of two firms has the independent choice of advertising its product or not advertising. If neither advertises, each gets $10 million in profit; if both advertise, their profits will be $5 million each; and if one advertises while the other does not, the advertiser gets profit of $15 million while the other gets profit of $2 million. What is the likely outcome if the firms could successfully collude? (Hint: create the payoff matrix for yourself.)
A. |
Both firms may or may not advertise. |
|
B. |
One will advertise and the other will not. |
|
C. |
Both firms will advertise. |
|
D. |
Neither firm will advertise. |
Suppose two companies own adjacent oil fields, beneath which is a common pool of oil worth $30 million. For each well that is drilled, the company that drills the well incurs a cost of $3 million. Each company can drill one or two wells. Firms’ revenues are proportional to their share of the total number of wells drilled; for example, if three wells have been drilled total of which one firm has two, it gets two-thirds of the oil revenues, or $20 million (gross). What is the likely outcome of this game if each company pursues its own self-interest? (Hint: create the payoff matrix for yourself.)
A. |
Each company drills one well and experiences a profit of $15 million. |
|
B. |
Each company drills one well and experiences a profit of $12 million. |
|
C. |
Each company drills two wells and experiences a profit of $9 million. |
|
D. |
One company drills two wells and experiences a profit of $14 million; the other company drills one well and experiences a profit of $7 million. |
In: Economics
When OPEC (Organization for Petroleum Exporting Countries) was established and started to apply a quota (restriction) in petroleum production, this triggered a crisis that we called as stagflation (supply shock) in 1970s. Can you write what did happen and why did it happen clearly by drawing a graph to explain this crisis. Don’t forget to label the graph and also explain how an economy get rid of from this crisis?
In: Economics
a- What is a car, a final good or an intermediate good? Why?
b- What is the difference between natural rate of unemployment and cyclical unemployment? Explain very briefly. (Please explain the difference only.)
c- Company, which was once a state enterprise established in 1965, sold to foreigners in 2012. What was the effect of this transaction to Turkish GDP when it
was sold? (Increase?, decrease?, no change to GDP?) Explain the reason.
d- Bulgarian army bought an airplane from France in 2018. What is the effect of this transaction to Bulgarian GDP in 2018? (Increase?, decrease?, no change to GDP?)
Explain the reason.
In: Economics
According to economic articles and journals, Covit 19 pandemic will bring a detrimental recession to lots of countries. By using the aggregate expenditure model that you have learned, can you explain why will there be a recession? (Explain fully and clearly what is the main culprit in this model.) You should draw a graph as well and relate your explanations with the graph.
In: Economics
As the number of firms in an oligopoly increases, and provided the firms do not successfully collude, the
price approaches marginal cost, and the quantity approaches the efficient level. |
||
price and quantity approach the monopoly levels. |
||
price effect exceeds the output effect. |
||
individual firms’ profits increase. |
As the number of firms in an oligopolized market
decreases, and provided the firms do not successfully collude, the price charged by the firms and the total quantity produced will both decrease. |
||
decreases, and provided the firms do not successfully collude, the market approaches the competitive market outcome. |
||
increases, and provided the firms do not successfully collude, the market approaches the competitive market outcome. |
||
increases, and provided the firms do not successfully collude, the market approaches the monopoly outcome. |
The paradoxical nature of oligopoly can be demonstrated by the fact that, even though the monopoly outcome is best for the oligopolists,
they collude to set the output level equal to the Nash equilibrium level of output. |
||
they have private incentives to increase production above the monopoly outcome. |
||
they do not behave as profit maximizers. |
||
self-interest juxtaposes the profits earned at the Nash equilibrium. |
To increase their individual profits, members of a cartel have an incentive to
charge a higher price than the other members of the cartel. |
||
increase production above the level agreed upon. |
||
ignore the choices made by the other firms and act as a monopolist. |
||
charge the same price a monopolist would charge. |
In: Economics
In: Economics
Monopolistically-competitive firms have an incentive to offer products and services that
are easily substituted for those offered by other firms. |
||
are indistinguishable from those offered by other firms. |
||
have features that are easily replicable by other firms should they prove popular. |
||
have unique features that make them difficult to substitute. |
If producers strongly object to a ban on their advertising, it is a good clue that
the advertising in question is primarily informational in nature. |
||
the advertising was assisting consumers in making more informed decisions, such as by aiding price discovery. |
||
producers are concerned about the welfare of the advertising agencies they work with. |
||
they believe the advertising in question persuades customers that products are more different than they really are. |
A financial services company may hire a famous professional athlete as a spokesperson because
famous professional athletes are wealthier than the general public, and hence more informed about financial services. |
||
doing so can act as a credible signal to consumers that the company’s products are of high quality since the firm is able/willing to spend money hiring a famous professional athlete in the first place. |
||
famous professional athletes tend to have a lot of friends who work in financial services. |
||
it can signal to customers that the company’s products are easy to understand, since famous professional athletes are usually pretty dumb. |
Spending a lot on advertising
can be a credible signal to consumers that a product is actually of low quality. |
||
can be a credible signal to producers that they should to introduce high-quality substitutes. |
||
is something every producer has an incentive to do. |
||
can be a credible signal to consumers that a product is of high quality. |
In: Economics
Unemployment Here are four individuals telling you their stories of how they became unemployed. In a multi-paragraph essay, apply the theories of unemployment to explain the type of unemployment that each of these individuals is facing and explain which of these individuals qualifies for unemployment benefits: Two months ago, Marcelle used to work full time in an automobile manufacturing firm. "The factory where I used to work has closed because our market contracted so much, and so I was laid off. This is happening to people all over the country-all you see in the papers is that economic growth has fallen and incomes across the country have fallen. I have been looking very hard for a new job, but have had no luck yet." Until last week, Dominic used to work full time as a hair-dresser in downtown Cincinnati. "I decided to quit my job, because I want to move to New York City." Until last month, Francine worked part time at a ski resort. "Well, it is summer now, and so the resort is closed. I will apply again in the winter when the snow is back. I am not interested in working until then." Two months ago, Beauvoir had been working full time as a secretary. "I was a good typist, but I don't know how to use a computer. My boss wanted to upgrade the office to computers, and so I was replaced by someone who is computer-savvy. I have been looking for another job, but it appears that I need to learn some computer skills." Develop a response that includes examples and evidence to support your ideas, and which clearly communicates the required message to your audience. Organize your response in a clear and logical manner as appropriate for the genre of writing. Use well-structured sentences, audience-appropriate language, and correct conventions of standard American English.
In: Economics
Here are some hypothetical numbers used to illustrate the ideas
of trade-offs, specialization, and comparative advantage. Assume
Sri Lanka, using all her resources efficiently, can produce either
1,000 bags of rice OR 3,000 bags of tea. Let's also assume that,
using all her resources efficiently, Kenya can produce either 1,000
bags of rice OR 1,000 bags of tea. Further, assume that the
countries have similar resource endowments and that, initially,
they are not trading with each other. Therefore, each of the
countries has to produce both rice and tea for its citizens.
Suppose that, in the no-trade situation, Sri Lanka was consuming
400 bags of rice and 1,800 bags of tea, and in the no-trade
situation, Kenya was consuming 500 bags of rice and 500 bags of
tea.
Now, let's play a fun game called the "Trading Game" to figure out
whether there is any benefit (in terms of increased consumption
possibilities) for these two countries if they trade with each
other. You are given the following information to start the
"Trading Game". The trading price is set at one bag of rice for two
bags of tea, and Kenya wishes to keep at least 550 bags of rice
after trade.
Apply your knowledge of opportunity cost to identify the
comparative advantage enjoyed by each country. Now using your
knowledge of specialization and trade, show in a multi-paragraph
essay, that the two countries can benefit by consuming more of both
goods after trade.
Develop a response that includes examples and evidence to support
your ideas, and which clearly communicates the required message to
your audience. Organize your response in a clear and logical manner
as appropriate for the genre of writing. Use well-structured
sentences, audience-appropriate language, and correct conventions
of standard American English.
In: Economics
In: Economics
Which of the following is NOT a possible government activity that can assist in economic issues that could influence long-run growth?
Group of answer choices
Controlling excess inflation.
Allowing excess short-term growth.
Investing in infrastructure.
Regulating business activities.
In: Economics
Which of the following is NOT an argument against economic growth? Group of answer choices
Growth may deplete resources.
Growth is often inequitable.
Growth has negative environmental impacts.
Growth leads to an expansion of power.
In: Economics
In: Economics
In: Economics