Modigliani-Miller argue that except for taxes, debt would have no impact on ‘firm’ value. What is...

Modigliani-Miller argue that except for taxes, debt would have no impact on ‘firm’ value.

What is the basis of this argument? Why does it break down in reality?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Modigliani and Miller said that the value of the firm is always the same under different capital structures. The key assumptions they made are

1. No taxes

2. Corporates and individuals can borrow at same rate of interest

3. No transaction costs

So, as long as individuals can borrow at same rate, they can duplicate the results of leverage on their own (by taking loan and buying shares of unlevered firm).

As debt increases, the risk to equity investors also increase. And that offsets any gain.

Investors expected return increases with leverage as they need compensation for more risk.

It breaks down in reality because all the above assumptions are not valid in reality. Companies get tax shield on the amount of interest and hence, debt becomes cheaper and lucrative option. Companies can deduct the amount of interest from taxable income and then pay tax, which reduces tax liability. Such deductions are not available for dividend payments and so leverage lowers tax payments.

jeff jeffy answered 1 year ago

Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

Modigliani and Miller argued that the value of a firm is separate from the source of...

Modigliani and Miller argued that the value of a firm is separate from the source of financing for its assets. Do you agree? Why or why not? Do you believe that, for any or all firms, there exists an optimal capital structure? Why or why not? How do taxes impact their original findings? If tax laws changes eliminated the deductibility of interest for corporations, would this motivate or deter corporations from increasing the level of debt in their capital structure?...

Discuss the finding of Modigliani and Miller in a world with taxes in regards to the...

Discuss the finding of Modigliani and Miller in a world with taxes in regards to the value of levered and unlevered firms. What do these finding imply about the effects of capital structure? The effects of investment decisions? The cost of capital?

According to the Modigliani Miller approach, how does using debt affect the business value?

What is wrong with the following example: Assume a Modigliani Miller (without taxes) world. An unlevered...

What is wrong with the following example: Assume a Modigliani Miller (without taxes) world. An unlevered firm is worth$1000. Another firm with $500 debt has the same value, $1000. The risk-free rate is 5%. The income of both firms is $100. According to Modigliani and Miller, capital structure does not matter in this case, hence there should be no arbitrage opportunities under such circumstances. However, here is one: You own 10% of the all equity firm, and obviously, your investment...

In the absence of taxes and perfect capital market assumptions what conclusions did Modigliani and Miller...

In the absence of taxes and perfect capital market assumptions what conclusions did Modigliani and Miller make about the relevance of the capital structure decision? Use numerical examples to support your answer.

“Modigliani and Miller (MM) suggested that in a perfect world with no taxes or bankruptcy cost,...

“Modigliani and Miller (MM) suggested that in a perfect world with no taxes or bankruptcy cost, the dividend policy is irrelevant. They proposed that the dividend policy of a company has no effect on the stock price of a company or the company’s capital structure.” (Ani 2016) Based on the above statement you are required write an essay on dividend irrelevance and capital structure theories that has been originally advanced by Franco Modigliani and Merton H. Miller (Modigliani and Miller...

List the three assumptions that lie behind the Modigliani-Miller theory in a world without taxes. Are...

List the three assumptions that lie behind the Modigliani-Miller theory in a world without taxes. Are these assumptions reasonable in the real world? Explain.

3 (c) Explain briefly how the Modigliani-Miller model with corporate taxes is modified in the presence...

3 (c) Explain briefly how the Modigliani-Miller model with corporate taxes is modified in the presence of bankruptcy costs. What specific conditions are necessary for debtholders to be unaffected by expected bankruptcy costs? Explain. (150 words)

Outline reasons why Modigliani-Miller irrelevance of dividend policy may not hold. Explain what roles taxes, transaction...

Outline reasons why Modigliani-Miller irrelevance of dividend policy may not hold. Explain what roles taxes, transaction costs, and signalling play in theories of dividend policy.

Define the capital structure of a firm and relate to the Modigliani and Miller (M&M) theory...

Define the capital structure of a firm and relate to the Modigliani and Miller (M&M) theory of capital structure. Do you feel the M&M theory is correct in its findings on the capital structure of a firm? Why or why not?

Subjects