Question

8) Consider a reusable aluminum beverage cup and a recyclable paper cup. Use the definitions of strong and weak sustainability to argue for your most sustainable beverage consumption vessel.

Answer 1

On the off chance that sustainability relies upon the upkeep of the capital stock, at that point an imperative issue is whether it is the aggregate supply of capital that must be kept up, with substitution permitted between the diverse capital structures, or whether certain segments of capital, specifically characteristic capital, are non-substitutable, i.e. they add to welfare exceptionally that can't be duplicated by another capital stock.

Weak sustainability is worried about keeping up the aggregate capital stock flawless, without respect to the parceling of that capital among the four sorts. This would infer that the different sorts of capital are pretty much substitutable, at any rate inside the limits of current levels of monetary action and asset enrichment.

Solid sustainability requires the support of the different capital stocks, expecting that regular and human-made capitals are not impeccable substitutes, but rather corresponding. For defenders of solid sustainability, the substitutability of fabricated for regular capital is truly restricted by such qualities of common capital as irreversibility, vulnerability and the presence of basic parts of characteristic capital which make a novel commitment to welfare.'

So for reusable aliminium beverage cup, there is weak sustainability because it is a scarce resouce and its abundance is limited in the nature. While for the recyclable paper cup, there is a strong sustainability, as paper can be gerearted more quickly and easily over a time in comparision to aluminium. So it is better to consume more recyclable paper cups and decrease the consumablity of recycled aluminium cups. This should make our sustainable consumption vessel.