In: Accounting
  | 
  | 
  | 
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  | 
| Year | Annual production | Multiply: %Good Quality | Good units | ||
| 2012 | 42,938 | 76% | 32,633 | ||
| 2013 | 42,938 | 77% | 33,062 | ||
| 2014 | 42,938 | 78% | 33,492 | ||
| 2015 | 42,938 | 79% | 33,921 | ||
| 2016 | 42,938 | 80% | 34,350 | ||
| Year | Annual production | Less: Good units | Bad units | ||
| 2012 | 42938 | 32,633 | 10,305 | ||
| 2013 | 42938 | 33,062 | 9,876 | ||
| 2014 | 42938 | 33,492 | 9,446 | ||
| 2015 | 42938 | 33,921 | 9,017 | ||
| 2016 | 42938 | 34,350 | 8,588 | ||
| Year | Bad units | Multiply: rework percentage | Rework units | Add: good units | Product yield | 
| 2012 | 10,305 | 6% | 618 | 32,633 | 33,251 | 
| 2013 | 9,876 | 6% | 593 | 33,062 | 33,655 | 
| 2014 | 9,446 | 6% | 567 | 33,492 | 34,058 | 
| 2015 | 9,017 | 6% | 541 | 33,921 | 34,462 | 
| 2016 | 8,588 | 6% | 515 | 34,350 | 34,866 | 
| Year | Manufacturing Cost | 
 Rework cost (Rework units*13)  | 
Total cost | 
 Divided by: Product yield  | 
 Manufacturing cost per good parker  | 
| 2012 | $ 420,900 | $ 8,038 | $ 428,938 | 33,251 | $ 12.90 | 
| 2013 | $ 423,400 | $ 7,703 | $ 431,103 | 33,655 | $ 12.81 | 
| 2014 | $ 424,700 | $ 7,368 | $ 432,068 | 34,058 | $ 12.69 | 
| 2015 | $ 436,100 | $ 7,033 | $ 443,133 | 34,462 | $ 12.86 | 
| 2016 | $ 435,500 | $ 6,698 | $ 442,198 | 34,866 | $ 12.68 | 
| Correct answer: | 
| the increased % of good quality increased product yield, thereby reducing the cost of manufacturing | 
| Increased in % Good-quality would be results in product yield increased. | 
| Increased in % Good-quality would be results in cost of manufacturing per good parka decreased. |