In: Accounting
|
|
|
|
Year | Annual production | Multiply: %Good Quality | Good units | ||
2012 | 42,938 | 76% | 32,633 | ||
2013 | 42,938 | 77% | 33,062 | ||
2014 | 42,938 | 78% | 33,492 | ||
2015 | 42,938 | 79% | 33,921 | ||
2016 | 42,938 | 80% | 34,350 | ||
Year | Annual production | Less: Good units | Bad units | ||
2012 | 42938 | 32,633 | 10,305 | ||
2013 | 42938 | 33,062 | 9,876 | ||
2014 | 42938 | 33,492 | 9,446 | ||
2015 | 42938 | 33,921 | 9,017 | ||
2016 | 42938 | 34,350 | 8,588 | ||
Year | Bad units | Multiply: rework percentage | Rework units | Add: good units | Product yield |
2012 | 10,305 | 6% | 618 | 32,633 | 33,251 |
2013 | 9,876 | 6% | 593 | 33,062 | 33,655 |
2014 | 9,446 | 6% | 567 | 33,492 | 34,058 |
2015 | 9,017 | 6% | 541 | 33,921 | 34,462 |
2016 | 8,588 | 6% | 515 | 34,350 | 34,866 |
Year | Manufacturing Cost |
Rework cost (Rework units*13) |
Total cost |
Divided by: Product yield |
Manufacturing cost per good parker |
2012 | $ 420,900 | $ 8,038 | $ 428,938 | 33,251 | $ 12.90 |
2013 | $ 423,400 | $ 7,703 | $ 431,103 | 33,655 | $ 12.81 |
2014 | $ 424,700 | $ 7,368 | $ 432,068 | 34,058 | $ 12.69 |
2015 | $ 436,100 | $ 7,033 | $ 443,133 | 34,462 | $ 12.86 |
2016 | $ 435,500 | $ 6,698 | $ 442,198 | 34,866 | $ 12.68 |
Correct answer: |
the increased % of good quality increased product yield, thereby reducing the cost of manufacturing |
Increased in % Good-quality would be results in product yield increased. |
Increased in % Good-quality would be results in cost of manufacturing per good parka decreased. |