In: Accounting
White Diamond Flour Company manufactures flour by a series of three processes, beginning with wheat grain being introduced in the Milling Department. From the Milling Department, the materials pass through the Sifting and Packaging departments, emerging as packaged refined flour.
The balance in the account Work in Process-Sifting Department was as follows on July 1:
Work in Process-Sifting Department | |
(900 units, 3/5 completed): | |
Direct materials (900 × $2.05) | $1,845 |
Conversion (900 × 3/5 × $0.40) | 216 |
$2,061 |
The following costs were charged to Work in Process-Sifting Department during July:
Direct materials transferred from Milling Department: | |
15,700 units at $2.15 a unit | $33,755 |
Direct labor | 4,420 |
Factory overhead | 2,708 |
During July, 15,500 units of flour were completed. Work in Process-Sifting Department on July 31 was 1,100 units, 4/5 completed.
Required: | |
1. | Prepare a cost of production report for the Sifting Department for July. If an amount is zero, enter "0". Round your cost per unit answers to the nearest cent. |
2. | Journalize the entries for costs transferred from Milling to Sifting and the costs transferred from Sifting to Packaging. Refer to the chart of accounts for the exact wording of the account titles. CNOW journals do not use lines for spaces or journal explanations. Every line on a journal page is used for debit or credit entries. Do not add explanations or skip a line between journal entries. CNOW journals will automatically indent a credit entry when a credit amount is entered. Use the date July 31 for all journal entries. |
3. | Determine the increase or decrease in the cost per equivalent unit from June to July for direct materials and conversion costs. Round your answers to the nearest cent. |
4. | Discuss the uses of the cost of production report and the results of part (3). |
WHITE DIAMOND FLOUR COMPANY | |||
Cost of Production Report-Sifting Department | |||
For the Month Ended July 31 | |||
UNITS | Whole Units | Equivalent Units | |
Direct Materials | Conversion | ||
Units charged to production: | |||
Inventory in process, July 1 | |||
Received from Milling Department | |||
Total units accounted for by the Sifting Department | |||
Units to be assigned costs: | |||
Inventory in process, July 1 (3/5 completed) | |||
Started and completed in July | |||
Transferred to Packaging Department in July | |||
Inventory in process, July 31 (4/5 completed) | |||
Total units to be assigned costs |
Points:
17 / 18
Feedback
Check My Work
1. Calculate equivalent units for direct materials and conversion costs.
COSTS | Costs | ||
Direct Materials | Conversion | Total | |
Cost per equivalent unit: | |||
Total costs for July in Sifting Department | |||
Total equivalent units | ÷ | ÷ | |
Cost per equivalent unit | |||
Costs assigned to production: | |||
Inventory in process, July 1 | |||
Costs incurred in July | |||
Total costs accounted for by the Sifting Department | |||
Costs allocated to completed and partially completed units: | |||
Inventory in process, July 1-balance | |||
To complete inventory in process, July 1 | |||
Cost of completed July 1 work in process | |||
Started and completed in July | |||
Transferred to Packaging Department in July | |||
Inventory in process, July 31 | |||
Total costs assigned by the Sifting Department |
solution 1:
White Diamond Flour Company | |||
Sifting Department | |||
Computation of Equivalent unit (FIFO) | |||
Particulars | Physical units | Material | Conversion |
Units to be accounted for: | |||
Beginning WIP Inventory | 900 | ||
Units started this period | 15700 | ||
Total unit to be accounted for | 16600 | ||
Units Accounted for: | |||
Units completed and transferred out | |||
From
beginning inventory Material - 0% Conversion - 2/5 |
900 | 0 | 360 |
Started and completed currently | 14600 | 14600 | 14600 |
Units in
ending WIP Material - 100% Conversion - 4/5 |
1100 | 1100 | 880 |
Total units accounted for | 16600 | 15700 | 15840 |
White Diamond Flour Company | |||
Sifting Department | |||
Computation of Cost per Equivalent unit | |||
Particulars | Total cost | Material | Conversion |
Current period cost | $40,883.00 | $33,755.00 | $7,128.00 |
Equivalent units | 15700 | 15840 | |
Cost per equivalent unit | $2.15 | $0.45 |
White Diamond Flour Company | |||
Sifting Department | |||
Producton cost report - FIFO | |||
Particulars | Total cost | Material | Conversion |
Cost Accounted for : | |||
Cost assigned to unit transferred out: | |||
Cost from beginning WIP Inventory | $2,061 | $1,845 | $216 |
Current cost added to complete beginning WIP: | |||
Material | $0 | $0 | |
Conversion (360 * $0.45) | $162 | $162 | |
Total Cost from beginning inventory | $2,223 | $1,845 | $378 |
Current cost of unit started and completed: | |||
Material (14600*$2.15) | $31,390 | $31,390 | |
Conversion (14600*$0.45) | $6,570 | $6,570 | |
Total cost of unit started and completed | $37,960 | $31,390 | $6,570 |
Total cost of unit transferred out | $40,183 | $33,235 | $6,948 |
Cost assigned to ending WIP: | |||
Material (1100*$2.15) | $2,365 | $2,365 | |
Conversion (880*$0.45) | $396 | $396 | |
Total ending WIP inventory | $2,761 | $2,365 | $396 |
Total cost accounted for | $42,944 | $35,600 | $7,344 |
Solution 2:
Journal Entries - White Diamond Flour Company | |||
Date | Particulars | Debit | Credit |
July | Work In Process - Sifting Department Dr | $33,755.00 | |
To Work In Process - Milling Department | $33,755.00 | ||
(Being cost transferred from milling to sifting department) | |||
July | Work In Process - Packaging Department Dr | $40,183.00 | |
To Work In Process - Sifting Department | $40,183.00 | ||
(Being cost transferred from sifting to packaging department) |
Solution 3:
Particulars | Direct material | Conversion |
Cost per equivalent unit: | ||
From current period | $2.15 | $0.45 |
From beginning period | $2.05 | $0.40 |
Increase (decrease) | $0.10 | $0.05 |
Solution 4:
The cost of production report may be used as the basis for allocating product costs between Units completed & Transferred and Units in ending WIP. The report can also be used to control costs by holding each department head responsible for the units entering production and the costs incurred in the department. Any differences in unit product costs from one month to another, such as those in part (3), can be studied carefully and any significant differences investigated.