In: Statistics and Probability
Do bonds reduce the overall risk of an investment portfolio? Let x be a random variable representing annual percent return for Vanguard Total Stock Index (all stocks). Let y be a random variable representing annual return for Vanguard Balanced Index (60% stock and 40% bond). For the past several years, we have the following data.
| x: | 
 13  | 
 0  | 
 23  | 
 31  | 
 37  | 
 17  | 
 27  | 
 ?18  | 
 ?18  | 
 ?8  | 
| y: | 
 10  | 
 ?9  | 
 18  | 
 24  | 
 25  | 
 25  | 
 20  | 
 ?5  | 
 ?10  | 
 ?7  | 
(a) Compute ?x, ?x2, ?y, ?y2.
| ?x | ?x2 | ||
| ?y | ?y2 | 
(b) Use the results of part (a) to compute the sample mean,
variance, and standard deviation for x and for y.
(Round your answers to two decimal places.)
| x | y | |
| x | ||
| s2 | ||
| s | 
(c) Compute a 75% Chebyshev interval around the mean for x
values and also for y values. (Round your answers to two
decimal places.)
| x | y | |
| Lower Limit | ||
| Upper Limit | 
Use the intervals to compare the two funds.
75% of the returns for the balanced fund fall within a narrower range than those of the stock fund. 75% of the returns for the stock fund fall within a narrower range than those of the balanced fund. 25% of the returns for the balanced fund fall within a narrower range than those of the stock fund. 25% of the returns for the stock fund fall within a wider range than those of the balanced fund.
(d) Compute the coefficient of variation for each fund. (Round your
answers to the nearest whole number.)
| x | y | |
| CV | % | % | 
Use the coefficients of variation to compare the two funds.
-For each unit of return, the stock fund has lower risk.
-For each unit of return, the balanced fund has lower risk.
-For each unit of return, the funds have equal risk.
If s represents risks and x represents expected
return, then s/x can be thought of as a measure
of risk per unit of expected return. In this case, why is a smaller
CV better? Explain.
-A smaller CV is better because it indicates a higher risk per unit of expected return.
-A smaller CV is better because it indicates a lower risk per unit of expected return.
a)
| X | Y | X^2 | Y^2 | |
| 13 | 10 | 169 | 100 | |
| 0 | -9 | 0 | 81 | |
| 23 | 18 | 529 | 324 | |
| 31 | 24 | 961 | 576 | |
| 37 | 25 | 1369 | 625 | |
| 17 | 25 | 289 | 625 | |
| 27 | 20 | 729 | 400 | |
| -18 | -5 | 324 | 25 | |
| -18 | -10 | 324 | 100 | |
| -8 | -7 | 64 | 49 | |
| Sum | 104 | 91 | 4758 | 2905 | 
;
; 
 and
b) Mean: 
Sample variance: 
Sample standard deviation: 
| X | Y | |
| Mean | 10.4 | 9.1 | 
| S.Var | 408.49 | 230.767 | 
| S.Std | 20.211 | 15.191 | 
c) 75% chebyshev interval around the mean for x values and also for y values:
Chebhyshev's: 
 and Z=k=2
Chebhyshev's Interval:


| X | Y | |
| Lower | -30.0222 | -21.282 | 
| Upper | 50.82222 | 39.48201 | 
Use the intervals to compare the two funds.
75% of the returns for the balanced fund fall within a narrower range than those of the stock fund.
d) Coefficient of variation:

CV of X= (20.211/10.4) *100= 1.943376
CV of Y=(15.191/9.1) *100= 1.669341
Use the coefficients of variation to compare the two funds:
For each unit of return, the balanced fund has lower risk. Because coefficient of variation is low.
If s represents risks and x represents expected return, then s/x can be thought of as a measure of risk per unit of expected return. In this case, why is a smaller CV better:
A smaller CV is better because it indicates a lower risk per unit of expected return