In: Statistics and Probability
Do bonds reduce the overall risk of an investment portfolio? Let x be a random variable representing annual percent return for Vanguard Total Stock Index (all stocks). Let y be a random variable representing annual return for Vanguard Balanced Index (60% stock and 40% bond). For the past several years, we have the following data.
x: |
13 |
0 |
23 |
31 |
37 |
17 |
27 |
?18 |
?18 |
?8 |
y: |
10 |
?9 |
18 |
24 |
25 |
25 |
20 |
?5 |
?10 |
?7 |
(a) Compute ?x, ?x2, ?y, ?y2.
?x | ?x2 | ||
?y | ?y2 |
(b) Use the results of part (a) to compute the sample mean,
variance, and standard deviation for x and for y.
(Round your answers to two decimal places.)
x | y | |
x | ||
s2 | ||
s |
(c) Compute a 75% Chebyshev interval around the mean for x
values and also for y values. (Round your answers to two
decimal places.)
x | y | |
Lower Limit | ||
Upper Limit |
Use the intervals to compare the two funds.
75% of the returns for the balanced fund fall within a narrower range than those of the stock fund. 75% of the returns for the stock fund fall within a narrower range than those of the balanced fund. 25% of the returns for the balanced fund fall within a narrower range than those of the stock fund. 25% of the returns for the stock fund fall within a wider range than those of the balanced fund.
(d) Compute the coefficient of variation for each fund. (Round your
answers to the nearest whole number.)
x | y | |
CV | % | % |
Use the coefficients of variation to compare the two funds.
-For each unit of return, the stock fund has lower risk.
-For each unit of return, the balanced fund has lower risk.
-For each unit of return, the funds have equal risk.
If s represents risks and x represents expected
return, then s/x can be thought of as a measure
of risk per unit of expected return. In this case, why is a smaller
CV better? Explain.
-A smaller CV is better because it indicates a higher risk per unit of expected return.
-A smaller CV is better because it indicates a lower risk per unit of expected return.
a)
X | Y | X^2 | Y^2 | |
13 | 10 | 169 | 100 | |
0 | -9 | 0 | 81 | |
23 | 18 | 529 | 324 | |
31 | 24 | 961 | 576 | |
37 | 25 | 1369 | 625 | |
17 | 25 | 289 | 625 | |
27 | 20 | 729 | 400 | |
-18 | -5 | 324 | 25 | |
-18 | -10 | 324 | 100 | |
-8 | -7 | 64 | 49 | |
Sum | 104 | 91 | 4758 | 2905 |
; ; and
b) Mean:
Sample variance:
Sample standard deviation:
X | Y | |
Mean | 10.4 | 9.1 |
S.Var | 408.49 | 230.767 |
S.Std | 20.211 | 15.191 |
c) 75% chebyshev interval around the mean for x values and also for y values:
Chebhyshev's: and Z=k=2
Chebhyshev's Interval:
X | Y | |
Lower | -30.0222 | -21.282 |
Upper | 50.82222 | 39.48201 |
Use the intervals to compare the two funds.
75% of the returns for the balanced fund fall within a narrower range than those of the stock fund.
d) Coefficient of variation:
CV of X= (20.211/10.4) *100= 1.943376
CV of Y=(15.191/9.1) *100= 1.669341
Use the coefficients of variation to compare the two funds:
For each unit of return, the balanced fund has lower risk. Because coefficient of variation is low.
If s represents risks and x represents expected return, then s/x can be thought of as a measure of risk per unit of expected return. In this case, why is a smaller CV better:
A smaller CV is better because it indicates a lower risk per unit of expected return