In: Statistics and Probability
From the SAS data set myclass.fueldata, create - a horizontal bar chart showing the average highway MPG for each class; - a vertical bar chart showing the average highway MPG for different fuel types; - a histogram showing the distribution of highway MPG for each class; Add a title to each chart and label axes properly.
During the recent campaign for mayor, a clear majority of city
readers who responded to our survey indicated a desire for more
news about city government. To increase circulation, and thus our
profits, we should therefore consistently devote a greater
proportion of space in all editions of The Clarion to coverage of
local news.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your
discussion be sure to analyse the line of reasoning and the use of
evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider
what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what
alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the
conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would
strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument
would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would
help you better evaluation its conclusion.
-----------------------------------------------------------
On the surface the argument is defensible – a greater desire for a
certain type of news would likely lead to the assumption that more
of that news would lead to greater circulation. However, there are
a number of flaws in the argument, and this essay will examine
three: the quality of the poll; the inaccurate conclusion; and the
failure to derive an appropriate and accurate solution. It will
conclude with a recommendation for better analysis.
Firstly, the poll is highly limited in its scope, in particular its
timeframe. It is extremely likely that during an election interest
in local politics is going to be higher, and therefore it is
dangerous to assume that this interest is going to persist forever
(the article refers to “consistently” altering its content). It is
also dependent on those who have responded, and it is likely that
these individuals are particularly moved or motivated to do so;
those people who did not respond may be a higher percentage of
readership, and may not have responded due to their satisfaction
with the current output of the paper – circulation levels and
readership rates provide more accurate assessments, but take longer
to a