Question

In: Computer Science

Recall that in MergeSort algorithm, we used a linear-time subroutine called Merge which merges two sorted...

Recall that in MergeSort algorithm, we used a linear-time subroutine called Merge which merges two sorted lists into a single sorted list. Now suppose there are k sorted lists and there are n elements in total in these k lists. Design an efficient algorithm that merges these k sorted lists into one sorted list. The running time of your algorithm should be a function of both n and k.

Solutions

Expert Solution

The method strength begins with merging arrays into groups of two. After the first merge, we have k/2 arrays. Repeatedly merge arrays in groups, now we have k/4 arrays. This is similar to the merge sort. Divide k arrays into two halves including an equal number of arrays until there are two arrays in a group. This is resulted in merging the arrays in a bottom-up manner.

  • Algorithm:
    1. Design a recursive function that takes k arrays and returns the output array.
    2. In the recursive function, if the value of k is 1 then return the array else if the value of k is 2 then merge the two arrays in linear time and return the array.
    3. If the value of k is greater than 2 then divide the group of k elements into two equal halves and recursively call the function, i.e 0 to k/2 array in one recursive function and k/2 to k array in a different recursive function.
    4. Print the output array.
  • C++ implementation:
    #include<bits/stdc++.h>
    using namespace std;
    #define n 4


    void mergeArr(int a1[], int a2[], int n1,
                               int n2, int a3[])
    {
       int i = 0, j = 0, k = 0;
      

       while (i<n1 && j <n2)
       {

           if (a1[i] < a2[j])
               a3[k++] = a1[i++];
           else
               a3[k++] = a2[j++];
       }
      
      
       while (i < n1)
           a3[k++] = a1[i++];
      

       while (j < n2)
           a3[k++] = a2[j++];
    }


    void printArr(int arr[], int size)
    {
    for (int i=0; i < size; i++)
       cout << arr[i] << " ";
    }


    void mergeKArr(int arr[][n],int i,int j, int output[])
    {
      
       if(i==j)
       {
           for(int p=0; p < n; p++)
           output[p]=arr[i][p];
           return;
       }
      
        if(j-i==1)
       {
           mergeArr(arr[i],arr[j],n,n,output);
           return;
       }
      
      
       int out1[n*(((i+j)/2)-i+1)],out2[n*(j-((i+j)/2))];
      

       mergeKArr(arr,i,(i+j)/2,out1);
       mergeKArr(arr,(i+j)/2+1,j,out2);
      
      
       mergeArr(out1,out2,n*(((i+j)/2)-i+1),n*(j-((i+j)/2)),output);
      
    }



    int main()
    {
      
       int arr[][n] = {{2, 6, 12, 34},
                       {1, 9, 20, 1000},
                       {23, 34, 90, 2000}};
       int k = sizeof(arr)/sizeof(arr[0]);
       int output[n*k];
       mergeKArr(arr,0,2, output);

       cout << "Merged array is " << endl;
       printArr(output, n*k);

       return 0;
    }

Complexity Analysis:

  • Time Complexity: O( n * k * log k).
    There are log k levels as in each level the k arrays are divided in half and at each level, the k arrays are traversed. So time Complexity is O( n * k ).
  • Space Complexity: O( n * k * log k).
    In each level O( n*k ) space is required So Space Complexity is O( n * k * log k)

Related Solutions

Write and test a merge function that uses a recursive algorithm to merge two sorted arrays...
Write and test a merge function that uses a recursive algorithm to merge two sorted arrays of integers. Neither list contains duplicates, and the resulting list should not contain duplicates either. Hint: You may want to call a helper function from merge. PROGRAM: C
(Linear time algorithm for finding duplicates of two sorted arrays, 20pt) Devise a linear time O(m+n)...
(Linear time algorithm for finding duplicates of two sorted arrays, 20pt) Devise a linear time O(m+n) algorithm to find the duplicates between two sorted arrays (m, n are the sizes of two arrays). For instance, for inputs {1,3,5,7} and {1,2,3,4}, the correct outputs should be {1,3
Recall our linear-time deterministic selection algorithm, SELECT. Give the pseudocode for a modified Quicksort algorithm, call...
Recall our linear-time deterministic selection algorithm, SELECT. Give the pseudocode for a modified Quicksort algorithm, call it AWESOME-QUICKSORT , that has worst-case run time O(nlogn). State the cost of your algorithm using a recurrence T(n), and solve then solve this recurrence any way you like (e.g., master method).
Recall the Matrix-Multiplication Algorithm for determining all-pairs distances in a graph. Provide a linear-time recursive implementation...
Recall the Matrix-Multiplication Algorithm for determining all-pairs distances in a graph. Provide a linear-time recursive implementation of the function void print_path(Matrix D[], int n, int i, int j); that takes as input the array of matrices D[1], D[2], . . . , D[n − 1] that have been computed by the algorithm, and prints the optimal path from vertex i to vertex j. Hint: for convenience you may use the notation Dr ij to denote the value D[r][i, j], i.e....
Design a linear-time algorithm which, given an undirected graph G and a particular edge e in...
Design a linear-time algorithm which, given an undirected graph G and a particular edge e in it, determines whether G has a cycle containing e. Your algorithm should also return the length (number of edges) of the shortest cycle containing e, if one exists. Just give the algorithm, no proofs are necessary. Hint: you can use BFS to solve this.
Two cross-country running teams, called the Gazelles and the Cheetahs, participated in a (hypothetical) study in which 50% of the Gazelles and 65% of the Cheetahs used weight training to supplement a running workout.
Two cross-country running teams, called the Gazelles and the Cheetahs, participated in a (hypothetical) study in which 50% of the Gazelles and 65% of the Cheetahs used weight training to supplement a running workout. The remaining runners did not use weight training. At the end of the season, the mean improvement in race times (in seconds) for each team was as shown in the table below.Describe how the results recorded in the table might seem surprising or paradoxical.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT