In: Economics
In her article, “Blood on our Backs,” Karen
Coates discusses the plight of Cambodian garment workers that
produce clothing sold in the Western world – primarily in the
United States by such stores as Old Navy, Target, Walmart and
Kohl’s. In so doing, Coats outlines the contrasting perspectives of
(1) the workers, mostly young
women, who seek a safer work environment and an increase in their
meager $80 monthly wage, (2) the garment manufacturers, who prefer to
maintain their $5 billion annual exports and their current profit
margin, (3) retail stores/corporations such as Walmart that
prefer that their costs remain low, and (4) western consumers who also prefer that
prices for clothing at these stores remain low and
affordable.
As the article indicates, each of these social categories of actors
has different beliefs, values, attitudes, and interests. In other
words, they inhabit somewhat different cultures and sub-cultures.
As a result, they disagree over whether this objective condition
really is a problem, what, if anything, should be done about
the situation (i.e., whose behavior needs to change), and the
likelihood that such efforts would be successful.
In your essay you will answer these four sets of questions:
(1) What are the different cultural perspectives (beliefs, values, attitudes, and interests) of the four categories of social actors listed above? Pay particular attention to the difference you find in their values and indicate how these differences affect their role and position in this state of affairs.
(2) How are these four categories of social actors, which represent local, regional, national, and global communities, connected in a larger system of relations and how do they interact on a national and global level?
(3) Whether you recognize it or not, your actions as a consumer play a part in the current circumstances in Cambodia. In your view, do you have any social responsibility to act – for example, to boycott stores that carry these products – in order to effect change? What other strategies would you suggest? What are the effects of you not doing anything?
(4) Given the competing interests and differences in power that are attached to the different collective social actors, a solution to this problem will not be easily devised. Cheap labor always seems to be available. And according to Ken Loo, secretary-general of the Cambodian Garment Manufacturers Association, in the end, a few boycotting consumers “can’t do anything.” Discuss what you believe to be the responsibility of each of the groups to solve the problems associated with the situation. In your view, are these difficulties insurmountable? Why or why not?