In: Economics
Consider TC=25000+25000+2Q=50000+2Q
TR=P*Q=(400-3Q)Q= 400Q-3Q^2
Now to have profit maximising output, MR=MC and MR'<=MC'
thus, 2Q=400-6Q
thus Q=50.
output is 50 units.
Now At Q=50,To find wether this output is profit maximising price let us first calculate MR' and MC'
MR'=-6 and MC'=2
thus MC'>=MR'
Thus this is profit maximising output.
Now price assosciated with Q=50 is
P=400-3(50)....Resubstituting Q=50 in DD equation
P=250$
Profit maximising price is 250$
Totalprofit is TC-TR=50000+100-(400*50)+(3*2500)
Profit = 50100-(20000+7500)
Profit= 50100-27500
At Profit maximising output and price Profit=22500$
Under long Run,
1) Motorola phones that are sold at 200$ currently in longrun would have higher demand as the price is quite low than Apples 250$. Thus DD for Apple I phones might decrease in longrun qwing to the fact that Motorola phones are their perfect substitutes at ceteris paribus.Apple should not stay in business for longrun.
2) If apple is momnopolist,surely they can stay in business for long run.As their dd is not changing.But that is quite a hypothetical situation to be.
3)Though the rival firms in monopolistic competetion decide to produce the close substitutes still they will not be perfect substitutes.Thus Being differentiated products, Aplle still ahs a chance to capturre the market.And can surely be in the business for long run.
4)One best way is to set their price after the rival firms set their price assuming constant output.But this is quite unrealistic(Cournots duopoly model).Thus apple should assume rivals will have constant price and determine its own price and focus on changing output at that price acording to Edgeworths model in oligopoly.It is relatively stable to Bertrands model.