Question

In: Accounting

Beverley Johnson holds 5% of the shares in JPR Pty Ltd. The largest shareholder is Eugene...

Beverley Johnson holds 5% of the shares in JPR Pty Ltd. The largest shareholder is Eugene Mann who holds 80% of the shares. Eugene Mann and Carmel Wren are the only directors, and the company does not have a constitution.

Beverley’s shares were issued with a right to a dividend which is double that of other shares and 4 votes per share. Eugene Mann wants to hold a general meeting of members to pass a resolution that will reduce the dividend and voting rights of Beverley’s shares down to the same level as the other shares.

Required

Using the Corporation Act 2001 (Cth) and case law if any, advice Beverley Johnson if JPR Pty Ltd can amend Beverley’s dividend and voting rights.

NOTE: You are required to use the 4-step process in answering this question.

Solutions

Expert Solution

The Corporations Act 2001 is an Act passed by the Australia which provides the detailed laws dealing with business entities in Australia at federal and interstate level. It mainly provides regulations dealing primarily with companies but also with other entities, such as partnerships and managed investment schemes.

Act provides that subject to any rights or restrictions attached to any class of shares, at a meeting of members of a company with a share capital:

                     (a) on a show of hands, each member has 1 vote; and

                     (b) on a poll, each member has 1 vote for each share they hold.

In the given case, Beverley holds 17.93% of voting rights in the Company compared 69.57% rights held by the Eugene Mann. Eugene Mann by virtue of more than 50% rights and in abscence of any constitution, it is most probably that the rosultion could be passed.

As a member Beverley, he has rights under Section 232 to 235 of the Act deal with oppresive conduct of affairs .

Act under said section provides following-

Act provides Grounds for Court order if:

                     (a) the conduct of a company’s affairs; or

                     (b) an actual or proposed act or omission by or on behalf of a company; or

                     (c) a resolution, or a proposed resolution, of members or a class of members of a company;

is either:

                     (d) contrary to the interests of the members as a whole; or

                     (e) oppressive to, unfairly prejudicial to, or unfairly discriminatory against, a member or members whether in that capacity or in any other capacity.

Further, Act provides that the Court can make any order under this section that it considers appropriate in relation to the company, including an order:

                     (a) that the company be wound up;

                     (b) that the company’s existing constitution be modified or repealed;

                     (c) regulating the conduct of the company’s affairs in the future;

                     (d) for the purchase of any shares by any member or person to whom a share in the company has been transmitted by will or by operation of law;

                     (e) for the purchase of shares with an appropriate reduction of the company’s share capital;

                      (f) for the company to institute, prosecute, defend or discontinue specified proceedings;

                     (g) authorising a member, or a person to whom a share in the company has been transmitted by will or by operation of law, to institute, prosecute, defend or discontinue specified proceedings in the name and on behalf of the company;

                     (h) appointing a receiver or a receiver and manager of any or all of the company’s property;

                      (i) restraining a person from engaging in specified conduct or from doing a specified act;

                      (j) requiring a person to do a specified act.

An application for an order under section 233 in relation to a company may be made by:

                     (a) a member of the company, even if the application relates to an act or omission that is against:

                              (i) the member in a capacity other than as a member; or

                             (ii) another member in their capacity as a member; or

                     (b) a person who has been removed from the register of members because of a selective reduction; or

                     (c) a person who has ceased to be a member of the company if the application relates to the circumstances in which they ceased to be a member; or

                     (d) a person to whom a share in the company has been transmitted by will or by operation of law;


Related Solutions

QUESTION 2 Damien is a foreign resident who holds 500 shares in IrriTable Furniture Pty Ltd,...
QUESTION 2 Damien is a foreign resident who holds 500 shares in IrriTable Furniture Pty Ltd, a resident company. The company paid a fully franked dividend of $3.50 per share on 1 June. What amount can Damien claim as a tax offset for the year? $1,750 $750 Nil $2,500
Gold Pty Ltd is an Australian resident private company. All the shares in Gold Pty Ltd...
Gold Pty Ltd is an Australian resident private company. All the shares in Gold Pty Ltd are owned by Johnny Gold. During the year ended 30 June 2019 the following events occurred in relation to Gold Pty Ltd: 1 July 2018​Opening balance of franking account​$200,000 2 July 2018​Payment of dividend franked to 70%​$1,600,000 28 October 2018​Payment of income tax for Gold Pty Ltd​$600,000 26 November 2018​Receipt of dividend from another company ​franked to 80%​​$450,000 31 December 2018​Refund of income tax...
Mandy is a minority shareholder and director of Happy Faces Childcare Pty Ltd. At a board...
Mandy is a minority shareholder and director of Happy Faces Childcare Pty Ltd. At a board meeting of the company, Mandy is shocked to learn that one of the directors, Arnold, had personally benefited from the sale of some of the company's assets at an undervalue. Despite objections from Mandy, a majority of the Board voted to ratify the transaction. Amold is a wealthy businessman. Required: Advise Mandy whether she would be able to pursue either a statutory derivative action...
Joe is the sole director and shareholder of Homes Building Pty Ltd, a company that builds...
Joe is the sole director and shareholder of Homes Building Pty Ltd, a company that builds prestigious homes in Perth, Western Australia by mainly using sub-contractors and a few employees. Joe knew that due to the downturn in the building industry, the company’s business was in trouble. For the last 6 to 8 months, Joe had been making late payments to his sub-contractors and had accrued $200,000 in overdue payments. Joe had also missed some payments to the Australian Taxation...
Josie is a major shareholder in OldSkool Pty Ltd and has noted that the company maintains...
Josie is a major shareholder in OldSkool Pty Ltd and has noted that the company maintains the old-fashioned ‘memorandum of association’ which has been prepared for OldSkool Pty Ltd. The memorandum contains an objects clause which limits the objects of the company to the development, manufacture and sale of commercial computing devices. With the changing times where more people are working from home, Josie believes that the devices will soon be able to be used on a wide scale domestic...
Y, an Australian resident, is the sole shareholder of ABC Pty Ltd, an Australian resident company....
Y, an Australian resident, is the sole shareholder of ABC Pty Ltd, an Australian resident company. In this income year, ABC Pty Ltd made an interest free loan of $100,000 to Y. By the income year end, the company waived 40% of the loan. The balance of the loan remains outstanding by the company’s lodgement date. The company’s distributable surplus for the income year is $50,000. Advise the tax implications of the above transaction for Y. How will your answer...
Ms Jennie Smiles is the major shareholder and chief executive officer of Celebrations Pty Ltd, a...
Ms Jennie Smiles is the major shareholder and chief executive officer of Celebrations Pty Ltd, a small business which provides organisation services and supplies for parties, wedding receptions and other happy occasions. Due to the relatively small size of the business Jennie is unable to justify a computerised accounting system thus all accounting is completed manually by ABC Accounting. Celebrations Pty Ltd uses a perpetual inventory system, noting the cost of all inventory sold is 65% of the sales (GST...
Question: Ms Jennie Smiles is the major shareholder and chief executive officer of Celebrations Pty Ltd,...
Question: Ms Jennie Smiles is the major shareholder and chief executive officer of Celebrations Pty Ltd, a ... Ms Jennie Smiles is the major shareholder and chief executive officer of Celebrations Pty Ltd, a small business which provides organisation services and supplies for parties, wedding receptions and other happy occasions. Due to the relatively small size of the business Jennie is unable to justify a computerised accounting system thus all accounting is completed manually by ABC Accounting. Celebrations Pty Ltd...
Larry Nelson holds 1,000 shares of General Electric common stock. As a shareholder, he has the...
Larry Nelson holds 1,000 shares of General Electric common stock. As a shareholder, he has the right to be involved in the election of its directors. These directors are responsible for managing the company and achieving the company’s objectives. True or False: Larry can invest in another company that is selling class A shares to the public, and class B shares will be retained by company insiders. This will help the founders maintain control in the company. True False Larry...
Mary holds 5,000 ordinary shares in Unity Ltd. The directors of Unity Ltd determined in April...
Mary holds 5,000 ordinary shares in Unity Ltd. The directors of Unity Ltd determined in April 2010 that a dividend of $2 per share would be paid in June and indicated to shareholders the dividend would be a cash payment paid on 28 June. In May the company auditors indicated there were financial stresses as a result of the global financial crisis and it was unlikely the company would have sufficient profits to pay a dividend in June. As a...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT