In: Economics
How did Singapore fare in the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997 and the Global Financial Crisis in 2008 relative to its other ASEAN partners (you may pick any one of them for discussion)?
declining regional demand for Singapore’s exports due to contraction in the crisis economies, slower growth
in real investment, and loss of competitiveness in the face of competitive devaluations posed new challenges for
Singapore which must adopt policies to combat the crisis. This paper examines the impact of the crisis on
Singapore and the effects of proposed policies using the computable general equilibrium (CGE) modelling
approach. We use two CGE models: a world model and a model of Singapore. First, the impact of the crisis is
simulated using the GTAP (Global Trade Analysis Project) model. Then the effects of policy responses are
examined using the Singapore model. In particular, we examine wage reduction, domestic demand stimulation,
and exchange rate policies.
Introduction
Singapore’s experience with the Asian crisis and its quick recovery following the policy responses
makes it a worthwhile and an interesting case study. In terms of both current and capital accounts,
Singapore has a very open economy, yet the impact of the crisis was less severe in comparison to
much less open economies in the region which have experienced dramatic economic and social
repercussions. In Singapore, the crisis impacted different sectors unevenly. Sectors such as
commerce, transport, tourism, and financial services, which have a large regional exposure, were
badly hit. Interestingly, the policy responses to the crisis were not to reject globalization and
liberalization and adopt capital control measures but to make much stronger domestic financial
system and to improve Singapore’s international competitiveness (Chia, 1998). Since the crisis,
many alternative explanations have emerged as the causes for the substantial economic downturn
in the region. Among these some political economy arguments and weakening of macroeconomic
fundamentals caused by the adoption of policies that are inconsistent with a peg exchanged rate
regime have occupied an important part of the debate (see Lee, 1999; Karunaratne, 1999).
______________________________
* This research was funded by a grant from the University of New England. The authors are grateful to two
anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions.
UNEAC Asia Papers No. 6 2003 2
This paper examines the impact of the crisis on Singapore and the effects of proposed
policies using the computable general equilibrium (CGE) modelling approach. We use two CGE
models: a world model and a model of Singapore (Siriwardana and Schulze, 2000). First, the impact
of the crisis is simulated using the GTAP (Global Trade Analysis Project) model. Then the effects
of policy responses are examined using the Singapore model. In particular, we examine wage
reduction, domestic demand stimulation, and exchange rate policies.
The paper is organised as follows: Section two is a brief discussion of the Asian crisis and
its implications for Singapore. Section three outlines the theoretical framework of the GTAP
model which is used to quantify the impact on Singapore of the crisis. The simulation results
obtained from the GTAP model are discussed in Section four. Section five reviews her policy
responses to the crisis. Section six presents the results of policy simulations. Section seven
concludes.
The Asian Crisis and Its Implications for Singapore
The Asian crisis began as an exchange rate crisis in Thailand and spread almost immediately
to Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines. This led to financial crises which, in turn, produced
severe downturns in real economic activity in these, and other, countries. While a full discussion
of the causes, propagation channels, and effects are beyond our scope,
1
some points need to be
made to show how, and to what extent, Singapore was caught up in the crisis. We focus on
Thailand, the first domino. An overvalued exchange rate pegged to the US$,
2
declining exports,
3
and a growing current account deficit made her vulnerable to a speculative exchange rate attack.
The falling yen and an effective depreciation of about 10 per cent of the yuan contributed to her
reduced export competitiveness
4
. The resulting devaluation triggered a financial crisis. Substantial
capital inflows, about 6 per cent of GDP, had fuelled price bubbles in real estate and the stock
market. Although these bubbles peaked at the end of 1993, by the end of 1997 share prices fell to
about 29 per cent of their 1995 levels while the property company share index fell to 10 per cent
of its 1995 level (Edison, Luangaram and Miller, 1998, p.4). In addition, relatively high domestic
interest rates and the pegged exchange rate led to increases in foreign short-term borrowing
5
that
was largely unhedged. As the exchange rate fell, financial institutions suffered large capital losses
as the value of their foreign denominated debt increased.
These losses were magnified since most bank lending was backed by collateral, particularly
real estate. Financial system solvency, already impaired, was further damaged as the value of their
collateral collapsed
6
and nonperforming loans increased. New domestic credit dried up, as did
foreign credit with capital outflows of about 2 per cent of GDP. Otherwise viable