Question

In: Economics

Suppose we can think of dividing a person’s working years up into three periods. The person...

Suppose we can think of dividing a person’s working years up into three periods. The person has three alternatives. The first is for her to start working immediately, earning $100,000 ($100k) in period 1, $110k in period 2, and $90k in period 3. The second is to spend $50k to attend college in period 1, then earn $180k in each of periods 2 and 3. The third is to attend college in period 1 (as in the previous option), attend graduate school in period 2 (which entails no spending or earnings), and earn $400k in period 3.

a. If her period discount rate is 20%, which option maximizes the net present value (NPV) of her lifetime earnings (net of costs)?

b. How low must her discount rate get to change the answer you got for part (a)? (Using a spreadsheet would be very helpful. Try lowering her discount rate 1 percentage point at a time so see how the NPV of each alternative is affected.)

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer:

a)

Given that the discounting rate is 20%.

Option 1:

If the person starts earning in period 1:

Net Present Value of earnings in three periods($100,000 in period 1, $110000 in period 2 and $90000 in period 3) =$100000/(1+20/100)+$110000/(1+20/100)2+$90000/(1+20/100)3=$83,333+76,389+52083=$2,11,805.

Option 2:

NPV=-$50000/(1+20/100)+$180000/(1+20/100)2+$180000/(1+20/100)3=-$41,667+125,000+104,167=$187,500.

Option 3:

NPV=-$50000/(1+20/100)+$400000/(1+20/100)3=-$41,667+$231,481=$189,814.

NPV is highest in Option 1.

b)

Option 3 is giving the second alternative to Option 1 as it is giving NPV higher than the Option 2.

If she want to change the answer from Option 1 to Option 3 then calculation will be as follows:

At 12 % discount rate:

Option 1:

NPV=100000/1.12+110000/(1.12)2+90000/(1.12)3=241,037.

Option 3:

NPV=-50000/1.12+400000/(1.12)3=240,070.

At 11% discount rate:

Option 1:

NPV=100000/1.11+110000/(1.11)2+90000/(1.11)3=245,206.

Option 3:

NPV=-50000/1.11+400000/(1.11)3=247,432.

So, at the discounting rate of 11% Option 3 is having higher NPV and the answer from a) is changed from Option 1 to Option 3

91


Related Solutions

Give an example that illustrates that when a person’s opportunity cost goes up that the person...
Give an example that illustrates that when a person’s opportunity cost goes up that the person will be financially better off. Use a numerical example in illustrating your point.
Suppose a person’s life is divided into two main blocks, periods 1 and 2. The consumer...
Suppose a person’s life is divided into two main blocks, periods 1 and 2. The consumer does not desire to perfectly smooth consumption over the two periods. In particular, preferences are such that c2 = 0.5 ∗ c1. Income in the two periods is equal to y1 = 500 and y2 = 1000, and income taxes are proportional τ1 = 50% and τ2 = 50%. The real interest rate is r = 0%. (a) What is the present value of...
Suppose a person’s life is divided into two main blocks, periods 1 and 2. The consumer...
Suppose a person’s life is divided into two main blocks, periods 1 and 2. The consumer does not desire to perfectly smooth consumption over the two periods. In particular, preferences are such that c2 = 0.5 ∗ c1. Income in the two periods is equal to y1 = 500 and y2 = 1000, and income taxes are proportional τ1 = 50% and τ2 = 50%. The real interest rate is r = 0%. (a) What is the present value of...
Suppose a person’s life is divided into two main blocks, periods 1 and 2. The consumer...
Suppose a person’s life is divided into two main blocks, periods 1 and 2. The consumer does not desire to perfectly smooth consumption over the two periods. In particular, preferences are such that c2 = 0.5 ∗ c1. Income in the two periods is equal to y1 = 500 and y2 = 1000, and income taxes are proportional τ1 = 50% and τ2 = 50%. The real interest rate is r = 0%. (a) What is the present value of...
Question No. 2 Life-Cycle Hypothesis a. Suppose a person expects to live six periods. This person...
Question No. 2 Life-Cycle Hypothesis a. Suppose a person expects to live six periods. This person has no accumulated wealth and receives an income of $15, $20, $25, $30 in each of the first 4 periods, respectively. After period 4 this person retires and receives no wage income. Assuming this person follows the life cycle consumption function, prepare a table showing income,consumption and saving in each of the 6 years of the person’s life. Assume the interestrate is zero for...
Suppose a nonrenewable resource can be extracted over two periods. Both periods are characterized by MB...
Suppose a nonrenewable resource can be extracted over two periods. Both periods are characterized by MB = 250 - .25Q and MC = 50 + .25Q and there are 350 units total available for extraction. Assume the discount rate is .15 (or 15%). Identify the socially optimal rates of extraction for period 1 and period 2. Identify and define the user cost associated with the extraction of this resource. Identify the socially optimal price of the resource for period 1...
Suppose that we are interested I the number of heads showing face up on three tosses...
Suppose that we are interested I the number of heads showing face up on three tosses of a coin. This is the experiment. The possible results are: zero heads, one head, two heads, and three heads. What is the probability distribution for the number of heads? In a region of a country, 5% of all cell phone calls are dropped. What is the probability that out of six randomly selected calls, none was dropped? Exactly one? Exactly two ? exactly...
Suppose that a consumer lives for two periods: working age and retirement age. The consumer works...
Suppose that a consumer lives for two periods: working age and retirement age. The consumer works during their working age, and does not work during their retirement age. a) Write out the consumer’s budget constraint. Draw the budget constraint, with correct labelling. b) Briefly explain how the following variables are likely to affect how much the consumer will save (ceteris paribus): (i) Discount rate, (ii) interest rate, (iii) uncertainty about retirement age income. c) Now suppose that there is a...
Think about the various factors that can influence life expectancy. Also, think about the time periods...
Think about the various factors that can influence life expectancy. Also, think about the time periods and what was happening during the different times. What social changes have occurred that might lead to some of the differences you see.
Suppose 4 people each start with $10. In each of 2 periods, each person flips a...
Suppose 4 people each start with $10. In each of 2 periods, each person flips a coin (50% probability of heads or tails). a. Suppose that each time a person flips heads, their wealth increases by 70%. If they flip tails, their wealth decreases by 30%. On average, what fraction (or percentage) of the total wealth would you expect the richest person to have in each period? (Show how you calculated the answer.) (1 pt) b. Now, repeat the exercise...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT