Question

In: Statistics and Probability

The maximum acceptable level of a certain toxic chemical in vegetables has been set at 0.4...

The maximum acceptable level of a certain toxic chemical in vegetables has been set at 0.4 parts per million (ppm). A consumer health group measured the level of the chemical in a random sample of tomatoes obtained from one producer. The levels, in ppm, are shown below.

0.31 0.47 0.19 0.72 0.56

0.91 0.29 0.83 0.49 0.28

0.31 0.46 0.25 0.34 0.17

0.58 0.19 0.26 0.47 0.81

Do the data provide sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean level of the chemical in tomatoes from this producer is greater than the recommended level of 0.4 ppm? Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that these sample levels come from a population with a mean greater than 0.4 ppm. Use the P-value method of testing hypotheses.

Initial Claim:

Null Hypothesis:

Alternative Hypothesis

Test statistic (make sure you state which test statistic that you are using):

P- Value

Initial conclusion (justify your answer – graphs are acceptable):

Final conclusion:

Solutions

Expert Solution

Values ( X )
0.31 0.0181
0.47 0.0007
0.19 0.0648
0.72 0.0759
0.56 0.0133
0.91 0.2167
0.29 0.0239
0.83 0.1486
0.49 0.0021
0.28 0.0271
0.31 0.0181
0.46 0.0002
0.25 0.0378
0.34 0.0109
0.17 0.0754
0.58 0.0184
0.19 0.0648
0.26 0.034
0.47 0.0007
0.81 0.1336
Total 8.89 0.9851

Mean

Standard deviation

To Test :-

H0 :-  

H1 :-

Test Statistic :-


t = 0.874


Test Criteria :-
Reject null hypothesis if


Result :- Fail to reject null hypothesis


Decision based on P value
P - value = P ( t > 0.874 ) = 0.1965
Reject null hypothesis if P value < level of significance
P - value = 0.1965 > 0.05 ,hence we fail to reject null hypothesis
Conclusion :- Fail to reject null hypothesis

There is insufficient evidence to support the claim that  the chemical in tomatoes from this producer is greater than the recommended level of 0.4 ppm.


Related Solutions

1. The maximum acceptable level of a certain toxic chemical in vegetables has been set at...
1. The maximum acceptable level of a certain toxic chemical in vegetables has been set at 0.4 parts per million (ppm). A consumer health group measured the level of the chemical in a random sample of tomatoes obtained from one producer. The levels, in ppm, are shown below. 0.31 0.47 0.19 0.72 0.56 0.91 0.29 0.83 0.49 0.28 0.31 0.46 0.25 0.34 0.17 0.58 0.19 0.26 0.47 0.81 Do the data provide sufficient evidence to support the claim that the...
. In the USA the maximum acceptable level for exposure to microwave radiation is 10 μW/cm2...
. In the USA the maximum acceptable level for exposure to microwave radiation is 10 μW/cm2 (microwatts per square centimetre). It is feared that a large TV transmitter may have raised the level of ambient microwave radiation above this level. Fourteen widely-spaced monitoring sites were selected among homes at roughly equal distances from the transmitter. For these sites, the mean radiation level was 10.95 μW/cm2 , with a standard deviation of 1.24 μW/cm2 . (a) Do these results indicate that...
Two chemical factories are discharging toxic waste into a large lake, and the pollution level at...
Two chemical factories are discharging toxic waste into a large lake, and the pollution level at a point ? miles from factory A toward factory B is ?(?) = 3?2 − 72? + 576 parts per million for 0 ≤ ? ≤ 50. Find where the pollution is the least
3. In the USA the maximum acceptable level for exposure to microwave radiation is 10 μW/cm2...
3. In the USA the maximum acceptable level for exposure to microwave radiation is 10 μW/cm2 (microwatts per square centimetre). It is feared that a large TV transmitter may have raised the level of ambient microwave radiation above this level. Fourteen widely-spaced monitoring sites were selected among homes at roughly equal distances from the transmitter. For these sites, the mean radiation level was 10.95 μW/cm2, with a standard deviation of 1.24 μW/cm2. (a) Do these results indicate that microwave radiation...
3. Assume that a chemical plant in your area has been dumping its toxic waste free...
3. Assume that a chemical plant in your area has been dumping its toxic waste free of charge into a local stream. A. What is the criterion that we use to define “static economic efficiency”? Why would the market allocation not meet this economic efficiency criterion? (4) B. Use a supply and demand (i.e., marginal benefit-marginal cost) diagram to compare the market allocation (price and quantity) with the socially optimal (i.e., statically efficient) allocation. (4) C. How could you use...
3. Assume that a chemical plant in your area has been dumping its toxic waste free...
3. Assume that a chemical plant in your area has been dumping its toxic waste free of charge into a local stream. A. What is the criterion that we use to define “static economic efficiency”? Why would the market allocation not meet this economic efficiency criterion? B. Use a supply and demand (i.e., marginal benefit-marginal cost) diagram to compare the market allocation (price and quantity) with the socially optimal (i.e., statically efficient) allocation. C. How could you use a marketable...
3. Assume that a chemical plant in your area has been dumping its toxic waste free...
3. Assume that a chemical plant in your area has been dumping its toxic waste free of charge into a local stream. A. What is the criterion that we use to define “static economic efficiency”? Why would the market allocation not meet this economic efficiency criterion? B. Use a supply and demand (i.e., marginal benefit-marginal cost) diagram to compare the market allocation (price and quantity) with the socially optimal (i.e., statically efficient) allocation. C. How could you use a marketable...
The acceptable level for insect filth in a certain food item is 5 insect fragments (larvae,...
 The acceptable level for insect filth in a certain food item is 5 insect fragments (larvae, eggs, body parts, and so on) per 10 grams. A simple random sample of 60 ten-gram portions of the food item is obtained and results in a sample mean of \(\bar{x}=5.7\) insect fragments per ten-gram portion. Complete parts (a) through (c) below.(a) Why is the sampling distribution of \(\bar{x}\) approximately normal?\(\mathrm{A}\). The sampling distribution of \(\bar{x}\) is assumed to be approximately normal.B. The sampling...
The acceptable level for insect filth in a certain food item is 2 insect fragments​ (larvae,...
The acceptable level for insect filth in a certain food item is 2 insect fragments​ (larvae, eggs, body​ parts, and so​ on) per 10 grams. A simple random sample of 40 ​ten-gram portions of the food item is obtained and results in a sample mean of x overbarequals2.7 insect fragments per​ ten-gram portion. Complete parts ​(a) through ​(c) below. ​ (a) Why is the sampling distribution of x overbar approximately​ normal? A. The sampling distribution of x overbar is approximately...
The acceptable level for insect filth in a certain food item is 2 insect fragments​ (larvae,...
The acceptable level for insect filth in a certain food item is 2 insect fragments​ (larvae, eggs, body​ parts, and so​ on) per 10 grams. A simple random sample of 40 ​ten-gram portions of the food item is obtained and results in a sample mean of x overbarequals2.7 insect fragments per​ ten-gram portion. Complete parts ​(a) through ​(c) below. ​ (a) Why is the sampling distribution of x overbar approximately​ normal? A. The sampling distribution of x overbar is approximately...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT