In: Finance
An oil-drilling company must choose between two mutually exclusive extraction projects, and each requires an initial outlay at t = 0 of $11.8 million. Under Plan A, all the oil would be extracted in 1 year, producing a cash flow at t = 1 of $14.16 million. Under Plan B, cash flows would be $2.0967 million per year for 20 years. The firm's WACC is 11.7%.
Construct NPV profiles for Plans A and B. Enter your answers in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. If an amount is zero, enter "0". Negative values, if any, should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places.
Discount Rate | NPV Plan A | NPV Plan B | |
0 | % | $ million | $ million |
5 | million | million | |
10 | million | million | |
12 | million | million | |
15 | million | million | |
17 | million | million | |
20 | million | million |
Identify each project's IRR. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places.
Project A: %
Project B: %
Find the crossover rate. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places.
%
Is it logical to assume that the firm would take on all available independent, average-risk projects with returns greater than 11.7%?
If all available projects with returns greater than 11.7% have been undertaken, does this mean that cash flows from past investments have an opportunity cost of only 11.7%, because all the company can do with these cash flows is to replace money that has a cost of 11.7%?
Does this imply that the WACC is the correct reinvestment rate assumption for a project's cash flows?