Question

In: Economics

Why do US private sector unions typically oppose free trade agreements? From a historical perspective, why...

Why do US private sector unions typically oppose free trade agreements? From a historical perspective, why does the Democratic party oppose free trade while Republicans typically support it? What are the arguments.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Private sector unions oppose free trade agreements, because it works to reduce the control of these unions upon the workers as well as their impact upon the management of the organization. When free trade takes place, then firms have to be competitive and highly productive to remain in the market. It can only happen, when workers increase their productivity and it will happen, when they will be paid on the basis of their merit and work done. But, it will reduce the collective bargaining strategy adopted by the unions and workers will only be employed if they are productive and they will be given performance based pay. If it does not happen, the companies will remain non-competitive and go out of the market very soon.  For this, it will be unions who will be held responsible.  As a result, unions will slowly lose the control and get vanished with free trade in place. It makes these private trade unions to oppose the free trade agreement.

From the historical perspective, democratic party has been established to bring social security,  equality and proper rights for everyone. This philosophy gets hurt, when free trade agreement takes place that can cause job loss, promote inequality and make less skilled workers as the biggest victim of the free trade. It makes democratic party to be careful when there is a discussion in free trade and scope of job loss takes place. In this regard, the arguments are based on protectionism, social securities, loss of jobs due to sourcing from other nations with cheap factors of production.

Though, Republican party supports it as it is the mean to expand the US leadership in the world, develop strategic alliances, making US MNCs to identify markets in overseas nations and give fuel to the US economy. The arguments are the benefits to be much more than the cost incurred due to the free trade, moving upward of the value chain to sell goods of high value ( as done in NAFTA)  and world leadership of the USA using the free trade agreements.


Related Solutions

From an economic perspective, what are the marginal benefits of private sector unions in the U.S.?
From an economic perspective, what are the marginal benefits of private sector unions in the U.S.?
most customs unions or free trade agreements are created between countries of close geographical proximity. Why...
most customs unions or free trade agreements are created between countries of close geographical proximity. Why is this case? is this always welfare increasing? why or why not?
What are the differences between common markets, common unions, and free trade agreements? Which of these...
What are the differences between common markets, common unions, and free trade agreements? Which of these are the most comprehensive form of trade agreement.
Most unions have opposed free trade agreements, such as NAFTA. On the other hand, most employer...
Most unions have opposed free trade agreements, such as NAFTA. On the other hand, most employer lobbying groups have supported such agreements. Create an argument for one side or the other.
2. There are four main reasons why economists typically oppose the use of trade restrictions. (1)....
2. There are four main reasons why economists typically oppose the use of trade restrictions. (1). From a global perspective, free trade increases total output. (2). International trade provides competition for domestic companies. (3). Restrictions based on national security are often abused. (4). Trade restrictions are addictive. Discuss each of these reasons.
Discuss why Free Trade Agreements (FTA) is growing rapidly in these days and why it becomes...
Discuss why Free Trade Agreements (FTA) is growing rapidly in these days and why it becomes more acceptable around the world.
why do economist oppose policies that restrict trade among nations ?
why do economist oppose policies that restrict trade among nations ?
Unions in developed nations often oppose imports from low-wage countries and advocate trade barriers to protect...
Unions in developed nations often oppose imports from low-wage countries and advocate trade barriers to protect jobs from what they often characterize as “unfair” import competition. Is such competition “unfair”? Do you think that this argument is in the best interests of: (a) the local companies, (b) the workers (c) the consumers
Unions in developed nations often oppose imports from low-wage countries and advocate trade barriers to protect...
Unions in developed nations often oppose imports from low-wage countries and advocate trade barriers to protect jobs from what they often characterize as “unfair” import competition. Is such competition “unfair”? Do you think that this argument is in the best interests of: (a) the local companies, (b) the workers (c) the consumers please answer with harvard referencing without plagiarism. thank you very much.
Unions in developed nations often oppose imports from low-wage countries and advocate trade barriers to protect...
Unions in developed nations often oppose imports from low-wage countries and advocate trade barriers to protect jobs from what they often characterize as “unfair” import competition. Is such competition “unfair?” Do you think that this argument is in the best interests of (a) the unions, (b) the people they represent, and/or (c) the country as a whole?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT