Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Although Western countries typically have low HIV prevalence rates (e.g., about 0.2% of the Australian population...

  1. Although Western countries typically have low HIV prevalence rates (e.g., about 0.2% of the Australian population has HIV), clinics offering free HIV testing usually attract at-risk groups among whom the prevalence rate is much higher. Managers of such a clinic believe that 12% of their patients have HIV. The clinic uses a diagnostic test which returns a positive result in 98% of cases where the patient actually has HIV. Among patients without HIV, 96% of test results are negative. The following questions concern diagnostic outcomes at this clinic.

    1. Use a contingency table to structure the above information about diagnostic outcomes at this clinic. Complete all marginal totals as well as the body of the table.

    2. What proportion of patients diagnosed as having HIV actually have it?

    3. A randomly-selected patient has received a negative diagnosis. What is the chance that this patient does not have HIV?

    4. Among patients attending this clinic, what does the diagnostic test do better: show who has HIV, or show who doesn’t have it? Justify your answer.

Solutions

Expert Solution

A contigency table will be formed as below:

True Condition
Person has HIV Person does not has HIV

Test

Results

HIV + True Positive False Positive
HIV - False Negative True Negative

Suppose there are 10000 people coming to the clinic. Hence, people having HIV = 12% * 1000 = 1200.

Now, 98% of the people are diagnosed positive from the test from these 1200 people = 1176.

In this manner, the information is collected and gathered into the following table:

True Condition
Person has HIV Person does not has HIV Total
Test Results HIV + 1176 352 1528
HIV - 24 8448 8472
Total 1200 8800 10000

(i) Proportion of people who are diagnosed as having HIV actually having it = 1176/1528 = 76.96%

(ii) The chance that a randomly selected patient who has received a negative diagnosis does not has HIV = 8448/8472 = 0.997

(iii) Let's calculate each statistic:

Let's say a person who has HIV. The chance that test will show him HIV + is: 98%

Let's say a person who does not have HIV. The chance that the test will show him HIV - = 96%

Hence, the diagnostic test does better in showing who has HIV rather than showing who doesn't as it is a better predictor in it (98%>96%)


Related Solutions

Time intervals measured with a stopwatch typically have an uncertainty of about 0.2 seconds due to...
Time intervals measured with a stopwatch typically have an uncertainty of about 0.2 seconds due to human reaction time. How does this compare to the uncertainties of individual measurements above? Can human reaction time fully account for these uncertainties? If not, what other factors may contribute to the uncertainty of individual measurements (provide at least one)? Also, What are the fundamental differences in the uncertainty of individual measurements vs uncertainty of mean of measurements
Low-energy lightbulbs typically cost $3.75, have a life of nine years, and use about $1.85 of...
Low-energy lightbulbs typically cost $3.75, have a life of nine years, and use about $1.85 of electricity a year. Conventional lightbulbs are cheaper to buy, for they cost only $.55. On the other hand, they last only about a year and use about $6.85 of energy.    a. If the real discount rate is 6%, what is the equivalent annual cost of the two products? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answers as a positive value rounded to 2 decimal...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT