A researcher is studying the effects of both hypnotist rapport (high versus low) and method of inducing hypnosis (strong versus seductive) on responsiveness to 20 standard hypnotic suggestions. The results are shown below. Strong Method Seductive Method High Rapport 15 11 17 15 11 18 14 15 Low Rapport 13 8 13 7 6 9 12 11 Conduct a two-factor ANOVA for this data and compare the F-ratios to the critical F (cutoff value, use α = .05). In other words, conduct a hypothesis test for the F-ratios. Give me your findings about the data.. Make sure to test assumptions as well 1. State the independent and dependent variables. 2. State the Null Hypothesis in words and symbols. 3. Compute the appropriate statistic. 4. What is the decision? 5. State the full conclusion in words.

If there is anyway I can see a screen shot of the Template of the data my professor needs to see it like the actual data plugged in and the conclusions

A snapdragon plant has red, pink, or white flowers, inherited in an incomplete dominance pattern. It’s height is inherited in a dominant/recessive pattern. It can come in tall (T) or dwarf (homozygous recessive) varieties. What is the ratio expected if you cross a pink-tall (Tt) plant with a pink-short (tt) plant?

1. 1 red tall: 1 red dwarf: 2 pink tall : 2 pink dwarf : 1 white tall : 1 white dwarf
2. 1 red tall : 1 red dwarf : 1 pink tall : 1 pink dwarf : 1 white tall : 1 white dwarf
3. 3 red tall : 3 red dwarf : 1 white tall : 1 white dwarf
4. 2 red tall : 2 red dwarf : 1 pink tall : 1 pink dwarf : 1 white tall : 1 white dwarf
5. 2 red tall: 1 red dwarf : 1 pink tall : 1 pink dwarf : 2 white tall : 1 white dwarf

Lab Activity 4: Identifying APA Style in Journals

For this activity, please read the following question that are answer at the bottom and answer the following questions at the top. ( Note: At the bottom there already answer there that you can use to help you out with solving the answer)

Lee, K., Talwar, V., McCarthy, A., Ross, I., Evans, A., & Arruda, C. (2014). Can classic moral stories promote honesty in children? Psychological Science, 25, 1630-1636.

1. After reading through the abstract of the article, answer the following questions.

            a. How many studies were conducted in this article? What were the studies about?

  b. Who were the participants of the studies?

     c. In general, what was presented to the participants of the studies? Is this an independent or dependent variable?

     d. In general, what was the dependent variable of the studies?

  e. In general, what were the results of the first study? What were the results of the second study?

2. The first part of the article reflects which section of an APA style paper?

3. In the Method section of the first study, what were the two subsections of this section? Briefly describe what each subsection focused on.

4. What information did you learn from the Results section of the first study?

5. Looking at Experiment 2, why did they decide to conduct a second study?

6. Looking at the Method section, how were the participants the same as the previous study? How were they different?

7. What procedures were different in the second study than in the first study?

8. What were the results of the second study?

9. Briefly summarize what they talked about in the General Discussion section?

----------Information that can be used to help with question for this topic.

Explain why, specifically, the three stories utilized in Experiment 1 were chosen as modes of researching honesty in children for this experiment. How do these stories differ from each other in a way that can be accurately tested? [Introduction] The experimenters chose these stories because parents and teachers regularly use them to promote honesty in children. The three stories use different methods to promote honesty; one promotes honestly in immediate negative consequence (Pinocchio’s nose grows immediately); one teaches that the consequences to lying are long-term (the boy who cries wolf lies so often that no one believes him when the wolf finally comes); the last teaches positive consequences of honesty (George Washington’s father rewards and commends him after he confesses to cutting down the cherry tree).

2. Explain the modified temptation-resistance task used in this experiment. Do you think this is a good task for measuring lying in children? Why or why not? [Methods — Materials and Procedure] Participants played a game with the experimenter that required identifying a type of toy by the sound it made; the children sat with their back to a table, and the experimenter pressed a sound-toggle button on a toy. The children were asked to guess what the toy was. Then, the experimenter said that s/he needed to get a book from the car, placed a new toy on the table, and instructed the participant not to look at the toy. Then, the experimenter returned with a book and read the story that matched the condition. Afterwards, the experimenter asked the children if they peeked at the toy while the experimenter was gone. Responses to the opinion portion of the question will vary.

3. What were the hypotheses for the three stories presented? Be sure to differentiate these predictions between the younger and older children. The authors predicted that the cheaters who heard “the boy who cried wolf” would be more included than cheaters who heard the other stories to confess to cheating (due to the fatal consequences of lying in the story). They also predicted this effect would only be seen in older children because they have a better understanding of death. They expected that children who heard “Pinocchio” would be more likely to confess their cheating behavior across age groups, because the consequences of lying (in this case) involve public humiliation – something that should be relatable across age groups. They also predicted that “George Washington and the Cherry Tree” would be effective in promoting honesty across age groups because the story features the benefits of honesty.

4. Explain the purpose behind why “The Tortoise and the Hare” was used in this experiment. The story “The Tortoise and the Hare” was told in the control condition, because it didn’t involve lying nor discussed the consequences.

5. The children in Experiment 1 were coded into three separate groups. What were these and how was this coding procedure conducted? Non-Peekers, Peekers who lied (liars), and Peekers who confessed (confessors). Peeking was operationalized as the presence or absence of a 90o head turn when the researcher was away. Peekers who confessed when the researcher asked, were coded as confessors; peekers who lied when the researcher asked were coded as liars.

6. Based on the results from Experiment 1, what answer did the authors get to their research question? The researchers found that hearing “George Washington and the Cherry Tree” promoted honesty in children.

7. What was added for Experiment 2, and what was the purpose of adding this factor? The authors changed the story slightly in Exp 2, because they hypothesized that the GW story promoted honesty by illustrating the benefits of honesty, rather than the implications of dishonesty. To test this, they added a new GW story condition but changed the classic ending to focus on the implications of lying.

Important: please show work for each question. Thank you!

In a previous section of PSY230, the second exam was worth 80 points. The scores from that class were normally distributed with a mean (μ ) of 65 and a standard deviation (σ) of 5. If the exam scores were converted to a Z distribution, the distribution would form a perfect bell shape. The following questions require locating individual exam scores on the Z distribution and examine the percentage (or proportion) of cases above or below a score.

Hints: It helps to draw a Z distribution (bell curve) and place John’s and Tom’s Z scores on the distribution for answering the questions. Use the Z table for converting between Z score and area (percentage) of the distribution.

1. John obtained a score of 74. What is John’s z score?

2. What is the percentage of the students that scored higher than John?

3. If 50 students were in that class, about how many of them scored lower than John’s score? (You can round your answer to the nearest whole number.)

4. Tom obtained a score of 59. What is Tom’s z score?

5. What is the percentage of students that scored between John and Tom?

6. There are 50 students in the class, so about how many of them would likely score lower than Tom? (You can round your answer to the nearest whole number.)

7. Anna only knows that she scores at 87^th percentile on this exam, what is her z score?

8. Based on the result of the previous question, what would be Anna’s actual score on the exam?

1. A rectangular beam 230 mm wide is subjected to the following at a section
   • Ultimate bending moment of 135 kn.m
   • Ultimate shear force of 90 kn
   • Use M25 grade of concrete and Fe 415 steel

Design a suitable section and find the (flexural & shear) reinforcement required in the section.

introduction and background on the design of water supply system. Present the concepts of water flow in piping system focusing on energy equation (Bernoulli equation), head losses, and momentum. Support all the information with references. Provide the objectives at the end of the section.

Briefly present the main objective of this report. State the approach used to achieve the tasks focusing into the equations used in the calculation. You can evaluate your design through the results you achieved such as velocities, flowrate, head losses, pressure, etc. it is recommended to discuss the challenges and design limitation

5.

California and Washington state both started reporting COVID-19 cases at approximately the same time. Suppose a researcher wants to study the fatality rate of diagnosed COVID-19 cases in the 2 states.

a. What null hypothesis should be used? Pick one and explain.

i. California has a higher fatality rate than Washington.
ii. California has lower higher fatality rate than Washington.
iii. California has a different fatality (possibly higher, possibly lower) rate than Washington. iv. California and Washington have the same fatality rate.

b. What alternate hypothesis should be used? Pick one and explain.

i. California has a higher fatality rate than Washington.
ii. California has lower higher fatality rate than Washington.
iii. California has a different fatality (possibly higher, possibly lower) rate than Washington. iv. California and Washington have the same fatality rate.

c. As of 3/24/2020, California had 2220 cases and 100 fatalities, compared to 111 fatalities in 2221 cases in Washington. Use your calculator to carry out a suitable hypothesis test. Report the p-value of the test, determine whether or not to reject the null, and state what should be concluded. Use ? = .05.

The next time the economy falls into a recession, there will be a spirited debate about whether the government should try to counteract the downturn, or whether it is better to let the economy run its course. Most likely, there will some action taken to try to improve the economy. Then the debate will turn to what tools the government should use to fight the recession. In this week's discussion we will focus on (1) what role the government should play in stabilizing the economy, and (2) what tools they should use if the government does step in. Please respond to the both of the following questions in your initial post:

1. Assume the economy has entered a recession and policymakers are debating whether to intervene or not. What are arguments in favor of and against active government intervention to fight recessions? Be sure rely the  economics we learned this week in your summaries.
2. Now assume that the decision has been made to try and fight the recession. Based on the economics we learned this week, provide a recommendation to policymakers about how they should fight the recession. That is, in your professional economic opinion, what is the best approach? You may want to consider the following in your response. Should we use fiscal policy, monetary policy, or both? Should we use tax cuts, increased spending, or both? Who should get the biggest tax cuts to stimulate the economy - poor vs rich, evenly across income groups? Be to explain why you believe your recommendation is the best, again, using the economics you have learned.

using the header:

#include <pthread.h>

// This is a header file for a Read/Right Lock Library. Your C code
//SHOULD access your routines using these exact function
// prototypes

typedef struct RW_lock_s
{
} RW_lock_t;

void RW_lock_init(RW_lock_t *lock);
/* This routine should be called on a pointer to a struct variable of RW_lock_t
to initialize it and ready it for use. */

void RW_read_lock(RW_lock_t *lock);
/* This routine should be called at the beginning of a READER critical section */

void RW_read_unlock(RW_lock_t *lock);
/* This routine should be called at the end of a READER critical section */

void RW_write_lock(RW_lock_t *lock);
/* This routine should be called at the beginning of a WRITER critical section */

void RW_write_unlock(RW_lock_t *lock);
/* This routine should be called at the end of a WRITER critical section */

and class:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include "RW_lock.h"

void RW_lock_init(RW_lock_t *lock)
{

}

void RW_read_lock(RW_lock_t *lock)
{
}

void RW_read_unlock(RW_lock_t *lock)
{
}

void RW_write_lock(RW_lock_t *lock)
{ pthread_mutex_lock(&(lock->g));
}

void RW_write_unlock(RW_lock_t *lock)
{
}

implement a reader writer lock in C