Question 5
Complete parts 1 and 2 below:
Part 1:
Suppose in Janet’s utility function 2 hot dogs are perfect substitutes for 1 cheeseburger. If the price of one hot dog is $1 and the price of one cheeseburger is $3, how should Janet allocate her $15 budget between hot dogs and cheeseburgers to maximize her satisfaction?
A. she should spend all money on cheeseburgers
B. she should purchase 6 hot dogs and 3 cheeseburgers
C. she should purchase 9 hot dogs and 2 cheeseburgers
D. none of the others
E. she should spend all money on hot dogs
Suppose in Janet’s utility function 2 hot dogs and 1 bottle of coke are perfect complements. If the price of one hot dog is $1 and the price of one coke is $1.5, how should Janet allocate her $7 budget between hot dogs and cheeseburgers to maximize her satisfaction?
A. she should spend all money on hot dogs
B. she should purchase 4 hot dogs and 1 bottle of coke
C. she should purchase 1 hot dog and 4 cheeseburgers
D. none of the others
E. she should spend all money on cheeseburgers
Part 2:
We observe that Shelton purchased 20 apples and 10 orange in period 1, when the price of apple is $1 and the price of orange is $2. Suppose Shelton has regular preference (strictly monotone, transitive, complete, convex). Which statement cannot be inferred from the given information?
A. Shelton prefers (20,10) to (30,3)
B. Shelton prefers (30,22) to (20,10)
C. Shelton prefers (20,10) to (10,10)
D. Shelton prefers (20,10) to (10,20)
We observe that Shelton purchased 20 apples and 10 oranges in period 1, when the price of apple is $1 and the price of orange is $2. We also observe that Shelton purchased 10 apples and 20 oranges in period 2, when the price of apple is $1.5 and the price of orange is $1.
A. Shelton prefers (20,10) to (10,20)
B. We can say for sure Shelton is not maximizing utility
C. Shelton‘s income is not changing
D. Shelton prefers (10,20) to (15,10)
In: Economics
Balance Sheet
Brand Brew Inc.
Years 1 & 2 ($000's)
Year 1 . Year 2 .
Cash & Marketable
Securities 309,705 59,167
Accounts Receivable 108,732 705,426
Inventories 138,577 215,159
Other Current Assets 49,515 74,144
Total Current Assets 606,529 1,053,896
PP&E, Net 869,710 1,380,239
Intangibles 86,289 1,256,145
Other Assets 177,164 607,131
Total Assets 1,739,692 4,297,411
Accounts Payable 222,493 334,647
Other current liabilities 210,052 669,195
Short-term Debt 85,000 144,049
Total Current Liabilities 517,545 1,147,891
Long-term debt 20,000 1,383,392
Other long-term liabilities 250,835 784,277
Total liabilities 788,380 3,315,560
Capital Stock 8,922 28,334
Retained earnings 954,981 1,086,965
Adjustments -12,591 -133,448
Total shareholders' equity 951,312 981,851
Total Liabilities & Equity 1,739,692 4,297,411
Income Statement for Brand Brew Inc. Year 1 Year 2 Revenues 2,429,462 3,776,322 COGS 1,537,623 2,414,530 Depreciation 121,091 230,299 SG&A 619,143 833,208 EBIT 151,605 298,285 Interest Expense –14,403 49,732 Other income 32,005 8,047 Pre-Tax Income 198,013 256,600 Income Tax 75,049 94,947 Net Income 122,964 161,653
7. Refer to Brand Brew, Inc. financial statements,
Which of the following statements is correct?
(x) Both total asset turnover and ROA for the
firm decreased from Year 1 to Year 2.
(y) The amount of debt held by Brand Brew, Inc.
increased by more than 300 percent from
Year 1 to Year 2.
(z) The ROE for Brand Brew, Inc. rose from
12.9% in Year 1 to more than 17.4% in
Year 2.
A. (x), (y) and (z)
B. (x) and (y) only
C. (x) and (z) only
D. (y) and (z) only
E. (x) only
8. Refer to Brand Brew, Inc. financial statements.
What is the most important determinant of the
change in ROE?
A. ROA
B. Profit Margin
C. The change in leverage
D. Total Asset Turnover
E. Both A and B are important determinants
In: Finance
Please read the following made up story and come up with 1 1/2-2 page resolution to the story
Keeping
organizations properly succeeding is vital in our mission at OTC
(Organizational Theory Consultants). We pride ourselves in being
able to upright the most complex of situations involving various
organizations needing a turn around to keep from failing in their
specific industry. Organizations need to have their culture running
like a well
oiled machine to
avoid any hiccups which can have a negative impact. Culture is one
of the most important theories we at OTC focus on. Culture involves
a variety of different aspects that reside in the organizations we
are called into help. Culture can have many different
variable
that need to
be addressed such as the ethics, morals, values, synergy,
relationships, etc.
The culture within organizations is highly regarded in terms of success within the organization; a lack of culture can ultimately cripple an organization from the inside. “There are many definitions of organizational culture yet all pointing to the idea that culture represents a shared understanding of “How we do things around here.” It is comprised of written and unwritten, norms, beliefs, values, attitudes, and feelings that are expressed in the stories, rituals, ceremonies, behaviors, and the workplace’s physical setting. These different attributes contribute to the whole picture of the organization, creating essentially a personality based on how the company ticks internally. Culture within an organization is the most vital aspect that can be researched in depth in regards to success and failure within organizations.
We have been summoned to a semi large retailer in the D.C area whom provides a variety of services and the sale of goods, an overall general store. The morale among the store is quite well between associates and supervisors, with a clear and concise company goal of customer service. The associates of this retailer abide by this overall goal and respectfully the customers admire their attitude. The associates among themselves have formed a tight knit family like atmosphere, but with any organization there are a few bad apples that appear to want to go against the grain of the organization. From an outside picture this retailer has all the positive cultural aspects to remain a top competitor in their industry; but, the store owner has noticed the statistical sales are on in a dive bomb towards becoming bankrupt. The owner has called us to peel back the various layers of his organizations to identify the potentially fatal underlying issues.
Our team has been called into this retailer for a reason so we can take a thorough look into the underlying aspects as to why this retailer is beginning a downward spiral to failure. Once we identify the problematic organizational culture issues that present themselves then we can help turn this organizations into a positive trending successful retail store.
Prestige apparel has been in business for almost 10 years. Known by both their employees and customers to high moral and very little turnover it is surprising to many that they are currently facing the issues they are today and receiving such negative media attention. Almost two weeks ago a female employee reported a sexual harassment incident to HR and her immediate manager. Their response was that they saw no reason to take extreme measures and that having a sit-down with him should be enough. For years Prestige apparel has made it their business to ensure their employees of the fact that they have a work environment where they feel safe above all else. This situation changed things for some employees, they no longer felt safe and protected. A system that once made them feel safe by providing the ability to report incidents as such and know that they would be thoroughly investigated failed them. In this situation HR failed to take extreme measures because they did not want to lose a manager who has been employed for years with the company and produces great numbers. Not only is this unethical but their lack of holding this individual accountable for their actions have caused a huge uproar in a once safe workplace. Employees no longer come to work with the same work ethic they once did. The moral has completely shifted, and the tension can be felt amongst the customers every time they enter the store.
Prestige’s decision to turn a blind eye on a situation this serious has resulted in the employee feeling as if their only choices were to quit or stay and deal with the possibility that it could possibly occur again and be sweep under the rug. The employee decided to take matters into her own had and go public with her story which is now drawing negative media attention to the company. What once made this company unique were their company values; employees were always encouraged to be themselves, to work as a team to accomplish/meet goals, to protect and treat one another with respect has suddenly fallen to the waist side. As time passed they ultimately forgot to keep the pace of a once family-oriented work environment and some managers became more obsessed with company gains and meeting their sales in order to receive their bonuses at the end of each quarter. Once money became the main goal all ethical standards went out of the window. Upper management turned a blind eye to important issues taking place under their noses in order to keep their highest earners in que. Now that the media has caught wind of this situation loyal customers and investors are demanding the company take action. Failure to do so can greatly impact the future of the company.
In: Operations Management
1. Consider the cost function, C = 2q^2(wr)^1/2. Suppose the firm with this cost function is perfectly competitive in its output market and faces an output price, p. A. Find the marginal cost function for output. B. Find the average cost function. Show your work. C. Is this a long-run or short-run cost function? Explain. D. Derive the cost elasticity with respect to output. Show your formula and all calculations. What does this value of cost elasticity tell you about the degree of scale economies? Explain. E. Derive the supply function for output. Show all your logic and work. 2. Consider the cost function, C(q) = 0.5 q^2 − 10q + 200. A. Is it a short or long run cost function. Explain. B. Calculate the short-run average total cost function. C. Find the output level at which average total cost is minimized. Show your logic and work. D. Calculate the output supply function for a competitive firm whose market determined price of output is given by p. Show your logic and work. E. What is the shut-down condition? Explain its logic. 3. Consider the production function, q = L^1/4E^1/4K^1/4, where L is labor, E, energy, and K, capital. Their prices are respectively w, u, and r. The price of output is given by p. Output and input prices are competitively determined so that they are parametric (constants). Capital, K, is a fixed input. The short-run variable cost function is given by CV(q, w, u, K) = 2q2(wu/k)1/2. A. Use the short-run variable cost function to find the profit-maximizing output supply function. B. Find the maximum profit function. C. Compute the derivative of the maximum profit function with respect to output price, p. Does it look familiar? D. Compute the derivative of the maximum profit function with respect to input price, w, and multiply it by − 1: − ∂π/∂w where π denotes the maximum profit function. This derivative gives the profit-maximizing demand for labor. Together, the derivatives, − ∂π/∂w, − ∂π/∂u, and ∂π/∂p, constitute Hotelling’s lemma, the analog to Shephard’s lemma for the cost and expenditure functions.
In: Economics
Potential Answers :
A.
| 1) -$645,656; 2) -$661,653; 3) Buy |
B.
| 1) -$591,793; 2) -$661,653; 3) Buy |
|
C. |
1) -$591,793; 2) -$550,952; 3) Lease |
D.
| 1) -$607,696; 2) -$550,952; 3) Lease |
An equipment costs $1,000,000, the loan rate on the equipment is 10%, and the marginal tax rate is 40%. Assume that the equipment will have 3-year MACRS life but will be used for four years (with the annual depreciation rates of 33.33% the first year, 44.5% the second year, 14.75% the third year, and 7.5% the fourth year). If the company borrows and buys, assume that it can obtain a maintenance contract at a cost of $20,000 per year. The equipment will have a residual value of $ $200,000 at the end of year 4. Assume that the firm can lease the equipment, instead of borrowing and buying it, at a cost of $250,000 per year. Please answer the following questions: 1) What is the present value of the cost of owning? 2) What is the present value of the cost of leasing? 3) Should the firm buy or lease the equipment?
In: Finance
Module 2 Course Work
1. Read Pages 12-30.
2. Use the week 1 video's and this week's reading to complete Lab
1.
Lab 1
This week’s assignment must be done using Microsoft Access.
Please use this assignment as a rubric.
Cross-off each step as you complete
it.
In: Computer Science
how many 1/2 teaspoons of salt will dissolve in 1/2 cup room temp. water and how many in boiling water and why?
In: Chemistry
Types of Interview Questions
I. Getting Acquainted
1.
2.
II. Experience & Qualifications
1.
2.
III. About the Company
1.
2.
IV. About the Future
1.
2.
V. Challenging
1.
2.
VI. Situational
1.
2.
VII. Behavioral
1.
2.
VIII. Salary
1.
2.
IX. Asking your own question
1.
2.
In: Operations Management
Suppose the expenditure function is e(p, u) = p1 * p2 + 2p1^1/2 * p2^ 1/2 * u. Then ∂e/∂p1 (p, u) = p2 + (p2/p1)^1/2*u and ∂e/∂p2(p, u) = p1 + (p1/p2)^1/2*u
(a) Find the Hicksian demand function h(p, u).
(b) Find the indirect utility function v(p,w) (this should be a function of w, p1, and p2).
(c) Find the demand function x(p, w). Are goods 1 and 2 substitutes or complements?
In: Economics
Wilfley and colleagues (2008) tested whether the antiobesity drug sibutramine would be an effective treatment for people with binge eating disorder. They measured the frequency of binge eating every 2 weeks for 24 weeks during treatment. The following table lists a portion of the data similar to results reported by the authors for the frequency of binge eating over the first 8 weeks of the drug treatment.
| Frequency of Binge Eating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 6 | Week 8 |
| 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
(a) Complete the F-table. (Round your answers to two decimal places.)
|
Source of Variation |
SS | df | MS | Fobt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Between groups |
||||
| Between persons |
||||
| Within groups (error) |
||||
| Total |
Make a decision to retain or reject the null hypothesis. (Assume
experimentwise alpha equal to 0.05.)
Retain the null hypothesis.Reject the null hypothesis.
(b) Use the Bonferroni procedure to make the post hoc test. In
which week do we first see significant differences compared to
baseline?
Week 2 is the first week where significant differences from baseline are evident.Week 4 is the first week where significant differences from baseline are evident. Week 6 is the first week where significant differences from baseline are evident.Week 8 is the first week where significant differences from baseline are evident.None of the weeks are significantly different from the baseline.
In: Statistics and Probability