Smoky Mountain Corporation makes two types of hiking
boots—Xtreme and the Pathfinder. Data concerning these two product
lines appear below:
|
Xtreme |
Pathfinder |
||||||
|
Selling price per unit |
$ |
138.00 |
$ |
90.00 |
|||
|
Direct materials per unit |
$ |
64.40 |
$ |
51.00 |
|||
|
Direct labor per unit |
$ |
13.50 |
$ |
9.00 |
|||
|
Direct labor-hours per unit |
1.5 |
DLHs |
1.0 |
DLHs |
|||
|
Estimated annual production and sales |
22,000 |
units |
73,000 |
units |
|||
The company has a traditional costing system in which manufacturing
overhead is applied to units based on direct labor-hours. Data
concerning manufacturing overhead and direct labor-hours for the
upcoming year appear below:
|
Estimated total manufacturing overhead |
$ |
2,438,000 |
||
|
Estimated total direct labor-hours |
106,000 |
DLHs |
||
Required:
1. Compute the product margins for the Xtreme and the Pathfinder products under the company’s traditional costing system. (Do not round your intermediate calculations.)
|
2. The company is considering replacing its traditional costing system with an activity-based costing system that would assign its manufacturing overhead to the following four activity cost pools (the Other cost pool includes organization-sustaining costs and idle capacity costs):
|
Estimated |
Activity |
||||||||||||
|
Activities and Activity Measures |
Overhead Cost |
Xtreme |
Pathfinder |
Total |
|||||||||
|
Supporting direct labor (direct labor-hours) |
$ |
646,600 |
33,000 |
73,000 |
106,000 |
||||||||
|
Batch setups (setups) |
969,000 |
330 |
240 |
570 |
|||||||||
|
Product sustaining (number of products) |
780,000 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|||||||||
|
Other |
42,400 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|||||||||
|
Total manufacturing overhead cost |
$ |
2,438,000 |
|||||||||||
Compute the product margins for the Xtreme and the Pathfinder
products under the activity-based costing system. (Negative
product margins should be indicated with a minus sign. Round your
intermediate calculations to 2 decimal places.)
|
In: Accounting
Please provide a step by step solution
Key the names in indexing order using the ARMA rules. In the upper right corner of each card, key the corresponding number for each name
In: Operations Management
Work in Process Account Data for Two Months; Cost of Production Reports
Pittsburgh Aluminum Company uses a process cost system to record
the costs of manufacturing rolled aluminum, which consists of the
smelting and rolling processes. Materials are entered from smelting
at the beginning of the rolling process. The inventory of Work in
Process—Rolling on September 1 and debits to the account during
September were as follows:
| Bal., 2,600 units, ¼ completed: | ||
| Direct materials (2,600 x $15.50) | $40,300 | |
| Conversion (2,600 x ¼ x $8.50) | 5,525 | |
| $45,825 | ||
| From Smelting Department, 28,900 units | $462,400 | |
| Direct labor | 158,920 | |
| Factory overhead | 101,402 | |
During September, 2,600 units in process on September 1 were completed, and of the 28,900 units entering the department, all were completed except 2,900 units that were 4/5 completed.
Charges to Work in Process—Rolling for October were as
follows:
| From Smelting Department, 31,000 units | $511,500 |
| Direct labor | 162,850 |
| Factory overhead | 104,494 |
During October, the units in process at the beginning of the month were completed, and of the 31,000 units entering the department, all were completed except 2,000 units that were 2/5 completed.
Required:
2. Provide the same information for October by recording the October transactions in the four-column work in process account. Construct a cost of production report, and present the October computations (a through d) listed in part (1). If an amount box does not require an entry, leave it blank.
| ACCOUNT | Work in Process-Rolling Department | ACCOUNT NO. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance | ||||||
| DATE | ITEM | POST. REF. | DEBIT | CREDIT | DEBIT | CREDIT |
| Oct. 1 | Balance | |||||
| Oct. 31 | Smelting Dept., 31,000 units at $16.50/unit | |||||
| Oct. 31 | Direct labor | |||||
| Oct. 31 | Factory overhead | |||||
| Oct. 31 | Finished goods | |||||
| Oct. 31 | Bal., 2,000 units, 2/5 completed | |||||
If an amount is zero, enter in a zero "0". Round cost per unit answers to the nearest cent.
| Pittsburgh Aluminum Company Cost of Production Report-Rolling Department For the Month Ended October 31 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Units | Equivalent Units | ||
| Units | Direct Materials (a) | Conversion (a) | |
| Units charged to production: | |||
| Inventory in process, October 1 | |||
| Received from Smelting Department | |||
| Total units accounted for by the Rolling Department | |||
| Units to be assigned costs: | |||
| Inventory in process, October 1 | |||
| Started and completed in October | |||
| Transferred to finished goods in October | |||
| Inventory in process, October 31 | |||
| Total units to be assigned costs | |||
| Costs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Costs | Direct Materials | Conversion | Total Costs | |||||||||
| Cost per equivalent unit: | ||||||||||||
| Total costs for October in Rolling Department | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Total equivalent units | ||||||||||||
| Cost per equivalent unit (b) | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Costs assigned to production: | ||||||||||||
| Inventory in process, October 1 | $ | |||||||||||
| Costs incurred in October | ||||||||||||
| Total costs accounted for by the Rolling Department | $ | |||||||||||
| Costs allocated to completed and partially completed units: | ||||||||||||
| Inventory in process, October 1 balance (c) | $ | |||||||||||
| To complete inventory in process, October 1 (c) | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Cost of completed October 1 work in process | $ | |||||||||||
| Started and completed in October (c) | ||||||||||||
| Transferred to finished goods in October (c) | $ | |||||||||||
| Inventory in process, October 31 (d) | ||||||||||||
| Total costs assigned by the Rolling Department | $ | |||||||||||
In: Accounting
White Diamond Flour Company manufactures flour by a series of three processes, beginning with wheat grain being introduced in the Milling Department. From the Milling Department, the materials pass through the Sifting and Packaging departments, emerging as packaged refined flour.
The balance in the account Work in Process-Sifting Department was as follows on July 1:
| Work in Process-Sifting Department | |
| (900 units, 3/5 completed): | |
| Direct materials (900 × $2.05) | $1,845 |
| Conversion (900 × 3/5 × $0.40) | 216 |
| $2,061 | |
The following costs were charged to Work in Process-Sifting Department during July:
| Direct materials transferred from Milling Department: | |
| 15,700 units at $2.15 a unit | $33,755 |
| Direct labor | 4,420 |
| Factory overhead | 2,708 |
During July, 15,500 units of flour were completed. Work in Process-Sifting Department on July 31 was 1,100 units, 4/5 completed.
| Required: | |
| 1. | Prepare a cost of production report for the Sifting Department for July. If an amount is zero, enter "0". Round your cost per unit answers to the nearest cent. |
| 2. | Journalize the entries for costs transferred from Milling to Sifting and the costs transferred from Sifting to Packaging. Refer to the chart of accounts for the exact wording of the account titles. CNOW journals do not use lines for spaces or journal explanations. Every line on a journal page is used for debit or credit entries. Do not add explanations or skip a line between journal entries. CNOW journals will automatically indent a credit entry when a credit amount is entered. Use the date July 31 for all journal entries. |
| 3. | Determine the increase or decrease in the cost per equivalent unit from June to July for direct materials and conversion costs. Round your answers to the nearest cent. |
| 4. | Discuss the uses of the cost of production report and the results of part (3). |
| WHITE DIAMOND FLOUR COMPANY | |||
| Cost of Production Report-Sifting Department | |||
| For the Month Ended July 31 | |||
| UNITS | Whole Units | Equivalent Units | |
| Direct Materials | Conversion | ||
| Units charged to production: | |||
| Inventory in process, July 1 | |||
| Received from Milling Department | |||
| Total units accounted for by the Sifting Department | |||
| Units to be assigned costs: | |||
| Inventory in process, July 1 (3/5 completed) | |||
| Started and completed in July | |||
| Transferred to Packaging Department in July | |||
| Inventory in process, July 31 (4/5 completed) | |||
| Total units to be assigned costs | |||
Points:
17 / 18
Feedback
Check My Work
1. Calculate equivalent units for direct materials and conversion costs.
| COSTS | Costs | ||
| Direct Materials | Conversion | Total | |
| Cost per equivalent unit: | |||
| Total costs for July in Sifting Department | |||
| Total equivalent units | ÷ | ÷ | |
| Cost per equivalent unit | |||
| Costs assigned to production: | |||
| Inventory in process, July 1 | |||
| Costs incurred in July | |||
| Total costs accounted for by the Sifting Department | |||
| Costs allocated to completed and partially completed units: | |||
| Inventory in process, July 1-balance | |||
| To complete inventory in process, July 1 | |||
| Cost of completed July 1 work in process | |||
| Started and completed in July | |||
| Transferred to Packaging Department in July | |||
| Inventory in process, July 31 | |||
| Total costs assigned by the Sifting Department | |||
In: Accounting
| Cost Accounting Project Part I Template | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project Part I | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | An overview of the job-costing system is: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | Budgeted manufacturing overhead divided by allocation base: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| a. | Machining Department: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| b. | Finishing Department: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Show work | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | Machining Department overhead | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Finishing Department overhead | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total manufacturing overhead allocated | $0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | Total costs of Job 431: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Direct costs: | Show work | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Direct materials | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Machining Department | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Finishing Department | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Direct manufacturing labor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Machining Department | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Finishing Department | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indirect costs: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Machining Department overhead | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Finishing Department overhead | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total costs | $0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The per-unit product cost of Job 431 is | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Machining | Finishing | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Manufacturing overhead incurred (actual) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Manufacturing overhead allocated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Machining | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Finishing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Underallocated manufacturing overhead | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overallocated manufacturing overhead | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total overallocated overhead = | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Clear View is a manufacturer of custom windows and uses a job-costing system at its Orlando, FL plant. The plant has a machining department and a finishing department. Clear View uses normal costing with two direct-cost categories (direct materials and direct manufacturing labor) and two manufacturing overhead cost pools (the machining department with machine-hours as the allocation base and the finishing department with direct manufacturing labor costs as the allocation base). The 2014 budget for the plant is as follows:
Prepare an overview diagram of Clear View's job-costing system. What is the budgeted manufacturing overhead rate in the machining department? In the finishing department? During the month of January, the job-cost record for Job 431 shows the following:
Compute the total manufacturing overhead cost allocated to Job 431. Assuming that Job 431 consisted of 300 units of product, what is the cost per unit? Amounts at the end of 2014 are as follows:
Compute the under- or overallocated manufacturing overhead for each department and for the Dover plant as a whole. Why might Clear View use two different manufacturing overhead cost pools in its job-costing system? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In: Accounting
1.
Direct Materials Purchases Budget
Pasadena Candle Inc. budgeted production of 785,000 candles for January. Wax is required to produce a candle. Assume 10 ounces of wax is required for each candle. The estimated January 1 wax inventory is 16,000 pounds. The desired January 31 wax inventory is 12,500 pounds. If candle wax costs $1.24 per pound, determine the direct materials purchases budget for January. (One pound = 16 ounces.) For those boxes in which you must enter subtracted or negative numbers use a minus sign.
| Pasadena Candle Inc. | |
| Direct Materials Purchases Budget | |
| For the Month Ending January 31 | |
| Pounds of wax required for production: | |
| Candles | |
| Desired ending inventory, January 31 | |
| Total units available | |
| Estimated beginning inventory, January 1 | |
| Total pounds to be purchased | |
| Unit price (per lb.) | |
| Total direct materials to be purchased in January | |
2.
Pasadena Candle Inc. budgeted production of 785,000 candles for January. Each candle requires molding. Assume that six minutes are required to mold each candle. If molding labor costs $18 per hour, determine the direct labor cost budget for January. Wax is required to produce a candle. Assume 487,125 pounds of material will be purchased during January. The candle wax costs $1.24 per pound.
Prepare a cost of goods sold budget for Pasadena Candle Inc. using the information above. Assume the estimated inventories on January 1 for finished goods and work in process were $200,000 and $41,250, respectively and direct materials wax inventory of 16,000 pounds. Also assume the desired inventories on January 31 for finished goods and work in process were $120,000 and $28,500, respectively and direct materials wax inventory of 12,500 pounds. Factory overhead was budgeted at $300,000. For those boxes in which you must enter subtracted or negative numbers use a minus sign.
| Pasadena Candle Inc. | |||
| Cost of Goods Sold Budget | |||
| For the Month Ending January 31 | |||
| Finished goods inventory, January 1 | |||
| Work in process inventory, January 1 | |||
| Direct materials: | |||
| Direct materials inventory, January 1 | |||
| Direct materials purchases | |||
| Cost of direct materials available for use | |||
| Direct materials inventory, January 31 | |||
| Cost of direct materials placed in production | |||
| Direct labor | |||
| Factory overhead | |||
| Total manufacturing costs | |||
| Total work in process during period | |||
| Work in process inventory, January 31 | |||
| Cost of goods manufactured | |||
| Cost of finished goods available for sale | |||
| Finished goods inventory, January 31 | |||
| Cost of goods sold | |||
In: Accounting
Question 3 (Total: 25 marks)
Sikawan Systems manufactures two products in its Sabah division. Traditionally the company has used an overhead absorption system based on machine hours. However, following a management consultancy exercise in which outside consultants reviewed the management information systems, the directors have decided to pilot an Activity Based Costing system at the Sabah division. For the coming year, 2021, Sabah’s production overheads are estimated as follows:
|
RM |
|
|
Factory rent and rates |
42,200 |
|
Heat and light to factory |
23,950 |
|
Factory insurance |
7,100 |
|
Supervisory salaries |
38,540 |
|
Other indirect labour |
18,030 |
|
Canteen charges |
6,100 |
|
Machinery depreciation |
18,000 |
|
Machinery maintenance |
5,520 |
|
Production consumable (e.g. machine oil) |
2,050 |
|
Other factory costs |
7,480 |
|
TOTAL |
168,970 |
Following a detailed review of the production processes, the finance director and the divisional accountant identify a set of key cost drivers, together with cost allocations to each, and estimates of the relevant quantities involved for products A and B in the 2021 financial year:
|
Activity |
Cost driver |
Total |
Product A |
Product B |
Total cost per cost driver RM |
|
Planned units of production |
6,000 |
5,000 |
|||
|
Machining |
Machine hours |
11,000 |
6,000 |
5,000 |
63,030 |
|
Assembly |
Labour hours |
9,000 |
3,000 |
6,000 |
43,020 |
|
Packing |
Labour hours |
4,000 |
2,000 |
2,000 |
31,000 |
|
Materials ordering |
No. of orders |
111 |
86 |
25 |
9,990 |
|
Materials issues |
No. of issues |
150 |
103 |
47 |
12,000 |
|
Machine set up |
No. of hours used in set up |
33 |
25 |
8 |
5,940 |
|
Quality inspection |
No. of inspection |
35 |
10 |
25 |
3,990 |
|
TOTAL |
168,970 |
Each planned unit of production of both product A and product B uses one machine hour. One unit of A has a prime cost of RM12.50, while one unit of B has a prime cost of RM16.
Required:
a) Calculate the overhead absorption rate based on the company’s traditional system of using machine hours as a basis for overhead absorption.
b) Calculate the overhead per unit of product A and product B using the data provided for the new Activity Based Costing system.
c) Calculate the production cost of one unit of product A and one unit of product B under both the old and the new costing systems.
d) Comment on the difference between the production costs for each product under the old and the new costing systems.
In: Accounting
Question 3 – Better Than That, Co. provides the following information:
|
Job J1 |
Job L5 |
Job T2 |
||||||||||
|
Balances on October 31 |
: |
|||||||||||
|
Direct materials |
$ |
0 |
$ |
0 |
$ 19,500 |
|||||||
|
Direct labor |
0 |
0 |
$6,850 |
|||||||||
|
Applied overhead |
0 |
0 |
$8,220 |
|||||||||
|
Costs during November: |
||||||||||||
|
Direct materials |
56,400 |
101,800 |
$ |
72,100 |
||||||||
|
Direct labor |
22,550 |
45,600 |
28,700 |
|||||||||
|
Applied overhead |
? |
? |
? |
|||||||||
|
Status on November 30 |
In process |
Finished (sold) |
Finished (unsold) |
|||||||||
In: Accounting
Question 3 – Better Than That, Co. provides the following information:
|
Job J1 |
Job L5 |
Job T2 |
||||||||||
|
Balances on October 31 |
: |
|||||||||||
|
Direct materials |
$ |
0 |
$ |
0 |
$ 19,500 |
|||||||
|
Direct labor |
0 |
0 |
$6,850 |
|||||||||
|
Applied overhead |
0 |
0 |
$8,220 |
|||||||||
|
Costs during November: |
||||||||||||
|
Direct materials |
56,400 |
101,800 |
$ |
72,100 |
||||||||
|
Direct labor |
22,550 |
45,600 |
28,700 |
|||||||||
|
Applied overhead |
? |
? |
? |
|||||||||
|
Status on November 30 |
In process |
Finished (sold) |
Finished (unsold) |
|||||||||
(I only need c,d, & e answered)
In: Accounting
Required information
[The following information applies to the questions
displayed below.]
Trico Company set the following standard unit costs for its single
product.
| Direct materials (30 Ibs. @ $5.10 per Ib.) | $ | 153.00 |
| Direct labor (6 hrs. @ $15 per hr.) | 90.00 | |
| Factory overhead—variable (6 hrs. @ $7 per hr.) | 42.00 | |
| Factory overhead—fixed (6 hrs. @ $11 per hr.) | 66.00 | |
| Total standard cost | $ | 351.00 |
The predetermined overhead rate is based on a planned operating
volume of 80% of the productive capacity of 56,000 units per
quarter. The following flexible budget information is
available.
| Operating Levels | ||||||
| 70% | 80% | 90% | ||||
| Production in units | 39,200 | 44,800 | 50,400 | |||
| Standard direct labor hours | 235,200 | 268,800 | 302,400 | |||
| Budgeted overhead | ||||||
| Fixed factory overhead | $ | 2,956,800 | $ | 2,956,800 | $ | 2,956,800 |
| Variable factory overhead | $ | 1,646,400 | $ | 1,881,600 | $ | 2,116,800 |
During the current quarter, the company operated at 90% of capacity
and produced 50,400 units of product; actual direct labor totaled
299,400 hours. Units produced were assigned the following standard
costs.
| Direct materials (1,512,000 Ibs. @ $5.10 per Ib.) | $ | 7,711,200 |
| Direct labor (302,400 hrs. @ $15 per hr.) | 4,536,000 | |
| Factory overhead (302,400 hrs. @ $18 per hr.) | 5,443,200 | |
| Total standard cost | $ | 17,690,400 |
Actual costs incurred during the current quarter follow.
| Direct materials (1,499,000 Ibs. @ $6.30 per lb.) | $ | 9,443,700 |
| Direct labor (299,400 hrs. @ $12.50 per hr.) | 3,742,500 | |
| Fixed factory overhead costs | 2,604,700 | |
| Variable factory overhead costs | 2,438,500 | |
| Total actual costs | $ | 18,229,400 |
(a) Compute the variable overhead spending and
efficiency variances. (Round "cost per unit" and "rate per
hour" answers to 2 decimal places.)
AH = Actual Hours
SH = Standard Hours
AVR = Actual Variable Rate
SVR = Standard Variable Rate
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(b) Compute the fixed overhead spending and
volume variances. (Round "cost per unit" and "rate per
hour" answers to 2 decimal places.)
AH = Actual Hours
SH = Standard Hours
AFR = Actual Fixed Rate
SFR = Standard Fixed Rate
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(c) Compute the total overhead controllable variance.
|
||||||||||||||||
In: Accounting