1. The auditor's responsibility section of the standard unmodified opinion audit report under US GAAS states:
a) that the audit is designed to obtain reasonable assurance as to whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement whether due to fraud or error
b) that the procedures performed were specified by generally accepted auditing standards
c) that the financial statement audit includes procedures sufficient to express an opinion on whether the company's internal control over financial reporting is effective
d)all of the above
2. The standard unmodified opinion audit report under US GAAS must include the name of the audit partner responsible for issuing the audit report
True False
3. Which of the following are required to be included in an audit report under the Standards of the PCAOB?
a) the name of the audit partner responsible for the audit
b) the signature of the audit firm that issued the audit report
c) a statement that the firm is a member of the AICPA
d) all of the above
4. Which of the following statements regarding internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) for US public companies are correct?
a) management of all US public companies must assess and report on the effectiveness of their ICFR
b) certain of the largest US public companies must engage their auditor to audit and report on the effectiveness of the companies' ICFR
c) PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 5 requires that the audit of internal control be integrated with the audit of the financial statements
d) all of the above
5. The auditor identified a misstatement in the financial statements that was material but not pervasive. If management fails to correct the misstatement, the auditor's report on those financial statements should include:
a) a qualified opinion
b) an adverse opinion
c) a disclaimer of opinion
d) none of the above: the auditor is required to withdraw from the audit engagement
6. The auditor was unable to audit a portion of the financial statements that was very highly material. If the audit client insists that the auditor issue a report on those financial statements, the auditor should
a) qualify the opinion for a scope limitation
b) disclaim an opinion because of a scope limitation
c) qualify the opinion for a departure from GAAP
d) issue an unqualified opinion on the financial statements with an extra paragraph describing the reasons for the scope limitation
In: Accounting
Hydraulics & Hydrology
Problem Statement
The Romans were exquisite water engineers, and that without having at their disposal the modern tools and the knowledge we have today. Remember that Hydraulics and Hydrology as we know it now only came to be in the 1700’ when engineers started to put a fundamental framework together that is/was based on lab experiments and theoretical approaches and principles. Until then, you just “knew”. The Romans build all sorts of hydraulic systems, from irrigation canals, to water supply infrastructure, to the famed “hot baths” of Rome, to sewer systems, you name it. They realized that if you want water for different purposes at locations that were important to you that very often you had to get the water there because it just was not available in close proximity.
One of the marvelous feats they accomplished was to build water supply systems that would run over dozens of miles to convey water from sources to locations of need, typically the towns and cities they founded in their vast empire. They managed to do so by building a lot of infrastructure that withstood time and that, almost 2000 years later, is still in place for us to marvel at. Especially the many bridges that were built to cross valleys and gorges to keep the supply line flowing as an open channel are spectacular in their construction, such as the Pont du Gard, Segovia, and Aquila aqueducts.
Task:
In: Civil Engineering
Case Study – Does a Turtle Have More Rights Than a Human?
Resolving Controversial Environmental Issues
As you have learned in the first chapter, you need to identify the issue, conclusion, and reasons when reading an article. Identifying the argument in the following essay will help you better understand and evaluate it.
Ethical norms are ideas that guide our behavior. Everyone generally agrees that ethical norms are positive ways of behaving. Some examples of ethical norms are honest, cooperation, and individual responsibility. If I ask you, “Do you value honesty?” you would probably say “yes.” If I ask you, “Do you value loyalty?” you would probably say “yes.” But how do you behave when those ethical norms conflict? For example, you discover that your best friend, who is also your co-worker, is stealing money from your boss. If you are loyal to your friend, you cannot also be honest to your boss. Which ethical norm guides your behavior?
Ethical norms often conflict in the law. Four ethical norms that often arise in legal controversies are freedom, justice, security, and efficiency. Try to think of more ethical norms that might guide you thinking. When you read an article, you should try to identify the ethical norms that are guiding the authors thinking. This task is difficult because the author typically will not tell you his or her ethical norm preferences. Consequently, you must infer the preferences through the reasons. Can you identify which ethical norms seem to be present in the reasons and conclusion provided in the following editorial? Which ethical norm is in conflict with the authors preferred ethical norm?
Does a Turtle Have More Rights Than a Human?
Who should be allowed to bring a case in a court of law? One might respond with the following simple answer: Anyone who has been wronged. Environmentalists claim that when environmental wrongs occur, it is often difficult for those who have been wronged to bring a case because of a perceived lack of legal standing – the legal right to bring a lawsuit.
However, environmentalists actually have had an advantage in lawsuits. Environmental groups have been permitted to file lawsuits alleging underenforcement of the Endangered Species Act (ESA); in contrast, property owners could not file suit against overzealous regulation. Environmental groups had standing whereas property owners did not. Imagine a scenario in which an individual’s property use is restricted because of an endangered species living on the property. Who seems most directly injured – the property owner or the environmental group? The proper owner, of course. Yet the property owner has been unable to bring a suit against the overzealous regulation.
Luckily, the Supreme Court has rectified this unfair situation. A recent ruling gives legal standing to people with an economic stake in land and water restrictions that allegedly protect endangered species. It is about time we give legal protection to those who are truly harmed.
After all, courts have now offered legal standing to animals protected by the ESA. For ex., turtles have been successful plaintiffs in cases. Furthermore, some environmentalists claim that legal rights should be extended to forests, oceans, and rivers. We should not even consider extending rights to inanimate objects until all people have rights. Why should a river have more rights than a property owner? A person’s rights must come before the perceived concern of a river or a lake.
I argue that the Supreme Court made the right decision by allowing property owners to bring cases against overregulation. Most environmental laws are like the ESA in the sense that they allow citizens to bring suits. The Supreme Court ruling should allow property owners to bring suits under these other environmental laws. Environmental protection has gone too far when a turtle has more rights than a person. Let us not lower the protections for people while raising the protections for animals and inanimate objects.
Question: 4. Do you think the turtle (or more appropriately the Environmental group representing the turtle) could argue legal standing? Explain your answer.
In: Economics
Case Study – Does a Turtle Have More Rights Than a Human?
Resolving Controversial Environmental Issues
As you have learned in the first chapter, you need to identify the issue, conclusion, and reasons when reading an article. Identifying the argument in the following essay will help you better understand and evaluate it.
Ethical norms are ideas that guide our behavior. Everyone generally agrees that ethical norms are positive ways of behaving. Some examples of ethical norms are honest, cooperation, and individual responsibility. If I ask you, “Do you value honesty?” you would probably say “yes.” If I ask you, “Do you value loyalty?” you would probably say “yes.” But how do you behave when those ethical norms conflict? For example, you discover that your best friend, who is also your co-worker, is stealing money from your boss. If you are loyal to your friend, you cannot also be honest to your boss. Which ethical norm guides your behavior?
Ethical norms often conflict in the law. Four ethical norms that often arise in legal controversies are freedom, justice, security, and efficiency. Try to think of more ethical norms that might guide you thinking. When you read an article, you should try to identify the ethical norms that are guiding the authors thinking. This task is difficult because the author typically will not tell you his or her ethical norm preferences. Consequently, you must infer the preferences through the reasons. Can you identify which ethical norms seem to be present in the reasons and conclusion provided in the following editorial? Which ethical norm is in conflict with the authors preferred ethical norm?
Does a Turtle Have More Rights Than a Human?
Who should be allowed to bring a case in a court of law? One might respond with the following simple answer: Anyone who has been wronged. Environmentalists claim that when environmental wrongs occur, it is often difficult for those who have been wronged to bring a case because of a perceived lack of legal standing – the legal right to bring a lawsuit.
However, environmentalists actually have had an advantage in lawsuits. Environmental groups have been permitted to file lawsuits alleging underenforcement of the Endangered Species Act (ESA); in contrast, property owners could not file suit against overzealous regulation. Environmental groups had standing whereas property owners did not. Imagine a scenario in which an individual’s property use is restricted because of an endangered species living on the property. Who seems most directly injured – the property owner or the environmental group? The proper owner, of course. Yet the property owner has been unable to bring a suit against the overzealous regulation.
Luckily, the Supreme Court has rectified this unfair situation. A recent ruling gives legal standing to people with an economic stake in land and water restrictions that allegedly protect endangered species. It is about time we give legal protection to those who are truly harmed.
After all, courts have now offered legal standing to animals protected by the ESA. For ex., turtles have been successful plaintiffs in cases. Furthermore, some environmentalists claim that legal rights should be extended to forests, oceans, and rivers. We should not even consider extending rights to inanimate objects until all people have rights. Why should a river have more rights than a property owner? A person’s rights must come before the perceived concern of a river or a lake.
I argue that the Supreme Court made the right decision by allowing property owners to bring cases against overregulation. Most environmental laws are like the ESA in the sense that they allow citizens to bring suits. The Supreme Court ruling should allow property owners to bring suits under these other environmental laws. Environmental protection has gone too far when a turtle has more rights than a person. Let us not lower the protections for people while raising the protections for animals and inanimate objects.
Question:
3. Which ethical norm seems to conflict with the author’s preferred ethical norm?
In: Economics
Case Study – Does a Turtle Have More Rights Than a Human?
Resolving Controversial Environmental Issues
Ethical norms often conflict in the law. Four ethical norms that often arise in legal controversies are freedom, justice, security, and efficiency. Try to think of more ethical norms that might guide you thinking. When you read an article, you should try to identify the ethical norms that are guiding the authors thinking. This task is difficult because the author typically will not tell you his or her ethical norm preferences. Consequently, you must infer the preferences through the reasons. Can you identify which ethical norms seem to be present in the reasons and conclusion provided in the following editorial? Which ethical norm is in conflict with the authors preferred ethical norm?
Does a Turtle Have More Rights Than a Human?
Who should be allowed to bring a case in a court of law? One might respond with the following simple answer: Anyone who has been wronged. Environmentalists claim that when environmental wrongs occur, it is often difficult for those who have been wronged to bring a case because of a perceived lack of legal standing – the legal right to bring a lawsuit.
However, environmentalists actually have had an advantage in lawsuits. Environmental groups have been permitted to file lawsuits alleging underenforcement of the Endangered Species Act (ESA); in contrast, property owners could not file suit against overzealous regulation. Environmental groups had standing whereas property owners did not. Imagine a scenario in which an individual’s property use is restricted because of an endangered species living on the property. Who seems most directly injured – the property owner or the environmental group? The proper owner, of course. Yet the property owner has been unable to bring a suit against the overzealous regulation.
Luckily, the Supreme Court has rectified this unfair situation. A recent ruling gives legal standing to people with an economic stake in land and water restrictions that allegedly protect endangered species. It is about time we give legal protection to those who are truly harmed.
After all, courts have now offered legal standing to animals protected by the ESA. For ex., turtles have been successful plaintiffs in cases. Furthermore, some environmentalists claim that legal rights should be extended to forests, oceans, and rivers. We should not even consider extending rights to inanimate objects until all people have rights. Why should a river have more rights than a property owner? A person’s rights must come before the perceived concern of a river or a lake.
I argue that the Supreme Court made the right decision by allowing property owners to bring cases against overregulation. Most environmental laws are like the ESA in the sense that they allow citizens to bring suits. The Supreme Court ruling should allow property owners to bring suits under these other environmental laws. Environmental protection has gone too far when a turtle has more rights than a person. Let us not lower the protections for people while raising the protections for animals and inanimate objects.
Question:
2. Identify the ethical norm guiding the author’s thinking.
In: Economics
Evaluate the proper accounting for transactions with respect to interim and segment reporting using the accounting codification and other accounting research tools.
Scenario
CM Corporation (CMC) was founded six years ago by Phil Connor and Eric Martin. The company designs, installs, and services security systems for high-tech companies. The founders, who describe themselves as "entrepreneurial geeks," met in a computer lab when they were teenagers and found they had common interests in working on security systems for critical industries. CMC hired you as a junior accountant this year.
Lately, Connor and Martin have been working with "radio frequency identification" (RFID) technology. They have developed a detailed system designed to track inventory items using RFID tags embedded invisibly in products. This technology has numerous inventory applications in multiple industries.
One of the most basic applications is tracking manufacturing components; if tagged components "go walking" (if employees attempt to take them), companies can easily track and find them. Connor and Martin have sold their system to several high-tech companies in the area. These companies have a number of government contracts that require extensive security systems to protect sensitive data from infiltration by terrorists and others. To date, CMC's cash flow from sales and services has adequately funded its operations.
CMC expects much growth potential for its products. As a result, they are considering going public and expanding internationally in the near future. Many of the issues you will address in this course project involve researching topics involving these anticipated events.
Instructions
Connor and Martin have heard that IFRS is used internationally for financial statements, but they know very little about it. Since they will most likely be going public and expanding internationally in the near future, they are considering switching to IFRS from GAAP and would like more information. They also realize if they go public and expand their business, they will have to deal with some issues they have not had to deal with previously, such as interim and segment reporting. Prepare a research memorandum for Connor and Martin addressing their questions below:
What are the similarities between GAAP and IFRS?
What are the major differences between GAAP and IFRS?
What are the requirements for interim reporting under both GAAP and IFRS?
Are there any problems or issues associated with interim reporting?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of providing segmented reporting?
What are the requirements for segment reporting under both GAAP and IFRS? Include the definition of an operating segment.
Memorandum Mechanics should be as follows:
The body of the memorandum should be a professional presentation centered on clear and concise writing. The responses to the questions should be detailed, well researched, and specifically related to CMC's industry.
Use the FASB Codification and IFRS to address all technical accounting issues presented in the questions, being certain to reference the applicable sections of the Codification and IFRS in your report. You may quote directly from the Codification and IFRS as long as all direct quotes are included in quotation marks.
Any other sources used to support your responses should similarly be properly documented. You should have other credible sources in addition to the Codification and IFRS.
For the ASC FASB Codification content, please reference asc.fasb.org.
For the Authoritative IFRS standards content, please reference eifrs.ifrs.org.
In: Accounting
Co-dominance, Multiple Alleles, and Sex-linkage
In: Biology
“I know headquarters wants us to add that new product line,” said Dell Havasi, manager of Billings Company’s Office Products Division. “But I want to see the numbers before I make any move. Our division’s return on investment (ROI) has led the company for three years, and I don’t want any letdown.”
Billings Company is a decentralized wholesaler with five autonomous divisions. The divisions are evaluated on the basis of ROI, with year-end bonuses given to the divisional managers who have the highest ROIs. Operating results for the company’s Office Products Division for this year are given below:
| Sales | $ | 21,100,000 |
| Variable expenses | 13,350,400 | |
| Contribution margin | 7,749,600 | |
| Fixed expenses | 5,935,000 | |
| Net operating income | $ | 1,814,600 |
| Divisional average operating assets | $ | 4,220,000 |
The company had an overall return on investment (ROI) of 18.00% this year (considering all divisions). Next year the Office Products Division has an opportunity to add a new product line that would require an additional investment that would increase average operating assets by $2,262,500. The cost and revenue characteristics of the new product line per year would be:
| Sales | $9,050,000 |
| Variable expenses | 65% of sales |
| Fixed expenses | $2,534,000 |
Required
6. Suppose that the company’s minimum required rate of return on operating assets is 16% and that performance is evaluated using residual income.
a. Compute the Office Products Division’s residual income for this year.
b. Compute the Office Products Division’s residual income for the new product line by itself.
c. Compute the Office Products Division’s residual income for next year assuming that it performs the same as this year and adds the new product line.
d. Using the residual income approach, if you were in Dell Havasi’s position, would you accept or reject the new product line?
In: Accounting
“I know headquarters wants us to add that new product line,” said Dell Havasi, manager of Billings Company’s Office Products Division. “But I want to see the numbers before I make any move. Our division’s return on investment (ROI) has led the company for three years, and I don’t want any letdown.”
Billings Company is a decentralized wholesaler with five autonomous divisions. The divisions are evaluated on the basis of ROI, with year-end bonuses given to the divisional managers who have the highest ROIs. Operating results for the company’s Office Products Division for this year are given below:
| Sales | $ | 22,440,000 |
| Variable expenses | 14,094,600 | |
| Contribution margin | 8,345,400 | |
| Fixed expenses | 6,130,000 | |
| Net operating income | $ | 2,215,400 |
| Divisional average operating assets | $ | 4,480,000 |
The company had an overall return on investment (ROI) of 18.00% this year (considering all divisions). Next year the Office Products Division has an opportunity to add a new product line that would require an additional investment that would increase average operating assets by $2,430,600. The cost and revenue characteristics of the new product line per year would be:
| Sales | $9,705,000 |
| Variable expenses | 65% of sales |
| Fixed expenses | $2,591,710 |
6. Suppose that the company’s minimum required rate of return on operating assets is 15% and that performance is evaluated using residual income.
a. Compute the Office Products Division’s residual income for this year.
b. Compute the Office Products Division’s residual income for the new product line by itself.
c. Compute the Office Products Division’s residual income for next year assuming that it performs the same as this year and adds the new product line.
Show less
|
In: Accounting
“I know headquarters wants us to add that new product line,” said Dell Havasi, manager of Billings Company’s Office Products Division. “But I want to see the numbers before I make any move. Our division’s return on investment (ROI) has led the company for three years, and I don’t want any letdown.”
Billings Company is a decentralized wholesaler with five autonomous divisions. The divisions are evaluated on the basis of ROI, with year-end bonuses given to the divisional managers who have the highest ROIs. Operating results for the company’s Office Products Division for this year are given below:
| Sales | $ | 22,000,000 |
| Variable expenses | 13,500,000 | |
| Contribution margin | 8,500,000 | |
| Fixed expenses | 6,000,000 | |
| Net operating income | $ | 2,500,000 |
| Divisional average operating assets | $ | 4,443,500 |
The company had an overall return on investment (ROI) of 16.00% this year (considering all divisions). Next year the Office Products Division has an opportunity to add a new product line that would require an additional investment that would increase average operating assets by $2,289,300. The cost and revenue characteristics of the new product line per year would be:
| Sales | $9,155,000 |
| Variable expenses | 65% of sales |
| Fixed expenses | $2,543,950 |
6. Suppose that the company’s minimum required rate of return on operating assets is 13% and that performance is evaluated using residual income.
a. Compute the Office Products Division’s residual income for this year.
b. Compute the Office Products Division’s residual income for the new product line by itself.
c. Compute the Office Products Division’s residual income for next year assuming that it performs the same as this year and adds the new product line.
d. Using the residual income approach, if you were in Dell Havasi’s position, would you accept or reject the new product line?
In: Accounting