Chapter 2 HW P2-35A
The accounts of Cascade Consulting, Inc., follow with their normal balances at December 31, 2010. The accounts are listed in no particular order.
Prepare the company’s trial balance at December 31, 2010, listing accounts in the proper order. List the largest expense first, the second largest expense next, and so on.
|
Cascade Consulting Inc. Trial Balance Dec 31, 2010 |
||
|
Account |
Debit |
Credit |
|
Cash |
$8,300 |
|
|
Accounts Receivable |
$6,500 |
|
|
Land |
$24,000 |
|
|
Building |
$110,000 |
|
|
Accounts Payable |
$3,700 |
|
|
Notes Payable |
$76,000 |
|
|
Common Stock |
$65,000 |
|
|
Retained Earnings |
$9,700 |
|
|
Dividends |
$13,500 |
|
|
Service Revenues |
$83,000 |
|
|
Salary Expense |
$51,000 |
|
|
Rent Expense |
$12,800 |
|
|
Utilities Expense |
$6,400 |
|
|
Supplies Expense |
$3,200 |
|
|
Insurance Expense |
$1,700 |
|
|
Total |
$237,400 |
$237,400 |
Prepare the financial statements: income statement, statement of retained earnings, and balance sheet. The retained earnings balance of $9,700 is the beginning balance for the year; it has not been updated for the current year’s income or loss.
|
Cascade Consulting Inc. Income Statement For the year ended Dec 31 2010 |
||
|
Revenue (A) |
Amount $ |
Amount $ |
|
Service Revenues |
$83,000 |
|
|
Expenses (B) |
||
|
Salary Expense |
$51,000 |
|
|
Rent Expense |
$12,800 |
|
|
Utilities Expense |
$6,400 |
|
|
Supplies Expense |
$3,200 |
|
|
Insurance Expense |
$1,700 |
|
|
$75,100 |
||
|
Net Income (A)-(B) |
$7,900 |
|
Cascade Consulting Inc. Statement of Retained Earnings For the year ended Dec 31,2010 |
||
|
Particulars |
Amount $ |
Amount $ |
|
Retained Earnings at the beginning of year |
$9,700 |
|
|
Add: Net income for the current year |
$7,900 |
|
|
Subtotal |
$17,600 |
|
|
Less: Dividends |
$13,500 |
|
|
Retained Earnings at the end of the year |
$4,100 |
|
Balance |
Sheet |
||
|
Cash |
$8300 |
Accounts Payable |
$3,700 |
|
Accounts Receivable |
$6,500 |
Notes Payable |
$76,000 |
|
Supplies |
$400 |
Total Liabilities |
$79,700 |
|
Land |
$24,000 |
||
|
Building |
$110,000 |
||
|
Common Stock |
$65,000 |
||
|
Retained Earnings |
$9,700 |
||
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
$74,700 |
||
|
Total |
$149,200 |
Total Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity |
$154,400 |
I cannot figure out why the total and the total liabilities and stockholders Equity do not match up
In: Accounting
please properly paraphrase in your own words this paragraph ;
Technological Innovation
With refining the methods used of fossil fuel like coal or petroleum production to reduce and lessen the impact on climate , and biofuels, an important area of investigation and investment to be mentioned are new offshore wind parks (solar energy has been abandoned as a major R&D area in 2008). An offshore wind farm with a generation power of 108 MWh has been developed with energy provider company Nuon, which is 10 km west of the Dutch coast at Egmond aan Zee (5). Shells offshore has a lot of technical knowledge and background related with oil and gas platforms which helped ensuring the 115 tonne turbines to withstand the harshest weather.
New ways of Stakeholder Engagement
The company has started to create a close relationships with
their external stakeholders.This way communication of shell with
its stakeholder will help in maintaining conatcts with the academic
world, the governmental bodies like states department and NGO’s (
Non government organization) .
This relationships/Communication will provide
two-way information (informing NGOs about latest Shell related news
and guiding information of NGO into the Shell organisation). Shell
is also regulalry performing the impact assessments to see the
impact of this strategy and setting up engagements and involvement
with NGO’s and local communities to investigate check the impact of
new upstream and upcoming projects,so that sustainable cooperation
with local communities can be held . One of the example
is the project in the Arctic region which prooved to be very
successful and highly impacted the local communities . Corporating
with IUCN and Wetlands International, Shell is studying
implications of construction of new upstream projects on tundra and
permafrost environments and trying to analyse it overall and
generalized impacts . For this the convenient and Traditional
knowledge of Eskimos about ice seasons, whale and seal movements is
therefore very crucial. It helps Shell to plan better its offshore
production, not to disturb traditional fishing and hunting for the
sake of the sustainability .
In: Economics
Describe the “innovation environment” at Adobe systems during the time the Kick Box program was developed.
2. a. What are the most important elements of the kick box program?
b. How do they affect the participants’ abilities to learn about the ‘Intrapreneurship’ process and to launch new business concepts?
3. a. Should Adobe work to expand the reach of the Kickbox Program?
b.What re the benefits and potential risks of doing so?
c. How long should a program like this be continued?
4. Should Adobe change the way in which it supports and sustains high potential business concepts identified by the Kick Box process ?
5. How would you assess Adobe’s goals and ambitions for the Kick Box program overall?:
In: Computer Science
For incremental innovation, customers’ needs and wants are or can be known, hence more traditional marketing research methods can be used, such as surveys, focus groups, customer visits, and joint technology disclosures, etc. This is “easy” marketing way.
Opposed to this, for highly innovative products and services the needs and wants of potential customers are harder to pin down and clearly define, as customers themselves find it difficult to articulate them. Thus, non-traditional market research methods are required in this case involving probe-and-learn processes and customer-driven innovations.
in at least 300 words (probably taking more to fully address this situation) how you as a young member of a high technology product marketing group would convince other group members who are comprised of traditional marketiers regarding an all-new, highly innovative product, the engineering development team has suggested.
In: Economics
WIKIPEDIA, leverages technological innovation afforded by the Internet combined with a crowdsourcing approach to content development and maintenance. Beyond the technical challenges of web interfaces, servers, and bandwidth for delivery is a sometimes-overlooked capability: the Wikipedians themselves. Over 32 million people have registered accounts to contribute edits to Wikipedia. More than 300,000 users provide edits to the website at least once a month. These volunteers build the content for the site, using a creative commons license that ensures free access to any of the 500 million unique visitors each month. This crowdsourcing and its legal underpinnings are successful only as long as individuals are willing to spend their own time contributing to the site for no pay or other extrinsic benefits. The ability to attract and utilize legions of interested individuals is vital to the success of Wikipedia both today and into the future. Moreover, Wikipedia is a nonprofit, free-of-advertising social entrepreneurship venture that is exclusively financed by donations. Wikipedia runs regular calls for donations using slogans such as: “Please help us feed the servers,” “We make the Internet not suck. Help us out,” and “We are free, our bandwidth isn’t!” Calls for donations also come in the form of personal appeals by co-founder Jimmy Wales. The question arises whether the donation model is sustainable given not only the increasing demand for Wikipedia’s services, but also the emergence of competitors. Wikipedia might not be as error-prone in science topics as shown in the Nature study mentioned earlier, because most entries on Wikipedia are not about science. Wikipedia maintains that it fosters a “neutral point of view.” A recent research study tested this claim. In particular, a study of 28,000 articles about US politics revealed a significant bias. On average, Wikipedia entries lean left of center. Initial entries arrive with a slant, and change little over time. This bias is more pronounced in earlier Wikipedia articles. The authors call this the “vintage bias.” Although the degree of slant in Wikipedia articles changes little over time, more recent political entries are more balanced. One reason the authors put forth to explain the vintage effect is that in the early days of Wikipedia only technology enthusiasts and early adopters participated, and this demographic tends to lean left. The shift toward a more “neutral point of view” over the years has arisen from the growth of Wikipedia, bringing in the early and late majority as contributors. Questions
a. How can Wikipedia maintain and grow its ability to harness the crowdsourcing of its “Wikipedians” to maintain high-quality (and quickly updated) content?
b. As Wikipedia keeps growing, do you think it can continue to rely exclusively on donations (in time and money)? Why or why not? What other “business models” could be considered? Would any of those “violate the spirit of Wikipedia”? Why or why not?
c. What, if anything, should Wikipedia do to ensure that its articles indeed present a “neutral point of view”? Shouldn’t the crowdsourcing approach ensure objectivity? Does a “neutral point of view” matter to Wikipedia’s sustainability? Why or why not?
d. How has the “long tail” affected Wikipedia?
In: Operations Management
Week 7 Discussion
"The Necessity of building and Managing Innovation Networks" Please respond to the following:
Describe three methods of building a formal network and then discuss the benefits of each strategy. Next, discuss the formal network strategy you would utilize for your business model and explain the implications of this decision. Provide examples to support your rationale.
Discuss how you could utilize formal network structures to develop new products and services for an organization Next, evaluate two success factors that would contribute to the success of your new product development strategy. Provide support for your response.
In: Operations Management
WIKIPEDIA, leverages technological innovation afforded by the Internet combined with a crowdsourcing approach to content development and maintenance. Beyond the technical challenges of web interfaces, servers, and bandwidth for delivery is a sometimes-overlooked capability: the Wikipedians themselves. Over 32 million people have registered accounts to contribute edits to Wikipedia. More than 300,000 users provide edits to the website at least once a month. These volunteers build the content for the site, using a creative commons license that ensures free access to any of the 500 million unique visitors each month. This crowdsourcing and its legal underpinnings are successful only as long as individuals are willing to spend their own time contributing to the site for no pay or other extrinsic benefits. The ability to attract and utilize legions of interested individuals is vital to the success of Wikipedia both today and into the future. Moreover, Wikipedia is a nonprofit, free-of-advertising social entrepreneurship venture that is exclusively financed by donations. Wikipedia runs regular calls for donations using slogans such as: “Please help us feed the servers,” “We make the Internet not suck. Help us out,” and “We are free, our bandwidth isn’t!” Calls for donations also come in the form of personal appeals by co-founder Jimmy Wales. The question arises whether the donation model is sustainable given not only the increasing demand for Wikipedia’s services, but also the emergence of competitors. Wikipedia might not be as error-prone in science topics as shown in the Nature study mentioned earlier, because most entries on Wikipedia are not about science. Wikipedia maintains that it fosters a “neutral point of view.” A recent research study tested this claim. In particular, a study of 28,000 articles about US politics revealed a significant bias. On average, Wikipedia entries lean left of center. Initial entries arrive with a slant, and change little over time. This bias is more pronounced in earlier Wikipedia articles. The authors call this the “vintage bias.” Although the degree of slant in Wikipedia articles changes little over time, more recent political entries are more balanced. One reason the authors put forth to explain the vintage effect is that in the early days of Wikipedia only technology enthusiasts and early adopters participated, and this demographic tends to lean left. The shift toward a more “neutral point of view” over the years has arisen from the growth of Wikipedia, bringing in the early and late majority as contributors. Questions a. How can Wikipedia maintain and grow its ability to harness the crowdsourcing of its “Wikipedians” to maintain high-quality (and quickly updated) content? b. As Wikipedia keeps growing, do you think it can continue to rely exclusively on donations (in time and money)? Why or why not? What other “business models” could be considered? Would any of those “violate the spirit of Wikipedia”? Why or why not? c. What, if anything, should Wikipedia do to ensure that its articles indeed present a “neutral point of view”? Shouldn’t the crowdsourcing approach ensure objectivity? Does a “neutral point of view” matter to Wikipedia’s sustainability? Why or why not? d. How has the “long tail” affected Wikipedia? 5. The chapter discussed the Internet as a disruptive innovation that has facilitated online retailing. It also, however, has presented challenges to brick-and-mortar retailers. How might retailers such as Nordstrom, Neiman Marcus, or Macy’s need to change their in-store experience in order to continue to attract a flow of customers into their stores to expand sales using direct selling and store displays of the actual merchandise? If the Internet continues to grow and sales of brick-and-mortar retailers decline, how might the retailers attract, train, and retain high-quality employees if the industry is perceived as in decline?
In: Operations Management
Alighting Innovation in the Utility IndustryThere are 3,200 utilities that make up the U.S. electrical grid that sell $400 billion worth of electricity per year. However, that’s slowly changing. Companies such as Comcast, NineStar Connect, and Vivint have started selling their customers electricity along with their services. Comcast offers its XFINITY customers in Pennsylvania the opportunity to purchase electricity as well as phone, Internet, and TV services. NineStar Connect offers electricity, phone, broadband and home security to customers in central Indiana. Vivint, an alarm system company on the East Coast, installs solar panels on alarm clients’ homes for free and then requires the homeowner to purchase the electricity that is generated. Any excess is sold to the local power company. Google, while it has not formally entered the market, has its own wholesale power license and has purchased Nest, which makes a “learning thermostat.” Industry experts speculate that it will only be a matter of time before Google formally enters the market.
With this influx of new competitors, utilities will have to start learning to compete. Michael Peevey, the president of the California Public Utilities Commission, states that these days utilities “hold their own fate in their hands. They can do nothing but complain or moan about technological change or they can try to adapt.”56
Utilities lose revenues when businesses and residential customers switch to solar and wind power and lose additional money from having to buy any excess electricity generated. Utilities have to maintain the power transmission lines across the grid. Customers often are assessed fees in their bills that help cover line maintenance, but those who are selling back power don’t pay these fees while still using the power lines.
Further, utility companies face a number of regulations and are limited in their actions. For instance, utilities in Louisiana, Idaho, and California want to impose fees or taxes on solar users but have been rejected by regulators. It is unlikely that U.S. regulators will ever completely do away with electric companies as there will always be a need to have a secure supply of power. Thus, these companies will always have to incur the expense of maintaining the power lines with a dwindling customer base.
Additionally, most utility companies are behind the times on technology. While there are smart meters, most utilities have a limited presence in customer homes with programmable thermostats. They could have a greater presence if they were to invest in developing better in-home energy management tools (like the thermostats offered by Nest). Nor have many utilities looked into apps for phones or tablets that can help consumers manage
Finally, the utilities themselves have been getting in the way of their own success. Over a decade ago, Peevey recommended to the California utilities to enter the solar power business. He suggested they put solar panels on people’s homes and then build the cost of installation into the rate base. CEOs of the utility companies balked at Peevey’s calls for change. Most CEOs replied back to his innovative ideas: “It’s not our culture.” This is true, as most electric companies didn’t have a need to innovate its production processes or products for decades.
4. What cna you do to help overcom employees' resistance to change both before the changes are implemented as well as during the change process? Is it simply behavior that will need to chnage, or will attitudes need to change as well?
In: Operations Management
Case Assignment: Tesla Motors
Tesla Motors was founded with innovation in mind. Launched in 2003 by a group of engineers in Silicon Valley who wanted to prove that electric cars could replace gasoline-powered automobiles, Tesla’s mission is to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy.
The Tesla Roadster was launched in 2008 and can travel 245 miles per charge of its lithium ion battery. There are now more than 2,400 Roadsters being driven in more than 30 countries. The Roadster was followed by the Tesla Model S in 2012. The Model S can travel 265 miles per charge and has room for seven passengers with 64 cubic feet of storage. The Model S was named Motor Trend’s 2013 Car of the Year and achieved a 5-star safety rating from the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Next came the Model X, which Tesla began delivering in 2015, and the new Model 3 will begin production in mid-2017 with estimated delivery for new reservations at mid-2018 or later. Model 3 is Tesla’s most affordable model to date, starting at $35,000. It has seating for five adults and can travel 215 miles per charge.
Improvements to battery life and safety features weren’t the only upgrades Tesla had quietly been putting together. They created a roar in the automobile industry when they announced in October 2016 that, moving forward, all vehicles produced in Tesla factories would have the hardware needed for full self-driving capabilities at a safety level higher than that of a human driver. Model S and Model X vehicles with the new hardware are already in production, and the hardware will be included on the new Model 3 when it goes into production.
This hardware includes eight surround cameras providing 360-degree visibility around the car up to 250 meters of range; two updated ultrasonic sensors; forward-facing radar that can see through heavy rain, fog, dust, and even the car ahead; and a new onboard computer with more than 40 times the computing power of previous generations.
Tesla’s move was unprecedented compared to that of other car companies, but not as much for them. While Tesla will be creating cars with the hardware needed for self-driving capabilities, they do not have the software finished yet. They will update the software in the cars produced now using over-the-air software updates. This is a method that Tesla already employs to enhance performance and fix security bugs; it allows them to continually improve cars even after they are on the road and to stay ahead of automakers who do not operate under this model.
Tesla still has to complete millions of miles of real-world testing before the software can be implemented. They will run the software in the background while a professional drives the car and then compare what the computer would have done with what the person did do. The goal is for self-driving cars to be even better than humans at avoiding crashes.
Tesla must also achieve regulatory approvals of full self-driving cars before they can legally drive on public roadways. So it is still unclear when customers (even those currently purchasing models featuring the new hardware) will be able to experience fully autonomous driving.
TRUE/FALSE
1. Telsa’s new products have been successful, in part, because they have a well-defined new product strategy at their core and are driven by the corporate objectives and strategies of using electricity over gasoline when designing automobiles.
ANS:
2. A new-product strategy is a plan that links the new-product development process with the objectives of the marketing department, the business unit, and the corporation.
ANS:
3. The business analysis to determine if Tesla should equip their cars with the self-driving hardware before the software was complete would have been a simple process.
ANS:
4. Tesla employed simultaneous product development by having their hardware and their software design teams work together on the autonomous automobile initiative.
ANS:
5. Tesla will use test marketing to teach the self-driving software how to appropriately respond in different driving situations.
In: Operations Management
1) Human history is full of examples of adaptability and innovation. Some observers believe that predictions of climate impact do not take human adaptability into account, and so climate impacts tend to be overestimated. Do you agree?
2) As other countries rush to compete in the global market, their greenhouse gas emissions rise rapidly as well. Leaders in developing countries argue that they should have the same opportunities to grow and compete that the developed world enjoyed. What strategies and approaches could induce developing nations to reduce their emissions?
3)Material continually cycles in the natural world, where waste from one organism or process becomes food for another. If that is so, what prevents humans from taking advantage of the potential value in human biological waste?
4)List several human impacts on the health of the oceans. Describe how elements of your life connect to each impact.
In: Economics