Questions
First, read the attached article. What’s worse: monopoly power or government intervention? Politicians of all stripes...

First, read the attached article.

What’s worse: monopoly power or government
intervention?
Politicians of all stripes increasingly agree with Karl Marx on one point –
that monopolies are an inevitable consequence of free-market
capitalism, and must be broken up. Are they right? Stuart Watkins isn’t
so sure.
by: Stuart Watkins
1 OCT 2020
MoneyWeek
Free markets left to themselves in a capitalist context are great at producing wealth, but will
inevitably tend to concentrate that wealth in ever fewer hands, leading to increasing inequalities
of income, power and wealth, and undermining the benefits that might be supposed to flow to
consumers, such as cheaper prices. The logic inherent in market exchange must, in other words,
progressively undermine the very qualities that the champions of the market promise they will
deliver.
This, at least, was the view of Karl Marx. Perhaps surprisingly, it is also the mainstream view
today. It is not all that easy to find a mainstream commentator, economist, think-tanker or
policymaker who will raise a squeak of protest against the idea. All the main political parties –
particularly in the US, where the problem is deemed to be particularly acute – agree that
something must be done to curb the rise of the monopolies, namely that the state should step in
and break them up, or at least restrain them.
Indeed, “Market Power, Inequality and Financial Instability” – a new paper by Federal Reserve
Board economists Isabel Cairo and Jae Sim – argues that the concentration of market power in a
handful of companies, and the resulting decline in competition, explains the deepening of
inequality and financial instability in the US, as Craig Torres reports on Bloomberg. They blame
the rising market power of big companies for the decline in the share of wealth that goes to
workers, the rise in inequalities of wealth and income, and the growing debt burden. The authors
call for policies that will redistribute wealth to the poor, perhaps by gradually raising the tax on
dividend income from zero to 30%. They suggest that such policies might help to slow the rise of
inequality and the growth in debt, and make financial crises less likely.
The paper is just the latest voice in a rising chorus. Towards the end of last year, The Great
Reversal, a book by economist Thomas Philippon, presented a detailed empirical analysis of the
question and argued that America can no longer be considered a free-market economy in any real sense. As well as confirming that the trends already sketched are indeed in play, he concludes
that the main explanation is political – namely, that politicians have not enforced competition
policy as they should, thanks in part to lobbying and campaign contributions. The result, to quote
just one example, is that the price of broadband access in the US is roughly double that of
comparable countries, leading to predictably higher profits.
The year before Philippon’s book, a similar one by Jonathan Tepper and Denise Hearn (The
Myth of Capitalism) made the same point. “I realised that particularly in the US, which is
probably the most advanced in this trend, you’re seeing more and more industrial concentration,”
he said in an interview with MoneyWeek at the time of publication. That gives companies
pricing power over consumers, more power over workers as they don’t have to bid against rivals
for their labour, and power over suppliers. The result is that a small number of huge companies
are capturing very high profit margins. Tepper, too, blames lax enforcement of competition laws
for the problem.
The problem may be about to get worse. The response of governments to the coronavirus
pandemic has led to a huge economic crisis, and their response to what they have caused is to
throw money at it. The combined effect will be to push smaller firms out of business, quenching
the fires of creative destruction, and for the well-connected, better organised larger companies to
obtain all the government cash and bolster their already dominant position. Low interest rates
may also contribute, as bigger companies are in a better position to get hold of cheap credit and
invest it in expansion. If rising concentration and monopolies are a problem, it’s one that seems
set to get worse.
The case for the defense
Are Marx and his mainstream followers correct? The answer, as ever, is – it’s complicated. A
sounder tradition in economics would lead us to be cautious about the claims from first
principles. As Edmond Bradley, a writer for the Mises Institute, put it back when Microsoft was
the monopolistic bogeyman in the early 2000s, “the fear of industrial concentration is the last
refuge of socialist theory” and the idea that governments must step in to save us from it is
“wildly incorrect”. A company operating in a market economy might look like a monopoly
“under myopically static analysis”, but a broader and historical view will reveal that even very
large, dominant companies face intense competitive pressure – whether from the fear of potential
competition from new entrants eyeing their high profits; or from competitors offering products
and services of a different but nevertheless substitutable kind; or from losing customers
altogether, should they decide they’d rather do without what is being offered.
And if that’s what first principles tell us, there are plenty of reasons to be sceptical about what
the real-world data are showing, too. A roundtable discussion of the subject by experts, hosted by
the OECD group of wealthy nations in 2018, concluded that although market power did indeed
appear to be rising in many countries, the causes were unclear. It might reflect a reduction in
competitive intensity, but it might equally be the outcome of intense competition. If the causes
are unclear, then there’s no way to be confident about what the correct policy response should
be.
In any case, the rise in industrial concentration may not be all it appears to be. As a 2019 paper
by Alessandra Bonfiglioli, Rosario Crinò and Gino Gancia for the Centre for Economic Policy
Research notes, all the existing evidence for the increase in industrial concentration and the fear
that this will usher in a new era of monopolies has been based on national data. They find that when competition from foreign imports is included, the overall level of competition may in fact
have intensified rather than fallen – even if the number of firms from the home country entering
the market falls. So increased global competition and greater national concentration may be two
sides of the same coin – “growing global competition may force unproductive firms to exit and
top firms to consolidate on their best products”.
Is monopoly such a bad thing anyway?
Amazon is one of the companies charged with unfairly exploiting its dominant position to crush
competition and hence harm customers. Indeed, its boss, Jeff Bezos, was recently dragged before
the US Congress and had to defend his firm from hostile questioning. But if Amazon is a
monopoly, then the first question that arises is, is that such a bad thing? Amazon started out as an
idea in Bezos’s mind, which he put into action using money he raised himself from family and
investors, working from his basement and carrying parcels to the post office. It was, from the
beginning, a high-risk venture, deemed by most to be almost certain to fail. Yet by consistently
offering consumers what they didn’t know they wanted, and winning their approval and then
loyalty, Amazon rose above its competitors by sheer excellence. It’s not as if its customers have
been forced into anything.
Moreover, even in its current dominant position, Amazon faces plenty of intense competition. As
Bezos pointed out in his testimony to Congress, customer trust is hard to win and easy to lose.
Amazon’s globe-spanning dominance would end very quickly should that trust disappear. There
are plenty of competitors snapping at its heels. Amazon accounts for less than 1% of the $25trn
global retail market, according to Bezos, and less than 4% of retail in the US. There are more
than 80 retailers in the US alone that earn more than $1bn in annual revenue – that includes
Walmart, which is more than twice Amazon’s size and whose online sales grew 74% in the first
quarter. In the wake of the pandemic, plenty of other companies are competing with Amazon in
the race for online orders for goods, including Shopify and Instacart.
The briefest review of relatively recent history should be enough to show that large companies of
the kind that draw fire from those concerned about monopolies are in reality always in danger of
having their profits competed away at any moment – witness Kodak and Myspace, to take just
two commonly cited examples. As those economists who most consistently defend free markets
insist, monopolies are only ever really a threat, not as a result of companies operating in free
markets, but as a result of government interference – particularly, in our day, as a result of
money printing and ultra-low interest rates. What is needed, then, is not more government
interference to solve the problems they have created, but less. In this sense, the rising threat of
monopoly as a result of the coronavirus pandemic is a clue to the real source of the problem.

QUESTIONS: What do you think of the article? Do you think the author's examples of monopolies are actually that? Is there such a thing as "excess profits"? Are the firms mentioned truly monopolies, in that they are the ONLY providers for that good or service? Do we need more regulation, or less? Why?

In: Economics

1. interview objectives include all of the following except a) determining a reasonable pay level for...

1. interview objectives include all of the following except
a) determining a reasonable pay level for the candidate
b) providing candidates with information about the job and expected duties and responsibilities
c) determining how well tahe applicants would fit into the organization
d) assessing applicants qualification and observing relevant aspects of applicants behaviour

2. which of the following is an example of a situational interview question?
a) if you had a fellow programmer who was supposed to be working with you on a collaborative project but would not respond to your emails, what would you do?
b) describe your computer programming skills
c) in the past, what starategies you have used to keep organized?
d) what are your key strengths?

3. key advantages of a panel interview include all of the following except
a) an increased likehood that the information provided will be heard and recorded accurately
b) varied questions pertaining to each interviewres area of expertise
c) that they are generally considered less effective than one-on-one interviews
d) a reduced likehood of human rights/employment equity violations since an HR representatives is usually on the panel

4.which of the following is not a common interviewing mistake
a) poor planning
b) too large a panel
c) poor knowledge of the job
d) snap judgments

5. research has indicated that atleast one-third of job applicats lie in their job application/resume and/ or interview. reference checks are therefore helpful to confirm which of the following?
a) reason for leaving previous employment, dates of employment, and previous job title
b) reasons for leaving previous employment m, previous job titles, and any disabilities
c) previous job titles, salary, dates of employment, and age
d) the applicats fit with the prospective job, previous job, previous employment and marital status

In: Accounting

For this, please only give feedback on this discussion: Discuss two ways a corporate board member...

For this, please only give feedback on this discussion:

Discuss two ways a corporate board member might engage in inappropriate ethical behavior, and explain why each is a problem for the company and shareholders.

Corporate social responsibility is one of my favorite topics for discussion in business as it is a subject that is of great importance in my personal beliefs and values which greatly shape my shopping behavior.

There are many companies that are worth mentioning for their commitment to social responsibility but one of the first that comes to mind is The Body Shop. Established in 1976, English founder dame Anita Roddick began making cosmetic and body care products with a vision for developing a business with a heart and one that would be a force of positivity in the world. The Body Shop is now a recognized brand around the globe and is known for its efforts to enrich products, people and the planet. The Body Shop has been a pioneer over the years in developing products in the beauty industry and doing so while maintaining a firm stance against animal testing and other environmental initiatives (The Body Shop, 2018a).

The Body Shop boasts a long history of socially responsible initiatives and has several pages on their website dedicated to these efforts. I have listed only a few of these initiatives below but have included a link to their about us page for those who may want to learn more about their socially responsible practices https://www.thebodyshop.com/en-gb/about-us/our-commitment

Body Shop initiatives have demonstrated stellar social responsibility and have set the following goals to achieve by 2020 (The Body Shop, 2018b:

Doubled community trade program from 19 to 40 ingredients; the Body Shop states that this has ‘enriched’ the communities in which the ingredients are sourced.

The Body Shop guarantees that 100 percent of the natural ingredients used are not only traceable but sourced through sustainable methods. The Body Shop aims to protect 10,000 hectares of forest and various other habitats.

Reduce energy usage by 10 percent in addition to relying on well renewable or carbon balanced energy to power 100 percent of its stores.

Aims have been set to create and deliver 3 new sustainable packaging alternatives.

Aims to guarantee that 70 percent of its product packaging is free of fossil fuels.

Goals have been set and will continue annually to reduce their environmental footprint across each of its product lines.

Aspires to include 8 million people in its “Enrich Not Exploit” campaign to spread their mission.

The Body Shop has also announced its commitment to releasing annual reports to offer insight into its business practices and target progress with total transparency. The Body Shop benefits from these efforts largely in part due to a shift in consumer values and their desire to support companies that share their values and beliefs. From a CSR standpoint, these efforts aid in fostering customer relationships and attracting new customers. The Body Shop has gained competitive advantage having been a long-time pioneer in green practices, raising the bar for higher ethical standards and its strong desire to fill consumer needs without harming animals or the environment (The Body Shop, 2018b).

As a result, the Body Shop has attained brand and product differentiation as well as solidifying a large and very loyal consumer base through increased brand recognition and positive brand association. Additionally, the Body Shop’s efforts to reduce energy usage utilizing alternative methods leads to a reduction in operational costs (NI Business Info, 2018)

NI Business Info (2018) also notes that social responsibility also attracts highly desirable talent and can work to retain the talent the company already has as such efforts are known for increasing motivation and employee satisfaction; this is great for companies as costs are further reduced due to a decline in disruption and the costs associated with recruiting and training.

Some additional benefits that can be attained from socially responsible practices as noted by NI Business Info (2018) include:

Greater access to capital: Investors are more likely to invest in responsible and reputable companies

Greater opportunities for positive media attention.

Restrictions and regulations may be easier to navigate through strong relationships with governing agencies.

Opportunities for growth and innovation.

LA#2.2

Explain why Corporate Social Responsibility is important to each of the above stakeholders.

Concerns of social responsibility are not only relative to consumers, but are also shared by corporate stakeholders. By definition stakeholders are comprised of customers as well as employees, suppliers, board director members, government agencies, political groups etc. It is these groups of interested parties that make up the communities and markets in which companies aim to serve (Saylor Foundation, n.d.).

Primary stakeholders have a strong interest in the performance of the organization and its actions relative to how its business is conducted. Those in this category (e.g. employees, shareholders), are directly affected by the positive outcomes (successes) and in turn, are also subject to the company’s failures (The Saylor Foundation, n.d.).

Secondary stakeholders such as the media, labor unions, political and social groups not only have the power to positively and negatively affect companies but are also capable of influencing company actions. Stakeholders in this category serve as an example of how vested interest no matter how far removed from the internal and external workings of the company relate to primary stakeholders, communities (Saylor Foundation, n.d.) and in many instances society as a whole on a global scale. Thus, the scale of cause and effect can be quite large and all encompassing.

In short, virtually everyone in the world today has a stake or interest in the behaviors and actions that businesses carry out in the world today as we all are subject to the economic, social and environmental outcomes that play out.

In: Operations Management

Some financial information is extracted from financial statements of Global Co. as follows: 2020 2019 £000...

Some financial information is extracted from financial statements of Global Co. as follows:

2020

2019

£000

£000

Sales

21,000

17,500

Current assets

5,000

3,500

Current liabilities

3,800

1,900

Overdraft

1,500

200

Non-current liabilities

6,300

6,000

Operating profit margin

24%

30%

Inventory days

70

60

Receivable days

50

70

Payable days

100

90

Quick ratio

0.6:1

0.7:1

The credit controller of the company considers a new credit policy introduced in 2020 has effectively reduced the receivable days, which provides customers a 1% discount if they make full payment within 30 days. Further review of the policy indicates that the policy also reduced bad debts by £800,000 a year and the cost of financing receivables was covered by a short-term loan at the interest rate of 20% pa.

Required:
a) Is there any sign(s) of overtrading for Global? Explain with appropriate

ratio(s)/figure(s).

b) Calculate the appropriate equivalent annual percentage cost of a discount of 1 per cent, which reduces the time taken by credit customers to pay from 70 days to 50

days.

c) Assuming in 2020 customers either paid in 30 days to receive the discount or still paid in 70 days as they used to, what is the percentage of customers, by value, paid

in 30 days? Calculate the net benefit/cost of the policy.

In: Finance

Ramsey Corporation's capital structure consists of 50,000 shares of common stock with a par value of...

Ramsey Corporation's capital structure consists of 50,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $4. At December 31, 2020, an analysis of the accounts and discussions with company officials revealed the following information: Sales revenue $1,250,000 Discontinued operations loss (Note: you must adjust for tax) 90,000 Selling expenses 128,000 Cash 60,000 Accounts receivable 90,000 Common stock 200,000 Cost of goods sold 700,000 Accumulated depreciation-machinery 180,000 Dividend revenue 18,000 Unearned service revenue 4,400 Interest payable 1,000 Land 370,000 Patents 100,000 Retained earnings, January 1, 2020 270,000 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, Jan. 1, 2020 20,000 Unrealized holding loss from AFS debt securities, net of tax 5,000 Interest expense 17,000 Administrative expenses 170,000 Dividends declared common shareholders 14,000 Dividends declared preferred shareholders (and paid) 10,000 Allowance for doubtful accounts 5,000 Notes payable (maturity 7/1/26) 200,000 Machinery 450,000 Supplies 40,000 Accounts payable 60,000 Tax Rate is 30%

(a) Prepare a multiple-step income statement in good form (b) Prepare a statement of comprehensive income (separate from income statement) in good form. Note round EPS figures to the nearest penny. (c) Prepare a statement of stockholders’ equity in good form

In: Accounting

Under the acquisition method, when the fair value of net assets is higher than the consideration...

Under the acquisition method, when the fair value of net assets is higher than the consideration transferred, then the following entry is recorded?

A. Credit to goodwill

B. Debit to goodwill

C. Credit to gain on bargain purchase

D. Debit to gain on bargain purchase

E. Long term assets of acquired company are reduced

In: Accounting

Since the reveal of the Cambridge Analytica data privacy scandal in February 2014, Facebook’s share price...

Since the reveal of the Cambridge Analytica data privacy scandal in February 2014, Facebook’s share price increased from $60 in February 2014 to around $200 per share in December 2019. During the period, various unfavorable and costly events happened: a few lengthy investigations (internal and external) have been carried out; Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified before the U.S. Congress in April 2018; Facebook and the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) agreed to a $5 billion settlement over user privacy violations in July 2019; Facebook were fined by U.K., Spain, and Italy; Facebook revised its privacy policy; etc. However, the scandal did not seem to adversely affect Facebook’s share price over the 5-year period. How do you interpret this observation? What lessons have you learnt from this case about the goal(s) of a company (and its managers)?

In: Finance

Summary: Mick is a project manager at Zarlink, a multinational manufacturer of semiconductors for a variety...

Summary:

Mick is a project manager at Zarlink, a multinational manufacturer of semiconductors for a variety of high-technology military, medical and consumer applications. Mick is also a part-time MBA student at his local university. As part of his MBA, Mick has to complete a dissertation on a management topic of his choice. Since Mick had recently been selected to embed a new quality management system called TS 16949 into his manufacturing site at Swindon in the West of England it seemed sensible that he chose to study quality for his dissertation. Mick’s particular fascination was his firm belief that the route to high-quality process in organizations was not through introducing specific techniques but through ensuring that quality was embedded in everything done at Zarlink: part of the lifeblood of the organization. ‘Quality is even about more than people’s attitudes’ said Mick; ‘it’s about their beliefs. Quality must be a way of life and dominate the thoughts of everyone in the organization, irrespective of their job.’ Mick wanted to use his dissertation as a way not only of obtaining his MBA but also of learning how he could be more effective in introducing embedded quality at Swindon.

Mick started off his research by searching the quality literature. There was no shortage of this. But soon Mick realized that he was concerned with that branch of the quality literature that dealt with the ‘soft’ issues of organizational culture change. He became rather disenchanted with much of the literature because it was largely prescriptive. ‘I was dubious about a lot of what the gurus were saying,’ said Mick. ‘They seemed to be saying that if you get your employees to believe this and do that then everything will be fine. I was skeptical of this because I knew through my MBA studies that the success of certain techniques is usually contingent upon the individual circumstances of the organization.’ Nonetheless Mick became attracted to the idea that embedding certain core values in the organization was a good way of achieving quality goals. The problem was that he did not know which core values were appropriate for his site. Therefore his research question became: ‘What are the core values that need to be adopted in Zarlink, Swindon, if embedded quality is to become a success?’

More specifically, Mick’s research objectives were:

to identify general constructs that constitute ‘embedding quality’ within an organization;

to compare these beliefs with those espoused by a sample from the senior Zarlink Management team;

to establish the behaviors and attitudes of the current workforce towards the quality management system at the Zarlink foundry, Swindon;

to propose a framework of core values to facilitate the embedding of quality into Zarlink, Swindon.

Having used the literature to refine his research question and objectives Mick then turned his attention to collecting primary data within Zarlink. Initially he thought of using a positivist approach based on a questionnaire using qualitative data, but discussions with Philippa, his tutor, convinced him that there were other ways of collecting data. Mick began to think more deeply about his research strategy, and thought that the advantage of triangulating his data by using multi-method would convince not only his examiners that his data were valid but also the managers at Zarlink who he was hoping would give him the go-ahead to introduce his ideas.

Mick’s first research objective had been met by his coverage of the literature. This had been useful in concentrating his mind on embedded quality, but it only took him a limited way. The second and third objectives would lead to a much more meaningful management dissertation.

The second objective involved conducting interviews with key managers in order to ‘test’ the ideas that Mick had developed about core values as a result of the literature review. The managerial sample he chose comprised managers from other Zarlink sites in the world who had an excellent reputation for embedding quality. At the same time Mick thought it important to include those managers who were concerned with implementing quality at Swindon. Mick conducted six interviews across three sites: one in Canada and one in southern England in addition to the third in Swindon. In each site he interviewed the foundry director and the quality manager. These were the key managers concerned with quality. The non-Swindon managers were interviewed by telephone, and the Swindon managers were interviewed face to face by Mick. He hoped this phase of data collection would give him a very clear idea of Zarlink’s view of quality.

In order to meet the third objective he decided to collect data in two ways. The first was to conduct what he called a ‘gap analysis. The purpose of this was to establish the current behaviors concerned with quality – that is, what people actually did in their working lives. This would tell Mick what was being done well and what was being done badly, or not at all, and therefore identify what needed to be done to embed quality. In order to do this Mick designed an audit form based on a purpose-made audit that had been used before in similar organizations. This was administered in all departments of Zarlink, Swindon. Ten of Mick’s colleagues were responsible for carrying out the audit. This involved Mick in training them in its use in order to achieve reliability. Mick was opportunistic in the second way he collected data in respect of the third objective. He was fortunate that a general employee attitude survey was imminent. He decided to insert a subsection in this survey that consisted of questions to establish employees’ attitudes to quality. This went to each of the 130 employees at Swindon.

Mick was confident that his research strategy would yield rich, valid and reliable data on management beliefs and employee attitudes and practice, which would enable him to propose a framework of core values to facilitate the embedding of quality into Zarlink, Swindon. This would enable him to make a valuable contribution to the well-being of Zarlink and pass his MBA!

Discussing the case and incorporating answers to the questions below. It is important to address each of the questions presented. Respond to these questions in an essay format using APA style of writing, and use at least 5 peer-reviewed references.

Question:

1 Which type(s) of research strategy is Mick employing?


2 In what other ways could Mick have used the literature to refine his research question?


3 In what other ways might Mick have achieved his research aim?

In: Operations Management

Accounting for acquired goodwill has been a controversial issue for many years. In the United States

Accounting for acquired goodwill has been a controversial issue for many years. In the United States, the amount of acquired goodwill is capitalized and not amortized. Globally, the treatment of goodwill varies significantly, with some countries not recognizing goodwill as an asset. Professors Johnson and Petrone, in “Is Goodwill an Asset?” discuss this issue. 

 

Required: 

1. In your library or from some other source, locate the indicated article in Accounting Horizons, September 1998. 

2. Does goodwill meet the FASB’s definition of an asset? 3. What are the key concerns of those that believe goodwill is not an asset?

In: Accounting

The Paris Company purchased an 80% interest in Seine, Inc. for $600,000 on July 1, 2015,...

The Paris Company purchased an 80% interest in Seine, Inc. for $600,000 on July 1, 2015, when Seine had the following balance sheet:

Assets

Accounts receivable

$ 50,000

Inventory

120,000

Land

80,000

Building

270,000

Equipment

    80,000

     Total

$600,000

Liabilities and Equity

Current liabilities

$100,000

Common stock, $5 par

60,000

Paid-in capital in excess of par

140,000

Retained earnings (July 1)

300,000

     Total

$600,000

The inventory is understated by $20,000 and is sold in the third quarter of 2015. The building has a fair value of $320,000 and a 10-year remaining life. The equipment has a fair value of $120,000 and a remaining life of 5 years. Any remaining excess is attributed to goodwill.

From July 1 through June 30, 2016, Seine had net income of $100,000 and paid $10,000 in dividends.

Assume that Paris uses the equity method to record its investment in Seine.

Required:

a.

Prepare a determination and distribution of excess schedule as of July 1, 2015.

b.

Prepare the eliminations and adjustments that would be made on the June 30, 2016 consolidated worksheet to eliminate the investment in Seine. Distribute and amortize any excess.

Determination and distribution of excess schedule as of July 1, 2015:

-------Do this in Excel-------

Elimination and Adjusting Entries as of June 30, 2016:

-------Do this in Excel--------

On January 1, 20X1, Prange Company acquired 100% of the common stock of Seaman Company for $600,000. On this date Seaman had total owners' equity of $400,000. Any excess of cost over book value is attributable to a patent, which is to be amortized over 10 years.

During 20X1 and 20X2, Prange has appropriately accounted for its investment in Seaman using the simple equity method.

On January 1, 20X2, Prange held merchandise acquired from Seaman for $30,000. During 20X2, Seaman sold merchandise to Prange for $100,000, of which $20,000 is held by Prange on December 31, 20X2. Seaman's gross profit on all sales is 40%.

On December 31, 20X2, Prange still owes Seaman $20,000 for merchandise acquired in December.

Required:

Complete the worksheet similar to Figure 4-1 (following) for consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20X2. Prepare your worksheet in Excel. Following is a template in Figure 4-1 that will guide you in setting up your worksheet in Excel.

In: Accounting