|
Value-Stream Costing Objective During the week of June 12, Harrison Manufacturing produced and shipped 16,000 units of its aluminum wheels: 3,400 units of Model A and 12,600 units of Model B. The following costs were incurred:
Required: Note: Round ALL interim calculations to two decimal places. Uses these values in subsequent computations. 1. Assume initially that the value-stream costs
and total units shipped apply only to one model (a single-product
value stream). Calculate the unit cost. 2. Calculate the unit cost for Models A and B.
3. What if Model A is responsible for 40 percent of the materials cost? Calculate the unit materials cost for Models A and B.
Calculate the total unit cost for Models A and B.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In: Accounting
Factory Overhead Cost Variance Report Tannin Products Inc. prepared the following factory overhead cost budget for the Trim Department for July of the current year, during which it expected to use 18,000 hours for production: Variable overhead cost: Indirect factory labor $43,200 Power and light 13,500 Indirect materials 21,600 Total variable overhead cost $ 78,300 Fixed overhead cost: Supervisory salaries $76,490 Depreciation of plant and equipment 20,130 Insurance and property taxes 37,580 Total fixed overhead cost 134,200 Total factory overhead cost $212,500 Tannin has available 22,000 hours of monthly productive capacity in the Trim Department under normal business conditions. During July, the Trim Department actually used 17,000 hours for production. The actual fixed costs were as budgeted. The actual variable overhead for July was as follows: Actual variable factory overhead cost: Indirect factory labor $39,780 Power and light 12,520 Indirect materials 21,400 Total variable cost $73,700 Construct a factory overhead cost variance report for the Trim Department for July. Enter a favorable variance as a negative number using a minus sign and an unfavorable variance as a positive number. If an amount box does not require an entry, leave it blank. Round your interim computations to the nearest cent, if required.
In: Accounting
Using Regression Results to Construct and Apply a Cost Formula Dohini Manufacturing Company had the following 12 months of data on purchasing cost and number of purchase orders. Month Purchasing Cost Number of Purchase Orders January $18,860 370 February 18,065 330 March 19,250 370 April 18,050 410 May 19,345 400 June 19,500 450 July 19,670 460 August 20,940 560 September 19,430 440 October 20,020 500 November 18,800 470 December 19,340 480 The controller for Dohini Manufacturing ran regression on the data, and the coefficients shown by the regression program are: Intercept 15,021 (rounded to the nearest dollar) X variable 1 9.74 (rounded to the nearest cent) Required: 1. Construct the cost formula for the purchasing activity showing the fixed cost and the variable rate. Total purchasing cost = $ 15,021 + ($ 9.74 × Purchase orders) 2. If Dohini Manufacturing Company estimates that next month will have 430 purchase orders, what is the total estimated purchasing cost for that month? (Round your answer to the nearest dollar.) $ 19,209 3. What if Dohini Manufacturing wants to estimate purchasing cost for the coming year and expects 5,340 purchase orders? What will estimated total purchasing cost be? (Round your answer to the nearest dollar.) $ What is the total fixed purchasing cost?
In: Accounting
Table 14-9
Suppose that a firm in a competitive market faces the following
revenues and costs:
Quantity | Total Revenue | Total Cost |
0 | $0 | $10 |
1 | $9 | $14 |
2 | $18 | $19 |
3 | $27 | $25 |
4 | $36 | $32 |
5 | $45 | $40 |
6 | $54 | $49 |
7 | $63 | $59 |
8 | $72 | $70 |
9 | $81 | $82 |
Refer to Table 14-9. If the firm produces 4 units
of output,
| a)marginal revenue is less than marginal cost. | |
| b)marginal cost is $4. | |
| c)the firm is maximizing profit. | |
| d)total revenue is greater than variable cost. |
In: Economics
Riverside Inc. makes one model of wooden canoe. Partial information for it follows:
| Number of Canoes Produced and Sold | ||||||
| 515 | 665 | 815 | ||||
| Total costs | ||||||
| Variable costs | $ | 71,585 | ? | ? | ||
| Fixed costs | 148,400 | ? | ? | |||
| Total costs | $ | 219,985 | ? | ? | ||
| Cost per unit | ||||||
| Variable cost per unit | ? | ? | ? | |||
| Fixed cost per unit | ? | ? | ? | |||
| Total cost per unit | ? | ? | ? | |||
Required:
1. Complete the table.
3. Suppose Riverside sells its canoes for $510 each. Calculate the contribution margin per canoe and the contribution margin ratio.
4. Next year Riverside expects to sell 865 canoes. Complete the contribution margin income statement for the company.
In: Accounting
Wellsley Containers currently uses a recycled plastic to make bottles for the food industry.
Current bottle production? information:
The cost and time standards per batch of 10,000 bottles are as ?follows:
|
Plastic 360 kilograms at $11.00 per kg |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Direct labor 6.0 hours at $20.00 per hour The variable manufacturing overhead rate is based on total estimated variable manufacturing overhead of $500,000 and estiamted total DLH of 10,000. Wellsley allocates its variable manufacturing overhead based on direct labor hours (DLH). Proposed changes to bottle design and production? process: The container division manager is considering having both the bottle redesigned and the bottle production process reengineered so that the plastic usage would drop by 30 % overall due both to generating less scrap in the manufacturing process and using less plastic in each bottle. In addition to decreasing the amount of plastic used in producing the? bottles, the additional following benefits would be?realized:
|
In: Accounting
4. The relationship between marginal and average costs
Consider the following scenario to understand the relationship between marginal and average values. Suppose Larry is a professional basketball player, and his game log for free throws can be summarized in the following table.
Fill in the columns with Larry's free-throw percentage for each game and his overall free-throw average after each game.
|
Game |
Game Result |
Season Total |
Game Free-Throw Percentage |
Average Free-Throw Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6/8 | 6/8 | 75 | 75 |
| 2 | 2/8 | 8/16 | ||
| 3 | 2/4 | 10/20 | ||
| 4 | 8/10 | 18/30 | ||
| 5 | 8/10 | 26/40 |
On the following graph, use the orange points (square symbol) to plot Larry's free-throw percentage for each game individually, and use the green points (triangle symbol) to plot his overall average free-throw percentage after each game. Note: Plot your points in the order in which you would like them connected. Line segments will connect the points automatically. Game Free-Throw PercentageAverage Free-Throw Percentage0123451009080706050403020100FREE-THROW PERCENTAGEGAME You can think of the result in any one game as being Larry's marginal free-throw percentage. Based on your previous answer, you can deduce that when Larry's marginal free-throw percentage is above the average, the average must be . You can now apply this analysis to production costs. For a U-shaped average total cost curve, when the marginal cost curve is below the average total cost curve, the average total cost must be . Also, when the marginal cost curve is above the average total cost curve, the average total cost must be . Therefore, the marginal cost curve intersects the average total cost curve . |
In: Economics
Equivalent Units and Product Cost Report—Weighted Average Method
In its first month's operations (January 2016,, Allred Company's Department 1 incurred charges of $180,000 for direct materials (20,000 units), $49,500 for direct labor, and $87,000 for manufacturing overhead. At month- end, 17,600 units had been finished and transferred out. The remaining units were finished with respect to material but only 25% complete with respect to conversion costs.
Assuming Allred uses the weighted average method and that materials are added at the beginning of the process and conversion costs occur evenly, compute the following:
The equivalent units of materials and conversion costs.
The cost per equivalent unit of materials and conversion costs.
The total cost assigned to the units transferred out.
The total cost assigned to the ending inventory.
Prove that your solutions to requirements (c) and (d) sum to the total costs to be accounted for.
Round average cost per equivalent unit to two decimal places, if applicable.
Round other answers to the nearest whole number, when appropriate.
| Allred Company
Department 1 Flow of Units and Equivalent Units Calculation |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equivalent Units | ||||||
| % Work done |
Direct Materials |
% Work Done |
Conversion Costs |
|||
| Complete/Transferred | Answer | Answer % | Answer | Answer % | Answer | |
| Ending Inventory | Answer | Answer % | Answer | Answer % | Answer | |
| Total | Answer | a. | Answer | Answer | a. | |
| Product Cost Report | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Materials |
Conversion Costs |
|||||
| Beginning Inventory | $Answer | $Answer | $Answer | |||
| Current | Answer | Answer | Answer | |||
| Total Costs to Account For | $Answer | $Answer | $Answer | |||
| ÷ Total Equivalent Units | Answer | Answer | ||||
| Average cost / Equivalent unit | $Answer | b. | $Answer | b. | ||
| Complete / Transferred: | ||||||
| Direct Materials | $Answer | |||||
| Conversion costs | Answer | |||||
| Cost of Goods Manufactured | $Answer | c. | ||||
| Ending Inventory: | ||||||
| Direct Materials | $Answer | |||||
| Conversion costs | Answer | |||||
| Cost of Ending Inventory | $Answer | d. | ||||
| Total Costs Allocated | $Answer |
e. I am struggling to figure out C. D. E. |
||||
In: Accounting
| Number of workers | Units of output |
|---|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 10 |
| 2 | 30 |
| 3 | 44 |
| 4 | 55 |
| 5 | 60 |
| 6 | 60 |
| 7 |
55 |
| # cakes | VC | MC | AVC | FC | TC | ATC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | 50 | n/a | |
| 1 | 30 | |||||
| 2 | 50 | |||||
| 3 | 25 | |||||
| 4 | 155 | |||||
| 5 | 140 |
In: Economics
| E16-7 Prepare a production report | |||||||||
| The Sanding Department of Quik Furniture Company has the following production and manufacturing cost | |||||||||
| data for March 2017, the first month of operation. | |||||||||
| Production: 7,000 units finished and transferred out; 3,000 units started that are 100% complete as to | |||||||||
| materials and 20% complete as to conversion costs. | |||||||||
| Manufacturing costs: Materials $33,000; labor $21,000; overhead $36,000. | |||||||||
| Instructions | |||||||||
| Prepare a production cost report. | |||||||||
| NOTE: Enter a number in cells requesting a value; enter either a number or a formula in cells with a "?" . | |||||||||
| QUIK FURNITURE COMPANY | |||||||||
| Sanding Department | |||||||||
| Production Cost Report | |||||||||
| For the Month ended March 31, 2017 | |||||||||
| Equivalent Units | |||||||||
| Quantities | Physical Units | Materials | Conversion Costs | ||||||
| Units to be accounted for | |||||||||
| Work in process, March 1 | Value | ||||||||
| Started into production | Value | ||||||||
| Total units | ? | ||||||||
| Units accounted for | |||||||||
| Transferred out | Value | Value | Value | ||||||
| Work in process, March 31 | Value | Value | ? | ||||||
| Total units | ? | ? | ? | ||||||
| Costs | Materials | Conversion Costs | Total | ||||||
| Unit costs | |||||||||
| Total cost(a) | ? | ? | ? | ||||||
| Equivalent units (b) | Value | Value | |||||||
| Unit costs (a) ÷ (b) | ? | ? | ? | ||||||
| Costs to be accounted for | |||||||||
| Work in process, March 1 | Value | ||||||||
| Started into production | Value | ||||||||
| Total costs | ? | ||||||||
| Cost Reconciliation Schedule | |||||||||
| Cost accounted for | |||||||||
| Transferred out | Value | ||||||||
| Work in Process, March 31 | |||||||||
| Materials | Value | ||||||||
| Conversion costs | Value | ? | |||||||
| Total costs | ? | ||||||||
| After you have completed the requirements of E16-7, consider this additional question. | |||||||||
| 1. | Assume that 9,000 units were completed and transferred out. Show the impact of this change | ||||||||
| on the calculation of equivalent units, unit cost, and on the cost reconciliation schedule. | |||||||||
In: Accounting