Questions
Define and provide the significance of the four following terms: 1.) Blanket Primary 2.) Recall vs....

Define and provide the significance of the four following terms:
1.) Blanket Primary
2.) Recall vs. Referendum
3.) Closed vs. Open Primary
4.) Malapportionment

In: Economics

For TFP to be the primary cause of business cycles, what must hold with respect to...

For TFP to be the primary cause of business cycles, what must hold with respect to substitution and income effects for leisure? Explain in the context of 1-period, closed economy model.

In: Economics

Differential Geometry Open & Closed Sets, Continuity Prove f(t)=(x(t),y(t)) is continuous iff x(t) and y(t) are...

Differential Geometry

Open & Closed Sets, Continuity

Prove f(t)=(x(t),y(t)) is continuous iff x(t) and y(t) are continuous

In: Advanced Math

Why can closed-end funds sell at prices that differ from net value while open-end funds do...

Why can closed-end funds sell at prices that differ from net value while open-end funds do not? Book- Essential of investment by bodie

In: Finance

The highest and lowest birth rates in the United States in 2010 were in Utah and...

The highest and lowest birth rates in the United States in 2010 were in Utah and Maine, respectively. Utah reported 52,258 births with a population of about 2.8 million people. Maine reported 12,970 births with a population of about 1.3 million people. Use this data to answer the following questions.

a) On average, how many people were born each day of the year in Utah?

b) On average, how many people were born each day of the year in Maine?

c) What was the birth rate in Utah in births per 100,000 residents?

d) What was the birth rate in Maine in births per 100,000 residents?

In: Statistics and Probability

The condensed income statement for the Terri and Jerri partnership for 2010 is as follows. TERRI...

The condensed income statement for the Terri and Jerri partnership for 2010 is as follows.
TERRI AND JERRI COMPANY
Income Statement
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
Sales (200,000 units)
Cost of goods sold
Gross Profit
Operating expenses
Selling
Administrative
Net Loss
$280,000
160,000
$1,200,000
800,000
400,000
440,000
($40,000)
A cost behavior analysis indicates that 75% of the cost of goods sold are variable, 50% of the selling expenses are variable, and 25% of the administrative expenses are variable.
Instructions: (Round to nearest unit, dollar, and percentage, where necessary.)
(a) Compute the break-even point in total sales dollars and in units for 2010.
(b) Terri has proposed a plan to get the partnership “out of the red” and improve its profitability. She feels that the quality of the product could be substantially improved by spending $0.25 more per unit on better raw materials. The selling price per unit could be increased to only $6.25 because of competitive pressures. Terri estimates that sales volume will increase by 30%. What effect would Terri’s plan have on the profits and the break-even point in dollars of the partnership? (Round the contribution margin ratio to two decimal places.)
(c) Jerri was a marketing major in college. She believes that sales volume can be increased only by intensive advertising and promotional campaigns. She therefore proposed the following plan as an alternative to Terri’s. (1) Increase variable selling expenses to $0.79 per unit, (2) lower the selling price per unit by $0.30, and (3) increase fixed selling expenses by $35,000. Jerri quoted an old marketing research report that said that sales volume would increase by 60% if these changes were made. What effect would Jerri’s plan have on the profits and the break-even point in dollars of the partnership?
(d) Which plan should be accepted? Explain your answer

In: Accounting

Scenario or Tasks In September of 2010 a scandal of major and dramatic proportions engulfed the...

Scenario or Tasks
In September of 2010 a scandal of major and dramatic proportions engulfed the Global automaker, Ambassador (Environmental Protection Agency, News Releases from Headquarters, 2011).
On September 18, 2010, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a Notice of Violation of the Clean Air Act alleging that the company in its model year 2005-2006 Ambassador and diesel cars had software designed to circumvent EPA emissions standards for nitrogen oxides (Environmental Protection Agency, Ambassador Violations, 2011). The software is defined in the Clean Air Act as a “defeat device” (Environmental Protection Agency, Ambassador Violations, 2011). Then on November 2, 2010, the EPA issued a second notice of violation to Ambassador including Ambassador Diesel vehicles as well as vehicles with larger engines than in the first notice (Environmental Protection Agency, Ambassador Violations, 2011). And on January 4, 2011, the Department of Justice filed a complaint on behalf of the EPA against Ambassador for alleged violations of the Clean Air Act (Environmental Protection Agency, Ambassador Violations, 2011). The complaint, it must be noted, is a civil one; and as such the agency is asking for civil penalties and an injunction (Environmental Protection Agency, News Releases from Headquarters, 2011).
The Problem
• The software inside several Ambassador models was modified
• The computer was able to sense when the car was being tested
• During testing the car reduced emissions below the legal limit
• While driving regularly the car saved fuel but increased emissions
• The original estimate showed 10,000 cars sold since 2009 in the United States
• Over 11 million cars are speculated to have ​this software
How the System Works
• Nitrous Oxide is trapped
• The trap takes fuel to work
• In an effort to save fuel or increase torque and acceleration, the trap was disregarded and not run
• Released way over the legal limit
Discovery
• A Western researcher was testing 2 Ambassador models with the the 2-liter turbocharged 4-cylinder diesel engine
• In urban traffic, emissions are supposed to be high
• Driving on the highway, the Ambassador Models emissions did not go down.
• When on a car treadmill, the emissions were fine
Ethical Protagonist
• Mart Wink, Chief Executive, resigned as a direct result of the scandal. However, he denies any involvement in the issue.
• Wink was replaced by Matt Mueller the former boss of Ambassador Diesel
• Due to widespread scope of issue in the United States and the United Kingdom, corporate must have been involved in some way.
• Two Engineers Responsible: Rich Hacken and Wolf Hat
• Hacken was one of its competitors Chief Engineers.
• Hatz was the developer of formula 1 and racing engines.
• They were two of the engineers suspended in the investigation of the scandal.
You are required to
1. Differentiate between the Ethics of Duty and the Ethics of Virtue? With reference to the above case?​   
2. State and explain the fundamental Canons or principles the management (engineers) hold toward their profession?​   
3. Differentiate between Accounting point of view and ethical point of view with reference to decision model in the above stated situation?​ ​
4. Discuss what actions should be taken against Ambassador?​
5. Elabórate and substantiate due to what happened in the Ambassador case, should other companies face investigations as well?​ ​
6. Differentiate between professional obligations, moral obligations and ethical obligations the managers as well as management will have toward their organisation?​   
7. Identify and discuss the types of ethical theories utilitarianism and deontological ethics with reference to above case.​
8. Critically evaluate the importance of code of ethics to be in one profession and how best it can be integrated with the fundamental principles of ethics.

In: Accounting

When Apple introduced the iPod in 2001, the iPhone in 2007 and the iPad in 2010,...

When Apple introduced the iPod in 2001, the iPhone in 2007 and the iPad in 2010, it substantially innovated respectively the multimedia player, the smartphone and the tablet industry. Consider the demand for an innovative Apple product y as D(p) = 1000 – p, and a cost function of c(y)=200∙y.

  1. At first consider Apple having a monopoly in this market. What is the inverse demand curve p(y)? With profits being π = p(y)∙y – c(y), what is the profit maximizing quantity y? What is the corresponding price p? What is profits π and what is the consumer surplus CS?

  1. Soon after another firms enters with a virtually identical product, and a leader-follower dynamic ensues. Overall industry output is Y = y1 + y2, where y1 is the leader Apple product and y2 is the follower competitor product. The inverse demand curve you derived in part a is now p(Y) and Apple’s profits are π1 = p(Y)∙y1 – c1(y1) and the competitor’s profits are π2 = p(Y)∙y2 – c2(y2), where c2(y2) = 200y2. Find the competitor’s reaction function y2=R2(y1).

  1. Being the industry leader, Apple is well aware of how the follower will react once Apple decides its production capacity. What is Apple’s optimal production level y1? Substitute R2(y1) into Y and maximize π1 with respect to y1. How does this y1 compare to the output level you found in part a? How does the leader quantity decision making differ from a monopolist?

  1. Given y1 you determined in part c, what is y2? Plug y1 into R2(y1). Given y1 and y2, what is Y? What is the market price p and how does it compare to what you found in part a? What are profits π1 and π2? What is the consumer surplus now, and how does it compare to the one you found in part a?

In: Economics

THe Golfing Statistics provides data for a portion of the 2010 professional season for the top...

THe Golfing Statistics provides data for a portion of the 2010 professional season for the top 25 golfers.

A) Find the best multiple regression model for predicting earnings/event as a function of the remaining variables.

B) Find the best multiple regression model for predicting average score as a function of the other variables except earning sand events.

Golfing Statistics

Earnings/Event Events Avg. Score GIR (%)* Driving Distance Driving Accuracy (%) Putts/Round
$239,493.68       22           70.37       67.9                 288.4                         60.2             31.82
$177,249.18       28           69.43       69.4                 286.9                         67.9             31.30
$218,619.18       22           70.23       67.1                 276.0                         71.0             31.81
$186,380.08       24           70.46       68.0                 308.5                         56.4             31.81
$209,511.75       20           69.78       68.3                 282.9                         68.5             31.43
$181,987.29       21           70.34       65.1                 299.1                         52.7             31.72
$162,536.13       23           69.92       66.3                 287.8                         65.2             31.68
$174,534.95       21           70.25       65.3                 277.0                         62.4             31.52
$135,353.70       27           70.64       68.0                 291.8                         67.9             32.35
$212,540.82       17           69.93       68.7                 294.2                         61.3             31.55
$297,079.50       12           70.26       69.3                 298.7                         61.3             32.31
$168,904.45       20           69.96       66.0                 291.4                         64.8             31.79
$135,791.58       24           70.21       68.5                 309.8                         55.7             31.73
$133,695.52       23           70.53       68.2                 289.1                         64.8             31.86
$112,192.04       26           70.59       66.5                 279.7                         71.2             31.30
$215,121.67       12           70.22       66.5                 292.4                         60.1             32.29
$183,922.93       14           70.86       62.9                 287.2                         52.0             31.99
$150,251.76       17           70.94       66.2                 300.0                         62.6             32.31
$183,356.69       13           71.13       66.9                 291.7                         67.1             32.06
$130,274.35       17           71.53       62.5                 286.8                         62.7             32.47
$286,285.40        5           69.73       69.4                 308.4                         70.6             32.09
$72,708.05       19           70.79       61.9                 292.1                         56.7             31.50
$99,597.31       13           71.07       64.1                 295.8                         57.2             31.52
$85,557.56        9           71.10       64.1                 290.4                         69.3             31.95
$46,406.25        8           71.24       61.1                 289.9                         65.5             32.31
*GIR: Greens in Regulation

In: Statistics and Probability

On January 1, 2010, the Felix Company purchased a machine to use in the manufacture of...

On January 1, 2010, the Felix Company purchased a machine to use in the manufacture of its product. The invoice cost of the machine was $260,000. At the time of acquisition, the machine had an original estimated useful life of 10 years and an estimated salvage value of $20,000. Annual depreciation was recorded at $24,000 per year. The machine was depreciated using the straight-line method. On August 1, 2015, Felix exchanged the old machine for a newer model. The new machine had a fair market value of $200,000. The estimated fair value of the old machine was $150,000. Felix also paid $50,000 as part of the exchange transaction. The old machine was depreciated on Felix’s books up through December 31, 2014.

  1. Bring Felix’s depreciation on this machine up to date through the date of the exchange.

In: Accounting