Questions
How does your community and lived experience influence who you are and how you think about public health?


  1. How does your community and lived experience influence who you are and how you think about public health? Limit to 250 words

Academic or Personal Challenge *

  1. Tell us what you learned from a recent academic or personal challenge and what it means for how you might approach a challenge in the future. Limit to 250 words.

Impact *

  1. What is the impact you would like to make and how will the Public Health-Global Health major assist you in that path? Limit to 250 words.

Academic Experience

  1. Address any discrepancies in your academic record and reflect on your experience. Limit to 250 words.

In: Nursing

Year Revenue (Entry) # of Companies Employees Revenue/Employees (Profitability = Y) 2000 $24,996,750,000 39 291,227 85,832.53...

Year Revenue (Entry) # of Companies Employees Revenue/Employees
(Profitability = Y)
2000 $24,996,750,000 39 291,227 85,832.53
2001 $44,745,760,000 63 446,831 100,140.23
2002 $65,444,950,000 87 387,526 168,878.86
2003 $39,937,040,000 85 406,374 98,276.56
2004 $76,985,390,000 102 442,473 173,988.90
2005 $41,571,010,000 98 391,641 106,145.70
2006 $59,540,940,000 104 477,869 124,596.78
2007 $107,513,070,000 127 611,950 175,689.30
2008 $118,890,930,000 145 719,897 165,149.92
2009 $155,165,540,000 160 856,854 181,087.49
2010 $213,437,520,000 144 916,889 232,784.47
2011 $159,266,760,000 122 773,126 206,003.63
2012 $94,751,110,000 54 499,211 189,801.73
2013 $85,184,260,000 35 498,395 170,917.16
2014 $113,949,560,000 49 573,167 198,806.91
2015 $127,059,310,000 65 781,837 162,513.81
2016 $130,005,490,000 81 813,389 159,831.88
2017 $129,021,400,000 59 647,861 199,149.82
2018 $145,397,350,000 59 748,140 194,345.11

Do new entrants and employees affect the Healthcare industry for the years 2000-2018?

Dependent variable - industry's revenue

Independent variable - the number of new entrants and employees + omitted variables

Using the above table create:

- Hypothesis testing

- P-value

- T-test

- Level of significance

- Scatter Plot

- Regression analysis

In: Economics

From the table below giving the quantity demanded of a commodity (Y), its price (X10, and...

  1. From the table below giving the quantity demanded of a commodity (Y), its price (X10, and consumer income (X2) from 1996 to 2015,
  1. Find the least-squares regression equation of Y on X1 and X2 USING EXCEL’S DATA ANALYSIS TOOL.
  2. Test at the 5 percent for the statistical significance of the slope parameters,
  3. Find the adjusted and the adjusted coefficients of determination, and
  4. Test at 5 percent level for the overall statistical significance of the regression.

Show all your results to three decimal places.

Year

Y

X1

X2

1996

72

$10

$2000

1997

81

9

2100

1998

90

10

2210

1999

99

9

2305

2000

108

8

2407

2001

126

7

2500

2002

117

7

2610

2003

117

9

2698

2004

135

6

2801

2005

135

6

2921

2006

144

6

3000

2007

180

4

3099

2008

162

5

3201

2009

171

4

3308

2010

153

5

3397

2011

180

4

3501

2012

171

5

3689

2013

180

4

3800

2014

198

4

3896

2015

189

4

3989

In: Economics

13. Given the following data on the Dollar/Pound exchange rate (y) and the U.S. CPI (x),...

13. Given the following data on the Dollar/Pound exchange rate (y) and the U.S. CPI (x), determine the linear regression equation, and include the Summary Output from Excel. • Based on the Summary Output is the coefficient b2 significant using the t-table (one-tail) at the 5% level with n-2 df? Prove your answer using data from the t-table. • Does the relationship given by the regression equation seem to be a reasonable economic model-- is it reasonable to assume that in this model y = f(x)? Explain why or why not. y x Period Exchange rate $ / £ CPI US 1985 1.2974 107.6 1986 1.4677 109.6 1987 1.6398 113.6 1988 1.7813 118.3 1989 1.6382 124 1990 1.7841 130.7 1991 1.7674 136.2 1992 1.7663 140.3 1993 1.5016 144.5 1994 1.5319 148.2 1995 1.5785 152.4 1996 1.5607 156.9 1997 1.6376 160.5 1998 1.6573 163 1999 1.6172 166.6 2000 1.5156 172.2 2001 1.4396 177.1 2002 1.5025 179.9 2003 1.6347 184 2004 1.833 188.9 2005 1.8204 195.3 2006 1.8434 201.6 2007 2.002 207.342

In: Economics

Year Rp Rm Rf 2000 18.1832 -24.9088 5.112 2001 -3.454 -15.1017 5.051 2002 47.5573 20.784 3.816...

Year Rp Rm Rf
2000 18.1832 -24.9088 5.112
2001 -3.454 -15.1017 5.051
2002 47.5573 20.784 3.816
2003 28.7035 9.4163 4.2455
2004 29.8613 8.7169 4.2182
2005 11.2167 16.3272 4.3911
2006 32.2799 14.5445 4.7022
2007 -41.0392 -36.0483 4.0232
2008 17.6082 9.7932 2.2123
2009 14.1058 16.5089 3.8368
2010 16.1978 8.0818 3.2935
2011 11.558 15.1984 1.8762
2012 42.993 27.1685 1.7574
2013 18.8682 17.2589 3.0282
2014 -1.4678 5.1932 2.1712
2015 9.2757 4.4993 2.2694
2016 8.5985 23.624 2.4443

When performing calculations in the following problems, use the numbers in the table as-is. I.e., do NOT convert 8.5985 to 8.5985% (or 0.085985). Just use plain 8.5985.

1. Compute the Sortino Ratio of the portfolio using a minimal acceptable return of R M A = 3 . To calculate DDp :

  1. Compute R p − R M A each year.
  2. n = number of years R p − R M A < 0 .
  3. DD p = square root of 1/ n− 1 ∑ ( R p − R M A )^2 for the years when R p − R M A < 0

In: Finance

Why did the Reformation happen in Germany?

Why did the Reformation happen in Germany? What issues motivated Martin Luther to rebel against the Church and papacy? 

In: History

Based on the documentary The Age of Discovery by Howard Goodall How important was the church...

Based on the documentary The Age of Discovery by Howard Goodall How important was the church in the development of music as we know it today?

In: Psychology

Ronnie, who is in the 33% tax bracket this year, expects to retire next year and...

Ronnie, who is in the 33% tax bracket this year, expects to retire next year and be in the 25% tax bracket. He plans to donate $50,000 to his church. Because he will not have the case available until next year, Ronnie donates land (long term capital gain property) with a basis of $10,000 and fair market value of $50,000 to the church in December of the current year. He reacquires the land for $50,000 in February of next year. Discuss Ronnie's tax objectives and all tax issues related to his actions.

In: Accounting

South Hampton University is preparing its budget for the upcoming academic year. This is a specialised...

South Hampton University is preparing its budget for the upcoming academic year. This is a specialised private university that charges fees for all degree courses. Currently, 30 000 students are enrolled on campus. However, the university is forecasting a 5 per cent growth in student numbers in the coming year, despite an increase in fees to $3 000 per subject. The following additional information has been gathered from an examination of university records and conversations with university managers:
1. South Hampton is planning to award scholarships to 200 students, which will cover their fees.
2. The average class has 80 students, and the typical student takes 4 subjects per semester. South Hampton operates 2 semesters per year.
3. The average academic staff salary is $120 000 per annum including on-costs.
4. South Hampton’s academic staff are evaluated on the basis of teaching, research, administration and professional/community service. Each of the academic staff teaches the equivalent of three subjects during the academic year.
Required:
a. Prepare a revenue budget for the upcoming academic year.
b. Determine the number of staff needed to cover classes.
c. Assume there is a shortage of full-time academic staff. List at least five actions that South Hampton might take to accommodate the growing student numbers

In: Accounting

MARKET FAILURE – packaging in the UK: Consider the external effects of soft-drink packaging on UK...

MARKET FAILURE – packaging in the UK:

Consider the external effects of soft-drink packaging on UK beaches, according to this article:

"

Coca-Cola bottles and cans are the most commonly found items of packaging pollution on British beaches, making up nearly 12% of all litter, research by Surfers Against Sewage (SAS)has found.

The results came from a series of 229 beach cleans organised by the anti-pollution campaigning group in April, which found close to 50,000 pieces of waste. About 20,000 of these carried identifiable brands, of which Coca-Cola was the leader, followed by Walkers crisps, Cadbury’s, McDonald’s and Nestlé.

When other brands owned by Coca-Cola were taken into account, the company’s share of the waste found rose to more than 15%. PepsiCo was the parent company to more than 10% of the branded waste found, followed by Cadbury’s owner, Mondelēz International, with about 7%. Identifiable packaging from McDonald’s accounted for 6% of the total with Nestlé just behind at 5.5%.

Hugo Tagholm, chief executive of SAS, said businesses must take responsibility for the waste associated with their products, citing new rules intended to force companies to prevent and remedy littering. “Producers must offer full transparency and disclosure on the amount and type of packaging they use. Our environment is in peril and plastic pollution is a clear indicator that business as usual just won’t do,” he said. “This is not a littering issue – business needs to provide radical and responsible new systems that drastically reduce their impact on our oceans, forests and nature at large.”

More than 45,000 volunteers took place in the Big Spring Beach Clean series of events in April that resulted in the biggest ever survey of beach litter in the UK, analysed by the consultancy Eunomia. The findings have been submitted to the government, which is considering ways to reduce the UK’s littering and packaging pollution problems through the Extended Producer Responsibility regulations.

Sign up to the Green Light email to get the planet's most important stories

Read more

At present, companies must be accountable for their packaging if they have an annual turnover of more than £2m and handle more than 50 tonnes of packaging a year. However, SAS complains that in practice the vast majority of the cost of dealing with litter and packaging waste – about 90% – is borne by local authorities and that the parent companies of many leading brands do not share information on the quantity of packaging they produce.

Following the consultation, the government may toughen the rules, making companies 100% responsible for the cost of the waste resulting from their packaging, from production to final disposal. SAS is calling for more transparency to make any new rules effective.

The survey found that 10 companies were responsible for more than half of the identifiably branded rubbish found on the UK’s beaches. Tagholm said: “People and planet need these companies to change how they do business. At the moment, the cost of this waste is left in the hands of local councils, taxpayers and the environment.”

Advertisement

A Coca-Cola spokesperson said: “We don’t want to see any of our packaging end up as litter, on land or in the ocean. We are one of the few companies to publish the amount of packaging we use, globally and locally, and we are supportive of reform to the Extended Producer Responsibility [rules], including the introduction of a deposit return scheme to help us get more packaging back.”

The company, which produces 3m tonnes of plastic packaging a year, has pledged to collect and recycle one bottle or can for every one that it sells, as part of a global initiative called WorldWithoutWaste, and last year said it would increase the amount of recycled plastic in all bottles across its brands from 25% to 50% by 2020. “In Britain, all our bottles and cans are already 100% recyclable and our goal is to use the power of our brand to drive people to recycle more, and calling for reform of the UK producer responsibility system,” the spokesperson said.

“When disposed of properly, our bottles can be recycled into new bottles over and over again. The current consultations on packaging and recycling represent a once-in-a-generation opportunity to reform the system to ensure more packaging is recovered and recycled and we welcome these.”

We've got an announcement …

… on our progress as an organisation. In service of the escalating climate emergency, we have made an important decision – to renounce fossil fuel advertising, becoming the first major global news organisation to institute an outright ban on taking money from companies that extract fossil fuels.

In October we outlined our pledge: that the Guardian will give global heating, wildlife extinction and pollution the urgent attention and prominence they demand. This resonated with so many readers around the world. We promise to update you on the steps we take to hold ourselves accountable at this defining point in our lifetimes. With climate misinformation rife, and never more dangerous than now, the Guardian's accurate, authoritative reporting is vital – and we will not stay quiet.

We chose a different approach: to keep Guardian journalism open for all. We don't have a paywall because we believe everyone deserves access to factual information, regardless of where they live or what they can afford to pay.

Our editorial independence means we are free to investigate and challenge inaction by those in power. We will inform our readers about threats to the environment based on scientific facts, not driven by commercial or political interests. And we have made several important changes to our style guide to ensure the language we use accurately reflects the environmental emergency.

The Guardian believes that the problems we face on the climate crisis are systemic and that fundamental societal change is needed. We will keep reporting on the efforts of individuals and communities around the world who are fearlessly taking a stand for future generations and the preservation of human life on earth. We want their stories to inspire hope."

Based on this discussion and economic theory, draw an appropriate diagram to illustrate and explain this specific type of externality (assume the market is competitive). Demonstrate on your diagram and evaluate what would be a suitable government policy to help solve the market failure in this case. [Type answer in 500 words or less]

In: Economics