Using Rstudio
# 1. Monty-Hall Three doors
Recall the Monty-Hall game with three doors, discussed in class. Run a simulation to check that the probablility of winning increases to 2/3 if we switch doors at step two.
Set up the experiment two functions "monty_3doors_noswitch" and "monty_3doors_switch" (these functions will have no input values):
```{r}
monty_3doors_noswitch <- function(){
}
monty_3doors_switch <- function(){
}
```
Use your two functions and the replicate function to compute the
empirical probablility of winning for the two experiments.
Compare your answers with the actual theoretical predictions.
```{r}
```
In: Computer Science
Suppose you work for a small company that produces and sells gourmet pierogi-flavored cookies (yum?) called Babushkies in Northwest Indiana. Your boss has never really paid any attention to the demand for your product before, and one day she asks you to conduct a quantitative demand analysis for Babushkies. She provides you with yearly data from 2000 and 2019 on factors that may be important in the demand for Babushkies, including the price (Px ) and number of Babushkies sold (Qx) , the price of a related good (Py) and the average annual income for Northwest Indiana (M ).
The following steps walk you through the process of conducting a quantitative demand analysis:
Qxd=α0+αXPx+αyPy+αMM
What is the estimated demand function (you can round estimated coefficients to two significant decimals)? Write this out clearly. Include a copy of your regression output from Excel.
| Year | Qx | Px | Py | M |
| 2019 | 173 | 3.7 | 3.04 | 39,010 |
| 2018 | 197 | 5.58 | 8.45 | 37,645 |
| 2017 | 175 | 5.06 | 1.95 | 39,718 |
| 2016 | 182 | 6.65 | 6.59 | 39,208 |
| 2015 | 206 | 5.85 | 6.87 | 39,629 |
| 2014 | 176 | 5.4 | 3.77 | 40,239 |
| 2013 | 158 | 6.55 | 3.44 | 39,717 |
| 2012 | 181 | 4.79 | 4.49 | 39,912 |
| 2011 | 170 | 6.25 | 5.61 | 39,738 |
| 2010 | 197 | 4.54 | 5.86 | 39,779 |
| 2009 | 209 | 4.64 | 7.89 | 39,666 |
| 2008 | 180 | 4.07 | 3.97 | 40,814 |
| 2007 | 168 | 5.7 | 3.3 | 39,218 |
| 2006 | 198 | 4.09 | 4.68 | 40,014 |
| 2005 | 214 | 3.99 | 7.12 | 38,889 |
| 2004 | 209 | 3.63 | 7.77 | 39,535 |
| 2003 | 187 | 4.08 | 5.39 | 41,304 |
| 2002 | 189 | 4.82 | 5.62 | 39,899 |
| 2001 | 205 | 5.12 | 7.51 | 40,345 |
| 2000 | 204 | 3.86 | 6.7 | 40,070 |
In: Economics
There is some evidence that, in the years 1981 - 85, a simple name change resulted in a short-term increase in the price of certain business firms' stocks (relative to the prices of similar stocks). (See D. Horsky and P. Swyngedouw, "Does it pay to change your company's name? A stock market perspective," Marketing Science v.6, pp. 320- 35, 1987.)
Suppose that, to test the profitability of name changes in the more recent market (the past five years), we analyze the stock prices of a large sample of corporations shortly after they changed names, and we find that the mean relative increase in stock price was about 0.72%, with a standard deviation of 0.14%. Suppose that this mean and standard deviation apply to the population of all companies that changed names during the past five years. Complete the following statements about the distribution of relative increases in stock price for all companies that changed names during the past five years.
(a) According to Chebyshev's theorem, at least____ of the relative increases in stock price lie between 0.51 % and 0.93 %.
(b) According to Chebyshev's theorem, at least ____ of the relative increases in stock price lie between 0.44 % and 1.00 %.
(c) Suppose that the distribution is bell-shaped. According to the empirical rule, approximately____ of the relative increases in stock price lie between 0.44 % and 1.00 %.
(d) Suppose that the distribution is bell-shaped. According to
the empirical rule, approximately 99.7% of the relative increases
in stock price lie between___%
and ____%.
In: Statistics and Probability
There is some evidence that, in the years 1981-85, a simple name change resulted in a short-term increase in the price of certain business firms' stocks (relative to the prices of similar stocks). (See D. Horsky and P. Swyngedouw, "Does it pay to change your company's name? A stock market perspective," Marketing Science v.6 , pp. 320-35,1987.) Suppose that, to test the profitability of name changes in the more recent market (the past five years), we analyze the stock prices of a large sample of corporations shortly after they changed names, and we find that the mean relative increase in stock price was about 0.70%, with a standard deviation of 0.15%. Suppose that this mean and standard deviation apply to the population of all companies that changed names during the past five years. Complete the following statements about the distribution of relative increases in stock price for all companies that changed names during the past five years.
a) According to Chebyshev's theorem, at least of the relative increases in stock price lie between 0.25 % and 1.15.
(b) According to Chebyshev's theorem, at least of the relative increases in stock price lie between 0.40 % and 1.00.
(c) Suppose that the distribution is bell-shaped. According to the empirical rule, approximately of the relative increases in stock price lie between 0.40 % and 1.00.
(d) Suppose that the distribution is bell-shaped. According to the empirical rule, approximately 68% of the relative increases in stock price lie between _% and _%. .
In: Statistics and Probability
Suppose the systolic blood pressure (in mm) of adult males has an approximately normal distribution with mean μμ =125 and standard deviation σσ =14.
Create an empirical rule graph with the following:
Note: This may be hand drawn or computer generated. See the models
for desired formats.
a. Upload your completed file below. Choose FileScan Mar 5, 2020
(1).pdf
Now use your graph to answer the following questions.
b. About 95% of men will have blood pressure between what
amounts?
and
c. What percentage of men will have a systolic blood pressure
outside the range 97 mm to 167 mm?
d. Suppose you are a health practitioner and an adult male patient
has systolic blood pressure of 172 mm. Use statistics to explain
the gravity of his situation. Structure your essay as
follows:
In: Statistics and Probability
There is some evidence that, in the years 1981-85, a simple name change resulted in a short-term increase in the price of certain business firms' stocks (relative to the prices of similar stocks). (See D. Horsky and P. Swyngedouw, "Does it pay to change your company's name? A stock market perspective," Marketing Science v.6, pp. 320-35,1987.) Suppose that, to test the profitability of name changes in the more recent market (the past five years), we analyze the stock prices of a large sample of corporations shortly after they changed names, and we find that the mean relative increase in stock price was about 0.89%, with a standard deviation of 0.16%. Suppose that this mean and standard deviation apply to the population of all companies that changed names during the past five years. Complete the following statements about the distribution of relative increases in stock price for all companies that changed names during the past five years.
(a) According to Chebyshev's theorem, at least of the relative increases in stock price lie between 0.57 % and 1.21 %.
(b) According to Chebyshev's theorem, at least of the relative increases in stock price lie between 0.65 % and 1.13 %.
(c) Suppose that the distribution is bell-shaped. According to the empirical rule, approximately of the relative increases in stock price lie between 0.57 % and 1.21 %. (d) Suppose that the distribution is bell-shaped. According to the empirical rule, approximately 99.7% of the relative increases in stock price lie between % and %.
In: Math
Daddy Warbucks is in the process of adopting Annie from a New York orphanage. He pays $7,000 in 2017, and $7,500 in 2018. Daddy Warbucks’ AGI for 2018 is $165,000.
a. How much is the adoption credit that Daddy Warbucks may claim for 2018 if the adoption becomes final in 2018?
b. How much is the adoption credit that Daddy Warbucks may claim for 2018 if the adoption becomes final in 2019?
c. How much is the adoption credit that Daddy Warbucks may claim for 2018 if the adoption falls through and is never finalized?
In: Finance
The following inventory transactions took place near December 31, 2018, the end of the Rasul Company's fiscal year-end:
Assignment:
In: Accounting
Form a portfolio investing 50% of your money into Amazon and 50% into Pfizer.
a)Calculate the monthly return for each month of the portfolio. Then, provide arithmetic average and standard deviation of the portfolio return. Check and report whether the linear combination (weighted average) of standard deviation of two companies is smaller than portfolio’s standard deviation or not.
b)Calculate the monthly market return, average market return, and market variance using S&P500 Index. Using the variance of market return and covariance between market return and Amazon’s return, calculate the Amazon’s beta. Use =VAR.S() for variance and =COVARIANCE.S() function to get covariance
c)Suppose risk free rate is 1% and expected market return is 5%. Compute the expected return of Amazon using CAPM. You would get the beta in (b)
|
Date |
Stock Price |
|||
|
Amazon |
Pfizer |
S&P 500 |
||
|
2017/12 |
1169,47 |
33,38 |
2673,61 |
|
|
2018/01 |
1450,89 |
34,13 |
2823,81 |
|
|
2018/02 |
1512,45 |
33,46 |
2713,83 |
|
|
2018/03 |
1447,34 |
33,01 |
2640,87 |
|
|
2018/04 |
1566,13 |
34,05 |
2648,05 |
|
|
2018/05 |
1629,62 |
33,42 |
2705,27 |
|
|
2018/06 |
1699,80 |
34,07 |
2718,37 |
|
|
2018/07 |
1777,44 |
37,50 |
2816,29 |
|
|
2018/08 |
2012,71 |
38,99 |
2901,52 |
|
|
2018/09 |
2003,00 |
41,74 |
2913,98 |
|
|
2018/10 |
1598,01 |
40,78 |
2711,74 |
|
|
2018/11 |
1690,17 |
43,79 |
2760,17 |
|
|
2018/12 |
1501,97 |
41,66 |
2506,85 |
|
In: Finance
T&H Plumbing Company completed the following transactional data for the first month of operations.
May 1: Steven Mattel deposited $68,700 in the business account. In addition, he transferred his vehicle title, worth $13,820, to the business. Steven received capital in return.
1: A Payment was made for the amount of $2,500 to Sky Properties. The concept states “May through July Rent.”
4: Purchased business insurance policy for $2,400 for the period May, 2000, through April 30,2001.
5: Steven went to the Plumbing Tools Distributor and purchased $5,600 on account. This invoice for specialize plumbing tools is due in 30 days.
5: Purchase general plumbing supplies for the amount of $450.
6: Purchased on account plumbing tools from PBS Wholesale costing $1,100. The invoice is payable on May 27.
8: Purchase a computer, $900, and a printer, $79. A check was written for the total amount of $979 under the name Best Buy Company.
8: Purchased office supplies for a total of $450.
9: Plumbing repair was performed for Don Smith Company, $2,800 was sign on account.
10: Deposited $1,000 cash from Don Smith Company in the bank.
11: Bought a pick-up truck for $7,500.00 on account. The first payment of $300 is due on June 15.
15: Paid $500 to Adam Prinkle for contract labor.
15: Signed a contract with Xerox Corporation for the amount of $14,280 for plumbing renovations. The starting date of the contract is May 15, 2000 and the ending date is August 30, 2000. Total amount was received at signature.
16: Provided plumbing services for Letty Petrovsky for $390.
17: Received electric and water bill for the amount of $250. The due date is June 4, 2000.
18: Borrowed $26,000 from bank with interest rate of 9% annually.
19: Deposited check from Don Smith Company for $700 paid on account.
22: Paid $2,000 to Plumbing Tools Distributor for invoice #301450.
22: Wrote check payable to New York Times for $200 for advertising.
25: Bought an office space for the amount of $28,000 on account.
26: Signed a plumbing contract with VP Cathering for the amount of $2,500. The contract is due in 3 months starting on June 1st. Total was received in advance.
30: Mattel withdrew cash of $2,000.
Requirements
In: Accounting