Questions
In 2002 the Supreme Court ruled that schools could require random drug tests of students participating...

In 2002 the Supreme Court ruled that schools could require random drug tests of students participating in competitive after-school activities such as athletics. Does drug testing reduce use of illegal drugs? A study compared two similar high schools in Oregon. Wahtonka High School tested athletes at random and Warrenton High School did not. In a confidential survey, 8 of 133 athletes at Wahtonka and 27 of 115 athletes at Warrenton said they were using drugs. Regard these athletes as SRSs from the populations of athletes at similar schools with and without drug testing.

(a) You should not use the large-sample confidence interval. Why not?
Choose a reason.The sample sizes are too small.The sample sizes are not identical.The sample proportions are too small.At least one sample has too few failures.At least one sample has too few successes.

(b) The plus four method adds two observations, a success and a failure, to each sample. What are the sample sizes and the numbers of drug users after you do this?

Wahtonka sample size:     Wahtonka drug users:
Warrenton sample size:     Warrenton drug users:

(c) Give the plus four 99.5% confidence interval for the difference between the proportion of athletes using drugs at schools with and without testing.
Interval: to

please show your work and what function to use on the calculator if any. Thank you!

In: Statistics and Probability

In 2002 the Supreme Court ruled that schools could require random drug tests of students participating...

In 2002 the Supreme Court ruled that schools could require random drug tests of students participating in competitive after-school activities such as athletics. Does drug testing reduce use of illegal drugs? A study compared two similar high schools in Oregon. Wahtonka High School tested athletes at random and Warrenton High School did not. In a confidential survey, 5 of 140 athletes at Wahtonka and 25 of 102 athletes at Warrenton said they were using drugs. Regard these athletes as SRSs from the populations of athletes at similar schools with and without drug testing.

(a) You should not use the large-sample confidence interval. Why not?
Choose a reason. The sample sizes are too small. The sample sizes are not identical. The sample proportions are too small. At least one sample has too few failures. At least one sample has too few successes.

(b) The plus four method adds two observations, a success and a failure, to each sample. What are the sample sizes and the numbers of drug users after you do this?

Wahtonka sample size:      Wahtonka drug users:  
Warrenton sample size:      Warrenton drug users:

(c) Give the plus four 95% confidence interval for the difference between the proportion of athletes using drugs at schools with and without testing.
Interval: to

In: Statistics and Probability

Using the financial statements for HealthSouth Corp for the quarter ending 6/30/2002, or use the current...

Using the financial statements for HealthSouth Corp for the quarter ending 6/30/2002, or use the current financial statements for either Microsoft or Facebook. Choose your primary ratio and post your analysis.

2 Calculate several ratios—I would suggest at least one from each of the categories (profitability, liquidity, solvency, and activity/efficiency) from chapter 4 (chapter 11 in Marshall) in the text plus at least one ratio that you have found somewhere else or even made up. You should examine these ratios over a 4 year period (No need to look at every quarter). For example you might look at quarter 2 every year for 4 years—including the quarter that I have chosen. Once you are used to looking up financial statements--if you do this strategically you should be able to examine 4 years of data by looking at only two separate years of financial statements.   Please do not discuss all of these ratios. Your goal in calculating a number of ratios is to increase your chances of finding a ratio that is interesting and important.  

INCOME STATEMENTS - USD ($)
shares in Millions, $ in Millions

3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017 Dec. 31, 2016 Dec. 31, 2017 Dec. 31, 2016
Revenue
Product $ 17,926 $ 18,273 $ 32,224 $ 33,241
Service and other 10,992 7,553 21,232 14,513
Total revenue 28,918 25,826 53,456 47,754
Cost of revenue
Product 5,498 5,378 8,478 8,959
Service and other 5,566 4,523 10,864 8,786
Total cost of revenue 11,064 9,901 19,342 17,745
Gross margin 17,854 15,925 34,114 30,009
Research and development 3,504 3,062 7,078 6,168
Sales and marketing 4,562 4,079 8,374 7,297
General and administrative 1,109 879 2,275 1,924
Operating income 8,679 7,905 16,387 14,620
Other income, net 490 117 766 229
Income before income taxes 9,169 8,022 17,153 14,849
Provision for income taxes 15,471 1,755 16,879 2,915
Net income (loss) $ (6,302) $ 6,267 $ 274 $ 11,934
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic $ (0.82) $ 0.81 $ 0.04 $ 1.54
Diluted $ (0.82) $ 0.80 $ 0.04 $ 1.52
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic 7,710 7,755 7,709 7,772
Diluted 7,710 7,830 7,799 7,853
Cash dividends declared per common share $ 0.42 $ 0.39 $ 0.84 $ 0.78

BALANCE SHEETS - USD ($)
$ in Millions

Dec. 31, 2017 Jun. 30, 2017
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 12,859 $ 7,663
Short-term investments (including securities loaned of $4,247 and $3,694) 129,921 125,318
Total cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments 142,780 132,981
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $337 and $345 18,428 22,431
Inventories 2,003 2,181
Other 4,422 5,103
Total current assets 167,633 162,696
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $26,849 and $24,179 26,304 23,734
Operating lease right-of-use assets 6,749 6,555
Equity and other investments 3,961 6,023
Goodwill 35,355 35,122
Intangible assets, net 9,034 10,106
Other long-term assets 6,967 6,076
Total assets 256,003 250,312
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable 7,850 7,390
Short-term debt 12,466 9,072
Current portion of long-term debt 3,446 1,049
Accrued compensation 4,427 5,819
Short-term income taxes 788 718
Short-term unearned revenue 21,309 24,013
Securities lending payable 26 97
Other 7,787 7,587
Total current liabilities 58,099 55,745
Long-term debt 73,348 76,073
Long-term income taxes 30,050 13,485
Long-term unearned revenue 2,500 2,643
Deferred income taxes 3,186 5,734
Operating lease liabilities 5,640 5,372
Other long-term liabilities 4,820 3,549
Total liabilities 177,643 162,601
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock and paid-in capital – shares authorized 24,000; outstanding 7,705 and 7,708 70,192 69,315
Retained earnings 8,567 17,769
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (399) 627
Total stockholders’ equity 78,360 87,711
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 256,003 $ 250,312

In: Accounting

On September​ 11, 2002, a particular state​ lottery's daily number came up 9 - 1 -...

On September​ 11, 2002, a particular state​ lottery's daily number came up 9 - 1 - 1. Assume that no more than one digit is used to represent the first nine months.

​a) What is the probability that the winning three numbers match the date on any given​ day?​

b) What is the probability that a whole year passes without this​ happening? ​

c) What is the probability that the date and winning lottery number match at least once during any​ year? ​

d) If 27 states have a​ three-digit lottery, what is the probability that at least one of them will come up 3 - 1 - 0 on March 10​?

In: Statistics and Probability

An article in Electronic Packaging and Production (2002, vol. 42) considered the effect of X-ray inspection...

An article in Electronic Packaging and Production (2002, vol. 42) considered the effect of X-ray inspection of integrated circuits. The radiation dose (rads) were studied as a function of current (in milliamps) and exposure (in minutes).The data are in excel file uploaded to Moodle. Name of the file is “Assignment 4 Data”. Use a software (preferable MINITAB) to answer the following questions

Part 2. Now, add current to the model and perform multiple regression analysis. (Include the output in your pdf file.)

a) Write the fitted model.

b) Is the model overall significant? Test at significance level of 5%.

c) Is current a significant variable for the model? Test at α=0.05.

d) Use the model to estimate mean radiation dose when the current is 25 mA and exposure time is 30 seconds.

e) Do you observe an improvement in coefficient of determination? Explain

***Assume that you have data of radiation dose, exposure time and mA for 40 samples. Can you solve the problem above using minitab amd show the steps please?

Rads mA Exposure Time
7,4 10 0,25
14,8 10 0,5
29,6 10 1
59,2 10 2
88,8 10 3
296 10 10
444 10 15
592 10 20
11,1 15 0,25
22,2 15 0,5
44,4 15 1
88,8 15 2
133,2 15 3
444 15 10
666 15 15
888 15 20
14,8 20 0,25
29,6 20 0,5
59,2 20 1
118,4 20 2
177,6 20 3
592 20 10
888 20 15
1184 20 20
22,2 30 0,25
44,4 30 0,5
88,8 30 1
177,6 30 2
266,4 30 3
888 30 10
1332 30 15
1776 30 20
29,6 40 0,25
59,2 40 0,5
118,4 40 1
236,8 40 2
355,2 40 3
1184 40 10
1776 40 15
2368 40 20

In: Statistics and Probability

An article in Electronic Packaging and Production (2002, vol. 42) considered the effect of X-ray inspection...

An article in Electronic Packaging and Production (2002, vol. 42) considered the effect of X-ray inspection of integrated circuits. The radiation dose (rads) were studied as a function of current (in milliamps) and exposure (in minutes).The data arein excel file uploaded to Moodle. Name of the file is “Assignment 4 Data”. Use a software (preferable MINITAB) to answer the following questions.

Part 1. Perform simple linear regression analysis with the variables, radiation dose and exposure time to answer the following questions. (Include the output in your pdf file.)

  1. a) Determine response variable and find the fitted line. (Estimated regression line)

  2. b) Predict the radiation dose when exposure time is 15 seconds.

  3. c) Estimate the standard deviation of radiation dose.

  4. d) What percentage of variability in radiation dose can be explained by the

    exposure time?

  5. e) Obtain 95% CI for the true slope of regression line.

*****Can you solve the problem above using Minitab and show the steps please?

X-ray Inspection Data
Rads mA Exposure Time
7,4 10 0,25
14,8 10 0,5
29,6 10 1
59,2 10 2
88,8 10 3
296 10 10
444 10 15
592 10 20
11,1 15 0,25
22,2 15 0,5
44,4 15 1
88,8 15 2
133,2 15 3
444 15 10
666 15 15
888 15 20
14,8 20 0,25
29,6 20 0,5
59,2 20 1
118,4 20 2
177,6 20 3
592 20 10
888 20 15
1184 20 20
22,2 30 0,25
44,4 30 0,5
88,8 30 1
177,6 30 2
266,4 30 3
888 30 10
1332 30 15
1776 30 20
29,6 40 0,25
59,2 40 0,5
118,4 40 1
236,8 40 2
355,2 40 3
1184 40 10
1776 40 15
2368 40 20

In: Statistics and Probability

Slot machines are the favorite game at casinos throughout the United States (Harrah’s Survey 2002: Profile...

Slot machines are the favorite game at casinos throughout the United States (Harrah’s Survey 2002: Profile of the American Gambler). A local casino wants to estimate the difference in the percent of women and me who prefer the slots with a 95% level of confidence. Random samples of 320 women and 250 men found that 256 women prefer slots and 165 men prefer slots.

1-

-Hypothesis test for one population mean (unknown population standard deviation)

2-Confidence interval estimate for one population mean (unknown population standard deviation)

3-Hypothesis test for population mean from paired differences

4-Confidence interval estimate for population mean from paired differences

5-Hypothesis test for difference in population means from two independent samples

6-Confidence interval estimate for difference in population means from two independent samples

7-Hypothesis test for one population proportion

8-Confidence interval estimate for one population proportion

9-Hypothesis test for difference between two population proportions

10-Confidence interval estimate for difference between two population proportions

The National Endowment for the Humanities sponsors summer institutes to improve the skills of high school language teachers. One institute hosted 20 French teachers for four weeks. At the beginning of the period, the teachers took the Modern Language Association's listening test of understanding of spoken French. After four weeks of immersion in French in and out of class, they took the listening test again. (The actual spoken French in the two tests was different, so that simply taking the first test should not improve the score on the second test.) The Director of the summer institute would like to estimate the change (and hopeful improvement) in the teachers' skills after participating in the class.

1-

-Hypothesis test for one population mean (unknown population standard deviation)

2-Confidence interval estimate for one population mean (unknown population standard deviation)

3-Hypothesis test for population mean from paired differences

4-Confidence interval estimate for population mean from paired differences

5-Hypothesis test for difference in population means from two independent samples

6-Confidence interval estimate for difference in population means from two independent samples

7-Hypothesis test for one population proportion

8-Confidence interval estimate for one population proportion

9-Hypothesis test for difference between two population proportions

10-Confidence interval estimate for difference between two population proportions

In: Statistics and Probability

Boca Electronics, a manufacturer of semiconductor components,was established in Houston, Texas, in 2002 afterspinning off from...

Boca Electronics, a manufacturer of semiconductor components,was established in Houston, Texas, in 2002 afterspinning off from its parent company. Originally a branch of Vissay Inc.,Boca Electronics had a solid customer base and strong sales with some major firms such as IBM, Compaq, and Motorola. Semiconductors included a wide array of products
that were broken down according to their application and material. Some of their main products include microprocessors, light-emitting diodes (LEDs), rectifiers, and suppressors. Boca
Electronics operated on a mainframe system that it inherited from its parent company and used additional stand-alone systems to perform many of its other business functions. For
the last four years the company had performed well financially, so little concern had been given to the business operations. However, recent slowdowns in the economy and an increase
in competition in the semiconductor industry had forced Boca Electronics to take another look at the way it operated its business.

Ron Butler, the purchasing manager at Boca Electronics, was responsible for ordering raw materials and ensuring that their delivery was on time and met production requirements.
Ron used his own forecasting software to determine purchasing needs based on past sales. Although this worked most ofthe time, Ron often found himself scrambling to meet large customer orders at the last minute and was forced to expedite a lot of orders to meet the production needs. Ron felt this was due largely to the lack of communication between his department and the sales force. Although he received production forecasts and projected sales from the sales department, it occurred on an irregular basis, and the forecasts would often change by the time he had placed orders to the suppliers. In addition, Ron had a difficult time synchronizing with suppliers and determining factors such as lead times and product prices. He had previously recommended a new software system that would integrate with suppliers of key components but the proposal was turned down by senior management due to a “current lack of need for such an investment.” Boca Electronics also faced issues regarding its cash flows. It took several weeks for the accounting department to process invoices and usually had to e-mail back and forth with the sales manager to make multiple corrections. Because both departments used different systems to manage customer accounts, some of the data was redundant and inaccurate (customer accounts would be updated in the sales department, but not in accounting). Although this issue went largely unnoticed during thriving periods, the recent slowdown in the economy revealed potential repercussions of the current business operations, as Boca Electronics began to run short on its cash flows.

In the last month, one of Boca Electronics’ largest customers began requiring all its suppliers to integrate their manufacturing operations to improve the sharing of information and
further improve its supply chain. This company had recently implemented an ERP system from a major provider and was encouraging its suppliers to do the same. Suppliers had the
option of implementing middleware software to integrate operations. Whether suppliers chose to keep their current systems and implement middleware, or implement an ERP system that would integrate with the company, they had one year to make the changes to continue doing business with this customer.

Paul Andrews, the CIO at Boca Electronics, was well aware of the issues facing the company. He knew that something had to be done to improve communication and information sharing within the company, and the current mainframe system was outdated and inefficient. He was also aware of the constraints that Ron was facing in Purchasing and how much it was costing the company. With the new request from one of its largest customers for further integration, the idea of implementing an ERP system for Boca Electronics seemed like a viable solution to Paul. However, recent economic downturns and a limited amount of capital made such a large capital outlay a risky investment for the company.

Determine the trade-offs of implementing an ERP system
in the company versus buying best-of-breed software and
using middleware to integrate.

What are the potential impacts of such an implementation
on the company’s suppliers and customers?

If the company chose to stay with the system it currently
has, what are some potential consequences that can occur
in the future?

Based on the business nature of the company, the industry,
and the current environment, what would you recommend
doing?

In: Operations Management

In the book Analysis of Longitudinal Data, 2nd ed., (2002, Oxford University Press), by Diggle, Heagerty,...

In the book Analysis of Longitudinal Data, 2nd ed., (2002, Oxford University Press), by Diggle, Heagerty, Liang,and Zeger, the authors analyzed the effects of three diets on the protein content of cow’s milk. The data shown here were collected after one week and include 25 cows on the barley diet and 27 cows each on the other two diets:

diet Protein content of cow's milk.
Barley 3.63 3.24 3.98 3.66 4.34 4.36 4.17 4.4 3.4 3.75 4.2 4.02 4.02 3.9 3.81 3.62 3.66 4.44 4.23 3.82 3.53 4.47 3.93 3.27 3.3
Barley+Lupins 3.38 3.8 3.8 4.59 4.07 4.32 3.56 3.67 4.15 3.51 4.2 4.12 3.52 4.08 4.02 3.18 4.11 3.27 3.27 3.97 3.31 4.12 3.92 3.78 4 4.37 3.79
Lupins 3.69 4.2 4.2 3.13 3.73 4.32 3.04 3.84 3.98 4.18 4.2 4.1 3.25 3.34 3.5 4.13 3.21 3.9 3.5 4.1 2.69 4.3 4.06 3.88 4 3.67 4.27

(a) What is the value of LSD for Barley+Lupins diet and Lupins diet? Use α=0.05.
Round your answer to three decimal places (e.g. 98.765).

(c) What is the absolute value of difference between mean protein content after Barley+Lupins diet and Lupins diet?
Round your answer to three decimal places (e.g. 98.765).

(d) Estimate the standard error for comparing the means using the graphical method. Use minimum sample size.
Round your answer to three decimal places (e.g. 98.765).

In: Math

0981283248l.e 1.Kenia is a small economy somewhere in the Aka Way. The information given in Table...

0981283248l.e

1.Kenia is a small economy somewhere in the Aka Way. The information given in Table 5 is from a recent issue of the Kenia Economic ObserverThere are only 3 goods produced in Kenia.The table below shows the prices and quantities produced of these goods in 2007, 2008, and 2009 as well as other related data. 2008 is the base year for this economy.

Data

2007

2008

2009

Price

Quantity

Price

Quantity unit

Price

Quantity

Good A

20

38

10

42

23

53

Good B

35

410

38

450

38

452

Good C

15

120

18

128

19

130

Population millions

3700

4600

4900

Employed millions

3310

4328

4818

Not in the labour force millions

221

235

245

a)      Calculate:

(i) The unemployment rate in 2008. Show the formula and workings.(3.5 marks)

(ii) The labor force participation rate in 2009. Show the formula and workings.(2.5 marks)

(iii) GDP deflator 2008. Show the formula and workings.(4.5 marks)

(iv) GDP deflator 2009. Show the formula and workings.          (4.5 marks)

(v) the inflation rate in 2009. Show the formula and workings. (1.5 marks)

Suppose that in a simple economy, only two types of products are produced: computers and automobiles. Sales and price data for these two products for three different years are as shown below:

Year

No. of

Computers Sold

Price per

Computer

No. of

Automobiles Sold

Price per

Automobile

2003

500

$6000

1 ,500

$12,000

2004

1 ,000

.$2000

5,000

$20,000

2005

1 ,500

$1300

6,000

$23,000

a)Assuming that all computers and automobiles are final goods, calculate nominal GDP in 2013, 2014 and 2015.    (4.5 marks)

Nominal GDP in 2003:

Nominal GDP in 2004:

Nominal GDP in 2005

b)Calculate real GDP in 2004 and 2005 year using 2003 as the base year. Show the formula.

Thanks for the help really appreciated it Expert!

In: Economics