Questions
A school counselor in a high school would like to try out a new conflict-resolution program...

A school counselor in a high school would like to try out a new conflict-resolution program to reduce aggressiveness in students. She first surveyed 16 students using a 20-item instrument to measure their levels of aggression (on a scale of 0 to 10, with higher numbers meaning higher aggression levels). One month after the conflict resolution program was implemented, the students were given the same survey. The data are listed in the table below. The school counselor/researcher has set the significance level at α = .05.

Aggressiveness rating

Subject

Before program

After program

1

6

4

2

2

3

3

3

1

4

5

5

5

7

7

6

4

4

7

2

3

8

4

3

9

2

1

10

8

3

11

3

3

12

5

4

13

5

4

14

8

4

15

6

7

16

1

4

  1. Calculate the mean from the sample of the difference scores (2 points total: 1 for work, 1 for answer)

  1. Estimate the standard deviation of the comparison population (that represents the null hypothesis) (2 points total: 1 for work, 1 for answer)
  1. Calculate the standard error (standard deviation of the sampling distribution) (2 points total: 1 for work, 1 for answer)

  1. Calculate the t statistic for the sample (2 points total: 1 for work, 1 for answer)
  1. Because the hypotheses are directional, a one-tailed test can be performed. Determine the critical t value based on the degrees of freedom and the preset alpha level. (1 point)

In: Statistics and Probability

1. Using any data sets, run two multiple regression equations. state the dependent and independent variable...

1. Using any data sets, run two multiple regression equations. state the dependent and independent variable ( you need to start with at least three and end with at least two) and how you believe they will be related. Run the regression equation until you get to the final model. Then test for the assumptions and interpret the necessary statistics. (use excel Megastat).

Please select from any of the data sets.

Real Estate Data

Price Bedrooms Size Pool Distance Twnship Garage Baths
263.1 4 2300 0 17 5 1 2
182.4 4 2100 1 19 4 0 2
242.1 3 2300 1 12 3 0 2
213.6 2 2200 1 16 2 0 2.5
139.9 2 2100 1 28 1 0 1.5
245.4 2 2100 0 12 1 1 2
327.2 6 2500 1 15 3 1 2
271.8 2 2100 1 9 2 1 2.5
221.1 3 2300 0 18 1 0 1.5
266.6 4 2400 1 13 4 1 2
292.4 4 2100 1 14 3 1 2
209 2 1700 1 8 4 1 1.5
270.8 6 2500 1 7 4 1 2
246.1 4 2100 1 18 3 1 2
194.4 2 2300 1 11 3 0 2
281.3 3 2100 1 16 2 1 2
172.7 4 2200 0 16 3 0 2
207.5 5 2300 0 21 4 0 2.5
198.9 3 2200 0 10 4 1 2
209.3 6 1900 0 15 4 1 2
252.3 4 2600 1 8 4 1 2
192.9 4 1900 0 14 2 1 2.5
209.3 5 2100 1 20 5 0 1.5
345.3 8 2600 1 9 4 1 2
326.3 6 2100 1 11 5 1 3
173.1 2 2200 0 21 5 1 1.5
187 2 1900 1 26 4 0 2
257.2 2 2100 1 9 4 1 2
233 3 2200 1 14 3 1 1.5
180.4 2 2000 1 11 5 0 2
234 2 1700 1 19 3 1 2
207.1 2 2000 1 11 5 1 2
247.7 5 2400 1 16 2 1 2
166.2 3 2000 0 16 2 1 2
177.1 2 1900 1 10 5 1 2
182.7 4 2000 0 14 4 0 2.5
216 4 2300 1 19 2 0 2
312.1 6 2600 1 7 5 1 2.5
199.8 3 2100 1 19 3 1 2
273.2 5 2200 1 16 2 1 3
206 3 2100 0 9 3 0 1.5
232.2 3 1900 0 16 1 1 1.5
198.3 4 2100 0 19 1 1 1.5
205.1 3 2000 0 20 4 0 2
175.6 4 2300 0 24 4 1 2
307.8 3 2400 0 21 2 1 3
269.2 5 2200 1 8 5 1 3
224.8 3 2200 1 17 1 1 2.5
171.6 3 2000 0 16 4 0 2
216.8 3 2200 1 15 1 1 2
192.6 6 2200 0 14 1 0 2
236.4 5 2200 1 20 3 1 2
172.4 3 2200 1 23 3 0 2
251.4 3 1900 1 12 2 1 2
246 6 2300 1 7 3 1 3
147.4 6 1700 0 12 1 0 2
176 4 2200 1 15 1 1 2
228.4 3 2300 1 17 5 1 1.5
166.5 3 1600 0 19 3 0 2.5
189.4 4 2200 1 24 1 1 2
312.1 7 2400 1 13 3 1 3
289.8 6 2000 1 21 3 1 3
269.9 5 2200 0 11 4 1 2.5
154.3 2 2000 1 13 2 0 2
222.1 2 2100 1 9 5 1 2
209.7 5 2200 0 13 2 1 2
190.9 3 2200 0 18 3 1 2
254.3 4 2500 0 15 3 1 2
207.5 3 2100 0 10 2 0 2
209.7 4 2200 0 19 2 1 2
294 2 2100 1 13 2 1 2.5
176.3 2 2000 0 17 3 0 2
294.3 7 2400 1 8 4 1 2
224 3 1900 0 6 1 1 2
125 2 1900 1 18 4 0 1.5
236.8 4 2600 0 17 5 1 2
164.1 4 2300 1 19 4 0 2
217.8 3 2500 1 12 3 0 2
192.2 2 2400 1 16 2 0 2.5
125.9 2 2400 1 28 1 0 1.5
220.9 2 2300 0 12 1 1 2
294.5 6 2700 1 15 3 1 2
244.6 2 2300 1 9 2 1 2.5
199 3 2500 0 18 1 0 1.5
240 4 2600 1 13 4 1 2
263.2 4 2300 1 14 3 1 2
188.1 2 1900 1 8 4 1 1.5
243.7 6 2700 1 7 4 1 2
221.5 4 2300 1 18 3 1 2
175 2 2500 1 11 3 0 2
253.2 3 2300 1 16 2 1 2
155.4 4 2400 0 16 3 0 2
186.7 5 2500 0 21 4 0 2.5
179 3 2400 0 10 4 1 2
188.3 6 2100 0 15 4 1 2
227.1 4 2900 1 8 4 1 2
173.6 4 2100 0 14 2 1 2.5
188.3 5 2300 1 20 5 0 1.5
310.8 8 2900 1 9 4 1 2
293.7 6 2400 1 11 5 1 3
179 3 2400 1 8 4 1 2
188.3 6 2100 0 14 2 1 2.5
227.1 4 2900 1 20 5 0 1.5
173.6 4 2100 1 9 4 1 2
188.3 5 2300 1 11 5 1 3

Baseball2012 Data

Team League Opened Age Seating Capacity Salary 2012 Wins Attendance BA ERA HR Errors SB
San Diego Padres 0 2004 10 42691 55.2 76 2.12 0.247 4.01 121 121 155
Houston Astros 0 2000 14 40981 60.7 55 1.61 0.236 4.56 146 118 105
Pittsburgh Pirates 0 2001 13 38362 63.4 79 2.09 0.243 3.86 170 112 73
Arizona Diamondbacks 0 1998 16 48633 74.3 81 2.18 0.259 3.93 165 90 93
Colorado Rockies 0 1995 19 50398 78.1 64 2.63 0.274 5.22 166 122 100
Washington Nationals 0 2008 6 41487 81.3 98 2.37 0.261 3.33 194 94 105
Cincinnati Reds 0 2003 11 42319 82.2 97 2.35 0.251 3.34 172 89 87
Atlanta Braves 0 1996 18 49586 83.3 94 2.42 0.247 3.42 149 86 101
Chicago Cubs 0 1914 100 41009 88.2 61 2.88 0.24 4.51 137 105 94
New York Mets 0 2009 5 41922 93.4 95 2.24 0.249 4.09 139 101 79
Los Angeles Dodgers 0 1962 52 56000 95.1 86 3.32 0.252 3.34 116 98 104
Milwaukee Brewers 0 2001 13 41900 97.7 83 2.83 0.259 4.22 202 99 158
St. Louis Cardinals 0 2006 8 43975 110.3 88 3.26 0.271 3.71 159 107 91
San Francisco Giants 0 2000 14 41915 117.6 94 3.38 0.269 3.68 103 115 118
Miami Marlins 0 2012 2 36742 118.1 69 2.22 0.244 4.09 137 103 149
Philadelphia Phillies 0 2004 10 43651 174.5 81 3.57 0.255 3.83 158 101 116
Oakland Athletics 1 1966 48 35067 55.4 94 1.68 0.238 3.48 195 111 122
Kansas City Royals 1 1973 41 37903 60.9 72 1.74 0.265 4.3 131 113 132
Tampa Bay Rays 1 1990 24 34078 64.2 90 1.56 0.24 3.19 175 114 134
Toronto Blue Jays 1 1989 25 49260 75.5 73 2.1 0.245 4.64 198 101 123
Cleveland Indians 1 1994 20 43429 78.4 68 1.6 0.251 4.78 136 96 110
Baltimore Orioles 1 1992 22 45971 81.4 93 2.1 0.247 3.9 214 106 58
Seattle Mariners 1 1999 15 47860 82 75 1.72 0.234 3.76 149 72 104
Minnesota Twins 1 2010 4 39504 94.1 66 2.78 0.26 4.77 131 107 135
Chicago White Sox 1 1991 23 40615 96.9 85 1.97 0.255 4.02 211 70 109
Texas Rangers 1 1994 20 48194 120.5 93 3.46 0.273 3.99 200 85 91
Detroit Tigers 1 2000 14 41255 132.3 88 3.03 0.268 3.75 163 99 59
Los Angeles Angels 1 1966 48 45957 154.5 89 3.06 0.274 4.02 187 98 134
Boston Red Sox 1 1912 102 37495 173.2 69 3.04 0.26 4.7 165 101 97
New York Yankees 1 2009 5 50287 198 74 3.54 0.265 3.85 245 74 93
Data Set 3 --Buena School District Bus Data
Bus Number Maintenance Maint Age Age med Miles Type Type-Dum Bus-Mfg Passenger
982 441 0 1 0 823 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
279 390 0 2 0 792 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
695 477 1 2 0 802 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
686 329 0 3 0 741 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
101 424 0 4 0 827 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
814 426 0 4 0 757 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
554 458 1 4 0 817 Diesel 0 Bluebird 14 Passenger
918 390 0 5 0 799 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
725 392 0 5 0 774 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
731 432 0 6 0 819 Diesel 0 Bluebird 42 Passenger
321 450 0 6 0 856 Diesel 0 Bluebird 6 Passenger
358 461 1 6 0 849 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
75 478 1 6 0 821 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
135 329 0 7 0 853 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
507 410 0 7 0 866 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
714 433 0 7 0 817 Diesel 0 Bluebird 42 Passenger
57 455 0 7 0 828 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
768 494 1 7 1 815 Diesel 0 Bluebird 42 Passenger
977 501 1 7 1 874 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
887 357 0 8 1 760 Diesel 0 Bluebird 6 Passenger
984 392 0 8 1 851 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
692 469 1 8 1 812 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
704 503 1 8 1 857 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
884 381 0 9 1 882 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
326 433 0 9 1 848 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
875 489 1 9 1 858 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
418 504 1 9 1 842 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
953 423 0 10 1 835 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
954 476 1 10 1 827 Diesel 0 Bluebird 42 Passenger
520 492 1 10 1 836 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
600 493 1 10 1 1008 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
200 505 1 10 1 822 Diesel 0 Bluebird 55 Passenger
883 436 0 2 0 785 Gasoline 1 Bluebird 55 Passenger
464 355 0 3 0 806 Gasoline 1 Bluebird 55 Passenger
540 529 1 4 0 846 Gasoline 1 Bluebird 55 Passenger
500 369 0 5 0 842 Gasoline 1 Bluebird 55 Passenger
660 337 0 6 0 819 Gasoline 1 Bluebird 55 Passenger
29 396 0 6 0 784 Gasoline 1 Bluebird 55 Passenger
39 411 0 6 0 804 Gasoline 1 Bluebird 55 Passenger
387 422 0 8 1 869 Gasoline 1 Bluebird 55 Passenger
43 439 0 9 1 832 Gasoline 1 Bluebird 55 Passenger
699 475 1 9 1 816 Gasoline 1 Bluebird 55 Passenger
40 466 1 10 1 865 Gasoline 1 Bluebird 55 Passenger
861 474 1 10 1 845 Gasoline 1 Bluebird 55 Passenger
490 497 1 10 1 859 Gasoline 1 Bluebird 55 Passenger
122 558 1 10 1 885 Gasoline 1 Bluebird 55 Passenger
482 514 1 11 1 980 Gasoline 1 Bluebird 55 Passenger
751 444 0 2 0 757 Diesel 0 Keiser 14 Passenger
705 403 0 4 0 806 Diesel 0 Keiser 42 Passenger
603 468 1 4 0 800 Diesel 0 Keiser 14 Passenger
365 462 1 6 0 799 Diesel 0 Keiser 55 Passenger
45 478 1 6 0 830 Diesel 0 Keiser 55 Passenger
767 493 1 6 0 816 Diesel 0 Keiser 55 Passenger
678 428 0 7 0 842 Diesel 0 Keiser 55 Passenger
724 448 0 8 1 790 Diesel 0 Keiser 42 Passenger
759 546 1 8 1 870 Diesel 0 Keiser 55 Passenger
989 380 0 9 1 803 Diesel 0 Keiser 55 Passenger
61 442 0 9 1 809 Diesel 0 Keiser 55 Passenger
948 452 0 9 1 831 Diesel 0 Keiser 42 Passenger
732 471 1 9 1 815 Diesel 0 Keiser 42 Passenger
120 503 1 10 1 883 Diesel 0 Keiser 42 Passenger
754 515 1 14 1 895 Diesel 0 Keiser 14 Passenger
481 382 0 3 0 818 Gasoline 1 Keiser 6 Passenger
162 406 0 3 0 798 Gasoline 1 Keiser 55 Passenger
9 414 0 4 0 864 Gasoline 1 Keiser 55 Passenger
353 449 0 4 0 817 Gasoline 1 Keiser 55 Passenger
10 427 0 5 0 780 Gasoline 1 Keiser 14 Passenger
38 432 0 6 0 837 Gasoline 1 Keiser 14 Passenger
427 359 0 7 0 751 Gasoline 1 Keiser 55 Passenger
370 459 1 8 1 826 Gasoline 1 Keiser 55 Passenger
693 469 1 9 1 775 Gasoline 1 Keiser 55 Passenger
880 474 1 9 1 857 Gasoline 1 Keiser 55 Passenger
396 457 1 2 0 815 Diesel 0 Thompson 55 Passenger
833 496 1 8 1 839 Diesel 0 Thompson 55 Passenger
398 570 1 9 1 844 Diesel 0 Thompson 14 Passenger
314 459 1 11 1 859 Diesel 0 Thompson 6 Passenger
193 540 1 11 1 847 Diesel 0 Thompson 55 Passenger
156 561 1 12 1 838 Diesel 0 Thompson 55 Passenger
168 467 1 7 0 827 Gasoline 1 Thompson 55 Passenger
671 504 1 8 1 866 Gasoline 1 Thompson 55 Passenger

Banking Chicago Data

Balance ATM Services Debit Interest City
748 9 2 1 0 1
1501 10 1 0 0 1
740 6 3 0 0 3
1593 10 8 1 0 1
1169 6 4 0 0 4
2125 18 6 0 0 2
1554 12 6 1 0 3
1474 12 7 1 0 1
1913 6 5 0 0 1
1218 10 3 1 0 1
1006 12 4 0 0 1
2215 20 3 1 0 4
137 7 2 0 0 3
167 5 4 0 0 4
343 7 2 0 0 1
2557 20 7 1 0 4
2276 15 4 1 0 3
2144 17 3 0 0 3
1995 10 7 0 0 2
1053 8 4 1 0 3
1120 8 6 1 0 3
1746 11 2 0 0 2
1958 6 2 1 0 2
634 2 7 1 0 4
580 4 1 0 0 1
1320 4 5 1 0 1
1675 6 7 1 0 2
789 8 4 0 0 4
1784 11 5 0 0 1
1326 16 8 0 0 3
2051 14 4 1 0 4
1044 7 5 1 0 1
765 4 3 0 0 4
32 2 0 0 0 3
1266 11 7 0 0 4
2204 14 5 0 0 2
2409 16 8 0 0 2
1338 14 4 1 0 2
2076 12 5 1 0 2
1708 13 3 1 0 1
2375 12 4 0 0 2
1487 8 4 1 0 4
1125 6 4 1 0 2
2156 14 5 1 0 2
1756 13 4 0 1 2
1831 10 4 0 1 3
1622 14 6 0 1 4
1886 17 3 0 1 1
1494 11 2 0 1 1
1526 8 4 0 1 2
1838 7 5 1 1 3
1616 10 4 1 1 2
1735 12 7 0 1 3
1885 10 6 1 1 2
1790 11 4 0 1 3
1645 6 9 0 1 4
890 7 1 0 1 1
2138 18 5 0 1 4
1455 9 5 1 1 3
1989 12 3 0 1 2

International Data

x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12 X13 X14
Country Area (KM) G-20 Petroleum Pop (1000's) 65 & over Life Expectancy Literacy % GDP/cap Labor force Unemployment Exports Imports Cell phones
Algeria 2,381,740 0 2 31,736 4.07 69.95 61.6 5.5 9.1 30 19.6 9.2 0.034
Argentina 2,766,890 1 1 37,385 10.42 75.26 96.2 12.9 15 15 26.5 25.2 3
Australia 7,686,850 1 1 19,357 12.5 79.87 100 23.2 9.5 6.4 69 77 6.4
Austria 83,858 0 0 8,150 15.38 77.84 98 25 3.7 5.4 63.2 65.6 4.5
Belgium 30,510 0 0 10,259 16.95 77.96 98 25.3 4.34 8.4 181.4 166 1
Brazil 8,511,965 1 1 174,469 5.45 63.24 83.3 6.5 79 7.1 55.1 55.8 4.4
Canada 9,976,140 1 1 31,592 12.77 79.56 97 24.8 16.1 6.8 272.3 238.2 4.2
China 9,596,960 1 1 1,273,111 7.11 71.62 81.5 3.6 700 10 232 197 65
Czech Republic 79 0 0 10,264 13.92 74.73 99.9 12.9 5.2 8.7 28.3 31.4 4.3
Denmark 43,094 0 1 5,352 14.85 76.72 100 25.5 2.9 5.3 50.8 43.6 1.4
Finland 337,030 0 0 5,175 15.03 77.58 100 22.9 2.6 9.8 44.4 32.7 2.2
France 547,030 1 0 59,551 16.13 78.9 99 24.4 25 9.7 325 320 11.1
Germany 357,021 1 0 83,029 16.61 77.61 99 23.4 40.5 9.9 578 505 15.3
Greece 131,940 0 1 10,623 17.72 78.59 95 17.2 4.32 11.3 15.8 33.9 0.937
Hungary 93,030 0 0 10,106 14.71 71.63 99 11.2 4.2 9.4 25.2 27.6 1.3
Iceland 103,000 0 0 278 11.81 79.52 100 24.8 0.16 2.7 2 2.2 0.066
India 3,287,590 1 1 1,029,991 4.68 62.68 52 2.2 * * 43.1 60.8 2.93
Indonesia 1,919,440 1 2 228,437 4.63 68.27 83.8 2.9 99 17.5 64.7 40.4 1
Iran 1,648,000 0 2 66,129 4.65 69.95 72.1 6.3 17.3 14 25 15 0.265
Iraq 437,072 0 2 23,332 3.08 66.95 58 2.5 4.4 * 21.8 13.8 0
Ireland 70,280 0 0 3,840 11.35 76.99 98 21.6 1.82 4.1 73.5 45.7 2
Italy 301,230 1 0 57,680 18.35 79.14 98 22.1 23.4 10.4 241.1 231.4 20.5
Japan 377,835 1 0 126,771 17.35 80.8 99 24.9 67.7 4.7 450 355 63.9
Kuwait 17,820 0 2 2,041 2.42 76.27 78.6 15 1.3 1.8 23.2 7.6 0.21
Libya 1,759,540 0 2 5,240 3.95 75.65 76.2 8.9 1.5 30 13.9 7.6 0
Luxembourg 2,586 0 0 443 14.06 77.3 100 36.4 0.248 2.7 7.6 10 0.215
Mexico 1,972,550 1 1 101,879 4.4 71.76 89.6 9.1 39.8 2.2 168 176 2
Netherlands 41,526 0 1 15,981 13.72 78.43 99 24.4 7.2 2.6 210.3 201.2 4.1
New Zealand 286,680 0 0 3,864 11.53 77.99 99 17.7 1.88 6.3 14.6 14.3 0.6
Nigeria 923,768 0 2 126,635 2.82 51.07 57.1 0.95 66 28 22.2 10.7 0.027
Norway 324,220 0 1 4,503 15.1 78.79 100 27.7 2.4 3 59.2 35.2 2
Poland 312,685 0 0 38,634 12.44 73.42 99 8.5 17.2 12 28.4 42.7 1.8
Portugal 92,391 0 0 10,066 15.62 75.94 87.4 15.8 5 4.3 26.1 41 3
Qatar 11,437 0 2 769 2.48 72.62 79 20.3 0.233 * 9.8 3.8 0.043
Russia 17,075,200 1 1 145,470 12.81 67.34 98 7.7 66 10.5 105.1 44.2 2.5
Saudi Arabia 1,960,582 1 2 22,757 2.68 68.09 62.8 10.5 7 * 81.2 30.1 1
South Africa 1,219,912 1 0 43,586 4.88 48.09 81.1 8.5 17 30 30.8 27.6 2
South Korea 98,480 1 0 47,904 7.27 74.65 98 16.1 22 4.1 172.6 160.5 27
Spain 504,782 0 0 40,038 17.18 78.93 97 18 17 14 120.5 153.9 8.4
Sweden 449,964 0 0 8,875 17.28 79.71 99 22.2 4.4 6 95.5 80 3.8
Switzerland 41,290 0 0 7,283 15.3 79.73 99 28.6 3.9 1.9 91.3 91.6 2
Turkey 780,580 1 0 66,494 6.13 71.24 85 6.8 23 5.6 26.9 55.7 12.1
United Arab Emirates 82,880 0 2 2,407 2.4 74.29 79.2 22.8 1.4 * 46 34 1
United Kingdom 244,820 1 1 59,648 15.7 77.82 99 22.8 29.2 5.5 282 324 13
United States 9,629,091 1 1 278,059 12.61 77.26 97 36.2 140.9 4 776 1223 69
Venezuela 912,050 0 2 23,917 4.72 73.31 91.1 6.2 9.9 14 32.8 14.7 2

Variable descriptions

Real Estate Sales data

Variables

X1 = selling price in $000

X2= Number of bedrooms

X3= Size of the home in square feet

X4= Pool (1=yes, 0= no)

X5= Distance from the center of the city in miles

X6= Township

X7= Garage attached (1=yes, 0= no)

X8= Number of bathrooms

105 homes sold

Baseball Data

Variables

X1 = Team

X2= Language (American =1, National =0)

X3= Built (year stadium was built)

X4= Size (stadium capacity)

X5= Salary (total 2012 team salary, $ million)

X6= Wins

X7= Attendance (total for team in millions)

X8= BA (team batting average)

X9= ERA (Team earned run average)

X10= HR (Team home runs)

X11 = Errors (team errors)

X12= SB (team stolen bases)

X13= year

X14= Average player salary ($)

Buena School District Bus Data

Variables

X1 = Bus number

X2= Maintenance cost ($)

X3= (Age)

X4= Miles

X5= Bus type (diesel or gasoline)

X6= Bus Manufacturer (Bluebird, Keiser, Thompson)

X7= Passengers

2. Using any dataset, run an ANOVA test, and interpret the statistically significant Tukey output.

I will be glad if this two questions are answered. My previous question was not answered. Please remember to use MegastatThank you.

In: Statistics and Probability

5. Is there sufficient evidence that weekly quizzes have any effect on the midterm scores for...

5.

Is there sufficient evidence that weekly quizzes have any effect on the midterm scores for groups with computer tutorials, on average? (Consider only groups required to answer the question; there is no need to factor in the other groups; in other words, ignore the groups not included.)

(a) Carry out the appropriate test to answer the question. Paste the corresponding StatCrunch output into your report

Define the null and alternative hypotheses in terms of the population means. What is the value of the test statistic and P-value? What is the null distribution of the test statistic? Based on the P- value, is there sufficient evidence to indicate any effect of weekly quizzes on the midterm scores for groups with computer tutorials?

(a) Two-sample t-test output: 3 points Appropriateness of pooling variances: 2 points Null and alternative hypotheses: 2 points Value of the test statistic: 2 points

the following is the data use stat crunch or excel to answer question 5

Category code score 
C 1 45
C 1 53
C 1 72
C 1 55
C 1 67
C 1 53
C 1 66
C 1 54
C 1 53
C 1 67
C 1 60
C 1 64
C 1 69
C 1 52
C 1 74
C 1 58
C 1 53
C 1 66
C 1 66
C 1 71
H 2 79
H 2 95
H 2 81
H 2 74
H 2 68
H 2 84
H 2 78
H 2 77
H 2 85
H 2 72
H 2 86
H 2 71
H 2 67
H 2 77
H 2 83
H 2 73
H 2 76
H 2 86
H 2 83
H 2 75
Q 3 58
Q 3 66
Q 3 67
Q 3 68
Q 3 64
Q 3 57
Q 3 58
Q 3 57
Q 3 75
Q 3 60
Q 3 63
Q 3 55
Q 3 64
Q 3 51
Q 3 60
Q 3 55
Q 3 61
Q 3 63
Q 3 76
Q 3 64
T 4 51
T 4 57
T 4 73
T 4 67
T 4 63
T 4 77
T 4 67
T 4 81
T 4 70
T 4 82
T 4 61
T 4 58
T 4 80
T 4 68
T 4 76
T 4 60
T 4 69
T 4 68
T 4 86
T 4 64
HT 5 78
HT 5 85
HT 5 86
HT 5 92
HT 5 84
HT 5 78
HT 5 79
HT 5 78
HT 5 95
HT 5 81
HT 5 83
HT 5 76
HT 5 83
HT 5 72
HT 5 81
HT 5 70
HT 5 81
HT 5 90
HT 5 95
HT 5 84
QT 6 55
QT 6 80
QT 6 67
QT 6 89
QT 6 90
QT 6 72
QT 6 75
QT 6 61
QT 6 68
QT 6 56
QT 6 63
QT 6 66
QT 6 64
QT 6 65
QT 6 62
QT 6 70
QT 6 83
QT 6 72
QT 6 65
QT 6 73

In: Statistics and Probability

5. Is there sufficient evidence that weekly quizzes have any effect on the midterm scores for...

5.

Is there sufficient evidence that weekly quizzes have any effect on the midterm scores for groups with computer tutorials, on average? (Consider only groups required to answer the question; there is no need to factor in the other groups; in other words, ignore the groups not included.)

(a) Carry out the appropriate test to answer the question. Paste the corresponding StatCrunch output into your report

Define the null and alternative hypotheses in terms of the population means. What is the value of the test statistic and P-value? What is the null distribution of the test statistic? Based on the P- value, is there sufficient evidence to indicate any effect of weekly quizzes on the midterm scores for groups with computer tutorials?

(a) Two-sample t-test output: 3 points Appropriateness of pooling variances: 2 points Null and alternative hypotheses: 2 points Value of the test statistic: 2 points

the following is the data use stat crunch or excel to answer question 5

Category code score 
C 1 45
C 1 53
C 1 72
C 1 55
C 1 67
C 1 53
C 1 66
C 1 54
C 1 53
C 1 67
C 1 60
C 1 64
C 1 69
C 1 52
C 1 74
C 1 58
C 1 53
C 1 66
C 1 66
C 1 71
H 2 79
H 2 95
H 2 81
H 2 74
H 2 68
H 2 84
H 2 78
H 2 77
H 2 85
H 2 72
H 2 86
H 2 71
H 2 67
H 2 77
H 2 83
H 2 73
H 2 76
H 2 86
H 2 83
H 2 75
Q 3 58
Q 3 66
Q 3 67
Q 3 68
Q 3 64
Q 3 57
Q 3 58
Q 3 57
Q 3 75
Q 3 60
Q 3 63
Q 3 55
Q 3 64
Q 3 51
Q 3 60
Q 3 55
Q 3 61
Q 3 63
Q 3 76
Q 3 64
T 4 51
T 4 57
T 4 73
T 4 67
T 4 63
T 4 77
T 4 67
T 4 81
T 4 70
T 4 82
T 4 61
T 4 58
T 4 80
T 4 68
T 4 76
T 4 60
T 4 69
T 4 68
T 4 86
T 4 64
HT 5 78
HT 5 85
HT 5 86
HT 5 92
HT 5 84
HT 5 78
HT 5 79
HT 5 78
HT 5 95
HT 5 81
HT 5 83
HT 5 76
HT 5 83
HT 5 72
HT 5 81
HT 5 70
HT 5 81
HT 5 90
HT 5 95
HT 5 84
QT 6 55
QT 6 80
QT 6 67
QT 6 89
QT 6 90
QT 6 72
QT 6 75
QT 6 61
QT 6 68
QT 6 56
QT 6 63
QT 6 66
QT 6 64
QT 6 65
QT 6 62
QT 6 70
QT 6 83
QT 6 72
QT 6 65
QT 6 73

In: Statistics and Probability

Firm A Firm B Emissions Total abatement costs Marginal abatement costs Emissions Total abatement costs Marginal...

Firm A

Firm B

Emissions

Total abatement costs

Marginal abatement costs

Emissions

Total abatement costs

Marginal abatement costs

4

0

0

4

0

0

3

1

1

3

2

2

2

3

2

2

6

4

1

6

3

1

12

6

0

10

4

0

20

8

1. What are the total abatement costs for the firms and economy to reduce 50% of the emissions with command and control policies?

2. How will cap and trade improve the situation, if each firm will get 2 permits?

3. What is the range of the price per permit so that trade will take place?

In: Economics

Let α ∈ C be a root of x^2 + x + 1 ∈ Q[x]. For...

Let α ∈ C be a root of x^2 + x + 1 ∈ Q[x]. For γ = 3 + 2α ∈ Q(α), find γ^ −1 as an element of Q(α).

Let a = 3 + 2(2^(1/3)) + 4^(1/3) and b = 1 + 5(4)^(1/3) belong to Q( 2^(1/3)). Calculate a · b and a −1 as elements of Q( 2^(1/3)).

In: Advanced Math

1. Find the appropriate measure of center. Discuss why the chosen measure is most appropriate. Why...

1. Find the appropriate measure of center. Discuss why the chosen measure is most appropriate. Why did you decide against other possible measures of center? 2. Find the appropriate measure of variation. The measure of variation chosen here should match the measure of center chosen in Part 1. 3. Find the graph(s) needed to appropriately describe the data. These may be done by hand and inserted into the Word document. You can also use Excel or a Web Applet to create a Histogram of the chosen data. Graphs can be copied and pasting onto the template. 4. Define the random variable (X) so that your chosen data set represents values of X. 5. Is your chosen random variable discrete or continuous? Explain how you know. 6. Would the Normal or Binomial distribution be a good fit for the underlying sample distribution of X? If one of them is a good fit, state how you would approximate the distribution parameters (Use the mean and standard deviation of the data chosen) 7. If you selected column D, calculate the probability that a flight will depart early or on-time. If you selected column E, calculate the probability that a flight will arrive early or on time using the empirical definition of probability. 8. If you selected column D, calculate the probability that a flight will depart late. If you selected column E, calculate the probability that a flight will arrive late using the empirical definition of probability. 9. For those that selected column D, assume now that the random variable X = Departure Time is exactly normally distributed with mean m= -2.5 and standard deviation s= 23. Compute the probability of a flight arriving late based on this new information. For those that selected column E, assume now that the random variable X = Arrival Time is exactly normally distributed with mean m= -2.5 and standard deviation s= 23. Does this contradict your answer from Part 8? Data: 0 -3 0 -7 8 -1 3 11 -6 -5 -8 -4 -13 -13 -11 -14 -16 -14 -18 -18 -23 -23 2 1 -4 -6 7 -8 -8 -4 -4 -5 -13 -9 -12 -7 -12 1 4 -19 -13 -19 3 12 13 2 0 0 4 -7 8 9 -1 -10 -6 -12 -14 -13 9 -15 -13 -14 20 -16 11 -14 18 -19 -3 -4 0 -3 2 6 6 -6 1 11 -7 -10 -13 9 -13 -18 -17 -11 -20 -18 8 0 -20 -3 1 -1 -4 -6 -5 -8 -10 -9 -6 8 -9 -12 -15 -14 -9 -17 -13 -17 2 -18 -18 -16 1 -4 0 -5 7 -7 -7 -5 0 5 -6 -12 1 6 -10 -15 -18 -16 -17 0 -21 -18 5 1 3 -2 -1 -2 -3 4 3 -11 9 -11 -11 0 -11 17 -10 -11 0 -19 -18 0 8 -23 3 -3 -4 -6 0 2 -1 -9 -9 4 1 -9 -12 0 0 -11 -14 -19 -17 -13 23 8 21 3 4 -2 1 6 7 -9 -3 1 -9 -5 -11 -6 -6 -10 -13 -9 -17 -6 -20 1 -21 -22 -2 0 -4 -3 3 -5 -6 -3 -5 -8 -12 -10 -7 -16 1 -14 -14 -16 -7 13 -17 -16 7 0 1 1 4 1 -8 -5 -9 0 -4 8 -7 -14 7 -8 5 4 8 21 3 11 2 -23 0 4 3 2 0 -1 -7 5 3 8 12 -12 -15 -11 -7 17 -15 -13 -17 -21 4 -19 -24 3 0 4 0 -2 -8 -5 6 5 1 -12 -14 7 8 -16 -11 -17 -20 10 4 -14 -22 -22 -3 -4 2 -4 -2 0 6 -6 2 -9 -3 -10 -13 7 -10 -12 -13 -16 -20 1 -14 -21 -17 3 -1 -1 0 -2 -7 -4 0 11 3 -11 -12 -11 -8 -13 -16 -16 7 2 -21 3 9 0 3 0 -5 -3 -3 -3 -3 -4 9 0 -8 -10 12 5 -16 -16 -13 -13 3 -19 0 -20 2 -3 -2 3 5 -1 -8 -3 -7 -11 -7 -10 12 -12 -8 17 -9 -18 -17 -14 1 -13 -21 -22 -2 -3 3 -3 -2 -7 -5 -10 -8 -6 -13 11 -11 -16 -9 -13 -12 -13 -16 -10 -20 -19 -22 -1 -4 2 4 -3 -8 4 -3 -7 -11 -13 2 -13 -12 -15 3 -17 -10 3 0 -19 -20 -20 0 0 -5 -4 -3 -5 -1 -8 -7 -2 13 11 -10 -12 -15 -14 -17 -18 6 12 6 -19 -20 0 -1 -5 -1 4 6 3 8 0 -11 -8 -14 -13 -11 3 -7 -11 10 -19 -20 -21 0 3 0 -4 0 2 -6 -7 -6 -7 8 -12 -2 -13 -7 9 -15 -14 -14 -17

In: Advanced Math

Solve x" + ? = ???2? , ? (0) = 2, ? ′ (0) = 1...

Solve x" + ? = ???2? , ? (0) = 2, ? ′ (0) = 1
1) manually 2) using Laplace transform. Show step-by-step process

In: Advanced Math

Consider the system: ?[?] − 0.5?[? − 1] − 0.25?[? − 2] = ?[?] + 2?[?...

Consider the system: ?[?] − 0.5?[? − 1] − 0.25?[? − 2] = ?[?] + 2?[? − 1] + ?[? − 2]

Assume initial conditions y(-1) = 1, y(-2) = 0 and that the input signal to the system is a discrete-time unit step. Determine the formula for the Z-transform of the solution, Y(z). Subsequently, determine the formula for the solution, y[n], itself.

In: Electrical Engineering

4. We would prefer to estimate the number of books in a college library without counting...

4. We would prefer to estimate the number of books in a college library without counting them. Data are collected from colleges across Books (in millions)

Books (in millions) Students Enrollment Highest Degree Area
4 5 3 20
5 8 3 40
10 40 3 100
1 4 2 50
0.5 2 1 300
2 8 1 400
7 30 3 40
4 20 2 200
1 10 2 5
1 12 1 100

Using Stepwise regression, show how each of the three factors affects the number of volumes in a college library.

In: Statistics and Probability