Questions
In what ways do advertisers in magazines use sexual imagery to appeal to youth? One study...

In what ways do advertisers in magazines use sexual imagery to appeal to youth? One study classified each of 1509 full-page or larger ads as "not sexual" or "sexual," according to the amount and style of the dress of the male or female model in the ad. The ads were also classified according to the target readership of the magazine. Here is the two-way table of counts.

Magazine readership
Model dress Women Men General interest Total
Not sexual 346 525 260 1131
Sexual 212 93 73 378
Total 558 618 333 1509

(a) Summarize the data numerically and graphically. (Compute the conditional distribution of model dress for each audience. Round your answers to three decimal places.)

Women Men General
Not sexual    
Sexual    


(b) Perform the significance test that compares the model dress for the three categories of magazine readership. Summarize the results of your test and give your conclusion. (Use α = 0.01. Round your value for χ2 to two decimal places, and round your P-value to four decimal places.)

χ2 =
P-value =

In: Statistics and Probability

In what ways do advertisers in magazines use sexual imagery to appeal to youth? One study...

In what ways do advertisers in magazines use sexual imagery to appeal to youth? One study classified each of 1509 full-page or larger ads as "not sexual" or "sexual," according to the amount and style of the dress of the male or female model in the ad. The ads were also classified according to the target readership of the magazine. Here is the two-way table of counts.

Magazine readership
Model dress Women Men General interest Total
Not sexual 354 504 244 1102
Sexual 216 88 103 407
Total 570 592 347 1509

(a) Summarize the data numerically and graphically. (Compute the conditional distribution of model dress for each audience. Round your answers to three decimal places.)

Women Men General
Not sexual    
Sexual    


(b) Perform the significance test that compares the model dress for the three categories of magazine readership. Summarize the results of your test and give your conclusion. (Use α = 0.01. Round your value for χ2 to two decimal places, and round your P-value to four decimal places.)

χ2 =
P-value =

In: Statistics and Probability

Read the narrative below and prepare a system flowchart for the process: The AA Company is...

  1. Read the narrative below and prepare a system flowchart for the process:

The AA Company is a magazine distributor that maintains a file of magazine subscribers for creating monthly mailing labels. Magazine subscribers mail change-of-address forms or new-subscription forms directly to the company, where input personnel key the information into the system through online terminals. The computer system temporarily stores this information as file of address-change or new subscription requests. Input personnel staff keys these data into computer files continuously, thus this file is named as “daily processing”.

Once a week, the system uses the information in the daily processing file to update the subscriber master file. At this time, new subscriber names and addresses are added to the file, and the addresses of existing subscribers who have moved are changed. The system also prepares a Master File Maintenance Processing Report to indicate what additions and modifications were made to the file. The report is reviewed by the input personnel before the personnel confirmed the content of the report. The system then prints the confirmed report and the personnel hands this report to the management.

In: Computer Science

In what ways do advertisers in magazines use sexual imagery to appeal to youth? One study...

In what ways do advertisers in magazines use sexual imagery to appeal to youth? One study classified each of 1509 full-page or larger ads as "not sexual" or "sexual," according to the amount and style of the dress of the male or female model in the ad. The ads were also classified according to the target readership of the magazine. Here is the two-way table of counts.

Magazine readership

Model dress

Women

Men

General interest

Total

Not sexual

344

530

250

1124

Sexual

208

96

81

385

Total

552

626

331

1509

(a) Summarize the data numerically and graphically. (Compute the conditional distribution of model dress for each audience. Round your answers to three decimal places.)

Women

Men

General

Not sexual

Sexual

(b) Perform the significance test that compares the model dress for the three categories of magazine readership. Summarize the results of your test and give your conclusion. (Use α = 0.01. Round your value for χ2 to two decimal places, and round your P-value to four decimal places.) χ2 = P-value =

In: Statistics and Probability

Hey, it's Robert Smith here. We wanted to replay one of our favorite episodes today because...

Hey, it's Robert Smith here. We wanted to replay one of our favorite episodes today because it seems super relevant for what's about to come. As you probably know, our new president, Donald J. Trump, loves to talk about the tariffs - tariffs, taxes on imports. And he wants to use these tariffs mainly as a threat to keep factories in the United States, saying, if you move manufacturing to a foreign country, we will tax the products when they come back. That's a tariff.

Now, this idea was not invented by President Trump. In fact, we have already lived through these kind of tariffs. And we wanted to tell you the story of how one of the strangest tariffs of all time changed the thing you may be inside of right now - the automobile.

We did this podcast with NPR's car correspondent Sonari Glinton. And after it's over, we'll get an update on where things stand right now.

SONARI GLINTON, HOST:

All right, Robert. This is really exciting. We're in Midtown Manhattan right across from Bryant Park. And I want to try an experiment, which is ask people to name off the top of their head as many midsized sedans as they know.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #1: Audi A7, BMW 5 Series, Ford Focus...

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #2: Kia Spectra, Chevy Impala, Dodge Charger...

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #3: BMW X5, BMW X3, the Fourth Series, 435s and Nissan Altima.

SMITH: OK, I get it. Like, the answers sort of run the gamut. Like, we have foreign cars, American cars, lots of different cars.

GLINTON: Exactly, but let's start something a little less easy. Let's ask some of these people how many pickup trucks they can name.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #4: Pickup trucks...

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN #1: Pickup trucks - I...

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #4: Ford F-150s.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN #1: Yeah, definitely.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #5: Well, I guess there's the Ford F-150.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #6: Ford F-150 - the 550 - whatever it's called.

GLINTON: The Ford F-150, OK.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #6: F-150 - all right. And then you got the Ram, right? And then...

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #7: Ford F-150...

SMITH: I think I see where you're going with this, which is when you talk about trucks, you are essentially talking about American trucks - the Ford F-150, other American-made trucks. Nobody named a foreign truck.

GLINTON: Exactly. That's because the American trucks just dominate the space - I mean absolutely, completely dominate the space. And there's a reason for that, Robert. The reason is chicken.

SMITH: And not just chicken but frozen chicken parts shipped to Germany after World War II. Believe me. We'll explain.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

GLINTON: Hello, and welcome to PLANET MONEY. I'm Sonari Glinton.

SMITH: And I'm Robert Smith. Today on the show - chicken, trucks - trucks and chicken and how a trade dispute can change the entire world.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

SMITH: OK, we are going to lay it out for you - how a frozen chicken drumstick led directly to the awesomeness of the Ford F-150. It goes back to after World War II in the late '50s, early '60s. And the European economy is finally getting better. And everyone is sort of helping each other in the world. This is an era of free trade.

GLINTON: And Americans are going absolutely bonkers for a German import.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN #2: Ein Volkswagen.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #8: Ein Volkswagen.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN #3: Ein Volkswagen (speaking German).

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #9: (Speaking German).

BOB LUTZ: Beetles were everywhere in the late '50s and early '60s. And it became sort of almost a craze.

GLINTON: That is the voice of Bob Lutz. He's a car guy's car guy. He's worked for pretty much every car company - GM, Ford, Chrysler, BMW, GM again.

LUTZ: Everybody had to have one Beetle, two Beetles. They had to have a Beetle plus a Volkswagen bus. And it became a sort of a cult object, and I think everybody was worried about it.

GLINTON: Well, everybody who worked in the American auto industry was worried about it.

SMITH: Now, meanwhile, over in Germany, they're having their own sort of trade invasion. This is not cars. This is, as we promised, the chicken parts because remember; up to this time, chicken was sort of a luxury in Germany. They were recovering from the war, and they had their own chicken manufacturers, but were really expensive.

In comes frozen, American chicken - frozen, American chicken on the bountiful American farms shipped over to Germany. And all of a sudden in Berlin, you can have chicken every night for dinner. They are going crazy for it. In fact, we looked at the stats. In 1961 alone, German chicken consumption went up 23 percent. If we were going crazy in the United States for the Volkswagen Beetle, the Germans were going crazy for American chicken.

GLINTON: Yeah, and that's the dream of free trade. They get cheap chicken. We get cheap cars. It's a bonus for everybody.

SMITH: Except for the German chicken farmers. The German chicken farmers look around, and their expensive chickens are losing out to these cheap American chickens. And so they do what farmers everywhere do.

GLINTON: They went to their government, and they said, protect us against this cheap chicken that's flooding the market. The German government responded, and they started a tax on American chicken up to 50 percent, which is huge.

SMITH: And the Americans are like, wait; wait; wait; wait; what? Germany, we just helped rebuild you after the war, and you want to start a trade dispute? You want to tax our chicken? Fine, we will find some German things that we can tax. It's basic playground logic - right? - tit-for-tat. So the U.S. plans its retaliation. They draft this idea aimed at Volkswagen. John Krafcik is with truecar.com.

JOHN KRAFCIK: So in December of 1963, Lyndon Johnson, who had just become president less than two weeks before, signed into effect this tariff - a 25 percent tariff on vehicles that were deemed to be primarily commercial goods-carrying vehicles.

SMITH: The chicken tax - they actually called it the chicken tax.

GLINTON: These are pickup trucks and commercial vans, and it's not just German pickup trucks. It's all foreign trucks. If you want to make a truck and ship it to the U.S., you got to pay 25 percent extra. It's called the chicken tax.

SMITH: And it changed the American car industry overnight. The first thing that happens is that foreign trucks are all of a sudden way too expensive to compete in this country.

So for instance, Volkswagen had this pickup truck. Basically it's a VW bus with a flatbed in back. And this was going to be their next big thing in America after the Beetle and the regular-sized bus, but once the chicken tax goes in, it is 25 percent more expensive. They pull it from the market. They're like, we cannot sell this car, this truck in America.

GLINTON: The American companies are obviously happy. There's less competition. It also allowed the American car companies to sort of kick back and relax a little bit and not really innovate.

SMITH: Because of the chicken tax, American trucks basically stayed the same over the years. I mean they got bigger. They got fancier. They certainly got more expensive. But without foreign competition, there weren't a lot of new ideas in the space.

You know, you could imagine if Hyundai had had the opportunity to build - I don't know - some funky, fuel-efficient truck they brought to America that would've inspired American manufacturers to be like, oh, I'm competing with Hyundai on that. But there was no foreign competition. There was no incentive.

GLINTON: Once you put a tariff on something, the innovation that would have gone into the product goes into getting around the tariff. And that's what the car companies started to do. Robert, things got really crazy really quickly.

Toyota says, so we can't directly ship our trucks from Japan. I'll tell you what we'll do. We'll build them in parts - giant parts. They shipped them to the U.S. and then snapped those parts together, put them on a train, and there you go. They got around the chicken tax.

SMITH: Because technically they were assembling the car. Even though all the parts were made in Japan, they were assembling it in the United States.

GLINTON: Yeah, tighten a couple of screws - made in America.

SMITH: Good to go.

GLINTON: And U.S. Customs was like, yeah, no, that's not going to play.

SMITH: And so I'm sure all the foreign car manufacturers at this point just gave up trying to get around the chicken tax.

GLINTON: Of course not because this is America, the most important market for any kind of vehicle. Of course they wanted to get their trucks in. Subaru, which is a great carmaker - they make SUVs. Why not make a truck? So they did in the '80s. I'm sure you remember the Subaru BRAT.

SMITH: The Subaru BRAT - my neighbor had one of these. It was amazing. From 50 feet away, it looked like a pickup truck. But when you got up close, there were these two flimsy, plastic seats just bolted into the bed of the truck.

KRAFCIK: The idea was, well, those seats are for people, therefore it must not be (laughter) a vehicle that's designed to carry goods. I thought it was a very clever solution.

SMITH: The U.S. government did not think this was a clever solution. They imposed the chicken tax, and the BRAT went away.

GLINTON: As time goes by and the global auto industry gets more interconnected and complicated, you can't parse out necessarily which is an American company and which is a foreign company because, say, a company like Ford makes cars and trucks on five continents.

SMITH: And all of a sudden, American companies started to encounter the same problem that foreign companies were, which is, American companies had to deal with the chicken tax.

GLINTON: For instance, Ford makes a cargo van in Europe. It's called the Transit Connect. But they didn't want to have to pay the chicken tax. So what they did was they took this cargo van, put some seats where the cargo was supposed to go, shipped it to the U.S. and said, hey, that's not a cargo van; that's a passenger van. The chicken tax doesn't apply. Here's Sean McAlinden from the Center for Automotive Research.

SEAN MCALINDEN: And when they get here to the United States - to, let's say, Ohio - they rip the seats out, punch out the windows and cover them with metal panels and resell the vet vehicle as a freight van. And it's cheaper to do that than pay the tariff.

GLINTON: After they took the seats out, they sent them back to Europe, put them in another van and shipped them back to U.S. to be taken out again over and over and over again in this vicious, unvirtuous cycle.

SMITH: All of this trade gymnastics may sound like insanity. And maybe it is insanity, but at the end of the day, the chicken tax accomplished exactly what it was supposed to accomplish, which is the dominance of the American truck.

American trucks own the road. And they have for 50 years. In fact, everyone agrees that American trucks are now so good, have had such an advantage for so long that even if you got rid of the chicken tax, it would take years and years and years for the rest of the world to catch up with American trucks.

GLINTON: And that's the question I've been having for years. If American trucks are so good, why is the 25 percent chicken tax still in place? At the most recent Detroit auto show, I got to speak to Mark Fields. He's the brand-new CEO of Ford Motor Company. And right before I talked to him, he had just unveiled what almost every Ford executive would call the most important truck to come out of Detroit in 50 years. So I had to ask him, if your trucks are so awesome...

Why do you still need the chicken tax?

MARK FIELDS: Well, in terms of the - you know, clearly when you look - we're free traders by design. We have been the best-selling vehicle in the U.S. for 33 years. Well, we want to make sure we're on a level playing field. And right now around the world - not so level depending upon things.

GLINTON: And you think it's fine. You want to keep it. Do you need it, though? That's the question.

FIELDS: I think, you know, it's on the books right now. And you know, that's the reality that we're dealing with.

GLINTON: Robert, let me translate that for you. I speak fluent auto executive. What he's saying is, we don't really need the chicken tax, but we aren't going to demand that we get rid of it. After all, it kind of benefits us.

I thought, that went so well; why stop at one CEO? Let's go on to the next. So I talked to Sergio Marchionne. He's the head of the FCA Group, which is the owner of Chrysler. And this is where it gets weird because this company is a European company and an American company. So not only is it helped by the chicken tax. It's also harmed by it as well.

SERGIO MARCHIONNE: I'm the wrong guy to ask that question because I would not have the chicken tax. But that's just my view.

GLINTON: Why not? I mean you're the right person to answer. You're in charge of an American car company that benefits.

MARCHIONNE: I am - no, but we benefit - when you run a global organization, the chicken tax is an incredibly protective measure to try and deal with I think an ill-perceived threat to the stability of the auto sector. I don't think it does much. But it exists, so it's going to take a while to try and take it out - take it off the table.

GLINTON: Finally, how...

MARCHIONNE: It's an interesting question. Why would you ask about the chicken tax?

GLINTON: Because...

MARCHIONNE: Of all the taxes you could be asking...

GLINTON: Because it's weird. It's weird that this tariff exists. I mean why not compete on a completely even playing field?

MARCHIONNE: You sound pretty good to me. I like your story. I didn't say anything. I'm not the guy that invented the chicken tax. I comply with the chicken tax. Do I need the chicken tax? The answer is no.

SMITH: So Sonari, even with CEO doublespeak, I'm not hearing these guys saying, like, we are going to die as companies without the chicken tax.

GLINTON: Well, of course not because they have such an advantage in the minds of the people who buy pickup trucks. It would take forever to break that bond with the American pickup truck.

SMITH: And that's the funny thing about tariffs, which is, once tariffs go into place, there's no real incentive to get rid of them. Even if you don't need them anymore, they stick around. And there's a really important reason for this, which is, once you have a tariff, it becomes a bargaining chip. It becomes something you can use in the next set of trade negotiations.

Hey, just an ending note here - it's been two years since we recorded that podcast. And like clockwork, Sonari Glinton just got back from the Detroit Auto Show. Hey, Sonari.

GLINTON: Hey. How's it going, Robert?

SMITH: It's going good. And you're still thinking about the chicken tax. It's still a thing in the auto industry.

GLINTON: It is very much still a thing in the auto industry. And actually listening to the curt (laughter) intonations of Sergio Marchionne, the CEO of the Fiat Chrysler Group - it's interesting because he - and along with the other American CEOs of the car companies - met with President Trump about manufacturing here in the U.S. and in Mexico.

SMITH: And Donald Trump talks a lot about tariffs and retaliatory tariffs. He talks about perhaps renegotiating NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement. And the chicken tax plays into that, right?

GLINTON: Yeah, exactly because one of the things that NAFTA did was - the industry and at least our neighbors thought this tariff is kind of crazy, and that's one of the things that NAFTA sort of erased. If you are a NAFTA country, you don't have to pay the chicken tax. So that's why a Ford F-150 - the aluminum body is built in Mexico and then assembled finally here in the U.S. Ram builds a lot of its trucks in Mexico, as does Chevy in part because it's so close to Texas, which is where a lot of pickup trucks are bought and sold.

SMITH: You know, it's interesting, Sonari, because sometimes I think that only those of us at PLANET MONEY really are obsessed with tiny, little, weird tariffs of the past. But if you renegotiate current trade deals as the president wants to do, they're all in there. All of this stuff is going to start to come to light again. Once you reopen big trade agreements like NAFTA, you're going to have to relitigate all of these old issues again.

GLINTON: When you think about it, Robert, I have to say, I have spent, you know, five and a half years covering the auto industry, and my job for the last five years has been the tremendous success of the auto industry. And there's this fear that, hey, guys, if you touch any of this, it may all come tumbling down.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

SMITH: Sonari Glinton, thank you so much. I think about this podcast all the time. Come back to PLANET MONEY soon.

GLINTON: Would love to.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

GLINTON: Well, of course, we always want to hear what you think. You can email us at [email protected]. And we're also on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

SMITH: The episode was originally produced by Frances Harlow. This rerun was produced by Nick Fountain. And if you're looking for more politics in your life, get used to it. You're going to have to do it. Check out the NPR Politics Podcast. They're great. You can find them at npr.org/podcasts or on the NPR One app. I'm Robert Smith.

GLINTON: And I'm Sonari Glinton. Thanks for joining us.


In 1-2 paragraphs, answer the first four questions in the text box.

Why was chicken considered a luxury in Germany?
What was the “chicken tax?” (Note: It’s not on chickens)
Describe how car companies get around the tariff.
Explain why Sergio Marchionne, the CEO of FCA group, would not have the chicken tax.

Answer the question below in a short paragraph.

5. Do you think we should continue to have the chicken tax? Why or why not?

In: Economics

I need 7-8 sentences responding to each paragraph written by my peers. Please make sure each...

I need 7-8 sentences responding to each paragraph written by my peers. Please make sure each paragraph is error/grammar free. Please separate each paragraph written by number 1 and 2. .please write with differing viewson their response. Thanks, Chegg

1- 97% of America or 97% of Americans. Obviously, one is based on land area and the other is based on the number of people. If a cell phone company can achieve 97% of Americans, then the company's income must be very substantial. If a cell phone company achieves 97% of the US land, it shows that the coverage is very wide, for example, some areas with sparsely populated areas are also covered. According to data, the United States has a population of 328.2 million and a land area of ​​3,797,000 mi². Wyoming has the smallest population in the United States, with only more than 500,000 residents. If I choose, I will choose company A. For me, cell phone company can cover 97% of the area of ​​the United States. Relatively speaking, the manpower and material resources spent by the company will be reduced, because the area is determined and easy to operate, but 97% of Americans need to spend a lot of money. Advertising costs, etc., that is very inefficient and difficult to maintain. For example, a person who loves to travel will also choose a US cell phone company that can cover 97% America, because going to places with few people can ensure that they can call others. So I choose company A.

-------------------------------------

2-Do you think it is better for a cell phone company to cover 97% of America or 97% of Americans? What is the difference? If cell phone company A covers 97% of America, while cell phone company B covers 97% of Americans, which company would you choose and why?

In my opinion, I think this question is to rely on a company’s two basics which are profit and service. If company B covers 97% of American users, this means that they will definitely make a large amount of money. There are about 330 million people in the USA (U.S. and World Population Clock, 2020). If 97% percent of these people using the same cell phone company that means this company will make trillions of incomes. what the greatest advantage is that this company's service can choose to focus on places with a high population density. This action will help them to cut a large amount of budget. Alaska, which is the largest US state and third least populated state. The land area of Alaska is one-fifth of the U.S. but the population is third-least in the US (Kästle, 2020). If company B services this place, it will be a very uneconomical action. the company can choose to abandon these very-low-density places and try their best to serve other states with more economic benefits. If company A covers 97% of America, this means that they will have the greatest service in the United States because this means that people in the US can use this service no matter where they go. Company A needs to focus on the coverage of US territory.


I just need u to write an opinion no need for sum

In: Accounting

1. In the 19th Century British trading patterns were countries from distant locations such as North...

1. In the 19th Century British trading patterns were countries from distant locations such as North America, Latin America, Africa and Asia. Today, most British trade patterns are European countries. Examine the causes of the British changing trade pattern with reference to the Gravity Model.

In: Economics

Some immigrants came willingly and some unwillingly. Discuss two (2) immigrants who came to America unwillingly....

Some immigrants came willingly and some unwillingly. Discuss two (2) immigrants who came to America unwillingly. How were they forced to come to America? How did their voyage across the Atlantic differ from other immigrants? How were they treated upon arrival?

In: Economics

After World War I and more than 20 years of reform, Americans became much more conservative...

After World War I and more than 20 years of reform, Americans became much more conservative in the 1920s. In fact, Reinhold Niebuhr stated that America was “rapidly becoming the most conservative nation on earth.” Give examples that defend this perception of America as conservative in the 1920s.

In: Psychology

discuss the role of government policy in promoting or retarding economic growth in one of the...

discuss the role of government policy in promoting or retarding economic growth in one of the following “development states” of east or south-east Asia: South Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia

In: Economics