You want to develop a regression model about the 2004 presidential election. The objective is to explain percentage of votes received by the Democratic candidate in each state. The explanatory variables are:

(i) unemployment rate in each state,

(ii) gender dummy (female =1 and male = 0),

(iii) a dummy variable for Bill Clinton’s appearance in the state to campaign,

(iv) an interaction term between the gender dummy and the Clinton dummy.

You want to consider a variety of models. Model I contains the variables in (i) and (ii). Model II contains the variables in (i), (ii), and (iii). Model III contains the variables in (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv).

1. Write down each of the above three regression models. Be sure to define all notations.
2. Interpret all the coefficients in Model III.
3. Using Models II and III, indicate how you would test the following hypotheses. Be sure to write down the null hypothesis, restricted and unrestricted models, etc.
   1. Unemployment doesn’t matter.
   2. Clinton’s appearance had no effect.
   3. Clinton’s appearance had same effect for both males and females.

Ethical Considerations" Please respond to the following:

• Reflect upon the responsibilities placed on auditors by the PCAOB, and discuss whether those expectations are adequate considering current emerging issues.
• Discuss whether the Sarbanes-Oxley Act should be modified to adjust regulation of corporate executives and auditors in response to issues subsequent to the 2002 scandals

Pretend it is early 2002 and you are Senator Paul Sarbanes.  What would you do differently when writing the Sarbanes-Oxley Act? (Do not say you think it is perfect and you would not do anything differently. Discuss at least two things you would do differently.please explain in detail.

"Ethical Considerations" Please respond to the following:

• Reflect upon the responsibilities placed on auditors by the PCAOB, and discuss whether those expectations are adequate considering current emerging issues.
• Discuss whether the Sarbanes-Oxley Act should be modified to adjust regulation of corporate executives and auditors in response to issues subsequent to the 2002 scandals.

The Work of Christ-The Evangelical View: What do evangelical Christians believe about what Christ accomplished in his life, death, and resurrection?

Soteriology-The Evangelical View: What do evangelical Christians believe about the nature of salvation? Think specifically about the doctrines of justification, sanctification, and glorification.

Ecclesiology-The Evangelical View: What do evangelical Christians believe about the attributes, marks, and mission of the church?

Eschatology-The Evangelical View: What do evangelical Christians believe about the end times?

Alexis, a single taxpayer, age 28, files a return for 2019. Information for the year includes the following:

AGI of $100,000

-Paid $1,000 to a Qualified Charitable Organization - local high school, to attend a fund raising dinner. The value of the dinner was $100.

-Made a donation to her church of $5,000

-Medical insurance of $11,000 (Alexis was NOT covered by a plan at work).

-Dentist bills $4,000

Her itemized deductions are how much: (NOTE: do not include a dollar sign, comma or period in your answer.)

Answer:

1how will I use my God-given aesthetic capacity when interacting with popular art, design and music? (Culturally current music and visual art and design?)

2how will I use my God-given aesthetic capacity when interacting with tradition-based art? (Church, holidays, ceremonial, and commemorative music and art?

(Reflect an understanding of the aesthetic ideas.

Give specific examples of each category and how you may incorporate your new skills into future encounters.)

Find u(x,y) harmonic in S with given boundary values:

1. S = {(x,y): 1 < y < 3} , u(x,y) = 5 (if y=1) and = 7 (when y=3)
2. S = {(x,y): 1 < x² + y² < 4}, u(x,y)= 5 (on outer circle) and = 7 (on inner circle)

I have these two problems to solve, and I'm not sure where to start. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!

In a clinical trial, 20 out of 600 patients taking a prescription drug complained of flulike symptoms. Suppose that it is known that 5.5​% of patients taking competing drugs complain of flulike symptoms. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that less than 5​% of this drug's users experience flulike symptoms as a side effect at the α=0.04 level of significance?

What is the P-value of the test result?

What is the test statistics?

What is the critical value?

What is the right boundary of the proportion estimation?