Trend or time-series analysis is another term used for ____ analysis
Multiple Choice
Ratio
Horizontal
Vertical
Diagonal
Vertical analysis refers to:
Multiple Choice
Expressing each item in a financial statement as a percentage of the same base amount.
Expressing each item in a financial statement in order of highest amount to lowest amount.
Expressing each item in a financial statement as its trend over time.
Expressing each item in a financial statement in order of highest importance to lowest importance.
The times interest earned ratio is classified as an indicator of a company's:
Multiple Choice
Profitability.
Long-term survival.
Liquidity.
Solvency.
Which of the following is an example of horizontal analysis?
Multiple Choice
Comparing a balance sheet account with another balance sheet account at the same point in time.
Comparing a balance sheet account with an income statement account.
Comparing an income statement account with another income statement account at the same point in time.
Comparing a balance sheet account over time.
Which of the following is an example of horizontal analysis?
Multiple Choice
Comparing assets with equity.
Comparing gross profit across companies.
Comparing gross profit with operating expenses.
Comparing the change in sales over time.
Jamble Co. reports cash of $40,000, accounts receivable of $60,000, inventory of $150,000, equipment of $350,000, and current liabilities of $100,000. What is Jamble's current ratio?
Multiple Choice
6.0.
1.0.
1.4.
2.5.
Which of the following is an example of conservative accounting?
Multiple Choice
Adjusting the allowance for uncollectible accounts to a smaller amount.
Recording the lowest possible warranty expense.
Changing to a longer useful life for depreciating a long-lived asset.
Recording inventory at lower of cost or net realizable value.
Sports Unlimited reports net income of $240,000, sales revenue of $24 million, and average total assets of $3 million. The asset turnover is:
Multiple Choice
12 times.
0.08 times.
8 times.
1.5 times.
amble Co. reports cash of $40,000, accounts receivable of $60,000, inventory of $150,000, equipment of $350,000, and current liabilities of $100,000. What is Jamble's acid-test ratio?
Multiple Choice
6.0.
1.0.
4.5.
2.5.
Which of the following is an example of an aggressive accounting practice in relation to the reporting of net income?
Multiple Choice
Judging a contingent loss to be reasonably likely instead of probable.
Estimating the useful life of a depreciable asset to be 10 years instead of 6 years.
Assuming net realizable value of inventory remains above cost despite lack of sales of current inventory.
All of the other answers are examples of aggressive accounting.
The Sports Addition reports net sales of $2 million, cost of goods sold of $1 million, operating expenses of $500,000, and other expenses of $100,000. If you were to perform a vertical analysis of this income statement, you would divide each of these income statement line items by:
Multiple Choice
$400,000.
$2,000,000.
$100,000.
$1,000,000.
Which of the following is an example of aggressive accounting?
Multiple Choice
Recording the lowest possible warranty expense.
The write-down of overvalued inventory.
Adjusting the allowance for uncollectible accounts to a larger amount.
Changing to a shorter useful life for depreciating a long-lived asset.
Which of the following ratios is more useful in evaluating solvency?
Multiple Choice
Debt to equity ratio.
Receivables turnover ratio.
Inventory turnover ratio.
Current ratio.
Conservative accounting practices refer to:
Multiple Choice
Practices that result in reporting lower income, lower assets, and/or higher liabilities.
Practices that reduce the amount of tax paid to federal, state, and local jurisdictions.
Practices that result in greater employee training to avoid injuries.
Practices that result in management taking fewer risky operating decisions that have the potential to result in losses.
The Sports Addition reports net sales of $2 million, cost of goods sold of $1 million, operating expenses of $500,000, and other expenses of $100,000. The Company's gross profit ratio is:
Multiple Choice
100%.
25%.
50%.
5%.
In: Accounting
Exercise 6: Determination of growth of E.coli
At the conclusion of this exercise you should be able to:
Description of the experiments
This experiment will determine the growth of E.coli over a four hour time period. In order to record this growth, we will be using two methods of determining growth: turbidometry and viable count methods. To begin this experiment, a 1.0 ml sample of an overnight culture of E.coli was placed in a 100 ml flask containing sterile nutrient broth. To determine an initial timepoint (time zero), a 2.0 ml sample was removed, 1.0 ml of which was used to examine turbidometry (Absorbance) at 600nm wavelength and 0.1 ml of the sample was applied to a nutrient agar plate and spread onto the plate to determine viable counts.
The flask was subsequently placed in a 370 C shaking water bath to allow the cells to grow. The flask was removed to obtain an hourly sample of culture, where 2.0 ml was aseptically removed from the flask to perform turbidometric and viable plate count methods (times 1 to 4 hours). To perform the viable counts over time, serial ten-fold dilutions of sample were made by adding 0.1 ml of sample to 9.9 ml of sterile water (this dilution is know as 1/10, or in scientific terms a 101 dilution). For this experiment, dilutions were made up to 107 for each subsequent timepoint.
A 0.1ml sample was removed from dilutions and added to a nutrient agar plate. The sample was subsequently spread onto the surface of the plate covering all quadrants of the plate (this is known as a lawn inoculum). After allowing plates to dry, plates were inverted upside down and placed in an incubator at 370C and removed after 18-24 hours. After incubation, plates showing colony numbers of 300 or less were counted for each time point. These are known as colony forming units (CFUs).
For a visual demonstration of how to perform serial dilutions and observe the appearance of colonies formed using this technique, watch How to Quantify Bacterial Culture Concentrations Using Serial Dilution and Plate Counts:
Results
Turbidometric recordings
|
Time (hours) |
Optical Density (Absorbance) OD600 (nm) |
|
0 |
0.005 |
|
1 |
0.03 |
|
2 |
0.21 |
|
3 |
0.29 |
|
4 |
0.35 |
Viable count (CFU) after 18 hours
|
Time (h) |
# Colonies on plate |
Dilution used |
# cells/ml * |
Log #cells/ml |
|
0 |
10 |
10-3 |
||
|
1 |
184 |
10-2 |
||
|
2 |
179 |
10-5 |
||
|
3 |
56 |
10-6 |
||
|
4 |
64 |
10-5 |
*Use proper scientific notation
# colonies on plate X 1/dilution X PF = #cells/ml e.g. 33 cells on the 10-5 plate would be:
33 X 105 X 10 =3.30 X 107 cells/ml (33 000 000 cells/ml)
Generation time =∆ t log 2
Log n – log N
Where: N = number of bacteria at a particular time point during log phase
n = number of bacteria at a second time point during log phase
∆t = time
In: Biology
Smoky Mountain Corporation makes two types of hiking boots—the Xtreme and the Pathfinder. Data concerning these two product lines appear below:
| Xtreme | Pathfinder | |||||
| Selling price per unit | $ | 121.00 | $ | 86.00 | ||
| Direct materials per unit | $ | 65.30 | $ | 52.00 | ||
| Direct labor per unit | $ | 13.50 | $ | 9.00 | ||
| Direct labor-hours per unit | 1.5 | DLHs | 1.0 | DLHs | ||
| Estimated annual production and sales | 31,000 | units | 65,000 | units | ||
The company has a traditional costing system in which manufacturing overhead is applied to units based on direct labor-hours. Data concerning manufacturing overhead and direct labor-hours for the upcoming year appear below:
| Estimated total manufacturing overhead | $ | 2,230,000 | ||
| Estimated total direct labor-hours | 111,500 | DLHs | ||
Required:
1. Compute the product margins for the Xtreme and the Pathfinder products under the company’s traditional costing system.
2. The company is considering replacing its traditional costing system with an activity-based costing system that would assign its manufacturing overhead to the following four activity cost pools (the Other cost pool includes organization-sustaining costs and idle capacity costs):
| Estimated Overhead Cost |
Expected Activity | |||||
| Activities and Activity Measures | Xtreme | Pathfinder | Total | |||
| Supporting direct labor (direct labor-hours) | $ | 724,750 | 46,500 | 65,000 | 111,500 | |
| Batch setups (setups) | 975,000 | 420 | 330 | 750 | ||
| Product sustaining (number of products) | 470,000 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Other | 60,250 | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Total manufacturing overhead cost | $ | 2,230,000 | ||||
Compute the product margins for the Xtreme and the Pathfinder products under the activity-based costing system.
3. Prepare a quantitative comparison of the traditional and activity-based cost assignments.
Smoky Mountain Corporation makes two types of hiking boots—the Xtreme and the Pathfinder. Data concerning these two product lines appear below:
| Xtreme | Pathfinder | |||||
| Selling price per unit | $ | 121.00 | $ | 86.00 | ||
| Direct materials per unit | $ | 65.30 | $ | 52.00 | ||
| Direct labor per unit | $ | 13.50 | $ | 9.00 | ||
| Direct labor-hours per unit | 1.5 | DLHs | 1.0 | DLHs | ||
| Estimated annual production and sales | 31,000 | units | 65,000 | units | ||
The company has a traditional costing system in which manufacturing overhead is applied to units based on direct labor-hours. Data concerning manufacturing overhead and direct labor-hours for the upcoming year appear below:
| Estimated total manufacturing overhead | $ | 2,230,000 | ||
| Estimated total direct labor-hours | 111,500 | DLHs | ||
Required:
1. Compute the product margins for the Xtreme and the Pathfinder products under the company’s traditional costing system.
2. The company is considering replacing its traditional costing system with an activity-based costing system that would assign its manufacturing overhead to the following four activity cost pools (the Other cost pool includes organization-sustaining costs and idle capacity costs):
| Estimated Overhead Cost |
Expected Activity | |||||
| Activities and Activity Measures | Xtreme | Pathfinder | Total | |||
| Supporting direct labor (direct labor-hours) | $ | 724,750 | 46,500 | 65,000 | 111,500 | |
| Batch setups (setups) | 975,000 | 420 | 330 | 750 | ||
| Product sustaining (number of products) | 470,000 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Other | 60,250 | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Total manufacturing overhead cost | $ | 2,230,000 | ||||
Compute the product margins for the Xtreme and the Pathfinder products under the activity-based costing system.
3. Prepare a quantitative comparison of the traditional and activity-based cost assignments.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In: Accounting
|
Myrtle Air Express decided to offer direct service from Cleveland to Myrtle Beach. Management must decide between a full-price service using the company's new fleet of jet aircraft and a discount service using smaller-capacity commuter planes. It is clear that the best choice depends on the market reaction to the service Myrtle Air offers. Management developed estimates of the contribution to profit for each type of service based upon two possible levels of demand for service to Myrtle Beach: strong and weak. The following table shows the estimated quarterly profits (in thousands of dollars):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In: Statistics and Probability
| BrainWeight | BodyWeight |
| 3.385 | 44.5 |
| 0.48 | 15.5 |
| 1.35 | 8.1 |
| 465 | 423 |
| 36.33 | 119.5 |
| 27.66 | 115 |
| 14.83 | 98.2 |
| 1.04 | 5.5 |
| 4.19 | 58 |
| 0.425 | 6.4 |
| 0.101 | 4 |
| 0.92 | 5.7 |
| 1 | 6.6 |
| 0.005 | 0.14 |
| 0.06 | 1 |
| 3.5 | 10.8 |
| 2 | 12.3 |
| 1.7 | 6.3 |
| 2547 | 4603 |
| 0.023 | 0.3 |
| 187.1 | 419 |
| 521 | 655 |
| 0.785 | 3.5 |
| 10 | 115 |
| 3.3 | 25.6 |
| 0.2 | 5 |
| 1.41 | 17.5 |
| 529 | 680 |
| 207 | 406 |
| 85 | 325 |
| 0.75 | 12.3 |
| 62 | 1320 |
| 6654 | 5712 |
| 3.5 | 3.9 |
| 6.8 | 179 |
| 35 | 56 |
| 4.05 | 17 |
| 0.12 | 1 |
| 0.023 | 0.4 |
| 0.01 | 0.25 |
| 1.4 | 12.5 |
| 250 | 490 |
| 2.5 | 12.1 |
| 55.5 | 175 |
| 100 | 157 |
| 52.16 | 440 |
| 10.55 | 179.5 |
| 0.55 | 2.4 |
| 60 | 81 |
| 3.6 | 21 |
| 4.288 | 39.2 |
| 0.28 | 1.9 |
| 0.075 | 1.2 |
| 0.122 | 3 |
| 0.048 | 0.33 |
| 192 | 180 |
| 3 | 25 |
| 160 | 169 |
| 0.9 | 2.6 |
| 1.62 | 11.4 |
| 0.104 | 2.5 |
| 4.235 | 50.4 |
a. Input the data to R and draw a scatter plot, and you can see
that the current scale is not the best for display. You can apply a
log-transformation on both variables. This can be done by using the
log() function, you can put the old data.frame in the parenthesis,
and assign the output a name so that you will have a new data.frame
of the transformed data, something like below
> new.data <- log(old.data)
Draw a scatter plot of the new data, does it look much better?
c. Fit a linear model on the original data. Draw plot the
residual against the predictor using something similar to
> plot(old.data$BodyWeight, lm.fit$res)
What do you think about the assumption that the error term does not
depend on x ?
d. Fit a linear model on the log-transformed data. Draw a plot the residual against the predictor. What do you see now?
Can you please show all work?
In: Statistics and Probability
In 2019, Pittsburgh Steelers starting quarterback Ben Roethlisberger suffered a season-ending elbow injury in Week 2. The team struggled to find a quarterback until Week 12, when undrafted rookie Devlin “Duck” Hodges entered a game against the Cincinnati Bengals at halftime and led the Steelers to a surprising comeback victory. His performance earned him the starting job for the rest of the season and engendered a flurry of media speculation about his potential as a future quarterback for the Steelers.
Assume quarterbacks can either be good, average, or bad. Because Hodges was undrafted, it’s fair to say that coaches and fans had low expectations for him. Assume the initial probability distribution for Hodges was:
P(Good) =0.1
P(Average)=0.2
P(Bad)= 0.7
Also assume quarterbacks can either have strong performances or weak performances (there are only two types of performances, strong or weak). The chance of a good quarterback having a strong performance is 80%, the chance of an average QB having a strong performance is 50%, and the chance of a bad QB having a strong performance is 30%. We have:
P(S | G) =0.8
P(S | A)=0.5
P(S | B)= 0.3
From ESPN.com, Hodges turned in the following performances during the last 6 weeks of the season:
|
Date |
Opponent |
Hodges Passer Rating |
Evaluation* |
|
24-Nov |
Bengals |
115 |
Strong |
|
1-Dec |
Browns |
95.7 |
Strong |
|
8-Dec |
Cardinals |
117.5 |
Strong |
|
15-Dec |
Bills |
43.9 |
Weak |
|
22-Dec |
Jets |
37 |
Weak |
|
29-Dec |
Ravens |
47.9 |
Weak |
|
*the average passer rating is around 88 |
|||
Use Bayes’s Rule to fill in the following table with the week-by-week probabilities of Duck being good, average, or bad.
|
Consecutive Wins |
Prior to the Season |
Game 1 |
Game 2 |
Game 3 |
Game 4 |
Game 5 |
Game 6 |
|
Chances of Being Good |
10% |
||||||
|
Chances of Being Average |
20% |
||||||
|
Chances of being Bad |
70% |
In: Statistics and Probability
In: Physics
In 2019, Pittsburgh Steelers starting quarterback Ben Roethlisberger suffered a season-ending elbow injury in Week 2. The team struggled to find a quarterback until Week 12, when undrafted rookie Devlin “Duck” Hodges entered a game against the Cincinnati Bengals at halftime and led the Steelers to a surprising comeback victory. His performance earned him the starting job for the rest of the season and engendered a flurry of media speculation about his potential as a future quarterback for the Steelers.
Assume quarterbacks can either be good, average, or bad. Because Hodges was undrafted, it’s fair to say that coaches and fans had low expectations for him. Assume the initial probability distribution for Hodges was:
P(Good) =0.1
P(Average)=0.2
P(Bad)= 0.7
Also assume quarterbacks can either have strong performances or weak performances (there are only two types of performances, strong or weak). The chance of a good quarterback having a strong performance is 80%, the chance of an average QB having a strong performance is 50%, and the chance of a bad QB having a strong performance is 30%. We have:
P(S | G) =0.8
P(S | A)=0.5
P(S | B)= 0.3
From ESPN.com, Hodges turned in the following performances during the last 6 weeks of the season:
|
Date |
Opponent |
Hodges Passer Rating |
Evaluation* |
|
24-Nov |
Bengals |
115 |
Strong |
|
1-Dec |
Browns |
95.7 |
Strong |
|
8-Dec |
Cardinals |
117.5 |
Strong |
|
15-Dec |
Bills |
43.9 |
Weak |
|
22-Dec |
Jets |
37 |
Weak |
|
29-Dec |
Ravens |
47.9 |
Weak |
|
*the average passer rating is around 88 |
|||
Use Bayes’s Rule to fill in the following table with the week-by-week probabilities of Duck being good, average, or bad.
|
Consecutive Wins |
Prior to the Season |
Game 1 |
Game 2 |
Game 3 |
Game 4 |
Game 5 |
Game 6 |
|
Chances of Being Good |
10% |
||||||
|
Chances of Being Average |
20% |
||||||
|
Chances of being Bad |
70% |
In: Statistics and Probability
An important quality characteristic used by the manufacturers of
ABC asphalt shingles is the amount of moisture the shingles contain
when they are packaged. Customers may feel that they have purchased
a product lacking in quality if they find moisture and wet shingles
inside the packaging. In some cases, excessive moisture
can cause the granules attached to the shingles for texture and
colouring purposes to fall off the shingles resulting in appearance
problems. To monitor the amount of moisture present, the company
conducts moisture tests. A shingle is weighed and then dried. The
shingle is then reweighed, and based on the amount of moisture
taken out of the product, the pounds of moisture per 100 square
feet is calculated. The company claims that the mean moisture
content cannot be greater than 0.35 pound per 100 square
feet.
The file (A & B shingles.csv) includes 36 measurements (in
pounds per 100 square feet) for A shingles and 31 for B
shingles.
3.1. For the A shingles, form the null and alternative hypothesis
to test whether the population mean moisture content is less than
0.35 pound per 100 square feet.
3.2. For the B shingles, form the null and alternative hypothesis
to test whether the population mean moisture content is less than
0.35 pound per 100 square feet.
3.3. Do you think that the population means for shingles A and B
are equal?
Form the hypothesis and conduct the test of the hypothesis.
What assumption do you need to check before the test for equality
of means is performed?
3.4. What assumption about the population distribution is needed in
order to conduct the hypothesis tests above?
|
A |
B |
|
0.44 |
0.14 |
|
0.61 |
0.15 |
|
0.47 |
0.31 |
|
0.3 |
0.16 |
|
0.15 |
0.37 |
|
0.24 |
0.18 |
|
0.16 |
0.42 |
|
0.2 |
0.58 |
|
0.2 |
0.25 |
|
0.2 |
0.41 |
|
0.26 |
0.17 |
|
0.14 |
0.13 |
|
0.33 |
0.23 |
|
0.13 |
0.11 |
|
0.72 |
0.1 |
|
0.51 |
0.19 |
|
0.28 |
0.22 |
|
0.39 |
0.44 |
|
0.39 |
0.11 |
|
0.25 |
0.11 |
|
0.16 |
0.31 |
|
0.2 |
0.43 |
|
0.22 |
0.26 |
|
0.42 |
0.18 |
|
0.24 |
0.44 |
|
0.21 |
0.43 |
|
0.49 |
0.16 |
|
0.34 |
0.52 |
|
0.36 |
0.36 |
|
0.29 |
0.22 |
|
0.27 |
0.39 |
|
0.4 |
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
0.37 |
In: Statistics and Probability
1.
A.Prepare the journal entry for sales.
B. Prepare the journal entry for collections.
C. Prepare the journal entry for write-offs.
D. Post the beginning balance and the journal entries to the T-account for Accounts Receivable. Calculate the balance after these entries have been posted.
E. Post the beginning balance and the journal entries to the T-account Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. Calculate and enter the balance after these entries have been posted.
1.2. December 31, 2019 aging schedule
|
Age Category |
Amount |
% Estimated as Uncollectible |
$ Estimated as Uncollectible |
|
Current |
$1,502,000 |
0.75% |
$11,265 |
|
0-90 days past due |
64,300 |
1.5% |
965 |
|
91-180 days past due |
11,719 |
15% |
1,758 |
|
Over 180 days past due |
3,071 |
75% |
2,303 |
|
Total |
$1,581,090 |
$16,291 |
Given the T-accounts for Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and the aging schedule above, prepare the December 31, 2019 adjusting entry for bad debt. Show and label any calculation below the journal entry.
A. Enter the amount for Bad Debt Expense and which financial statement it will appear on.
B. Enter the amount for Accounts Receivable and which financial statement it will appear on.
C. Enter the amount for Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and which financial statement it will appear on.
D. Enter the amount for Net realizable value of Accounts Receivable and which financial statement it will appear on.
E. Prepare the December 31, 2019 adjusting entry for bad debt assuming the company uses % of credit sales instead of aging and it estimates that 0.3% of credit sales will be uncollectible. Show and label any calculation below the journal entry.
In: Accounting