Questions
A stock, priced at $47.00, has 3-month call and put options with exercise prices of $45...

A stock, priced at $47.00, has 3-month call and put options with exercise prices of $45 and $50. The current market prices of these options are given by the following:

Exercise Price

Call

Put

45

$4.50

$2.20

50

$2.15

$4.80

Now, assume that you already hold a sizable block of the stock, currently priced at $47, and want to hedge your stock to lock in a minimum value of $45 per share at a very low up-front initial cost.

a) What hedge strategy from Chapter 7 would you recommend and what would you option transactions be to set up the holding (per 100 shares of stock that you already own) And, what would be the up-front cost to set up these option position?

b) What if the stock price falls appreciably over the next 3 months and ends up at $30. Relative to your starting point at time-zero when the stock was priced at $47, what is your dollar loss for the hedged position versus if you had not hedged and held the “long stock only” (again scaling by 100 shares of stock)? What would your percentage rate of return have been for your combined holdings (stock and options) from time-0 to time-T? What would your percentage rate of return have been for a comparable “long stock only” position over time-0 to time-T in this case? (Remember time-T is at option expiration).

c) Alternatively, what if the stock price had risen appreciably over the next 3 months and ends up at $65. Relative to your starting point at time-zero when the stock was priced at $47, what is your dollar gain for the hedged position versus if you had not hedged and held the “long stock only”? What would your percentage rate of return have been for your combined holdings (stock and options) from time-0 to time-T? What would your percentage rate of return have been for a comparable “long stock only” position over time-0 to time-T in this case?

In: Finance

#include <iostream> #include <string> #include <ctime> using namespace std; void displayArray(double * items, int start, int...

#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <ctime>
using namespace std;


void displayArray(double * items, int start, int end)
{
        for (int i = start; i <= end; i++)
                cout << items[i] << " ";
        cout << endl;
}



//The legendary "Blaze Sort" algorithm.
//Sorts the specified portion of the array between index start and end (inclusive)
//Hmmm... how fast is it?
/*
void blazeSort(double * items, int start, int end)
{
        if (end - start > 0)
        {
                int p = filter(items, start, end);
                blazeSort(items, start, p - 1);
                blazeSort(items, p + 1, end);
        }
}
*/

int main()
{
        ////////////////////////////////////////////////////
        //Part 1:  Implement a method called filter.
        ////////////////////////////////////////////////////

        //Filter is a function that takes in an array and a range (start and end).
        //
        //Call the first item in the range the 'pivot'.
        //
        //Filter's job is to simply separate items within the range based on whether they are bigger or smaller than the pivot.
        //In the example array below, 13 is the pivot, so all items smaller than 13 are placed in indices 0-3.  The pivot is then placed at index 4, and all
        //remaining items, which are larger than the pivot, are placed at positions 5-10.  Note that the array is NOT sorted, just "partitioned" around
        //the pivot value.  After doing this, the function must return the new index of the pivot value.

        double testNumsA[] = { 13, 34.1, 43, 189, 4, 4.5, 18.35, 85, 3, 37.2, 5 };

        //The filter will place all items <= 13 to the left of value 13, and all items large than 13 to the right of 13 in the array.
        int p = filter(testNumsA, 0, 10);
        cout << p << endl; //should be 4, the new index of 13.
        displayArray(testNumsA, 0, 10);  //should display something like this:  5 3 4.5 4 13 18.35 85 189 37.2 43 34.1

        //One more example:
        double testNumsB[] = { 13, 34.1, 43, 189, 4, 4.5, 18.35, 85, 3, 37.2, 5 };
        p = filter(testNumsB, 2, 6);  //Here we are only interested in items from indices 2-6, ie, 43, 189, 4, 4.5, 18.35
        cout << p << endl; //should be 5
        displayArray(testNumsB, 0, 10); //Notice only indices 2-6 have been partioned:  13 34.1 18.35 4 4.5 43 189 85 3 37.2 5


        /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
        //Part 2:  Uncomment "Blaze Sort".
        //Blaze Sort uses/needs your filter to work properly.
        /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////


        //Test if Blaze Sort correctly sorts the following array.
        double testNums[] = { 13, 34.1, 43, 189, 4, 4.5, 18.35, 85, 3, 37.2, 5 };

        blazeSort(testNums, 0, 10);

        displayArray(testNums, 0, 10);

        /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
        //Part 3:  Test how fast Blaze Sort is for large arrays.
        //What do you think the run-time (big-Oh) of blaze sort is?
        /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

        //Stress test:
        int size = 100; //test with: 1000, 10000, 100000,1000000, 10000000
        double * numbers = new double[size];

        for (int i = 0; i < size; i++)
        {
                numbers[i] = rand();
        }

        clock_t startTime, endTime;

        startTime = clock();
        blazeSort(numbers, 0, size - 1);
        endTime = clock();

        displayArray(numbers, 0, size - 1);
        cout << "Blaze sort took: " << endTime - startTime << " milliseconds to sort " << size << " doubles."  << endl;

        ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
        //Part 4: Sort Moby Dick, but this time with Blaze Sort
        ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

        //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
        //1) Create a second version of Blaze Sort that sorts arrays of strings
        //(instead of arrays of doubles).
        //2) Download whale.txt from the previous lab.  Read the words from the file into
        //an array, sort the array with Blaze Sort, and then write the sorted words to an output file.
        //
        //This time, it has to be fast!  Must finish in under 10 seconds.
        /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

        return 0;
}

In: Computer Science

#include <iostream> #include <string> #include <ctime> using namespace std; void displayArray(double * items, int start, int...

#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <ctime>
using namespace std;


void displayArray(double * items, int start, int end)
{
        for (int i = start; i <= end; i++)
                cout << items[i] << " ";
        cout << endl;
}



//The legendary "Blaze Sort" algorithm.
//Sorts the specified portion of the array between index start and end (inclusive)
//Hmmm... how fast is it?
/*
void blazeSort(double * items, int start, int end)
{
        if (end - start > 0)
        {
                int p = filter(items, start, end);
                blazeSort(items, start, p - 1);
                blazeSort(items, p + 1, end);
        }
}
*/

int main()
{
        ////////////////////////////////////////////////////
        //Part 1:  Implement a method called filter.
        ////////////////////////////////////////////////////

        //Filter is a function that takes in an array and a range (start and end).
        //
        //Call the first item in the range the 'pivot'.
        //
        //Filter's job is to simply separate items within the range based on whether they are bigger or smaller than the pivot.
        //In the example array below, 13 is the pivot, so all items smaller than 13 are placed in indices 0-3.  The pivot is then placed at index 4, and all
        //remaining items, which are larger than the pivot, are placed at positions 5-10.  Note that the array is NOT sorted, just "partitioned" around
        //the pivot value.  After doing this, the function must return the new index of the pivot value.

        double testNumsA[] = { 13, 34.1, 43, 189, 4, 4.5, 18.35, 85, 3, 37.2, 5 };

        //The filter will place all items <= 13 to the left of value 13, and all items large than 13 to the right of 13 in the array.
        int p = filter(testNumsA, 0, 10);
        cout << p << endl; //should be 4, the new index of 13.
        displayArray(testNumsA, 0, 10);  //should display something like this:  5 3 4.5 4 13 18.35 85 189 37.2 43 34.1

        //One more example:
        double testNumsB[] = { 13, 34.1, 43, 189, 4, 4.5, 18.35, 85, 3, 37.2, 5 };
        p = filter(testNumsB, 2, 6);  //Here we are only interested in items from indices 2-6, ie, 43, 189, 4, 4.5, 18.35
        cout << p << endl; //should be 5
        displayArray(testNumsB, 0, 10); //Notice only indices 2-6 have been partioned:  13 34.1 18.35 4 4.5 43 189 85 3 37.2 5


        /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
        //Part 2:  Uncomment "Blaze Sort".
        //Blaze Sort uses/needs your filter to work properly.
        /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////


        //Test if Blaze Sort correctly sorts the following array.
        double testNums[] = { 13, 34.1, 43, 189, 4, 4.5, 18.35, 85, 3, 37.2, 5 };

        blazeSort(testNums, 0, 10);

        displayArray(testNums, 0, 10);

        /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
        //Part 3:  Test how fast Blaze Sort is for large arrays.
        //What do you think the run-time (big-Oh) of blaze sort is?
        /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

        //Stress test:
        int size = 100; //test with: 1000, 10000, 100000,1000000, 10000000
        double * numbers = new double[size];

        for (int i = 0; i < size; i++)
        {
                numbers[i] = rand();
        }

        clock_t startTime, endTime;

        startTime = clock();
        blazeSort(numbers, 0, size - 1);
        endTime = clock();

        displayArray(numbers, 0, size - 1);
        cout << "Blaze sort took: " << endTime - startTime << " milliseconds to sort " << size << " doubles."  << endl;

        ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
        //Part 4: Sort Moby Dick, but this time with Blaze Sort
        ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

        //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
        //1) Create a second version of Blaze Sort that sorts arrays of strings
        //(instead of arrays of doubles).
        //2) Download whale.txt from the previous lab.  Read the words from the file into
        //an array, sort the array with Blaze Sort, and then write the sorted words to an output file.
        //
        //This time, it has to be fast!  Must finish in under 10 seconds.
        

        return 0;
}

In: Computer Science

To more efficiently manage its inventory, Treynor Corporation maintains its internal inventory records using first-in, first-out...

To more efficiently manage its inventory, Treynor Corporation maintains its internal inventory records using first-in, first-out (FIFO) under a perpetual inventory system. The following information relates to its merchandise inventory during the year:

Jan. 1 Inventory on hand—20,000 units; cost $12.20 each.
Feb. 12 Purchased 70,000 units for $12.50 each.
Apr. 30 Sold 50,000 units for $20.00 each.
Jul. 22 Purchased 50,000 units for $12.80 each.
Sep. 9 Sold 70,000 units for $20.00 each.
Nov. 17 Purchased 40,000 units for $13.20 each.
Dec. 31 Inventory on hand—60,000 units.


Required:
1.
Determine the amount Treynor would calculate internally for ending inventory and cost of goods sold using first-in, first-out (FIFO) under a perpetual inventory system.
2. Determine the amount Treynor would report externally for ending inventory and cost of goods sold using last-in, first-out (LIFO) under a periodic inventory system. (Assume beginning inventory under LIFO was 20,000 units with a cost of $11.70).
3. Determine the amount Treynor would report for its LIFO reserve at the end of the year.
4. Record the year-end adjusting entry for the LIFO reserve, assuming the balance at the beginning of the year was $10,000.

Determine the amount Treynor would calculate internally for ending inventory and cost of goods sold using first-in, first-out (FIFO) under a perpetual inventory system. (Round "Cost per Unit" to 2 decimal places.)

Perpetual FIFO: Cost of Goods Available for Sale Cost of Goods Sold - April 30 Cost of Goods Sold - September 9 Inventory Balance
# of units Cost per unit Cost of Goods Available for Sale # of units sold Cost per unit Cost of Goods Sold # of units sold Cost per unit Cost of Goods Sold Total Cost of Goods Sold # of units in ending inventory Cost per unit Ending Inventory
Beg. Inventory 20,000 $12.20 $244,000 0 $12.20 $12.20 $0 0 $12.20 $0
Purchases:
February 12 70,000 12.50 875,000 0 12.50 0 12.50 0 12.50 0
July 22 50,000 12.80 640,000 0 12.80 0 0 12.80 0 12.80
November 17 40,000 13.20 528,000 0 13.20 0 13.20 13.20
Total 180,000 $2,287,000 0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0

Determine the amount Treynor would report externally for ending inventory and cost of goods sold using last-in, first-out (LIFO) under a periodic inventory system. (Assume beginning inventory under LIFO was 20,000 units with a cost of $11.70).

LIFO Cost of Goods Available for Sale Cost of Goods Sold - Periodic LIFO Ending Inventory - Periodic LIFO
# of units Cost per unit Cost of Goods Available for Sale # of units sold Cost per unit Cost of Goods Sold # of units in ending inventory Cost per unit Ending Inventory
Beginning Inventory 20,000 $11.70 $234,000 $11.70 $0 $11.70
Purchases:
Feb 12 70,000 $12.50 875,000 $12.50 $12.50
Jul 22 50,000 $12.80 640,000 $12.80 $12.80
Nov 17 40,000 $13.20 528,000 $13.20 $13.20
Total 180,000 $2,277,000 0 $0 0 $0

Determine the amount Treynor would report for its LIFO reserve at the end of the year.

LIFO Reserve

Record the year-end adjusting entry for the LIFO reserve, assuming the balance at the beginning of the year was $10,000. (If no entry is required for a transaction/event, select "No journal entry required" in the first account field.)

Journal entry worksheet

  • Record the year-end adjusting entry for the LIFO reserve.

Note: Enter debits before credits.

Transaction General Journal Debit Credit
1

In: Accounting

De Anza College Accounting 1C online BEP Project Scott Osborne First Name________________Last Name____________________ Please print first...

De Anza College Accounting 1C online BEP Project Scott Osborne
First Name________________Last Name____________________
Please print first and last names as it shows on the attendance roster.
10 Homework Points
During the upcoming year De Anza Co. expects the following data:
Expected unit selling price is: $125
Expected unit variable cost is: $70
Expected total fixed costs are: $1,512,500
Required
1. Calculate breakeven point in both units and dollars. (Show work in blank space below.)
Round units to the nearest unit and round dollars to the nearest dollar.
2. Compute sales units required to realize income from operations of $630,000.
3. Construct a cost-volume-profit chart assuming maximum sales in the relevant
range of 40,000 units. ( Use the available graph template below.)
Label the following parts of the graph: Sales Revenue, Fixed Costs, Variable Costs,
Total Costs, Profit Area, Loss Area, and Break Even Point.

In: Accounting

To more efficiently manage its inventory, Treynor Corporation maintains its internal inventory records using first-in, first-out...

To more efficiently manage its inventory, Treynor Corporation maintains its internal inventory records using first-in, first-out (FIFO) under a perpetual inventory system. The following information relates to its merchandise inventory during the year:

Jan. 1 Inventory on hand—20,000 units; cost $12.20 each.
Feb. 12 Purchased 70,000 units for $12.50 each.
Apr. 30 Sold 50,000 units for $20.00 each.
Jul. 22 Purchased 50,000 units for $12.80 each.
Sep. 9 Sold 70,000 units for $20.00 each.
Nov. 17 Purchased 40,000 units for $13.20 each.
Dec. 31 Inventory on hand—60,000 units.


Required:
1.
Determine the amount Treynor would calculate internally for ending inventory and cost of goods sold using first-in, first-out (FIFO) under a perpetual inventory system.
2. Determine the amount Treynor would report externally for ending inventory and cost of goods sold using last-in, first-out (LIFO) under a periodic inventory system. (Assume beginning inventory under LIFO was 20,000 units with a cost of $11.70).
3. Determine the amount Treynor would report for its LIFO reserve at the end of the year.
4. Record the year-end adjusting entry for the LIFO reserve, assuming the balance at the beginning of the year was $10,000.

In: Accounting

Department P had the following information regarding equivalent units of production, which were determined using first-in-first-out...

Department P had the following information regarding equivalent units of production, which were determined using first-in-first-out process costing method:

                                                                                                            Equivalent Units of Production

  Units

Materials

Conversion

Completed and Transferred  (28,000 units):

    Work-in-process at the beginning

     Started and competed this period

Work-in-process at the end of the period

     8,000

   20,000

   14,000

       0

20,000

14,000

       4,000

     20,000

       8,400

    

Quantity Accounted for

     

  42,000

34,000

   32,400

The cost information is as follows:

Total Cost

Material Cost

Conversion Cost

Work-in-process beginning

$ 3,000,000

$  2,000,000

$1,000,000

Cost Added

$18,000,000

$10,500,000

$7,500,000

Required:

  1. What were the stages of completion of the work in process with respect to material and conversion cost at the beginning of this period? (Please show your computation)
  2. What were the stages of completion of the work in process with respect to material and conversion cost at the end of this period? (Please show your computation).
  3. Using the first-in-first-out process costing method, determine:(Please show your computations fully)  
  1. The cost of the 28,000 units completed and transferred; and
  2. The cost of work-in-process ending inventory.
  1. Assuming that the weighted average costing method had been used to compute the equivalent units of production by Department P, determine:
  1. What the equivalent units of production would have been for materials and conversion cost (Please show all your computations completely) and
  2. The cost per unit for materials and conversion.

In: Accounting

To more efficiently manage its inventory, Treynor Corporation maintains its internal inventory records using first-in, first-out...

To more efficiently manage its inventory, Treynor Corporation maintains its internal inventory records using first-in, first-out (FIFO) under a perpetual inventory system. The following information relates to its merchandise inventory during the year:

Jan. 1 Inventory on hand—20,000 units; cost $13.10 each.
Feb. 12 Purchased 70,000 units for $13.40 each.
Apr. 30 Sold 50,000 units for $20.90 each.
Jul. 22 Purchased 50,000 units for $13.70 each.
Sep. 9 Sold 70,000 units for $20.90 each.
Nov. 17 Purchased 40,000 units for $14.10 each.
Dec. 31 Inventory on hand—60,000 units.


Required:
1.
Determine the amount Treynor would calculate internally for ending inventory and cost of goods sold using first-in, first-out (FIFO) under a perpetual inventory system.
2. Determine the amount Treynor would report externally for ending inventory and cost of goods sold using last-in, first-out (LIFO) under a periodic inventory system. (Assume beginning inventory under LIFO was 20,000 units with a cost of $12.60).
3. Determine the amount Treynor would report for its LIFO reserve at the end of the year.
4. Record the year-end adjusting entry for the LIFO reserve, assuming the balance at the beginning of the year was $10,000.

In: Accounting

3 Fraley Chemical Company accounts for its production activities using first-in, first-out (FIFO) process costing. Inventory...

3 Fraley Chemical Company accounts for its production activities using first-in, first-out (FIFO) process costing. Inventory records for the process show a January 1 work-in-process inventory of 10,000 gallons, 80 percent complete as to materials and 40 percent complete as to conversion. The January 31 inventory consisted of 15,000 gallons, 60 percent complete as to materials and 20 percent complete as to conversion. In January, 40,000 gallons were completed and transferred to the finished goods inventory. Costs in the Work-in-Process Inventory account in January are as follows: Materials Conversion Total Costs in beginning inventory $ 1,920 $ 672 $ 2,592 Costs added this period 8,405 5,694 14,099 Total cost to be accounted for $10,325 $6,366 $16,691 a. Using first-in, first-out (FIFO) process costing, calculate the equivalent units (in gallons) for January. b. Using first-in, first-out (FIFO) process costing, calculate the cost per equivalent unit for January. (keep answers to 3 decimal points for calculation of part c) c. Using first-in, first-out (FIFO) process costing, calculate the cost of the 40,000 gallons that were completed and transferred out in January. Show your calculations.

In: Accounting

Classify the costs below as: Product-Direct, Product-Indirect, or Period AND Variable cost, Fixed cost, or Mixed...

Classify the costs below as: Product-Direct, Product-Indirect, or Period AND Variable cost, Fixed cost, or Mixed cost.   Below are budgeted income statements at different team levels, use the information to answer the questions below:

Number of Teams

15

25

30

Product Direct, Product Indirect or Period

Fixed/         Variable

Sales

$1,500

$2,500

$3,000

Cost of Goods Sold

          Direct Materials

75

125

150

          Direct Labor

150

250

300

          Applied Overhead

575

625

650

Gross Profit

$700

$1,500

$1,900

Selling Expenses

300

500

600

Administrative Expenses

280

280

280

Advertising Expenses

200

200

200

Miscellaneous Administrative Expenses

100

100

100

Net Income

$(180)

$420

$720

Using the above data and the high/low method, answer the following questions:

Units – Number of Teams

15

30

Net Income

(180)

720

Determine the variable cost per unit

Determine the fixed cost

What is the cost equation?

Estimate the total cost for 20 teams

In addition to the above data, assume the company has the following sales. Answer the following questions

Number of Teams

15

25

30

Sales

$1,500

$2,500

$3,000

What is the revenue generated per team?

What is the per unit contribution margin?

What is the contribution margin ratio?

Compute break-even point in dollars and in units (round to the next whole number) for each of the three scenarios. Then, choose a scenario for your team.

If CAVALRY wants to have net income of $100.00 from this event, how many teams are needed?

If CAVALRY estimates 20 teams, determine the Margin of Safety in sales dollars.

Perform a sensitivity analysis to determine how an increase in team revenue of $500 would impact Net Income?

If the team revenue changed to $120 per team, and all other expenses remained the same as calculated in your cost equation, what is the new break-even in units?

If the variable costs changed to $50 per team (the fix costs remained the same as in your cost equation and team revenue remained at $100 per team), what is the new break-even in units?

If the fixed costs changed to $980, (variable expenses remained the same as in your cost equation, and sales price remained at $100 per team), what is the new break-even in units?

In: Accounting