Required information
Problem 8-5 (Algo) Various inventory costing methods [LO8-1, 8-4]
Skip to question
[The following information applies to the questions
displayed below.]
Ferris Company began January with 7,000 units of its principal
product. The cost of each unit is $6. Merchandise transactions for
the month of January are as follows:
| Purchases | |||||||||
| Date of Purchase | Units | Unit Cost* | Total Cost | ||||||
| Jan. 10 | 6,000 | $ | 7 | $ | 42,000 | ||||
| Jan. 18 | 7,000 | 8 | 56,000 | ||||||
| Totals | 13,000 | 98,000 | |||||||
* Includes purchase price and cost of freight.
| Sales | ||
| Date of Sale | Units | |
| Jan. 5 | 3,000 | |
| Jan. 12 | 1,000 | |
| Jan. 20 | 4,000 | |
| Total | 8,000 | |
12,000 units were on hand at the end of the month.
Problem 8-5 (Algo) Part 1
Required:
1. Calculate January's ending inventory and cost
of goods sold for the month using FIFO, periodic system.
2. Calculate January's ending inventory and
cost of goods sold for the month using LIFO, periodic system.
4. Calculate January's ending inventory and cost of goods sold for the month using Average cost, periodic system.
5. Calculate January's ending inventory and
cost of goods sold for the month using Average cost, perpetual
system. (Round average cost per unit to 4 decimal places.
Enter sales with a negative sign.)
In: Accounting
Cost of Production Report
The Cutting Department of Karachi Carpet Company provides the following data for January. Assume that all materials are added at the beginning of the process.
| Work in process, January 1, 10,200 units, 75% completed | $116,025* | |
| *Direct materials (10,200 × $8.00) | $81,600 | |
| Conversion (10,200 × 75% × $4.50) | 34,425 | |
| $116,025 | ||
| Materials added during January from Weaving Department, 157,200 units | $1,281,180 | |
| Direct labor for January | 318,511 | |
| Factory overhead for January | 389,291 | |
| Goods finished during January (includes goods in process, January 1), 159,000 units | — | |
| Work in process, January 31, 8,400 units, 30% completed | — |
a. Prepare a cost of production report for the Cutting Department. If an amount is zero or a blank, enter in "0". For the cost per equivalent unit computations, round your answers to two decimal places.
| Karachi Carpet Company | |||
| Cost of Production Report-Cutting Department | |||
| For the Month Ended January 31 | |||
| Unit Information | |||
| Units charged to production: | |||
| Inventory in process, January 1 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_1 | ||
| Received from Weaving Department | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_2 | ||
| Total units accounted for by the Cutting Department | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_3 | ||
| Units to be assigned costs: | |||
| Equivalent Units | |||
| Whole Units | Direct Materials | Conversion | |
| Inventory in process, January 1 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_4 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_5 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_6 |
| Started and completed in January | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_7 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_8 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_9 |
| Transferred to finished goods in January | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_10 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_11 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_12 |
| Inventory in process, January 31 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_13 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_14 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_15 |
| Total units to be assigned cost | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_16 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_17 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_18 |
| Cost Information | |||
| Cost per equivalent unit: | |||
| Direct Materials | Conversion | ||
| Total costs for January in Cutting Department | $fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_19 | $fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_20 | |
| Total equivalent units | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_21 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_22 | |
| Cost per equivalent unit | $fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_23 | $fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_24 | |
| Costs assigned to production: | |||
| Direct Materials | Conversion | Total | |
| Inventory in process, January 1 | $fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_25 | ||
| Costs incurred in January | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_26 | ||
| Total costs accounted for by the Cutting Department | $fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_27 | ||
| Costs allocated to completed and partially completed units: | |||
| Inventory in process, January 1 balance | $fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_28 | ||
| To complete inventory in process, January 1 | $fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_29 | $fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_30 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_31 |
| Cost of completed January 1 work in process | $fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_32 | ||
| Started and completed in January | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_33 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_34 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_35 |
| Transferred to finished goods in January | $fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_36 | ||
| Inventory in process, January 31 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_37 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_38 | fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_39 |
| Total costs assigned by the Cutting Department | $fill in the blank c9badbff1f81fe7_40 | ||
b. Compute and evaluate the change in the costs per equivalent unit for direct materials and conversion from the previous month (December). If required, round your answers to two decimal places.
| Increase or Decrease | Amount | |
| Change in direct materials cost per equivalent unit | $fill in the blank f115df085fd3fa2_2 | |
| Change in conversion cost per equivalent unit | $fill in the blank f115df085fd3fa2_4 |
In: Accounting
A subsidiary of Elektra Electronics has developed new software
that allows Windows-based personal computers to run all Apple
(i.e., Mac, iPhone, iPad, etc.) and Droid applications. Elektra has
collected preliminary data on the weekly total cost of producing
the new product at a number of different levels of production. Cost
data are available in the worksheet entitled Software Cost.
a) Generate a scatterplot in order to understand the nature of the
relationship between weekly quantity produced and weekly total
cost. Use this information to complete the statements below.
According to the scatterplot, weekly total cost --- remains the same decreases sharply increases sharply at first, then it --- decreases sharply increases sharply levels off for a while, and then it begins to --- increase again levels off decrease again , as the quantity produced increases. There appears to be bend(s) or curve(s) in the data which suggests that a --- 2nd order polynomial 3rd order polynomial reciprocal transformation logarithmic transformation 4th order polynomial regression model is appropriate.
b) Use the data to fit three separate regression models. For the
first model, fit the 2nd order polynomial regression model to
predict weekly total cost. For the second model, fit the 3rd order
polynomial regression model to predict weekly total cost. For the
third model, fit the 4th order polynomial regression model to
predict weekly total cost.
Provide summary measures for each model separately in the table
below. (Enter your R2 values as percents to two
decimal places and enter your standard errors to three decimal
places.)
| Model | R2 | R2adj | se |
| Second-Order Model | % | % | |
| Third-Order Model | % | % | |
| Fourth-Order Model | % | % |
According to your analysis so far, summarize your results.
According to R2adj, the second-order model is clearly worse than either the third or fourth-order models, however, results are not so clear concerning whether the third or fourth-order model is best.According to R2adj, the second-order model is clearly superior to either the third or fourth-order models. According toR2adj, the third-order model is clearly superior to either the second or fourth-order models.According toR2adj, the fourth-order model is clearly worse than either the second or third-order models, however, results are not so clear concerning whether the second or third-order model is best.According to R2adj, the third-order model is clearly worse than either the second or fourth-order models, however, results are not so clear concerning whether the second or fourth-order model is best.According to R2adj, the fourth-order model is clearly superior to either the second or third-order models.
c) Perform the appropriate statistical test to test whether the
fourth-order model explains a statistically significant amount of
variation in total weekly cost above and beyond of that explained
by the third-order model. Use a 5% significance level.
State the appropriate test statistic name, degrees of freedom, test
statistic value, and the associated p-value (Enter your
degrees of freedom as a whole number, the test statistic value to
three decimal places, and the p-value to four decimal
places).
---Select--- G t F z p ( )
= , p ---Select--- ≤
> = ≥ <
State your decision.
The fourth-order model explains a significant amount of variation in total weekly cost compared to the third-order model. Therefore, the fourth-order term in the model is needed and the fourth-order model is best.The fourth-order model explains an insignificant amount of variation in total weekly cost compared to the third-order model. Therefore, the fourth-order term in the model is needed and the fourth-order model is best. The fourth-order model explains a significant amount of variation in total weekly cost compared to the third-order model. Therefore, the fourth-order term in the model is not needed and a simpler model is preferred.The fourth-order model explains an insignificant amount of variation in total weekly cost compared to the third-order model. Therefore, the fourth-order term in the model is not needed and a simpler model is preferred.
d) Regardless of your results above, assume that the third-order
model is best. Based on this estimated total cost function, provide
the estimated marginal total cost function (Enter all function
coefficients to four decimal places).
C'(x) =
e) Compute the following quantities WITHOUT any intermediate rounding. In other words, do NOT use the rounded version of the function you reported above in part d. Instead, use the one stored in you EXCEL worksheet. Enter your answers to two decimal places.
How quickly is the weekly total cost increasing when the level of production is 125 units per week?
dollars per unit
How quickly is the weekly total cost increasing when the level of production is 400 units per week?
dollars per unit
How quickly is the weekly total cost increasing when the level of production is 700 units per week?
dollars per unit
| Quantity | Cost |
| 110 | 15670.76 |
| 500 | 23405.66 |
| 120 | 18380.88 |
| 510 | 23145.39 |
| 340 | 23191.53 |
| 620 | 24464.14 |
| 350 | 22262.63 |
| 130 | 17012.08 |
| 510 | 23712.91 |
| 60 | 13728.09 |
| 80 | 14777.4 |
| 360 | 21645.45 |
| 110 | 15983.57 |
| 120 | 16254.58 |
| 230 | 20811.9 |
| 500 | 22145.26 |
| 650 | 25873.01 |
| 510 | 23094.15 |
| 90 | 14473.49 |
| 30 | 10810.92 |
| 250 | 20647.02 |
| 160 | 17342.48 |
| 710 | 27978.15 |
| 580 | 23724.68 |
| 560 | 23031.68 |
| 510 | 24193.06 |
| 340 | 22032.14 |
| 430 | 21703.87 |
| 660 | 25802.86 |
| 160 | 19589.52 |
| 360 | 23020.11 |
| 510 | 22350.73 |
| 520 | 22894.49 |
| 670 | 26330.24 |
| 510 | 23090.06 |
| 80 | 14072.29 |
| 740 | 30801.06 |
| 660 | 26305.13 |
| 250 | 20907.3 |
| 610 | 24660.3 |
| 380 | 21717.19 |
| 10 | 7132.79 |
| 760 | 30773.76 |
| 460 | 22831.66 |
| 380 | 22242.87 |
| 380 | 21411.74 |
| 250 | 18686.31 |
| 540 | 22751.03 |
| 430 | 21957.92 |
| 360 | 23092.64 |
| 550 | 23171.41 |
| 30 | 9890.3 |
| 300 | 20918.65 |
| 30 | 13103.14 |
| 120 | 17733.49 |
| 700 | 28261.58 |
| 690 | 27784.98 |
| 620 | 24911.21 |
| 800 | 36389.01 |
| 800 | 32989.9 |
| 360 | 21781.93 |
| 230 | 20480.66 |
| 520 | 21205.32 |
| 520 | 22512.59 |
| 510 | 24730.43 |
| 460 | 19778.44 |
| 370 | 22718.31 |
| 370 | 21864.31 |
| 390 | 22794.56 |
| 130 | 18682.11 |
| 80 | 14434.91 |
| 250 | 18966.93 |
| 130 | 17563.93 |
| 640 | 28181.57 |
| 400 | 22574.92 |
| 800 | 34484.12 |
| 430 | 22946.85 |
| 560 | 23943.21 |
| 620 | 24346.69 |
| 660 | 26324.26 |
| 30 | 10622.52 |
| 430 | 22247.62 |
| 550 | 23766.4 |
| 460 | 22794.75 |
| 30 | 11170.02 |
| 800 | 35079.01 |
| 110 | 15928.94 |
| 130 | 17397.95 |
| 300 | 23065.57 |
| 440 | 23248.85 |
| 400 | 21781.95 |
| 170 | 18099.79 |
| 120 | 16266.64 |
| 120 | 17441.66 |
| 540 | 22637.82 |
| 480 | 22443.35 |
| 160 | 17973.58 |
| 250 | 20820.46 |
| 510 | 22105.08 |
| 110 | 16005.45 |
| 520 | 22771.04 |
| 300 | 21372 |
| 380 | 21949.94 |
| 510 | 21284.16 |
| 620 | 23692.35 |
| 340 | 22329.97 |
| 550 | 23186.41 |
| 110 | 16214.73 |
| 380 | 21830.46 |
| 60 | 13411.67 |
| 360 | 21810.07 |
| 110 | 14902.48 |
| 430 | 22888.18 |
| 190 | 21034.96 |
| 430 | 22459.69 |
| 500 | 22541.96 |
| 620 | 24826.46 |
| 760 | 31807.33 |
| 250 | 21103.83 |
| 120 | 16178.64 |
| 370 | 22762.99 |
| 400 | 19607.21 |
| 70 | 12830.7 |
| 380 | 21656.21 |
| 510 | 22429.83 |
| 400 | 21939.05 |
| 20 | 9201.14 |
| 640 | 25381.11 |
| 740 | 29910.93 |
| 500 | 20920.47 |
In: Statistics and Probability
Goertz Corporation has an activity-based costing system with three activity cost pools--Machining, Order Filling, and Other. In the first stage allocations, costs in the two overhead accounts, equipment depreciation and supervisory expense, are allocated to the three activity cost pools based on resource consumption. Data used in the first stage allocations follow:
| Overhead costs: | |||||||
| Equipment depreciation | $ | 51,000 | |||||
| Supervisory expense | $ | 3,000 | |||||
Distribution of Resource Consumption Across Activity Cost Pools:
| Activity Cost Pools | |||||
| Machining | Order Filling | Other | |||
| Equipment depreciation | 0.40 | 0.10 | 0.50 | ||
| Supervisory expense | 0.20 | 0.30 | 0.50 | ||
Machining costs are assigned to products using machine-hours (MHs) and Order Filling costs are assigned to products using the number of orders. The costs in the Other activity cost pool are not assigned to products. Activity data for the company's two products follow:
Activity:
| MHs (Machining) | Orders (Order Filling) | |
| Product J3 | 9,100 | 100 |
| Product F7 | 900 | 900 |
| Total | 10,000 | 1,000 |
Finally, the costs of Machining and Order Filling are combined with the following sales and direct cost data to determine product margins.
Sales and Direct Cost Data:
| Product J3 | Product F7 | |||||||||
| Sales (total) | $ | 145,200 | $ | 90,700 | ||||||
| Direct materials (total) | $ | 81,400 | $ | 38,600 | ||||||
| Direct labor (total) | $ | 37,700 | $ | 42,400 | ||||||
The activity rate for the Order Filling activity cost pool under activity-based costing is closest to:
Multiple Choice
$3.33 per order
$3.00 per order
$54.00 per order
$6.00 per order
Provenzano Corporation manufactures two products: Product B56Z and Product D32N. The company is considering implementing an activity-based costing (ABC) system that allocates its manufacturing overhead to four cost pools. The following additional information is available for the company as a whole and for Products B56Z and D32N.
| Activity Cost Pool | Activity Measure | Total Cost | Total Activity | ||
| Machining | Machine-hours | $ | 330,000 | 15,000 | MHs |
| Machine setups | Number of setups | $ | 50,000 | 100 | setups |
| Product design | Number of products | $ | 88,000 | 2 | products |
| Order size | Direct labor-hours | $ | 280,000 | 10,000 | DLHs |
| Activity Measure | Product B56Z | Product D32N |
| Machine-hours | 6,000 | 9,000 |
| Number of setups | 80 | 20 |
| Number of products | 1 | 1 |
| Direct labor-hours | 6,000 | 4,000 |
What is the activity rate for the Machining activity cost pool?
rev: 03_17_2018_QC_CS-119201
Multiple Choice
$55.00 per MH
$22.00 per MH
$36.67 per MH
$74.80 per MH
Abel Corporation uses activity-based costing. The company makes two products: Product A and Product B. The annual production and sales of Product A is 200 units and of Product B is 400 units. There are three activity cost pools, with total cost and activity as follows:
| Total Activity | ||||||
| Activity Cost Pools | Total Cost | Product A | Product B | Total | ||
| Activity 1 | $ | 16,660 | 600 | 100 | 700 | |
| Activity 2 | $ | 18,450 | 1,100 | 700 | 1,800 | |
| Activity 3 | $ | 9,731 | 60 | 160 | 220 | |
The cost per unit of Product B is closest to:
Multiple Choice
$41.58
$81.53
$74.73
$17.69
Nissley Wedding Fantasy Corporation makes very elaborate wedding cakes to order. The owner of the company has provided the following data concerning the activity rates in its activity-based costing system:
| Activity Cost Pools | Activity Rate | ||
| Size-related | $ | 1.13 | per guest |
| Complexity-related | $ | 28.22 | per tier |
| Order-related | $ | 74.72 | per order |
The measure of activity for the size-related activity cost pool is the number of planned guests at the wedding reception. The greater the number of guests, the larger the cake. The measure of complexity is the number of tiers in the cake. The activity measure for the order-related cost pool is the number of orders. (Each wedding involves one order.) The activity rates include the costs of raw ingredients such as flour, sugar, eggs, and shortening. The activity rates do not include the costs of purchased decorations such as miniature statues and wedding bells, which are accounted for separately.
Data concerning two recent orders appear below:
| Tijerina Wedding | Twersky Wedding | |||
| Number of reception guests | 49 | 126 | ||
| Number of tiers on the cake | 2 | 4 | ||
| Cost of purchased decorations for cake | $ | 28.60 | $ | 54.64 |
Assuming that all of the costs listed above are avoidable costs in the event that an order is turned down, what amount would the company have to charge for the Tijerina wedding cake to just break even?
Multiple Choice
$74.72
$215.13
$28.60
$260.31
Which of the following budgets are prepared before the sales budget?
| Budgeted Income Statement | Direct Labor Budget | |
| A) | Yes | Yes |
| B) | Yes | No |
| C) | No | Yes |
| D) | No | No |
Multiple Choice
Choice A
Choice B
Choice C
Choice D
Fiwrt Corporation manufactures and sells stainless steel coffee mugs. Expected mug sales Fiwrt (in units) for the next three months are as follows:
| October | November | December | |||||
| Budgeted unit sales | 30,000 | 36,000 | 34,000 | ||||
Fiwrt likes to maintain a finished goods inventory equal to 30% of the next month's estimated sales. How many mugs should Fiwrt plan on producing during the month of November?
Multiple Choice
35,400 mugs
26,800 mugs
36,000 mugs
34,300 mugs
The Tobler Corporation has budgeted production for next year as follows:
| Quarter | ||||||||||
| First | Second | Third | Fourth | |||||||
| Production in units | 10,000 | 12,000 | 16,000 | 14,000 | ||||||
Four pounds of raw materials are required for each unit produced. Raw materials on hand at the start of the year total 4,000 pounds. The raw materials inventory at the end of each quarter should equal 10% of the next quarter's production needs. Budgeted purchases of raw materials in the third quarter would be:
Multiple Choice
63,200 pounds
62,400 pounds
56,800 pounds
50,400 pounds
In: Accounting
Acme Materials Company manufactures and sells synthetic coatings that can withstand high temperatures. Its primary customers are aviation manufacturers and maintenance companies. The following table contains financial information pertaining to cost of quality (COQ) in 2019 and 2020 (in thousands of dollars):
| 2019 | 2020 | ||||||
| Sales | $ | 16,500 | $ | 20,500 | |||
| Materials inspection | 350 | 65 | |||||
| In-process (production) inspection | 165 | 130 | |||||
| Finished product inspection | 300 | 75 | |||||
| Preventive equipment maintenance | 25 | 65 | |||||
| Scrap (net) | 550 | 350 | |||||
| Warranty repairs | 750 | 500 | |||||
| Product design engineering | 155 | 320 | |||||
| Vendor certification | 15 | 65 | |||||
| Direct costs of returned goods | 325 | 85 | |||||
| Training of factory workers | 45 | 145 | |||||
| Product testing—equipment maintenance | 65 | 65 | |||||
| Product testing labor | 260 | 95 | |||||
| Field repairs | 75 | 45 | |||||
| Rework before shipment | 290 | 205 | |||||
| Product-liability settlement | 410 | 65 | |||||
| Emergency repair and maintenance | 250 | 80 | |||||
Required:
1. Classify the cost items in the table into cost-of-quality (COQ) categories.
2. Calculate the ratio of each COQ category to revenues in each of the 2 years.
3. Calculate the percentage change in each COQ category and total COQ and comment on the results:
a. Percentage change in total COQ as a percentage of sales, from 2019 to 2020;
b. Total COQ in 2020 expressed as a percentage of 2019 sales dollars;
c. Percentage change in total prevention costs, 2019 to 2020;
d. Percentage change in total appraisal costs, 2019 to 2020;
e. Percentage change in total internal failure costs, 2019 to 2020;
f. Percentage change in total external failure costs, 2019 to 2020.
In: Accounting
Because most of the parts for its irrigation systems are standard, Waterways handles the majority of its manufacturing as a process cost system. There are multiple process departments. Three of these departments are the Molding, Cutting, and Welding departments. All items eventually end up in the Package department which prepares items for sale in kits or individually. The following information is available for the Molding department for January. Work in process beginning: Units in process 22,000 Stage of completion for materials 80% Stage of completion for labor and overhead 30% Costs in work in process inventory: Materials $168,360 Labor 67,564 Overhead 17,270 Total costs in beginning work in process $253,194 Units started into production in January 60,000 Units completed and transferred in January 58,000 Costs added to production: Materials $264,940 Labor 289,468 Overhead 60,578 Total costs added into production in January $614,986 Work in process ending: Units in process 24,000 Stage of completion for materials 50% Stage of completion for labor and overhead 10% Collapse question part
(a) Prepare a production cost report for Waterways using the weighted-average method. (Round unit costs to 2 decimal places, e.g. 2.25.)
Units to be accounted for Work in process, Jan. 1 253194
Started into production 60000
Total units Units accounted for
Transferred out
Work in process, Jan 31
Total units Costs
Materials
Conversion Costs
Total Unit costs Costs in January $ $ $
Equivalent units Unit costs $ $ $
Costs to be accounted for Work in process, Jan. 1 $
Started into production
Total costs $
Cost Reconciliation Schedule Costs accounted for
Transferred out $
Work in process, Jan. 31
Materials
Conversion costs
Total costs
In: Accounting
Sole Purpose Shoe Company
Sole Purpose Shoe Company is owned and operated by Sarah Charles. The company manufactures casual shoes, with manufacturing facilities in your state. Sarah began the business this year, and while she has a great deal of experience in manufacturing popular and comfortable shoes, she needs some help in evaluating her results for the year, and asks for your help.
Starting Questions
Sarah’s first questions for you have to do with the general ideas and terminology used to evaluate variances.
Provide answers to the following questions (1)-(3).
1. Why might Sarah want to use standard costs to compare with her actual costs?
a. Standard costs give management a cost structure for products that is applicable for the entire life of the business.
b. Standard costs allow management to motivate employees by comparing their performance to what it would be under perfect conditions.
c. Management can evaluate the differences between standard costs and actual costs to focus on correcting the cost variances.
c
2. What are some possible drawbacks to using standard costs that Sarah might consider?
a. Standards limit operating improvements because employees may be discouraged from improving beyond the standards.
b. Standards may become “stale” in a dynamic manufacturing environment.
c. Employees may focus only on efficiency improvement and their own operations rather than considering the larger objectives of the organization.
d. Since standards are impossible to attain, they are a distraction from the work at hand.
e. Since standards never change, they do not reflect reality.
b, c and d
3. Sarah wants to be sure she understands the basic definitions involved:
Answer the following questions by selecting the correct words.
A favorable variance occurs when the actual cost (what the product does cost) is less than the standard cost (what the product should cost). A favorable variance is represented by a negative number, indicating that costs are lower than expected.
An unfavorable variance occurs when the actual cost (what the product does cost) is greater than the standard cost (what the product should cost). An unfavorable variance is represented by a positive number, indicating that costs are higher than expected.
Feedback
1. Review the reasoning for using standard costs and comparing them with actual costs, and the advantages, the computation and analysis that cost variances can provide.
2. Review the criticisms of using standard costs and comparing them with actual costs, and the possible disadvantages inherent in the computation and analysis of cost variances.
3. Review the definitions of favorable and unfavorable variance.
Direct Materials
Under normal conditions, Sarah spends $8.40 per unit of materials, and it will take 3.60 units of material per pair of shoes. During July, Sole Purpose Shoe Company incurred actual direct materials costs of $61,321 for 6,890 units of direct materials in the production of 2,150 pairs of shoes.
Complete the following table, showing the direct materials variance relationships for July for Sole Purpose Shoe Company. If required, round your answers to two decimal places. When entering variances, use a negative number for a favorable cost variance, and a positive number for an unfavorable cost variance.
| Actual Cost | Standard Cost | |||||||||
| Actual Quantity |
X | Actual Price |
Actual Quantity |
X | Standard Price |
Standard Quantity |
X | Standard Price |
||
| X | $ | X | $ | X | $ | |||||
| = $ | = $ | = $ | ||||||||
| Unfavorable Direct Materials Time Variance: |
Unfavorable Direct Materials Quantity Variance: |
|||||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||||
| Favorable Total Direct Materials Cost Variance: |
||||||||||
| $ | ||||||||||
Feedback
Review Exhibit 6 in the text.
Direct Labor
Under normal conditions, Sarah pays her employees $8.50 per hour, and it will take 2.80 hours of labor per pair of shoes. During August, Sole Purpose Shoe Company incurred actual direct labor costs of $65,340 for 7,260 hours of direct labor in the production of 2,100 pairs of shoes.
Complete the following table, showing the direct labor variance relationships for August for Sole Purpose Shoe Company. If required, round your answers to two decimal places. When entering variances, use a negative number for a favorable variance, and a positive number for an unfavorable variance.
| Actual Cost | Standard Cost | |||||||||
| Actual Hours |
X | Actual Rate |
Actual Hours |
X | Standard Rate |
Standard Hours |
X | Standard Rate |
||
| X | $ | X | $ | X | $ | |||||
| = $ | = $ | = $ | ||||||||
| Unfavorable Direct Labor Cost Variance: |
Direct Labor Variance: |
|||||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||||
| Unfavorable Total Direct Labor Variance: |
||||||||||
| $ | ||||||||||
Feedback
Review Exhibit 7 in the text.
Budget Performance Report
Sarah has learned a lot from you over the past two months, and has compiled the following data for Sole Purpose Shoe Company for September using the techniques you taught her. She would like your help in preparing a Budget Performance Report for September. The company produced 3,500 pairs of shoes that required 12,250 units of material purchased at $8.20 per unit and 9,450 hours of labor at an hourly rate of $8.90 per hour during the month. Actual factory overhead during September was $28,350. When entering variances, use a negative number for a favorable cost variance, and a positive number for an unfavorable cost variance.
Use the data in the following table to prepare the Budget Performance Report for Sole Purpose Shoe Company for September.
Manufacturing Costs |
Standard Price |
Standard Quantity |
Standard Cost Per Unit |
| Direct materials | $8.40 per unit | 3.60 units per pair | $30.24 |
| Direct labor | $8.50 per hour | 2.80 hours per pair | 23.80 |
| Factory overhead | $2.70 per hour | 2.80 hours per pair | 7.56 |
| Total standard cost per pair | $61.60 |
| Sole Purpose Shoe Company Budget Performance Report For the Month Ended September 30 |
|||
Manufacturing Costs |
Actual Costs |
Standard Cost at Actual Volume |
Cost Variance - (Favorable) Unfavorable |
| Direct materials | $ | $ | $ |
| Direct labor | |||
| Factory overhead | |||
| Total manufacturing costs | $ | $ | $ |
Feedback
Review Exhibit 3 and computations for the amounts on the report.
Final Questions
Before Sarah makes any changes based on the Budget Performance Report for September, she wants to be sure she understands the results, and has the following questions for you.
Answer the following questions (1) and (2). All questions pertain to the September data.
1. What caused the total cost variance for direct materials?
a. The actual quantity of direct materials per unit was less than the standard quantity.
b. The actual price for direct materials per unit was less than the standard price.
c. The favorable price variance dominated the unfavorable quantity variance, causing the total cost variance for direct materials to be favorable.
d. The unfavorable quantity variance dominated the favorable price variance, causing the total cost variance for direct materials to be unfavorable.
e. A factor other than those listed caused the total cost variance for direct materials.
2. What caused the total cost variance for direct labor?
a. The actual number of labor hours per unit was less than the standard number.
b. The unfavorable rate variance was larger than the favorable time variance, causing the total cost variance for direct labor to be unfavorable.
c. The favorable time variance was larger than the unfavorable rate variance, causing the total cost variance for direct labor to be favorable.
d. The actual rate for labor hours per unit was less than the standard rate.
e. A factor other than those listed caused the total cost variance for direct labor.
In: Finance
Spates, Inc., manufactures and sells two products: Product H2 and Product E0. Data concerning the expected production of each product and the expected total direct labor-hours (DLHs) required to produce that output appear below:
| Expected Production | Direct Labor-Hours Per Unit | Total Direct Labor-Hours | |
| Product H2 | 260 | 7.6 | 1,976 |
| Product E0 | 260 | 6.6 | 1,716 |
| Total direct labor-hours | 3,692 | ||
|
|
|||
The company’s expected total manufacturing overhead is $274,468.
If the company allocates all of its overhead based on direct labor-hours, the overhead assigned to each unit of Product H2 would be closest to: (Round your intermediate calculations to 2 decimal places.)
Senff Corporation uses the following activity rates from its activity-based costing to assign overhead costs to products:
| Activity Cost Pools | Activity Rate | ||
| Setting up batches | $ | 80.00 | per batch |
| Processing customer orders | $ | 71.73 | per customer order |
| Assembling products | $ | 7.31 | per assembly hour |
|
|
|||
Data concerning two products appear below:
| Product V91Z | Product V21I | |
| Number of batches | 70 | 13 |
| Number of customer orders | 21 | 10 |
| Number of assembly hours | 493 | 698 |
|
|
||
How much overhead cost would be assigned to Product V91Z using the activity-based costing system? (Round your intermediate calculations to 2 decimal places.)
Gelinas, Inc., manufactures and sells two products: Product S5 and Product L3. Expected production of Product S5 is 500 units and of Product L3 is 700 units. The company has an activity-based costing system with the following activity cost pools, activity measures, and expected activity:
| Estimated | Expected Activity | |||||
| Activity Cost Pools | Activity Measures | Overhead Cost | Product S5 | Product L3 | Total | |
| Labor-related | DLHs | $ | 286,741 | 3,500 | 5,600 | 9,100 |
| Production orders | orders | 40,384 | 300 | 500 | 800 | |
| Order size | MHs | 463,730 | 4,000 | 3,900 | 7,900 | |
| $ | 790,855 | |||||
|
|
||||||
The overhead applied to each unit of Product L3 under activity-based costing is closest to: (Round your intermediate calculations to 2 decimal places.)
Strama, Inc., manufactures and sells two products: Product A6 and Product I5. The company has an activity-based costing system with the following activity cost pools, activity measures, and expected activity:
| Estimated | Expected Activity | |||||
| Activity Cost Pools | Activity Measures | Overhead Cost | Product A6 | Product I5 | Total | |
| Labor-related | DLHs | $ | 191,138 | 8,200 | 2,800 | 11,000 |
| Production orders | orders | 44,624 | 900 | 1,100 | 2,000 | |
| Order size | MHs | 183,147 | 5,600 | 5,700 | 11,300 | |
| $ | 418,909 | |||||
|
|
||||||
The activity rate for the Order Size activity cost pool under activity-based costing is closest to:
In: Accounting
Georgia Cabinets manufactures kitchen cabinets that are sold to local dealers throughout the Southeast. Because of a large backlog of orders for oak and cherry cabinets, the company decided to contract with three smaller cabinetmakers to do the final finishing operation. For the three cabinetmakers, the number of hours required to complete all the oak cabinets, the number of hours required to complete all the cherry cabinets, the number of hours available for the final finishing operation, and the cost per hour to perform the work are shown here:
| Cabinetmaker 1 | Cabinetmaker 2 | Cabinetmaker 3 | |
| Hours required to complete all the oak cabinets | 47 | 40 | 27 |
| Hours required to complete all the cherry cabinets | 64 | 52 | 36 |
| Hours available | 40 | 30 | 35 |
| Cost per hour | $34 | $41 | $52 |
a. Formulate a linear programming model that can be used
to determine the proportion of the oak cabinets and the proportion
of the cherry cabinets that should be given to each of the three
cabinetmakers in order to minimize the total cost of completing
both projects.
| Let | O1 = proportion of Oak cabinets assigned to cabinetmaker 1 |
| O2 = proportion of Oak cabinets assigned to cabinetmaker 2 | |
| O3 = proportion of Oak cabinets assigned to cabinetmaker 3 | |
| C1 = proportion of Cherry cabinets assigned to cabinetmaker 1 | |
| C2 = proportion of Cherry cabinets assigned to cabinetmaker 2 | |
| C3 = proportion of Cherry cabinets assigned to cabinetmaker 3 |
| Min | __________O1 | + | __________O2 | + | __________O3 | + | __________C1 | + | __________C2 | + | __________C3 | |||
| s.t. | ||||||||||||||
| __________O1 | __________C1 | ≤ | __________ | Hours avail. 1 | ||||||||||
| __________O2 | + | __________C2 | ≤ | __________ | Hours avail. 2 | |||||||||
| __________O3 | + | __________C3 | ≤ | __________ | Hours avail. 3 | |||||||||
| __________O1 | + | __________O2 | + | __________O3 | = | __________ | Oak | |||||||
| __________C1 | + | __________C2 | + | __________C3 | = | __________ | Cherry | |||||||
| O1, O2, O3, C1, C2, C3 ≥ 0 | ||||||||||||||
b. Solve the model formulated in part (a). What proportion of the oak cabinets and what proportion of the cherry cabinets should be assigned to each cabinetmaker? What is the total cost of completing both projects? If required, round your answers for the proportions to three decimal places, and for the total cost to two decimal places.
| Cabinetmaker 1 | Cabinetmaker 2 | Cabinetmaker 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oak | O1 = _______ | O2 = _______ | O3 = _______ |
| Cherry | C1 = _______ | C2 = _______ | C3 = _______ |
Total cost = $ __________
c. If Cabinetmaker 1 has additional hours available,
would the optimal solution change? YES OR NO
Explain.
d. If Cabinetmaker 2 has additional hours available,
would the optimal solution change? YES OR NO
Explain.
e. Suppose Cabinetmaker 2 reduced its cost to $38 per
hour. What effect would this change have on the optimal solution?
If required, round your answers for the proportions to three
decimal places, and for the total cost to two decimal
places.
| Cabinetmaker 1 | Cabinetmaker 2 | Cabinetmaker 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oak | O1 = _______ | O2 = _______ | O3 = _______ |
| Cherry | C1 = _______ | C2 = _______ | C3 = _______ |
Total cost = $ __________
Explain.
In: Math
In: Accounting