Questions
Translation and Remeasurement of Depreciable Assets Massmart, the second largest retailer in Africa, is a subsidiary...

Translation and Remeasurement of Depreciable Assets

Massmart, the second largest retailer in Africa, is a subsidiary of Wal-Mart Inc., a U.S. company. Massmart reports its accounts in its local currency, the rand (R). Wal-Mart’s fiscal year ends January 31. On February 1, 2018, Massmart reports facilities with original cost of R500 million and accumulated depreciation of R280 million in its noncurrent assets, as follows:

• Buildings acquired at a cost of R175 million when the exchange rate was $0.15/R, with accumulated depreciation of R100 million. The buildings are being depreciated on a straight-line basis over 25 years.

• Equipment acquired at a cost of R325 million when the exchange rate was $0.12/R, with accumulated depreciation of R180 million. The equipment is being depreciated on a straight-line basis over 10 years.

Additional exchange rates:

February 1, 2018 $0.10
Average for fiscal 2019 0.08
January 31, 2019 0.07

Massmart still holds these facilities at January 31, 2019.

Required

a. Assume that Massmart’s functional currency is the rand. Calculate Massmart’s translated facilities, at cost, and related accumulated depreciation, at January 31, 2019, and its translated depreciation expense for fiscal 2019.

b. Now assume that Massmart’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Calculate Massmart’s remeasured facilities, at cost, and related accumulated depreciation, at January 31, 2019, and its remeasured depreciation expense for fiscal 2019.

Enter answers using all zeros (do not abbreviate to millions or thousands).

a. Translated b. Remeasured
Facilities, at cost Answer Answer
Accumulated depreciation Answer Answer
Depreciation expense Answer Answer

In: Accounting

Williams-Santana, Inc., is a manufacturer of high-tech industrial parts that was started in 2009 by two...

Williams-Santana, Inc., is a manufacturer of high-tech industrial parts that was started in 2009 by two talented engineers with little business training. In 2021, the company was acquired by one of its major customers. As part of an internal audit, the following facts were discovered. The audit occurred during 2021 before any adjusting entries or closing entries were prepared. The income tax rate is 25% for all years.

  1. A five-year casualty insurance policy was purchased at the beginning of 2019 for $39,500. The full amount was debited to insurance expense at the time.
  2. Effective January 1, 2021, the company changed the salvage value used in calculating depreciation for its office building. The building cost $636,000 on December 29, 2010, and has been depreciated on a straight-line basis assuming a useful life of 40 years and a salvage value of $100,000. Declining real estate values in the area indicate that the salvage value will be no more than $25,000.
  3. On December 31, 2020, merchandise inventory was overstated by $29,500 due to a mistake in the physical inventory count using the periodic inventory system.
  4. The company changed inventory cost methods to FIFO from LIFO at the end of 2021 for both financial statement and income tax purposes. The change will cause a $1,005,000 increase in the beginning inventory at January 1, 2022.
  5. At the end of 2020, the company failed to accrue $17,300 of sales commissions earned by employees during 2020. The expense was recorded when the commissions were paid in early 2021.
  6. At the beginning of 2019, the company purchased a machine at a cost of $810,000. Its useful life was estimated to be ten years with no salvage value. The machine has been depreciated by the double-declining balance method. Its book value on December 31, 2020, was $518,400. On January 1, 2021, the company changed to the straight-line method.
  7. Warranty expense is determined each year as 1% of sales. Actual payment experience of recent years indicates that 0.75% is a better indication of the actual cost. Management effects the change in 2021. Credit sales for 2021 are $4,900,000; in 2020 they were $4,600,000.


Required:
For each situation:
1. Identify whether it represents an accounting change or an error. If an accounting change, identify the type of change. For accounting errors, choose "Not applicable".
2. Prepare any journal entry necessary as a direct result of the change or error correction, as well as any adjusting entry for 2021 related to the situation described. Any tax effects should be adjusted for through Income tax payable or Refund—income tax.

In: Accounting

Williams-Santana, Inc., is a manufacturer of high-tech industrial parts that was started in 2009 by two...

Williams-Santana, Inc., is a manufacturer of high-tech industrial parts that was started in 2009 by two talented engineers with little business training. In 2021, the company was acquired by one of its major customers. As part of an internal audit, the following facts were discovered. The audit occurred during 2021 before any adjusting entries or closing entries were prepared. The income tax rate is 25% for all years.

  1. A five-year casualty insurance policy was purchased at the beginning of 2019 for $31,000. The full amount was debited to insurance expense at the time.
  2. Effective January 1, 2021, the company changed the salvage value used in calculating depreciation for its office building. The building cost $568,000 on December 29, 2010, and has been depreciated on a straight-line basis assuming a useful life of 40 years and a salvage value of $100,000. Declining real estate values in the area indicate that the salvage value will be no more than $25,000.
  3. On December 31, 2020, merchandise inventory was overstated by $21,000 due to a mistake in the physical inventory count using the periodic inventory system.
  4. The company changed inventory cost methods to FIFO from LIFO at the end of 2021 for both financial statement and income tax purposes. The change will cause a $920,000 increase in the beginning inventory at January 1, 2022.
  5. At the end of 2020, the company failed to accrue $15,600 of sales commissions earned by employees during 2020. The expense was recorded when the commissions were paid in early 2021.
  6. At the beginning of 2019, the company purchased a machine at a cost of $640,000. Its useful life was estimated to be ten years with no salvage value. The machine has been depreciated by the double-declining balance method. Its book value on December 31, 2020, was $409,600. On January 1, 2021, the company changed to the straight-line method.
  7. Warranty expense is determined each year as 1% of sales. Actual payment experience of recent years indicates that 0.75% is a better indication of the actual cost. Management effects the change in 2021. Credit sales for 2021 are $3,200,000; in 2020 they were $2,900,000.


Required:
For each situation:
1. Identify whether it represents an accounting change or an error. If an accounting change, identify the type of change. For accounting errors, choose "Not applicable".
2. Prepare any journal entry necessary as a direct result of the change or error correction, as well as any adjusting entry for 2021 related to the situation described. Any tax effects should be adjusted for through Income tax payable or Refund—income tax.

In: Accounting

Williams-Santana, Inc., is a manufacturer of high-tech industrial parts that was started in 2009 by two...

Williams-Santana, Inc., is a manufacturer of high-tech industrial parts that was started in 2009 by two talented engineers with little business training. In 2021, the company was acquired by one of its major customers. As part of an internal audit, the following facts were discovered. The audit occurred during 2021 before any adjusting entries or closing entries were prepared. The income tax rate is 25% for all years.

  1. A five-year casualty insurance policy was purchased at the beginning of 2019 for $36,500. The full amount was debited to insurance expense at the time.
  2. Effective January 1, 2021, the company changed the salvage value used in calculating depreciation for its office building. The building cost $612,000 on December 29, 2010, and has been depreciated on a straight-line basis assuming a useful life of 40 years and a salvage value of $100,000. Declining real estate values in the area indicate that the salvage value will be no more than $25,000.
  3. On December 31, 2020, merchandise inventory was overstated by $26,500 due to a mistake in the physical inventory count using the periodic inventory system.
  4. The company changed inventory cost methods to FIFO from LIFO at the end of 2021 for both financial statement and income tax purposes. The change will cause a $975,000 increase in the beginning inventory at January 1, 2022.
  5. At the end of 2020, the company failed to accrue $16,700 of sales commissions earned by employees during 2020. The expense was recorded when the commissions were paid in early 2021.
  6. At the beginning of 2019, the company purchased a machine at a cost of $750,000. Its useful life was estimated to be ten years with no salvage value. The machine has been depreciated by the double-declining balance method. Its book value on December 31, 2020, was $480,000. On January 1, 2021, the company changed to the straight-line method.
  7. Warranty expense is determined each year as 1% of sales. Actual payment experience of recent years indicates that 0.75% is a better indication of the actual cost. Management effects the change in 2021. Credit sales for 2021 are $4,300,000; in 2020 they were $4,000,000.


Required:
For each situation:
1. Identify whether it represents an accounting change or an error. If an accounting change, identify the type of change. For accounting errors, choose "Not applicable".
2. Prepare any journal entry necessary as a direct result of the change or error correction, as well as any adjusting entry for 2021 related to the situation described. Any tax effects should be adjusted for through Income tax payable or Refund—income tax.

In: Accounting

Aaron Levie is the co-founder of Box. Assume that his company currently has $250,000 in equity,...

Aaron Levie is the co-founder of Box. Assume that his company currently has $250,000 in equity, and he is considering a $100,000 expansion to meet increased demand. The $100,000 expansion would yield $16,000 in additional annual income before interest expense. Assume that the business currently earns $40,000 annual income before interest expense of $10,000, yielding a return on equity of 12% ($30,000/$250,000). To fund the expansion, he is considering the issuance of a 10-year, $100,000 note with annual interest payments (the principal due at the end of 10 years).

Required

Using return on equity as the decision criterion, show computations to support or reject the expansion if interest on the $100,000 note is (a) 10%, (b) 15%, (c) 16%, (d) 17%, and (e) 20%.

What general rule do the results in part 1 illustrate?

In: Accounting

Interns, Mr. Howell, the prestigious founder and owner of our company would like you to perform...

Interns,

Mr. Howell, the prestigious founder and owner of our company would like you to perform an analysis on the company’s weekly revenues. He is requiring that the current weekly marginal revenue be at least $5,000 per week and if it is not currently at that level how fast should sales be changing to reach the target marginal revenue level. The most current information regarding weekly revenues can be found in Mr. Howell’s email below.

To be solved using derivatives.

Mr. Kleppin,

It has come to my attention that our weekly marginal revenues may not be at the minimum level of $5,000 per week as I required. According to the sales report, we are currently selling 1,000 DVD’s per week and sales are currently rising by 200 DVD’s a week (gotta love the Marvel Universe! Customers can’t get enough!). They also inform me that our current selling price is $20 and that the price is dropping by $1 per week to encourage more sales. I would like you, Mr. Kleppin, to give the interns a chance to earn one of the 10 available positions at the end of their internship by giving them the opportunity to do the analysis. Again, I need to know if we are at the minimum level of $5,000 per week in marginal revenue, and if not, at what level should our sales per week be at so as to achieve the minimum marginal revenue level.”

In: Civil Engineering

Implementation strategy of Ashland University MBA program Strategic Planning and Business Policy

Implementation strategy of Ashland University MBA program

Strategic Planning and Business Policy

In: Operations Management

Snapchat Parent Snap Valued at $24 Billion After IPO Pricing by: Corrie Driebusch and Maureen Farrell...

Snapchat Parent Snap Valued at $24 Billion After IPO Pricing
by: Corrie Driebusch and Maureen Farrell
Mar 02, 2017




TOPICS: Corporate Governance, Entrepreneurs, Initial Public Offering
SUMMARY: Snap, the parent of Snapchat, had a successful initial public offering (IPO). This may lead to other IPOs by technology firms in the $1 to $5 billion range. There are questions about the company and its growth potential, how it can ramp up revenue per user, why it's called a camera company, its plans to fight competition and the ownership structure that gives the founders a high level of voting control. The IPO raised $3.4 billion. 120 million shares were sold to investment firms. 50 million shares went to existing investors which left only 30 million shares for all other investors. The CEO and Chief Technology officer own more than 90% voting control after shares were offered with no voting rights. The restricted supply and lack of recent IPOs helped lift the price of shares. There are some concerns about Snap. It spent heavily on marketing and data storage last year and lost more than $500 million. It forecast $1 billion in revenue in 2017, but it will need to quickly scale up its advertising business to support that.
CLASSROOM APPLICATION: The Snap IPO involves several concepts in business. Supply and demand are illustrated in pricing for the issue. The issue had 200 million shares with only 30 million available to those who were not investment firms or prior investors in the company. Corporate governance is also a concept illustrated by the IPO because the shares did not have voting rights. This means the CEO and CTO have more than 90% voting control. This gives the founders control, but it also means that investors do not have voting rights to elect board members and make sure their interests are represented. There was strong interest in the IPO and the price increased, but uncertainty and questions remain about the company's ability to meet its 2017 revenue forecast. The business model for the company depends on a key demographic in the 18-34 year-old range.
QUESTIONS:   
Do a web search and explain what an IPO (initial public offering) is. 2. Discuss the issue of the shares and their voting rights in this IPO from the perspectives of investors and the company's CEO and CTO.

3 List the questions raised about the company as it traveled in the U.S. and London to win over prospective investors.

4. Why do entrepreneurs want to retain control of their companies? Explain why that control may not be good for the company and other shareholders?

5. Snapchat targets the 18-34 demographic. Why is this age group important?

In: Accounting

1. Explain why Wundt is considered the founder of psychology instead of Fechner or the other...

1. Explain why Wundt is considered the founder of psychology instead of Fechner or the other psychophysicists

In: Psychology

Blanchard Inc. acquired a packaging machine from CCC Corporation. CCC Corporation completed construction of the machine...

Blanchard Inc. acquired a packaging machine from CCC Corporation. CCC Corporation completed construction of the machine on January 1, 2020. In payment for the $4 million machine, Blanchard Inc. issued a three-year installment note to be paid in three equal payments at the end of each year. The payments include interest at the rate of 6%.

1. Prepare the journal entry for Blanchard’s purchase of the machine on January 1, 2020

January 1, 2020:


PVA(i=3%, n=3) = 2.82861, PVA(i=3%, n=6) = 5.41719, PVA(i=6%, n=3) = 2.67301, PVA(i=6%, n=6) = 4.917322. Prepare the partial amortization schedule for the first two years of the 3-year installment note

Amount of Loan
/ present value of an ordinary annuity (PVA) of $1
Installment payment (Rounded up to the nearest integer)
Date Cash Payment Effective Interest Decrease in Balance Outstanding Balance
1/1/2020
12/31/2020
12/31/2021
12/31/2022 Not required Not Required Not Required Not Required

3. Prepare the journal entry for the installment payments on December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2021.

December 31, 2020:

December 31, 2021

In: Accounting